Well-Being, PsychologicalNCT07152652
Physiological, Hormonal, and DNA-based Mechanisms of Psychosocial Stress and Therapeutic Effect
A study testing Groups 4 health in people with Well-Being, Psychological and Loneliness, run by University of Helsinki at 1 site in Finland.
Trial summary
The goal of this trial is to learn if the Groups 4 Health (G4H) intervention is effective in supporting student well-being at the University of Helsinki. It will also learn about the factors that may influence the efficacy of the intervention (such as facilitators characteristics, stress physiology and changes in gene… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 months and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Well-Being, Psychological, Loneliness
- What is being tested?
- Groups 4 health
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 148 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFinland
- Study dates
- 12 Sep 2025to Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 months and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult (age 18 and above)
- Student in the University of Helsinki, Finland
- Able to speak/read Finnish, Swedish, or English
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Finland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Helsinki
Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00014
Jari Lahti, PhD, 040 571 2297 ext. +358, jari.lahti@helsinki.fi
About this study
The goal of this trial is to learn if the Groups 4 Health (G4H) intervention is effective in supporting student well-being at the University of Helsinki. It will also learn about the factors that may influence the efficacy of the intervention (such as facilitators characteristics, stress physiology and changes in gene expression). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is the G4H intervention effective and cost-effective in supporting student well-being?
- To what extent participants' physiological, hormonal, or molecular characteristics mediate the therapeutic effect of the G4H
- To what extent participants' genotype moderates the effect of the G4H
- To what extent facilitators' characteristics mediate or moderate the effect of the G4H
Read more
Data is collected from both the intervention participants and the facilitators.
The G4H facilitators will:
- Facilitate the G4H intervention.
- Fill in questionnaires and provide physiological and molecular measurements before, during, and after the G4H intervention.
The G4H participants will:
- Participate in the G4H intervention.
- Fill in questionnaires and provide physiological, hormonal and molecular measurements before, during, and after the G4H intervention.
Read the detailed description
This study is a randomized waitlist-controlled trial for investigating the efficacy and cost-efficacy of Groups 4 Health (G4H) brief psychosocial intervention for loneliness among the students at the University of Helsinki. Furthermore, several biological and psychosocial mechanisms that may exert the effects of psychosocial stress and therapeutic change are studied. In addition to various psychosocial factors, the mechanisms include genetic factors and epigenetic alterations, hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA) activity (cortisol), and parasympathetic (heart rate variability) and sympathetic (alpha amylase) function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS).
This trial will investigate:
- The efficacy and cost-efficacy of the G4H in a wait-list randomized controlled trial (RCT)
- To what extent participants' physiological, hormonal or molecular measures of ANS, cortisol, alpha amylase, and Deoxyribonucleic Acid methylation (DNAm) mediate the therapeutic effect of the G4H.
- To what extent participants' genotype moderates the effects of the G4H.
- To what extent facilitators' characteristics mediates or moderates the effect of the G4H.
The participants will be randomized to start the G4H immediately after randomization or after the waitlist-period of 19 weeks (7 weeks active G4H + 3 months follow-up). The G4H includes five facilitated group sessions and will be delivered over a 7-week period. Data is collected before, during, and after the intervention, as well as in 1-, 3-, and 12-month follow-ups. The waitlist control group does not provide 12-months follow-up data, as they receive the intervention after the 19 weeks waitlist-period.
METHODS:
The study's outcome measures are described in the outcome measures -section. In addition, the following measures are used to answer the research questions.
Experience Sampling Method (ESM):
ESM is used to measure frequent, real-time assessments of participants self-reported mood, and stress appraisals at multiple times throughout the day. ESM is applied to explore the variation and changes in participants daily subjective well-being and loneliness in concurrence with G4H group facilitators stress appraisals before and after facilitation of G4H sessions. The ESM data will be collected using General Data Protection Regulation compliant experience-sampling software program that runs on smartphones (e.g. m-Path).
The daily ESM protocol consists of a morning and evening prompts in which participants are asked to rate their momentarily affect, and daily satisfaction with life. In the morning prompt, participants are also asked to assess daily physiological correlates such as sleep, amount of caffeine, and alcohol consumption, and exercise during the last 24h.
