StrokeNCT07161739
Vaccination Nudges From Pharmacists
A study testing Behavioural Nudge (Influenza Risk Reduction) and Behavioural Nudge (Travel Vaccination Benefit) in people with Stroke and Influenza Human, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The goal of this individual-level pragmatic randomized policy trial is to learn about the impact of behavioural nudges via mailed letters on increasing influenza and travel vaccination uptake in Alberta, Canada. The primary outcome is the proportion of adults receiving influenza and/or travel vaccination. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Influenza Human, Influenza Vaccines
- What is being tested?
- Behavioural Nudge (Influenza Risk Reduction) and Behavioural Nudge (Travel Vaccination Benefit)
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 6 Nov 2025to 1 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Visited a Mint Pharmacy site within 1 year of enrollment date
- 18 years of age and older by enrolment date
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Vaccination Nudges Project: Behavioural Nudges From Pharmacists to Increase Influenza and Travel Vaccination Uptake: A Pragmatic Randomized Control Trial.
The goal of this individual-level pragmatic randomized policy trial is to learn about the impact of behavioural nudges via mailed letters on increasing influenza and travel vaccination uptake in Alberta, Canada. The primary outcome is the proportion of adults receiving influenza and/or travel vaccination. The secondary outcome is the number of stroke events in the 6 months following vaccination. As such, this research aims to answer two key questions:
- Do behavioural nudges increase influenza and travel vaccination in Alberta?
- If yes, is there a decrease in the number of stroke events in the 6 months following vaccination?
Read more
The two-arm individual level pragmatic randomized trial design includes two letter dimensions, a letter (a "nudge") with an influenza and cardiovascular risk reduction message and a letter with a travel vaccination benefit message, yielding the following groups:
Letter with an influenza and cardiovascular risk reduction message Letter with a travel vaccination benefit message
Read the detailed description
Study Population Setting This research project will take place in Alberta, Canada and in partnership with Mint Health and Drugs (Mint Pharmacy), an Alberta-based pharmacy corporation. Participants will be recruited through Mint Pharmacy patient records.
Inclusion Criteria 18 years of age and older by September 1, 2025, and visited a Mint Pharmacy site within 1 year of September 1, 2025.
Study Procedures Sampling Size and Strategy Mint Pharmacy will be sending a letter to all active clients (defined as an adult who filled a prescription at their pharmacy in the last year). The investigators estimate this will be 20,000 clients with 10,000 receiving the influenza vaccine nudge and 10,000 receiving the travel vaccine nudge. This population size will allow the investigators to detect an absolute difference of 2% between the two groups with 80% power and α= 0.05.
Recruitment and Screening Mint Pharmacy analysts will pull the study sample from their patient records, including first and last name, date of birth, and sex. The list of participants will be shared with Alberta Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (AbSPOR) analysts for randomization and data linkage. AbSPOR analysts will share the randomized list of participants, including mailing addresses, with the approved mail vendor to print and mail the appropriate nudge letter that the participant has been randomized to receive. The investigators will stratify be geographic zone (North, Edmonton, Central, Calgary, and South) because of the geographic variation in vaccine uptake.
Intervention The Alberta Government provides free influenza vaccines from October through March annually, which corresponds with peak travel vaccine season. Travel vaccines are typically low cost or covered by private insurance. Vaccines are frequently administered by pharmacists in private pharmacies. As a pragmatic trial, there will be no in-person encounters with patients during the trial. The intervention will be delivered through mailed letters with different messages described below, to be delivered in mid-October 2025. The date of the initial letter will be defined as study baseline.
Arm 1 (Letter with an influenza risk reduction message): This letter will be signed by the pharmacist at the Mint Pharmacy site that the participant accesses and will discuss the benefits of the influenza vaccine in preventing influenza infection and cardiovascular disease risk reduction.
