Cesarean Section WoundNCT07137208
Bilevel Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery.
A study testing ESP block, TAP Block and Bupivacaine injection in people with Cesarean Section Wound, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Optimizing analgesia after cesarian delivery is an essential element of enhancing maternal recovery.A multimodal analgesic approach incorporating truncal blocks can provide effective pain relief with minimal side effects for both mother and infant.The posterior TAP block may provide enhanced effect due to possible… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 40 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cesarean Section Wound
- What is being tested?
- ESP block, TAP Block and Bupivacaine injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2025to 15 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 40 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Parturients with full term singleton pregnancy.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II.
Who cannot join
- Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m².
- Cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, hepatic, or renal disease.
- Any contraindication to spinal anesthesia, local anesthetic or opioids.
- Pre-existing chronic pain syndrome or history of recent opioid exposure.
- Inability to comprehend or participate in pain scoring system.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Bilevel Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Optimizing analgesia after cesarian delivery is an essential element of enhancing maternal recovery.A multimodal analgesic approach incorporating truncal blocks can provide effective pain relief with minimal side effects for both mother and infant.The posterior TAP block may provide enhanced effect due to possible retrograde spread to the paravertebral space.The ESP block has emerged as a valuable component of multimodal pain management, providing effective postoperative analgesia for various surgeries, including cesarean delivery. We hypothesized that the bilevel ESP block will offer superior analgesic efficacy compared to the TAP block and may be a valuable addition to multimodal analgesic regimens targeting opioid use reduction.
Read the detailed description
Optimizing analgesia after cesarian delivery is an essential element of enhancing maternal recovery, as it supports earlier mobilization, thereby reducing the risk of thromboembolic complications. A multimodal analgesic approach incorporating truncal blocks can provide effective pain relief with minimal side effects for both mother and infant. Epidural or intrathecal administration of morphine is the gold standard for post-cesarean analgesia and forms a cornerstone of multimodal pain management strategies.
In recent years, regional anesthesia techniques are increasingly employed to enhance analgesia and minimize systemic opioid use. These include local anesthetic wound infiltration, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks, and intraperitoneal anesthetic instillation. Fascial plane blocks such as transversus abdominis plane (TAP), quadratus lumborum (QL), and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks are also employed to target both somatic and visceral pain effectively.The TAP block is widely used for post-cesarean pain relief by blocking the anterior rami of spinal nerves supplying the abdominal wall through local anesthetic spread between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. While it offers effective somatic analgesia, it lacks visceral pain relief. The posterior TAP block may provide enhanced effect due to possible retrograde spread to the paravertebral space.The ESP block has emerged as a valuable component of multimodal pain management, providing effective postoperative analgesia for various surgeries, including cesarean delivery. It primarily targets the dorsal rami, with potential spread to the ventral rami through paravertebral space, offering broad and segmental analgesic coverage. The block's simplicity, safety, and opioid-sparing effects especially in low thoracic applications have contributed to its growing use in abdominal surgeries.Although early research suggests that the ESP block may reduce pain and opioid consumption following cesarean delivery, conclusive evidence of its superiority over the TAP block is still lacking. Therefore, this study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of TAP and bilevel ESP blocks in patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
Aim of the study:
This study aims to compare the bilateral bilevel ESP block with the bilateral TAP block for analgesia after cesarean delivery performed under spinal anesthesia.
Sample Size Calculation:
The sample size is determined based on pilot study on 10 patients, which reported a mean ± standard deviation of cumulative fentanyl consumption at 24 hours as 45 ± 28μg. Assuming a two-tailed Student's t-test with a significance level (α) of 0.05 and a power (1-β) of 90%, and targeting an effect size of 0.71, it was calculated that 43 participants per group would be needed to detect a 20-μg reduction in mean cumulative fentanyl consumption-considered the minimal clinically significant difference. To account for potential dropouts, 45 participants will be allocated to each group.
Methods The study will be conducted on healthy parturients with singleton pregnancy scheduled for elective cesarean delivery via a Pfannenstiel incision under spinal anesthesia at the Obstetric Department of Mansoura University Hospitals All the participants will provide written informed consent. The study subjects will be randomly assigned to 2 equal groups (TAP and bilevel ESP groups).
Randomization will be done using the permuted block randomization method. The group allocation codes will be concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes which will be opened only after assessing eligibility and obtaining consent.