Intervention participants are also asked to answer questions about momentarily appraisal of social company, and loneliness (see outcome measures). Facilitators' event-based sampling takes place before and after the group facilitation and consists of self-report on the appraisals and experiences related to situation with single items derived from widely used questionnaires.
Experiences related to the pre-group situation are assessed from the facilitators during the intervention with items related to momentarily affect: "When thinking about the upcoming group session I feel: calm; happy; determined; enthusiastic; tired; stressed; worried; anxious" (response options: 0 =not at all - 6 = very much), and expectations: "I have prepared well for the session; I trust in my ability to manage the upcoming group session; I expect the session to go well." (response options: 0 = strongly disagree - 6 = strongly agree). Experiences related to the post-group situation are assessed with items related to the group situation: "I feel that the group session went well; I felt competent in facilitating the session; I was present during the session; It was easy for me to feel compassion towards participants" (response options: 0 = strongly disagree - 6 = strongly agree).
Salivary cortisol and alpha amylase:
Saliva samples with Cortisol Salivette synthetic swabs (Sarsted) are collected for cortisol and alpha-amylase measurements from both the intervention participants (see outcomes) and facilitators. These samples are collected by placing a synthetic swab in mouth for 2 minutes and returning it to a plastic tube thereafter.
The cortisol and alpha-amylase samples are provided by the participating facilitators during the first, third, and last intervention sessions. The sampling times are -45, -10, 45, 90, 110, and 135 minutes from the start of the session (6 samples per session).
Covariates related to the stress measurements:
Information on the following potential covariates related to stress physiology is also collected from the intervention participants and facilitators on the same day as the saliva samples are given: situational stress, sleep, physical activity, smoking, alcohol and coffee consumption, menstrual cycle, medication, chronic illness.
Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) measures:
Omnigene saliva Oragene OG-600 DNA (or equivalent) is used for the DNAm and genotype sampling. Both the intervention participants and the facilitators will provide these samples before and immediately after the intervention.
Autonomic nervous system functioning:
A self-developed bra-integrated solution is used to collect non-medical electrocardiogram (ECG)-signal and accelerometer data from the facilitators. Data is collected by wearing a bra during times, when user regularly would use it, but especially on days when there is activity of G4H study. ECG signal is analysed by time- and frequency-based Hearth rate variability analysis (HRV). Accelerometer data is used to estimate physical activity and used for control high movement effects on HRV. HRV is used to assess daily levels of sympathetic and parasympathetic function of the ANS and to estimate cognitive load effects of facilitating G4H sessions.
Participants' background:
Participants' background information is collected from the intervention participants as potential covariates: gender, birth date, mother tongue, marital status, household composition, residential situation, employment status, education, income, subjective financial situation, subjective health, subjective loneliness, subjective minority status and willingness to participate in the intervention and academic skills (4-item organized studying scale, from Learn -questionnaire).
Facilitators' characteristics:
Information is collected at pre-intervention on the facilitator's background (gender, birth date, marital status, household composition, residential situation, employment status, education, work experience, income, subjective financial situation), and professional (12-item Experiences in Close Relationships Short form) and individual (30-item Extra-Short Five -questionnaire) characteristics.
The facilitators will also answer questionnaires during the intervention on study burnout risk (9-item Study Burnout Inventory, at pre-intervention and last session), perceived stress (10-item Perceived Stress Scale, at pre-intervention, 3rd, and last session), self and other compassion (4-item Process Based Assessment Tool, at pre-intervention, 3rd, and last session), and self-assessed skillfulness, difficulties, and feelings (36-item Therapist Work Involvement Scales, at 3rd and last session) as potential mediators or moderators of the intervention's effectiveness.
SAMPLE SIZE AND ANALYSES:
The minimum sample size is 148 intervention participants. Appropriate statistical methods including linear mixed model analyses will be used to study the effectiveness of the G4H intervention and the mediating and moderating factors. Appropriate imputation methods such as multiple imputation by chained equations will be used if necessary.
Written informed consent is gathered from all participants. The participants who have given their consent have the option to withdraw from the study at any point.