Arm 2 (Letter with travel vaccination benefit message): This letter will be signed by the pharmacist at the Mint Pharmacy site that the participant accesses and will discuss the benefits of travel vaccines in preventing travel related disease, such as evidence that vaccination against Hepatitis A, a common travel vaccination, is 90-95% effective in preventing Hepatitis A infection.
Outcomes Primary outcome: receipt of an influenza and/or travel vaccine on or before March 1, 2026.
Secondary outcome: Number of hospitalizations and emergency department visits for influenza and the number of stroke events on or before September 30, 2026 (6 months following influenza vaccination programs)
Blinding Study researchers will be blind to the participants' group allocation. Participants will not be aware that the communications they receive are part of a research study. Because of this deception, the investigators are requesting a waiver of consent and not attaching a patient information form or informed consent form.
Waiver of Consent
A waiver of consent is necessary both logistically and to limit bias. It is not feasible to obtain informed consent with a sample size n=5190. Additionally, because this study aims to investigate health behaviour, obtaining prior consent alerts participants to the existence of other health messages and may affect their response to the health message they do receive, introducing response bias. Our firm commitment to patient engagement and robust patient engagement plan also reduces participant risk. As per the Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS) 2.0, Article 3.7A, alterations to the consent process (including waiver of consent) are appropriate when:
- The research involves no more than minimal risk to the participant
- The alteration to consent requirements is unlikely to adversely affect the welfare of participants
- It is impossible or impractical to carry out the research and to address the research questions properly, given the research design, if the prior consent of participants is required
The proposed study meets the above TCPS 2.0 requirements for alterations to the consent process.
Data Collection Mint Pharmacy analysts will pull the study sample from their patient records, including first and last name, date of birth, and sex. The list of participants will be shared with Alberta Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (AbSPOR) analysts for randomization and data linkage. AbSPOR analysts will share the randomized list of participants, including mailing addresses, with the approved mail vendor to print and mail the appropriate nudge letter that the participant has been randomized to receive. AbSPOR analysts will gather vaccination data from the Alberta Health Immunization and Adverse Reactions Following Immunization (IMM/ARI) database by linking participant health numbers to determine how many participants received a vaccination. The IMM/ARI database is the most comprehensive vaccination database as it is where all vaccinations are required to be reported in Alberta with nearly 100% coverage. AbSPOR analysts will gather hospitalization, emergency department visit, and the number of stroke events from the Alberta Health Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) using participant health numbers. Influenza and stroke events will be identified using ICD-10 codes. This data collection will be continuous from April 1st, 2026, through September 30th, 2026, six-months following the influenza vaccination program. Data linkage and cross-reference will be conducted by AbSPOR, who will share de-identified data with the research team in either de-identified or aggregate form for analysis.
Data Analysis Data analysis will be conducted by members of the research team using the de-identified data provided by AbSPOR. Statistical comparisons will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The investigators will report the proportion of adults who received influenza vaccination and travel vaccination (any vaccines, specific vaccine types, and full series of vaccines) in each group along with 95% confidence intervals. The investigators will model the risk difference for each type of nudge compared to the comparison group) in separate models, including adjustment for multiple comparisons. As a secondary analysis, the investigators will assess time to vaccination in the influenza letter group compared to the travel vaccine letter group. To assess impact of vaccine uptake on influenza and stroke events, the investigators will compare the number of events in one intervention group with the number of stroke events in the comparison group. The primary analysis will be conducted on the as-randomized populations (intention-to-treat analysis).
- Conditions
- Stroke, Influenza Human, Influenza Vaccines, Health Behavior Change, Travel-Related Illness
- Being tested
- Behavioural Nudge (Influenza Risk Reduction), Behavioural Nudge (Travel Vaccination Benefit)
- Keywords
- Pragmatic Randomized Control Trial, Policy Trial, Waiver of Consent, Behavioral Nudge
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Influenza, Human, Travel-Related Illness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Behavioural Nudge (Influenza Risk Reduction)Behavioural
A behavioural nudge via mailed letter that discusses the benefits of the influenza vaccine in preventing influenza infection and reducing cardiovascular risk.