A single investigator will handle eligibility screening, informed consent, and baseline data collection. An anesthesiology resident, not involved in the study, will administer the spinal anesthesia, record intraoperative data, and prepare the block solution. The patients will be separated from the surgical field and the operators by a large opaque screen. After achieving an upper sensory level of T6 or higher, the primary investigator (who will not participate in anesthesia or postoperative care) will open group allocation envelopes and perform the block after skin closure. All blocks will be done by the same anesthesiologist. Postoperative data will be collected by independent assessors.
Following standard hospital protocol, a pre-anesthetic evaluation will be conducted, Eligible subjects will be instructed to fast from solid food for 8 hours before surgery, while clear fluids will be permitted up to 2 hours before the procedure. An18-gauge IV cannula will be inserted in a large forearm vein.
Study participants will enter the operating room without receiving any premedication. Upon arrival, a standard monitor (electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and noninvasive blood pressure) will be initiated.
Strict aseptic technique will be used to perform spinal anesthesia in the sitting position at either the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace using a 25-gauge spinal needle. Each patient will receive 2.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) combined with (15 μg) of fentanyl. Surgery will commence once a sensory block at the T6 level or higher is confirmed via pinprick test. If the sensory level remains below T6 after 20 minutes, the spinal anesthesia will be deemed unsuccessful, and the patient will be excluded from the study.
The upper sensory level will be evaluated using a pinprick test 30 minutes after the intrathecal injection and documented accordingly. If the patient experiences abdominal pain or discomfort after surgery begins, 2 mg of IV midazolam will be given. Should the discomfort persist despite midazolam, IV fentanyl and/or propofol will be administered as needed, and the patient will be excluded from the study.
Immediately following the intrathecal injection, the parturients will be placed in a supine position with a 15° left lateral tilt. A 1000 mL bolus of Ringer acetate will be infused over 10 minutes. In all cases, a lower segment cesarean delivery will typically be performed using a Pfannenstiel incision, with exteriorization of the uterus as part of the surgical technique. After fetal delivery, 10 units of oxytocin diluted in 500 mL of Ringer acetate will be administered over 30 minutes.
Throughout the cesarean procedure, continuous monitoring of mean arterial pressure and heart rate will be conducted. If systolic blood pressure drops by 20% from baseline or falls below 90 mmHg, 5 mg of IV ephedrine will be given. If the heart rate decreases to 50 bpm or lower, 0.5 mg of IV atropine will be administered.
The spinal level will be assessed and documented prior to the administration of either type of block.
At the end of surgery, with the patient under full monitoring, either ESP block or TAP block will be performed under ultrasound guidance. A total of 20 mL of 0.25 bupivacaine will be administered at each side.
All women will be instructed to report any symptoms of local anesthetic toxicity, such as circumoral or tongue numbness, visual or auditory disturbance, dizziness, or tinnitus.
Then, women will be transferred to the postoperative anesthesia care unit for routine monitoring and exclusion of acute complications from the blocks, and later to the obstetric department.
In the obstetric department, all the study subjects will receive postoperative standard analgesia, which includes (30 mg of IV ketorolac every 8 hours starting immediately after surgery and 1 gm of IV paracetamol every 8 hours starting 4 hours after surgery).
Rescue analgesia or first postoperative analgesia (fentanyl 25 μg intravenously) will be considered when VAS ≥4 will be observed or upon patient demand with maximum 4-hour dose limit 200 μg.
Statistical analysis:
Statistical analyses will be conducted using SPSS software (version 26). Data normality will be assessed using histograms and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables with a normal distribution will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed using the Student's t-test. Non-normally distributed data will be presented as median (range) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Bonferroni correction will be applied to adjust for multiple comparisons. Categorical variables will be presented as number (percentages) and analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A two-tailed p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant, with a 95% confidence interval. Time to first fentanyl dose will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared using the log-rank test.
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section Wound
- Being tested
- ESP block, TAP Block, Bupivacaine injection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ESP blockProcedure or surgery
In the ESP group, patients will be positioned in the right lateral position. The ultrasound probe will be placed vertically about 3 cm lateral to the spinous process of T9 to visualize the transverse process, trapezius, and erector spinae muscles. A 22-gauge spinal needle will be inserted in-plane in the cranial-to-caudal direction until the needle tip reaches the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and transverse process. Following hydrodissection with 2 mL of sterile saline to confirm needle placement, and negative aspiration to rule out intravascular placement, the local anesthetic will be injected. Likewise, the same block procedure will be performed at the T11 level and on both levels on the other side, 10 mL will be injected at each of the four injection sites.