- Conditions
- Well-Being, Psychological, Loneliness
- Being tested
- Groups 4 health
- Keywords
- University Students, Group Intervention, Mental Health, Loneliness, Social Isolation, Anxiety, Depression, Social Anxiety, Social Cohesion, Groups 4 Health, Stress system functioning, Genetics, Epigenetics, Experience Sampling Method, Stress physiology
- Medical subject headings
- Psychological Well-Being, Social Isolation, Anxiety Disorders, Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Groups 4 healthBehavioural
Also called G4H, Ryhmät kuntoon
Groups 4 Health (G4H) at the University of Helsinki is a manualized group intervention for the students that focuses on social connectedness and aims at improving general health and life satisfaction. G4H groups are facilitated by two psychology master's students (or licensed psychologists) carefully trained for the intervention and mentored by experienced clinical psychologists. G4H consists of five 90 minutes sessions that aim to give participants the knowledge and skills they need to effectively manage their social group memberships and identities. Each session contains exercises and discussions described in the G4H workbook that target different aspects of group life identified within the social identity model of identity change and put the Social Identity Approach to Health -model to practice. Students earn 2 European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) credits for completing the intervention.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Groups 4 Health Intervention | Experimental | This group will receive the G4H intervention immediately after randomization Receives: Behavioral: Groups 4 health |
| Waitlist Control Group | No intervention | This group will receive the G4H intervention after the 19 weeks waitlist period |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Loneliness
Loneliness is measured with the 4 and 8-item short forms of the revised University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (ULS-4 and ULS-8, response options: 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, lower score means better outcome).
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention (week 3), 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-up, 6) 12 months follow-up
Depression
Symptoms of depression are assessed with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (response options: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day, lower score means better outcome).
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Active group memberships
Multiple group memberships are assessed with the 4-item Exeter Identity Transition Scale (response options: 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree, higher score means better outcome).
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention (week 3), 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-up, 6) 12-months follow-up
Mental well-being
Mental well-being is assessed with the 7-item Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (response options: 1=not at all, 2=rarely, 3=occasionally, 4=often, 5=all the time, higher score means better outcome).
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
General well-being
General well-being is assessed with the 14-item General Population version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (response options: 0=not at all, 1=only occasionally, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=most of/all of the time, lower score means better outcome).
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Anxiety
Symptoms of anxiety are assessed with the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (response options: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day, lower score means better outcome).
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Social anxiety
Social anxiety is assessed with the 3-item Mini Social Phobia Inventory (response options: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day, lower score means better outcome).
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Secondary outcomes (16)
Perceived Stress
Perceived stress is measured with the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (response options: 0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2=sometimes, 3=fairly often, 4=very often, lower scores means better outcome)
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Self- and other-compassion
Self- and other-compassion is measured with the 4-item Process Based Assessment Tool (response options: 1=very seldom to 5=very often, higher scores means better outcome)
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Health-related quality of life
Health-related quality of life is measured with the Euro Quality of Life - 5 dimension - 5 level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The measure has 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) comprising of five statements of which the respondent can choose the option that best describes their situation. Higher score means better outcome. This measure is used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of the interventions.
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention, 3) three months follow-up
Use of social and health care services
The use of social and health care services for mental health is measured with a self-report questionnaire (medications, health care appointments, hospitalization, counseling). The use of health care services will be monetarized by using Finnish national unit costs. This measure is used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of the interventions.
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention, 3) three months follow-up
Time used by facilitators
The time used for planning, executing, and assessing the G4H sessions is reported by the facilitators. This measure is used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of the interventions.
Measured: Immediately after each intervention session, during 8 weeks
Study credits accumulated over one year
Overall accumulated study credit data is gathered from the University of Helsinki (UH) registries. These data will be used both as measures of effectiveness of the interventions and to account for the confounders in the statistical analyses.
Measured: 1 year before the intervention, 1 year after the intervention
Grade point average
One year grade point average is gathered from the UH registries. These data will be used both as measures of effectiveness of the interventions and to account for the confounders in the statistical analyses.
Measured: 1 year before the intervention, 1 year after the intervention
Weighted grade point average
Weighted grade point average is determined by the grades of each course weighted by the number of credits gained for it.