Behavioural Nudge (Travel Vaccination Benefit)Behavioural
A behavioural nudge via mailed letter that discusses the benefits of travel vaccines in preventing travel-related illnesses.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction | Experimental | Participants randomized to the Influenza Risk Reduction arm will receive a letter encouraging ("nudging") influenza vaccination as an influenza and cardiovascular risk reduction method. Receives: Behavioral: Behavioural Nudge (Influenza Risk Reduction) |
| Travel Vaccination Benefit | Experimental | Participants randomized to the Travel Vaccination Benefit arm will receive a letter encouraging ("nudging") travel vaccination as a health benefit by reducing the risk of contracting a travel-related illness. Receives: Behavioral: Behavioural Nudge (Travel Vaccination Benefit) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Influenza and/or Travel Vaccination
The proportion of participants who received an influenza and/or travel vaccination.
Measured: From enrollment and randomization to the end of the intervention window at 6 months post-enrollment/randomization.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Stroke Events
Number of stroke events among participants in the 6 months following vaccination.
Measured: From date of vaccination to the end of follow-up at 6 months post-vaccination.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Sep 2025
- Study start6 Nov 2025
- Primary completion1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A two-arm individual-level pragmatic randomized policy trial with two letter dimensions, 1) a letter with an influenza and cardiovascular risk reduction message, and 2) a letter with a travel vaccination benefit message, yielding the following groups: Letter with an influenza and cardiovascular risk reduction message Letter with a travel vaccination benefit message
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alberta Health services, Mint Health + Drugs
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Amity Quinn, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07161739
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REB25-1205
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Public Health Agency of Canada, Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2014-2015. 2014, National Advisory Committee on Immunization: Ottawa.
McAlister FA, Straus SE, Sackett DL, Altman DG. Analysis and reporting of factorial trials: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003 May 21;289(19):2545-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2545.
PubMed 12759326Renosa MDC, Landicho J, Wachinger J, Dalglish SL, Barnighausen K, Barnighausen T, McMahon SA. Nudging toward vaccination: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9):e006237. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006237.
PubMed 34593513Patel MS, Milkman KL, Gandhi L, Graci HN, Gromet D, Ho H, Kay JS, Lee TW, Rothschild J, Akinola M, Beshears J, Bogard JE, Buttenheim A, Chabris C, Chapman GB, Choi JJ, Dai H, Fox CR, Goren A, Hilchey MD, Hmurovic J, John LK, Karlan D, Kim M, Laibson D, Lamberton C, Madrian BC, Meyer MN, Modanu M, Nam J, Rogers T, Rondina R, Saccardo S, Shermohammed M, Soman D, Sparks J, Warren C, Weber M, Berman R, Evans CN, Lee SH, Snider CK, Tsukayama E, Van den Bulte C, Volpp KG, Duckworth AL. A Randomized Trial of Behavioral Nudges Delivered Through Text Messages to Increase Influenza Vaccination Among Patients With an Upcoming Primary Care Visit. Am J Health Promot. 2023 Mar;37(3):324-332. doi: 10.1177/08901171221131021. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
PubMed 36195982Modin D, Johansen ND, Vaduganathan M, Bhatt AS, Lee SG, Claggett BL, Dueger EL, Samson SI, Loiacono MM, Kober L, Solomon SD, Sivapalan P, Jensen JUS, Jean-Marie Martel C, Valentiner-Branth P, Krause TG, Biering-Sorensen T. Effect of Electronic Nudges on Influenza Vaccination Rate in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease: Prespecified Analysis of the NUDGE-FLU Trial. Circulation. 2023 May 2;147(18):1345-1354. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064270. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
PubMed 36871213Johansen ND, Vaduganathan M, Bhatt AS, Lee SG, Modin D, Claggett BL, Dueger EL, Samson SI, Loiacono MM, Kober L, Solomon SD, Sivapalan P, Jensen JUS, Martel CJ, Valentiner-Branth P, Krause TG, Biering-Sorensen T. Electronic nudges to increase influenza vaccination uptake in Denmark: a nationwide, pragmatic, registry-based, randomised implementation trial. Lancet. 2023 Apr 1;401(10382):1103-1114. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00349-5. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
PubMed 36889332Saaksvuori L, Betsch C, Nohynek H, Salo H, Sivela J, Bohm R. Information nudges for influenza vaccination: Evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial in Finland. PLoS Med. 2022 Feb 9;19(2):e1003919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003919. eCollection 2022 Feb.