TAP BlockProcedure or surgery
In the TAP group, patients will be positioned in the supine position. A posterior approach will be employed, with the ultrasound probe placed transversely on the anterolateral abdominal wall, midway between the costal margin and iliac crest, posterior to the midaxillary line. This will allow visualization of the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles. The probe will then be moved posteriorly to identify the tapering of the transversus abdominis muscle toward the quadratus lumborum. A 22-gauge spinal needle will be inserted in-plane from anterior to posterior. Following hydrodissection with 2 mL of sterile saline to confirm needle placement, and negative aspiration to rule out intravascular placement, the local anesthetic will be injected into the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Likewise, the same block procedure will be performed on the other side.
Bupivacaine injectionDrug
Also called 0.25 bupivacaine
A total of 20 mL of 0.25 bupivacaine will be administered at each side.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bilevel ESP block group | Active comparator | Ultrasound-guided bilevel ESP block will be performed under strict aseptic precautions and patients will be positioned in the right lateral position. Receives: Procedure: ESP block; Drug: Bupivacaine injection |
| Posterior TAP block group | Active comparator | Ultrasound-guided posterior TAP block will be performed under strict aseptic precautions and patients will be positioned the supine position. Receives: Procedure: TAP Block; Drug: Bupivacaine injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total analgesic requirements of fentanyl
The amount of fentanyl consumption given as a rescue analgesia to patients will be measured all over the 24 hours.
Measured: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Secondary outcomes (4)
the first analgesic request time
The time of the first analgesic request for fentanyl will be recorded.
Measured: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
The intensity of postoperative pain
using an 11-point NRS (0 = no pain and 10 = the worst possible pain), both at rest and during movement (e.g., lower limb flexion and extension, trunk movement by turning from a supine position to either the right or left side, and coughing) at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively, considering the time of completion of the respective block procedure (i.e., deposition of the required amount of local anesthetic into the desired plane) on each side as "time 0."
Measured: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia will be assessed at 24 hours using a 5-point scale (1 = very unsatisfied, 2 = unsatisfied, 3 = fair, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied).
Measured: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Incidence of any adverse effects
Any adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, itching, pruritus) will be recorded.
Measured: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2025
- Study start1 Oct 2025
- Primary completion30 Dec 2025
- Study completion15 Jan 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cesarean Section WoundStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mansoura UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled, single-blind study.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amany Hazem abdelmaksood EL-deeb, Mansoura University
- Investigators
- Amany H Eldeeb, Principal investigator, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07137208
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Bilevel ESPB for CS analgesia
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kamel AAF, Amin OAI, Ibrahem MAM. Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. Pain Physician. 2020 Jul;23(4):375-382.
PubMed 32709172Eksteen A, Wagner J, Kleyenstuber T, Kamerman P. Comparison of erector spinae plane and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2024 Nov;60:104259. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104259. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
PubMed 39307664Chin KJ, El-Boghdadly K. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;68(3):387-408. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
PubMed 33403545Canakci E, Gultekin A, Cebeci Z, Hanedan B, Kilinc A. The Analgesic Efficacy of Transverse Abdominis Plane Block versus Epidural Block after Caesarean Delivery: Which One Is Effective? TAP Block? Epidural Block? Pain Res Manag. 2018 Oct 17;2018:3562701. doi: 10.1155/2018/3562701. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30416635Silverman M, Zwolinski N, Wang E, Lockwood N, Ancuta M, Jin E, Li J. Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients. J Pain Res. 2023 Nov 10;16:3807-3835. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S428332. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 38026463Hussain N, Brull R, Thaete L, Fuller S, D'Souza RS, Mankinen-Abdallah Y, Essandoh MK, Weaver TE, Abdallah FW. The analgesic effects of novel fascial plane blocks compared with intrathecal morphine after Caesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2025 May;134(5):1415-1431. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.032. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
PubMed 40074621Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008.