Measured: 1 year before the intervention, 1 year after the intervention
Study burnout risk
Study burnout risk is measured by the 9-item Study Burnout Inventory (response options: 1=Completely disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Partly disagree, 4=Partly agree, 5=Agree, 6=Completely agree. Lower score means better outcome).
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Sleep quality
Sleep quality is measured with the Single-Item Sleep Quality Scale (response options: 0=terrible to 10=excellent, higher score means better outcome)
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Salivary cortisol
The cortisol awakening profile is used as an index of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function reflecting stress physiology. The participants' salivary cortisol profiles are studied relative to awakening times. Atypical awakening profiles indicate poorer outcome.
Measured: The participants provide the samples on two consecutive days 1) before the intervention 2) after the intervention, and 3) at 3-months follow-up. The sampling times are 0, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after awakening (4 samples per day).
Salivary alpha-amylase
The salivary alpha-amylase is used as an index of sympathetic nervous system function reflecting stress physiology. The participants' salivary alpha amylase profiles are studied relative to awakening times. Atypical awakening profiles indicate poorer outcome.
Measured: The participants provide the samples on two consecutive days 1) before the intervention 2) after the intervention, and 3) at 3-months follow-up. The sampling times are 0, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after awakening (4 samples per day). The alpha amylase awake
Daily positive and negative affect
Daily affect is assessed with items of The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: "To what extent do you currently feel: calm; happy; enthusiastic; tired; stressed; anxious?" (response options: 0 =not at all - 6 = very much).
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) three months follow-up]
Daily health-related information
Daily health-related factors are assessed with items adapted from the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health Sleep and Health Information Form. Perceived sleep quality and quantity is assessed with an item "Last night I slept well/ enough". (response options: 0 = strongly disagree - 6 = strongly agree). Use of caffeine, alcohol and nicotine products, and amount of physical activity during the past 24 hours are assessed by reporting usage (yes/ no) or the amounts.
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) three months follow-up
Daily momentary loneliness
Daily momentary loneliness, and appraisals related to company are assessed with items "I feel lonely" (response options: 0 =not at all - 6 = very much), and if in company "I enjoy this company" (response options: 0 = strongly disagree - 6 = strongly agree).
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) three months follow-up
Daily satisfaction with life
Daily life satisfaction is measured with an item: "How satisfied were you with your life today?" (response options: 0 = not at all satisfied - 6 = very satisfied).
Measured: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) three months follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Sep 2025
- Study start12 Sep 2025
- Primary completionDec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Well-Being, PsychologicalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Helsinki
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Strategic Research Council, Finland, University of Eastern Finland, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Finnish Cultural Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jari Lahti, University of Helsinki
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07152652
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 60/2025
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 25 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Haslam C, Cruwys T, Chang MX, Bentley SV, Haslam SA, Dingle GA, Jetten J. GROUPS 4 HEALTH reduces loneliness and social anxiety in adults with psychological distress: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;87(9):787-801. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000427.
PubMed 31403815Haslam C, Cruwys T, Haslam SA, Dingle G, Chang MX. Groups 4 Health: Evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health. J Affect Disord. 2016 Apr;194:188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
PubMed 26828756Haslam C, Holme A, Haslam SA, Iyer A, Jetten J, Williams WH. Maintaining group memberships: social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008 Oct-Dec;18(5-6):671-91. doi: 10.1080/09602010701643449.
PubMed 18924001Cruwys T, Haslam C, Rathbone JA, Williams E, Haslam SA, Walter ZC. Groups 4 Health versus cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression and loneliness in young people: randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial with 12-month follow-up. Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;220(3):140-147. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.128.
PubMed 35049477
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physiological, Hormonal, and DNA-based Mechanisms of Psychosocial Stress and Therapeutic Effect
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07152652
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 60/2025
- Conditions
- Well-Being, Psychological, Loneliness
- Keywords
- University Students, Group Intervention, Mental Health, Loneliness, Social Isolation, Anxiety, Depression, Social Anxiety
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of HelsinkiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Strategic Research Council, Finland, University of Eastern Finland, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Finnish Cultural Foundation
- Study start
- 12 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this trial is to learn if the Groups 4 Health (G4H) intervention is effective in supporting student well-being at the University of Helsinki. It will also learn about the factors that may influence the efficacy of the intervention (such as facilitators characteristics, stress physiology and changes in gene expression). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is the G4H intervention effective and cost-effective in supporting student well-being?