PubMed 35139082Holodinsky JK, Zerna C, Malo S, Svenson LW, Hill MD. Association between influenza vaccination and risk of stroke in Alberta, Canada: a population-based study. Lancet Public Health. 2022 Nov;7(11):e914-e922. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00222-5.
PubMed 36334607Yu AYX, Krahn M, Austin PC, Rashid M, Fang J, Porter J, Vyas MV, Bronskill SE, Smith EE, Swartz RH, Kapral MK. Sex differences in direct healthcare costs following stroke: a population-based cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 29;21(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06669-w.
PubMed 34187462Holodinsky JK, Lindsay P, Yu AYX, Ganesh A, Joundi RA, Hill MD. Estimating the Number of Hospital or Emergency Department Presentations for Stroke in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci. 2023 Nov;50(6):820-825. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2022.338. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
PubMed 36536997Molinari NA, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Messonnier ML, Thompson WW, Wortley PM, Weintraub E, Bridges CB. The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: measuring disease burden and costs. Vaccine. 2007 Jun 28;25(27):5086-96. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.03.046. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
PubMed 17544181Schanzer DL, Sevenhuysen C, Winchester B, Mersereau T. Estimating influenza deaths in Canada, 1992-2009. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e80481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080481. eCollection 2013.
PubMed 24312225
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vaccination Nudges Project: Behavioural Nudges From Pharmacists to Increase Influenza and Travel Vaccination Uptake: A Pragmatic Randomized Control Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07161739
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REB25-1205
- Conditions
- Stroke, Influenza Human, Influenza Vaccines, Health Behavior Change, Travel-Related Illness
- Keywords
- Pragmatic Randomized Control Trial, Policy Trial, Waiver of Consent, Behavioral Nudge
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alberta Health services, Mint Health + Drugs
- Study start
- 6 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this individual-level pragmatic randomized policy trial is to learn about the impact of behavioural nudges via mailed letters on increasing influenza and travel vaccination uptake in Alberta, Canada. The primary outcome is the proportion of adults receiving influenza and/or travel vaccination. The secondary outcome is the number of stroke events in the 6 months following vaccination. As such, this research aims to answer two key questions:
- Do behavioural nudges increase influenza and travel vaccination in Alberta?
- If yes, is there a decrease in the number of stroke events in the 6 months following vaccination?
The two-arm individual level pragmatic randomized trial design includes two letter dimensions, a letter (a "nudge") with an influenza and cardiovascular risk reduction message and a letter with a travel vaccination benefit message, yielding the following groups:
Letter with an influenza and cardiovascular risk reduction message Letter with a travel vaccination benefit message
Detailed description
Study Population Setting This research project will take place in Alberta, Canada and in partnership with Mint Health and Drugs (Mint Pharmacy), an Alberta-based pharmacy corporation. Participants will be recruited through Mint Pharmacy patient records.
Inclusion Criteria 18 years of age and older by September 1, 2025, and visited a Mint Pharmacy site within 1 year of September 1, 2025.
Study Procedures Sampling Size and Strategy Mint Pharmacy will be sending a letter to all active clients (defined as an adult who filled a prescription at their pharmacy in the last year). The investigators estimate this will be 20,000 clients with 10,000 receiving the influenza vaccine nudge and 10,000 receiving the travel vaccine nudge. This population size will allow the investigators to detect an absolute difference of 2% between the two groups with 80% power and α= 0.05.