PubMed 26827847Mitchell KD, Smith CT, Mechling C, Wessel CB, Orebaugh S, Lim G. A review of peripheral nerve blocks for cesarean delivery analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Oct 25:rapm-2019-100752. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100752. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 31653797Sangkum L, Tangjitbampenbun A, Chalacheewa T, Brennan K, Liu H. Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Cesarean Delivery Analgesia: A Narrative Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 4;59(11):1951. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111951.
PubMed 38004000
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Bilevel Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07137208
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Bilevel ESPB for CS analgesia
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section Wound
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Optimizing analgesia after cesarian delivery is an essential element of enhancing maternal recovery.A multimodal analgesic approach incorporating truncal blocks can provide effective pain relief with minimal side effects for both mother and infant.The posterior TAP block may provide enhanced effect due to possible retrograde spread to the paravertebral space.The ESP block has emerged as a valuable component of multimodal pain management, providing effective postoperative analgesia for various surgeries, including cesarean delivery. We hypothesized that the bilevel ESP block will offer superior analgesic efficacy compared to the TAP block and may be a valuable addition to multimodal analgesic regimens targeting opioid use reduction.
Detailed description
Optimizing analgesia after cesarian delivery is an essential element of enhancing maternal recovery, as it supports earlier mobilization, thereby reducing the risk of thromboembolic complications. A multimodal analgesic approach incorporating truncal blocks can provide effective pain relief with minimal side effects for both mother and infant. Epidural or intrathecal administration of morphine is the gold standard for post-cesarean analgesia and forms a cornerstone of multimodal pain management strategies.
In recent years, regional anesthesia techniques are increasingly employed to enhance analgesia and minimize systemic opioid use. These include local anesthetic wound infiltration, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks, and intraperitoneal anesthetic instillation. Fascial plane blocks such as transversus abdominis plane (TAP), quadratus lumborum (QL), and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks are also employed to target both somatic and visceral pain effectively.The TAP block is widely used for post-cesarean pain relief by blocking the anterior rami of spinal nerves supplying the abdominal wall through local anesthetic spread between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. While it offers effective somatic analgesia, it lacks visceral pain relief. The posterior TAP block may provide enhanced effect due to possible retrograde spread to the paravertebral space.The ESP block has emerged as a valuable component of multimodal pain management, providing effective postoperative analgesia for various surgeries, including cesarean delivery. It primarily targets the dorsal rami, with potential spread to the ventral rami through paravertebral space, offering broad and segmental analgesic coverage. The block's simplicity, safety, and opioid-sparing effects especially in low thoracic applications have contributed to its growing use in abdominal surgeries.Although early research suggests that the ESP block may reduce pain and opioid consumption following cesarean delivery, conclusive evidence of its superiority over the TAP block is still lacking. Therefore, this study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of TAP and bilevel ESP blocks in patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
Aim of the study:
This study aims to compare the bilateral bilevel ESP block with the bilateral TAP block for analgesia after cesarean delivery performed under spinal anesthesia.
Sample Size Calculation:
The sample size is determined based on pilot study on 10 patients, which reported a mean ± standard deviation of cumulative fentanyl consumption at 24 hours as 45 ± 28μg. Assuming a two-tailed Student's t-test with a significance level (α) of 0.05 and a power (1-β) of 90%, and targeting an effect size of 0.71, it was calculated that 43 participants per group would be needed to detect a 20-μg reduction in mean cumulative fentanyl consumption-considered the minimal clinically significant difference. To account for potential dropouts, 45 participants will be allocated to each group.
Methods The study will be conducted on healthy parturients with singleton pregnancy scheduled for elective cesarean delivery via a Pfannenstiel incision under spinal anesthesia at the Obstetric Department of Mansoura University Hospitals All the participants will provide written informed consent. The study subjects will be randomly assigned to 2 equal groups (TAP and bilevel ESP groups).
Randomization will be done using the permuted block randomization method. The group allocation codes will be concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes which will be opened only after assessing eligibility and obtaining consent.
A single investigator will handle eligibility screening, informed consent, and baseline data collection. An anesthesiology resident, not involved in the study, will administer the spinal anesthesia, record intraoperative data, and prepare the block solution. The patients will be separated from the surgical field and the operators by a large opaque screen. After achieving an upper sensory level of T6 or higher, the primary investigator (who will not participate in anesthesia or postoperative care) will open group allocation envelopes and perform the block after skin closure. All blocks will be done by the same anesthesiologist. Postoperative data will be collected by independent assessors.