- To what extent participants' physiological, hormonal, or molecular characteristics mediate the therapeutic effect of the G4H
- To what extent participants' genotype moderates the effect of the G4H
- To what extent facilitators' characteristics mediate or moderate the effect of the G4H
Data is collected from both the intervention participants and the facilitators.
The G4H facilitators will:
- Facilitate the G4H intervention.
- Fill in questionnaires and provide physiological and molecular measurements before, during, and after the G4H intervention.
The G4H participants will:
- Participate in the G4H intervention.
- Fill in questionnaires and provide physiological, hormonal and molecular measurements before, during, and after the G4H intervention.
Detailed description
This study is a randomized waitlist-controlled trial for investigating the efficacy and cost-efficacy of Groups 4 Health (G4H) brief psychosocial intervention for loneliness among the students at the University of Helsinki. Furthermore, several biological and psychosocial mechanisms that may exert the effects of psychosocial stress and therapeutic change are studied. In addition to various psychosocial factors, the mechanisms include genetic factors and epigenetic alterations, hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA) activity (cortisol), and parasympathetic (heart rate variability) and sympathetic (alpha amylase) function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS).
This trial will investigate:
- The efficacy and cost-efficacy of the G4H in a wait-list randomized controlled trial (RCT)
- To what extent participants' physiological, hormonal or molecular measures of ANS, cortisol, alpha amylase, and Deoxyribonucleic Acid methylation (DNAm) mediate the therapeutic effect of the G4H.
- To what extent participants' genotype moderates the effects of the G4H.
- To what extent facilitators' characteristics mediates or moderates the effect of the G4H.
The participants will be randomized to start the G4H immediately after randomization or after the waitlist-period of 19 weeks (7 weeks active G4H + 3 months follow-up). The G4H includes five facilitated group sessions and will be delivered over a 7-week period. Data is collected before, during, and after the intervention, as well as in 1-, 3-, and 12-month follow-ups. The waitlist control group does not provide 12-months follow-up data, as they receive the intervention after the 19 weeks waitlist-period.
METHODS:
The study's outcome measures are described in the outcome measures -section. In addition, the following measures are used to answer the research questions.
Experience Sampling Method (ESM):
ESM is used to measure frequent, real-time assessments of participants self-reported mood, and stress appraisals at multiple times throughout the day. ESM is applied to explore the variation and changes in participants daily subjective well-being and loneliness in concurrence with G4H group facilitators stress appraisals before and after facilitation of G4H sessions. The ESM data will be collected using General Data Protection Regulation compliant experience-sampling software program that runs on smartphones (e.g. m-Path).
The daily ESM protocol consists of a morning and evening prompts in which participants are asked to rate their momentarily affect, and daily satisfaction with life. In the morning prompt, participants are also asked to assess daily physiological correlates such as sleep, amount of caffeine, and alcohol consumption, and exercise during the last 24h.
Intervention participants are also asked to answer questions about momentarily appraisal of social company, and loneliness (see outcome measures). Facilitators' event-based sampling takes place before and after the group facilitation and consists of self-report on the appraisals and experiences related to situation with single items derived from widely used questionnaires.
Experiences related to the pre-group situation are assessed from the facilitators during the intervention with items related to momentarily affect: "When thinking about the upcoming group session I feel: calm; happy; determined; enthusiastic; tired; stressed; worried; anxious" (response options: 0 =not at all - 6 = very much), and expectations: "I have prepared well for the session; I trust in my ability to manage the upcoming group session; I expect the session to go well." (response options: 0 = strongly disagree - 6 = strongly agree). Experiences related to the post-group situation are assessed with items related to the group situation: "I feel that the group session went well; I felt competent in facilitating the session; I was present during the session; It was easy for me to feel compassion towards participants" (response options: 0 = strongly disagree - 6 = strongly agree).