Recruitment and Screening Mint Pharmacy analysts will pull the study sample from their patient records, including first and last name, date of birth, and sex. The list of participants will be shared with Alberta Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (AbSPOR) analysts for randomization and data linkage. AbSPOR analysts will share the randomized list of participants, including mailing addresses, with the approved mail vendor to print and mail the appropriate nudge letter that the participant has been randomized to receive. The investigators will stratify be geographic zone (North, Edmonton, Central, Calgary, and South) because of the geographic variation in vaccine uptake.
Intervention The Alberta Government provides free influenza vaccines from October through March annually, which corresponds with peak travel vaccine season. Travel vaccines are typically low cost or covered by private insurance. Vaccines are frequently administered by pharmacists in private pharmacies. As a pragmatic trial, there will be no in-person encounters with patients during the trial. The intervention will be delivered through mailed letters with different messages described below, to be delivered in mid-October 2025. The date of the initial letter will be defined as study baseline.
Arm 1 (Letter with an influenza risk reduction message): This letter will be signed by the pharmacist at the Mint Pharmacy site that the participant accesses and will discuss the benefits of the influenza vaccine in preventing influenza infection and cardiovascular disease risk reduction.
Arm 2 (Letter with travel vaccination benefit message): This letter will be signed by the pharmacist at the Mint Pharmacy site that the participant accesses and will discuss the benefits of travel vaccines in preventing travel related disease, such as evidence that vaccination against Hepatitis A, a common travel vaccination, is 90-95% effective in preventing Hepatitis A infection.
Outcomes Primary outcome: receipt of an influenza and/or travel vaccine on or before March 1, 2026.
Secondary outcome: Number of hospitalizations and emergency department visits for influenza and the number of stroke events on or before September 30, 2026 (6 months following influenza vaccination programs)
Blinding Study researchers will be blind to the participants' group allocation. Participants will not be aware that the communications they receive are part of a research study. Because of this deception, the investigators are requesting a waiver of consent and not attaching a patient information form or informed consent form.
Waiver of Consent
A waiver of consent is necessary both logistically and to limit bias. It is not feasible to obtain informed consent with a sample size n=5190. Additionally, because this study aims to investigate health behaviour, obtaining prior consent alerts participants to the existence of other health messages and may affect their response to the health message they do receive, introducing response bias. Our firm commitment to patient engagement and robust patient engagement plan also reduces participant risk. As per the Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS) 2.0, Article 3.7A, alterations to the consent process (including waiver of consent) are appropriate when:
- The research involves no more than minimal risk to the participant
- The alteration to consent requirements is unlikely to adversely affect the welfare of participants
- It is impossible or impractical to carry out the research and to address the research questions properly, given the research design, if the prior consent of participants is required
The proposed study meets the above TCPS 2.0 requirements for alterations to the consent process.
Data Collection Mint Pharmacy analysts will pull the study sample from their patient records, including first and last name, date of birth, and sex. The list of participants will be shared with Alberta Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (AbSPOR) analysts for randomization and data linkage. AbSPOR analysts will share the randomized list of participants, including mailing addresses, with the approved mail vendor to print and mail the appropriate nudge letter that the participant has been randomized to receive. AbSPOR analysts will gather vaccination data from the Alberta Health Immunization and Adverse Reactions Following Immunization (IMM/ARI) database by linking participant health numbers to determine how many participants received a vaccination. The IMM/ARI database is the most comprehensive vaccination database as it is where all vaccinations are required to be reported in Alberta with nearly 100% coverage. AbSPOR analysts will gather hospitalization, emergency department visit, and the number of stroke events from the Alberta Health Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) using participant health numbers. Influenza and stroke events will be identified using ICD-10 codes. This data collection will be continuous from April 1st, 2026, through September 30th, 2026, six-months following the influenza vaccination program. Data linkage and cross-reference will be conducted by AbSPOR, who will share de-identified data with the research team in either de-identified or aggregate form for analysis.