Following standard hospital protocol, a pre-anesthetic evaluation will be conducted, Eligible subjects will be instructed to fast from solid food for 8 hours before surgery, while clear fluids will be permitted up to 2 hours before the procedure. An18-gauge IV cannula will be inserted in a large forearm vein.
Study participants will enter the operating room without receiving any premedication. Upon arrival, a standard monitor (electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and noninvasive blood pressure) will be initiated.
Strict aseptic technique will be used to perform spinal anesthesia in the sitting position at either the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace using a 25-gauge spinal needle. Each patient will receive 2.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) combined with (15 μg) of fentanyl. Surgery will commence once a sensory block at the T6 level or higher is confirmed via pinprick test. If the sensory level remains below T6 after 20 minutes, the spinal anesthesia will be deemed unsuccessful, and the patient will be excluded from the study.
The upper sensory level will be evaluated using a pinprick test 30 minutes after the intrathecal injection and documented accordingly. If the patient experiences abdominal pain or discomfort after surgery begins, 2 mg of IV midazolam will be given. Should the discomfort persist despite midazolam, IV fentanyl and/or propofol will be administered as needed, and the patient will be excluded from the study.
Immediately following the intrathecal injection, the parturients will be placed in a supine position with a 15° left lateral tilt. A 1000 mL bolus of Ringer acetate will be infused over 10 minutes. In all cases, a lower segment cesarean delivery will typically be performed using a Pfannenstiel incision, with exteriorization of the uterus as part of the surgical technique. After fetal delivery, 10 units of oxytocin diluted in 500 mL of Ringer acetate will be administered over 30 minutes.
Throughout the cesarean procedure, continuous monitoring of mean arterial pressure and heart rate will be conducted. If systolic blood pressure drops by 20% from baseline or falls below 90 mmHg, 5 mg of IV ephedrine will be given. If the heart rate decreases to 50 bpm or lower, 0.5 mg of IV atropine will be administered.
The spinal level will be assessed and documented prior to the administration of either type of block.
At the end of surgery, with the patient under full monitoring, either ESP block or TAP block will be performed under ultrasound guidance. A total of 20 mL of 0.25 bupivacaine will be administered at each side.
All women will be instructed to report any symptoms of local anesthetic toxicity, such as circumoral or tongue numbness, visual or auditory disturbance, dizziness, or tinnitus.
Then, women will be transferred to the postoperative anesthesia care unit for routine monitoring and exclusion of acute complications from the blocks, and later to the obstetric department.
In the obstetric department, all the study subjects will receive postoperative standard analgesia, which includes (30 mg of IV ketorolac every 8 hours starting immediately after surgery and 1 gm of IV paracetamol every 8 hours starting 4 hours after surgery).
Rescue analgesia or first postoperative analgesia (fentanyl 25 μg intravenously) will be considered when VAS ≥4 will be observed or upon patient demand with maximum 4-hour dose limit 200 μg.
Statistical analysis:
Statistical analyses will be conducted using SPSS software (version 26). Data normality will be assessed using histograms and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables with a normal distribution will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed using the Student's t-test. Non-normally distributed data will be presented as median (range) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Bonferroni correction will be applied to adjust for multiple comparisons. Categorical variables will be presented as number (percentages) and analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A two-tailed p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant, with a 95% confidence interval. Time to first fentanyl dose will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared using the log-rank test.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled, single-blind study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bilevel ESP block group | Active comparator | Procedure: ESP block, Drug: Bupivacaine injectionUltrasound-guided bilevel ESP block will be performed under strict aseptic precautions and patients will be positioned in the right lateral position. |
| Posterior TAP block group | Active comparator | Procedure: TAP Block, Drug: Bupivacaine injectionUltrasound-guided posterior TAP block will be performed under strict aseptic precautions and patients will be positioned the supine position. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Parturients with full term singleton pregnancy.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m².
- Cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, hepatic, or renal disease.
- Any contraindication to spinal anesthesia, local anesthetic or opioids.
- Pre-existing chronic pain syndrome or history of recent opioid exposure.