Salivary cortisol and alpha amylase:
Saliva samples with Cortisol Salivette synthetic swabs (Sarsted) are collected for cortisol and alpha-amylase measurements from both the intervention participants (see outcomes) and facilitators. These samples are collected by placing a synthetic swab in mouth for 2 minutes and returning it to a plastic tube thereafter.
The cortisol and alpha-amylase samples are provided by the participating facilitators during the first, third, and last intervention sessions. The sampling times are -45, -10, 45, 90, 110, and 135 minutes from the start of the session (6 samples per session).
Covariates related to the stress measurements:
Information on the following potential covariates related to stress physiology is also collected from the intervention participants and facilitators on the same day as the saliva samples are given: situational stress, sleep, physical activity, smoking, alcohol and coffee consumption, menstrual cycle, medication, chronic illness.
Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) measures:
Omnigene saliva Oragene OG-600 DNA (or equivalent) is used for the DNAm and genotype sampling. Both the intervention participants and the facilitators will provide these samples before and immediately after the intervention.
Autonomic nervous system functioning:
A self-developed bra-integrated solution is used to collect non-medical electrocardiogram (ECG)-signal and accelerometer data from the facilitators. Data is collected by wearing a bra during times, when user regularly would use it, but especially on days when there is activity of G4H study. ECG signal is analysed by time- and frequency-based Hearth rate variability analysis (HRV). Accelerometer data is used to estimate physical activity and used for control high movement effects on HRV. HRV is used to assess daily levels of sympathetic and parasympathetic function of the ANS and to estimate cognitive load effects of facilitating G4H sessions.
Participants' background:
Participants' background information is collected from the intervention participants as potential covariates: gender, birth date, mother tongue, marital status, household composition, residential situation, employment status, education, income, subjective financial situation, subjective health, subjective loneliness, subjective minority status and willingness to participate in the intervention and academic skills (4-item organized studying scale, from Learn -questionnaire).
Facilitators' characteristics:
Information is collected at pre-intervention on the facilitator's background (gender, birth date, marital status, household composition, residential situation, employment status, education, work experience, income, subjective financial situation), and professional (12-item Experiences in Close Relationships Short form) and individual (30-item Extra-Short Five -questionnaire) characteristics.
The facilitators will also answer questionnaires during the intervention on study burnout risk (9-item Study Burnout Inventory, at pre-intervention and last session), perceived stress (10-item Perceived Stress Scale, at pre-intervention, 3rd, and last session), self and other compassion (4-item Process Based Assessment Tool, at pre-intervention, 3rd, and last session), and self-assessed skillfulness, difficulties, and feelings (36-item Therapist Work Involvement Scales, at 3rd and last session) as potential mediators or moderators of the intervention's effectiveness.
SAMPLE SIZE AND ANALYSES:
The minimum sample size is 148 intervention participants. Appropriate statistical methods including linear mixed model analyses will be used to study the effectiveness of the G4H intervention and the mediating and moderating factors. Appropriate imputation methods such as multiple imputation by chained equations will be used if necessary.
Written informed consent is gathered from all participants. The participants who have given their consent have the option to withdraw from the study at any point.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Groups 4 Health Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Groups 4 healthThis group will receive the G4H intervention immediately after randomization |
| Waitlist Control Group | No intervention | –This group will receive the G4H intervention after the 19 weeks waitlist period |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 months and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult (age 18 and above)
- Student in the University of Helsinki, Finland
- Able to speak/read Finnish, Swedish, or English
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Groups 4 healthAlso: G4H, Ryhmät kuntoonGroups 4 Health (G4H) at the University of Helsinki is a manualized group intervention for the students that focuses on social connectedness and aims at improving general health and life satisfaction. G4H groups are facilitated by two psychology master's students (or licensed psychologists) carefully trained for the intervention and mentored by experienced clinical psychologists. G4H consists of five 90 minutes sessions that aim to give participants the knowledge and skills they need to effectively manage their social group memberships and identities. Each session contains exercises and discussions described in the G4H workbook that target different aspects of group life identified within the social identity model of identity change and put the Social Identity Approach to Health -model to practice. Students earn 2 European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) credits for completing the intervention. | Behavioural | Groups 4 Health Intervention |
Primary outcome
Loneliness
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention (week 3), 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-up, 6) 12 months follow-up
Loneliness is measured with the 4 and 8-item short forms of the revised University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (ULS-4 and ULS-8, response options: 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, lower score means better outcome).