Data Analysis Data analysis will be conducted by members of the research team using the de-identified data provided by AbSPOR. Statistical comparisons will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The investigators will report the proportion of adults who received influenza vaccination and travel vaccination (any vaccines, specific vaccine types, and full series of vaccines) in each group along with 95% confidence intervals. The investigators will model the risk difference for each type of nudge compared to the comparison group) in separate models, including adjustment for multiple comparisons. As a secondary analysis, the investigators will assess time to vaccination in the influenza letter group compared to the travel vaccine letter group. To assess impact of vaccine uptake on influenza and stroke events, the investigators will compare the number of events in one intervention group with the number of stroke events in the comparison group. The primary analysis will be conducted on the as-randomized populations (intention-to-treat analysis).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A two-arm individual-level pragmatic randomized policy trial with two letter dimensions, 1) a letter with an influenza and cardiovascular risk reduction message, and 2) a letter with a travel vaccination benefit message, yielding the following groups: Letter with an influenza and cardiovascular risk reduction message Letter with a travel vaccination benefit message
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction | Experimental | Behavioral: Behavioural Nudge (Influenza Risk Reduction)Participants randomized to the Influenza Risk Reduction arm will receive a letter encouraging ("nudging") influenza vaccination as an influenza and cardiovascular risk reduction method. |
| Travel Vaccination Benefit | Experimental | Behavioral: Behavioural Nudge (Travel Vaccination Benefit)Participants randomized to the Travel Vaccination Benefit arm will receive a letter encouraging ("nudging") travel vaccination as a health benefit by reducing the risk of contracting a travel-related illness. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Visited a Mint Pharmacy site within 1 year of enrollment date
- 18 years of age and older by enrolment date
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Behavioural Nudge (Influenza Risk Reduction)A behavioural nudge via mailed letter that discusses the benefits of the influenza vaccine in preventing influenza infection and reducing cardiovascular risk. | Behavioural | Influenza and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction |
| Behavioural Nudge (Travel Vaccination Benefit)A behavioural nudge via mailed letter that discusses the benefits of travel vaccines in preventing travel-related illnesses. | Behavioural | Travel Vaccination Benefit |
Primary outcome
Influenza and/or Travel Vaccination
Time frame: From enrollment and randomization to the end of the intervention window at 6 months post-enrollment/randomization.
The proportion of participants who received an influenza and/or travel vaccination.
1 secondary outcome
Stroke Events
Time frame: From date of vaccination to the end of follow-up at 6 months post-vaccination.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2026.
- BackgroundPublic Health Agency of Canada, Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2014-2015. 2014, National Advisory Committee on Immunization: Ottawa.
- Background: PubMed 12759326McAlister FA, Straus SE, Sackett DL, Altman DG. Analysis and reporting of factorial trials: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003 May 21;289(19):2545-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2545.
- Background: PubMed 34593513Renosa MDC, Landicho J, Wachinger J, Dalglish SL, Barnighausen K, Barnighausen T, McMahon SA. Nudging toward vaccination: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9):e006237. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006237.