- Inability to comprehend or participate in pain scoring system.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ESP blockIn the ESP group, patients will be positioned in the right lateral position. The ultrasound probe will be placed vertically about 3 cm lateral to the spinous process of T9 to visualize the transverse process, trapezius, and erector spinae muscles. A 22-gauge spinal needle will be inserted in-plane in the cranial-to-caudal direction until the needle tip reaches the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and transverse process. Following hydrodissection with 2 mL of sterile saline to confirm needle placement, and negative aspiration to rule out intravascular placement, the local anesthetic will be injected. Likewise, the same block procedure will be performed at the T11 level and on both levels on the other side, 10 mL will be injected at each of the four injection sites. | Procedure or surgery | Bilevel ESP block group |
| TAP BlockIn the TAP group, patients will be positioned in the supine position. A posterior approach will be employed, with the ultrasound probe placed transversely on the anterolateral abdominal wall, midway between the costal margin and iliac crest, posterior to the midaxillary line. This will allow visualization of the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles. The probe will then be moved posteriorly to identify the tapering of the transversus abdominis muscle toward the quadratus lumborum. A 22-gauge spinal needle will be inserted in-plane from anterior to posterior. Following hydrodissection with 2 mL of sterile saline to confirm needle placement, and negative aspiration to rule out intravascular placement, the local anesthetic will be injected into the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Likewise, the same block procedure will be performed on the other side. | Procedure or surgery | Posterior TAP block group |
| Bupivacaine injectionAlso: 0.25 bupivacaineA total of 20 mL of 0.25 bupivacaine will be administered at each side. | Drug | Bilevel ESP block group, Posterior TAP block group |
Primary outcome
Total analgesic requirements of fentanyl
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
The amount of fentanyl consumption given as a rescue analgesia to patients will be measured all over the 24 hours.
4 secondary outcomes
the first analgesic request time
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
The intensity of postoperative pain
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Incidence of any adverse effects
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 32709172Kamel AAF, Amin OAI, Ibrahem MAM. Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. Pain Physician. 2020 Jul;23(4):375-382.
- Results publication: PubMed 39307664Eksteen A, Wagner J, Kleyenstuber T, Kamerman P. Comparison of erector spinae plane and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2024 Nov;60:104259. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104259. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 33403545Chin KJ, El-Boghdadly K. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;68(3):387-408. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 30416635Canakci E, Gultekin A, Cebeci Z, Hanedan B, Kilinc A. The Analgesic Efficacy of Transverse Abdominis Plane Block versus Epidural Block after Caesarean Delivery: Which One Is Effective? TAP Block? Epidural Block? Pain Res Manag. 2018 Oct 17;2018:3562701. doi: 10.1155/2018/3562701. eCollection 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 38026463Silverman M, Zwolinski N, Wang E, Lockwood N, Ancuta M, Jin E, Li J. Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients. J Pain Res. 2023 Nov 10;16:3807-3835. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S428332. eCollection 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 40074621Hussain N, Brull R, Thaete L, Fuller S, D'Souza RS, Mankinen-Abdallah Y, Essandoh MK, Weaver TE, Abdallah FW. The analgesic effects of novel fascial plane blocks compared with intrathecal morphine after Caesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2025 May;134(5):1415-1431. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.032. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 26827847Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008.
- Results publication: PubMed 31653797Mitchell KD, Smith CT, Mechling C, Wessel CB, Orebaugh S, Lim G. A review of peripheral nerve blocks for cesarean delivery analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Oct 25:rapm-2019-100752. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100752. Online ahead of print.
- Results publication: PubMed 38004000Sangkum L, Tangjitbampenbun A, Chalacheewa T, Brennan K, Liu H. Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Cesarean Delivery Analgesia: A Narrative Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 4;59(11):1951. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111951.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cesarean Section Wound
Not yet recruiting
The Mepilex Cesarean Delivery Trial / MEPIDEL
Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain After Scheduled Cesarean Delivery: Spinal Morphine With or Without Levobupivacaine Wound Infiltration
Pain Management, C Section
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Timing of Cesarean Wound Dressing Removal on Wound Healing in Women With BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²
Cesarean Section, Surgical Wound Infection
Recruiting
Narrative Nursing for Cesarean Mothers' Anxiety and Breastfeeding Confidence
Postpartum Anxiety, Postpartum Depression (PPD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
The Use of Photobiomodulation for Pain and Healing in Cesarean Section
Post Partum, Cesarean Birth
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amany H Eldeeb principal investigator
Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ESP block, TAP Block and Bupivacaine injection in people with Cesarean Section Wound, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total analgesic requirements of fentanyl (time frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07137208, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2026.