Depression
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Symptoms of depression are assessed with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (response options: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day, lower score means better outcome).
Active group memberships
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention (week 3), 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-up, 6) 12-months follow-up
Multiple group memberships are assessed with the 4-item Exeter Identity Transition Scale (response options: 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree, higher score means better outcome).
Mental well-being
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Mental well-being is assessed with the 7-item Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (response options: 1=not at all, 2=rarely, 3=occasionally, 4=often, 5=all the time, higher score means better outcome).
General well-being
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
General well-being is assessed with the 14-item General Population version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (response options: 0=not at all, 1=only occasionally, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=most of/all of the time, lower score means better outcome).
Anxiety
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Symptoms of anxiety are assessed with the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (response options: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day, lower score means better outcome).
Social anxiety
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Social anxiety is assessed with the 3-item Mini Social Phobia Inventory (response options: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day, lower score means better outcome).
16 secondary outcomes
Perceived Stress
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Self- and other-compassion
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention, 3) three months follow-up
Use of social and health care services
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention, 3) three months follow-up
Time used by facilitators
Time frame: Immediately after each intervention session, during 8 weeks
Study credits accumulated over one year
Time frame: 1 year before the intervention, 1 year after the intervention
Grade point average
Time frame: 1 year before the intervention, 1 year after the intervention
Weighted grade point average
Time frame: 1 year before the intervention, 1 year after the intervention
Study burnout risk
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Sleep quality
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up, 5) 12-months follow-up
Salivary cortisol
Time frame: The participants provide the samples on two consecutive days 1) before the intervention 2) after the intervention, and 3) at 3-months follow-up. The sampling times are 0, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after awakening (4 samples per day).
Salivary alpha-amylase
Time frame: The participants provide the samples on two consecutive days 1) before the intervention 2) after the intervention, and 3) at 3-months follow-up. The sampling times are 0, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after awakening (4 samples per day). The alpha amylase awake
Daily positive and negative affect
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) three months follow-up]
Daily health-related information
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) three months follow-up
Daily momentary loneliness
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) three months follow-up
Daily satisfaction with life
Time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) three months follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2025.
- Background: PubMed 31403815Haslam C, Cruwys T, Chang MX, Bentley SV, Haslam SA, Dingle GA, Jetten J. GROUPS 4 HEALTH reduces loneliness and social anxiety in adults with psychological distress: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;87(9):787-801. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000427.
- Background: PubMed 26828756Haslam C, Cruwys T, Haslam SA, Dingle G, Chang MX. Groups 4 Health: Evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health. J Affect Disord. 2016 Apr;194:188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
- Background: PubMed 18924001Haslam C, Holme A, Haslam SA, Iyer A, Jetten J, Williams WH. Maintaining group memberships: social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008 Oct-Dec;18(5-6):671-91. doi: 10.1080/09602010701643449.
- Background: PubMed 35049477Cruwys T, Haslam C, Rathbone JA, Williams E, Haslam SA, Walter ZC. Groups 4 Health versus cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression and loneliness in young people: randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial with 12-month follow-up. Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;220(3):140-147. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.128.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Well-Being, Psychological
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Not yet recruiting
REM Enhancement Sleep Technology for Well-being, Emotion, and Life Lift
Healthy Adult Participants
Recruiting
Effects of Red Panax Ginseng Supplementation on Cognitive Performance and Emotional Well-Being in Young Healthy Adults
Mental Acuity
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Groups 4 health in people with Well-Being, Psychological and Loneliness, run by University of Helsinki at 1 site in Finland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jari Lahti, PhD (040 571 2297 ext. +358, jari.lahti@helsinki.fi), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Loneliness (time frame: 1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention (week 3), 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-up, 6) 12 months follow-up). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07152652, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2025.