- Background: PubMed 36195982Patel MS, Milkman KL, Gandhi L, Graci HN, Gromet D, Ho H, Kay JS, Lee TW, Rothschild J, Akinola M, Beshears J, Bogard JE, Buttenheim A, Chabris C, Chapman GB, Choi JJ, Dai H, Fox CR, Goren A, Hilchey MD, Hmurovic J, John LK, Karlan D, Kim M, Laibson D, Lamberton C, Madrian BC, Meyer MN, Modanu M, Nam J, Rogers T, Rondina R, Saccardo S, Shermohammed M, Soman D, Sparks J, Warren C, Weber M, Berman R, Evans CN, Lee SH, Snider CK, Tsukayama E, Van den Bulte C, Volpp KG, Duckworth AL. A Randomized Trial of Behavioral Nudges Delivered Through Text Messages to Increase Influenza Vaccination Among Patients With an Upcoming Primary Care Visit. Am J Health Promot. 2023 Mar;37(3):324-332. doi: 10.1177/08901171221131021. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
- Background: PubMed 36871213Modin D, Johansen ND, Vaduganathan M, Bhatt AS, Lee SG, Claggett BL, Dueger EL, Samson SI, Loiacono MM, Kober L, Solomon SD, Sivapalan P, Jensen JUS, Jean-Marie Martel C, Valentiner-Branth P, Krause TG, Biering-Sorensen T. Effect of Electronic Nudges on Influenza Vaccination Rate in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease: Prespecified Analysis of the NUDGE-FLU Trial. Circulation. 2023 May 2;147(18):1345-1354. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064270. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 36889332Johansen ND, Vaduganathan M, Bhatt AS, Lee SG, Modin D, Claggett BL, Dueger EL, Samson SI, Loiacono MM, Kober L, Solomon SD, Sivapalan P, Jensen JUS, Martel CJ, Valentiner-Branth P, Krause TG, Biering-Sorensen T. Electronic nudges to increase influenza vaccination uptake in Denmark: a nationwide, pragmatic, registry-based, randomised implementation trial. Lancet. 2023 Apr 1;401(10382):1103-1114. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00349-5. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 35139082Saaksvuori L, Betsch C, Nohynek H, Salo H, Sivela J, Bohm R. Information nudges for influenza vaccination: Evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial in Finland. PLoS Med. 2022 Feb 9;19(2):e1003919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003919. eCollection 2022 Feb.
- Background: PubMed 36334607Holodinsky JK, Zerna C, Malo S, Svenson LW, Hill MD. Association between influenza vaccination and risk of stroke in Alberta, Canada: a population-based study. Lancet Public Health. 2022 Nov;7(11):e914-e922. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00222-5.
- Background: PubMed 34187462Yu AYX, Krahn M, Austin PC, Rashid M, Fang J, Porter J, Vyas MV, Bronskill SE, Smith EE, Swartz RH, Kapral MK. Sex differences in direct healthcare costs following stroke: a population-based cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 29;21(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06669-w.
- Background: PubMed 36536997Holodinsky JK, Lindsay P, Yu AYX, Ganesh A, Joundi RA, Hill MD. Estimating the Number of Hospital or Emergency Department Presentations for Stroke in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci. 2023 Nov;50(6):820-825. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2022.338. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
- Background: PubMed 17544181Molinari NA, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Messonnier ML, Thompson WW, Wortley PM, Weintraub E, Bridges CB. The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: measuring disease burden and costs. Vaccine. 2007 Jun 28;25(27):5086-96. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.03.046. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
- Background: PubMed 24312225Schanzer DL, Sevenhuysen C, Winchester B, Mersereau T. Estimating influenza deaths in Canada, 1992-2009. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e80481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080481. eCollection 2013.
- Alberta Government. Alberta Influenza Statistics. 2023. \[cited 2023 May 25\];Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Recruiting
Connectomic Alterations Following Acute Ischemic Stroke in the MCA Territory
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Clevidipine for the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Testing How Well the Drug Extract of Ginkgo Biloba Leaves Tablets Works for People With Memory or Thinking Problems After a Stroke When Added to Standard Treatment
Ischemic Stroke Hospitalized, Impairment, Cognitive
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Anti-inflammatory and Anti-thrombotic Therapy With colcHicine and Low Dose Rivaroxaban for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Reduction in Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
CoMind Early Feasibility Study
Intracranial Pressure, Intracranial Pressure Changes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amity Quinn principal investigator
University of Calgary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Behavioural Nudge (Influenza Risk Reduction) and Behavioural Nudge (Travel Vaccination Benefit) in people with Stroke and Influenza Human, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Influenza and/or Travel Vaccination (time frame: From enrollment and randomization to the end of the intervention window at 6 months post-enrollment/randomization.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07161739, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2026.