AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Respiratory DiseaseNCT07170085

Positioning of Children With Acute Respiratory Insufficiency

A study testing positioning in people with Acute Respiratory Disease, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Acute respiratory insufficiency is one of the most common causes of hospitalization and death among young children. It often affects small children who, due to infections with RSV (respiratory syncytial virus), other cold viruses, or bacteria, experience difficulty breathing, rapid breathing, increased heart rate, low… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 12 months
Conditions the study is for
Acute Respiratory Disease
What is being tested?
positioning
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
24 Nov 2025to 1 Apr 2028
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 12 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Age 0-12 months
  • Clinical respiratory infection
  • Physician-ordered High-Flow oxygen or CPAP
  • Consent from the legal guardian

Who cannot join

  • Significant chronic pulmonary, cardiac, or neurological disorders
  • Children admitted to intensive care

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Josefine Gradman, MD, PhD contact

+4529241375

josefine.gradman@rsyd.dk

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hans Christian Andersen´s Childrens Hospital

    Odense, 5000

    Josefine Gradman, MD, PhD, +4529241375, josefine.gradman@rsyd.dk

    Josefine Gradman, MD, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Acute respiratory insufficiency is one of the most common causes of hospitalization and death among young children. It often affects small children who, due to infections with RSV (respiratory syncytial virus), other cold viruses, or bacteria, experience difficulty breathing, rapid breathing, increased heart rate, low oxygen levels in the blood, and reduced appetite. If left untreated, a child can become exhausted, lose consciousness, and ultimately die from the condition. Children with severe acute respiratory insufficiency occupy most of the acute care beds in the pediatric wards of hospitals during the winter months. Some children are treated simply with saline inhalations, nasal saline drops, and suctioning of the nose, but many require respiratory support in the form of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) or high-flow oxygen therapy.

In adults, it has been observed that prone positioning can improve blood oxygenation compared to supine positioning in cases of acute respiratory insufficiency.

Read more

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there are benefits or drawbacks to positioning small children admitted for difficulty breathing due to respiratory infections in a prone position instead of a supine position.

The study will include a total of 40 children with acute airway disease who have been prescribed respiratory support in the form of CPAP or high-flow oxygen. The study will last a total of 2 hours and will not involve any uncomfortable procedures or pose any risks to the child.

The Study Itself:

Once the child has CPAP or high-flow oxygen administered via the nose, the child will be positioned for 1 hour in the prone position and 1 hour in the supine position. The order will be random and determined by lottery. A nurse will record the child's breathing in both the prone and supine positions. After the two hours, the child will be placed in the supine position, which is standard practice in the department. The child will have a pulse oximeter on both during the study and afterwards.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there are benefits or drawbacks to positioning small children admitted for difficulty breathing due to respiratory infections in a prone position instead of a supine position.

Hypothesis:

Children under 1 year of age with acute respiratory insufficiency undergoing CPAP or High-Flow oxygen therapy will have improved respiratory function when positioned in the prone position compared to the supine position, as assessed by respiratory rate and symptom score.

The study will include a total of 40 children with acute airway disease who have been prescribed respiratory support in the form of CPAP or high-flow oxygen.

. Method: The study is designed as an open-label, randomized crossover study. The intervention involves positioning: 1 hour in the prone position and 1 hour in the supine position while the child receives treatment with CPAP or High-Flow oxygen.

The study will enroll children hospitalized with infection-triggered acute respiratory insufficiency, who, based on a clinical physician's assessment, are indicated for treatment with either CPAP or High-Flow oxygen. They will be randomized to either prone positioning followed by supine positioning or supine positioning followed by prone positioning upon initiation of respiratory support.

Being tested
positioning
Keywords
positioning

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • positioningOther

    The children will be positioned in the supine and prone position

Study groups in NCT07170085
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
supine-proneExperimentalfirst supine position, then prone position
Receives: Other: positioning
prone-supineExperimentalfirst prone position, then supine position
Receives: Other: positioning

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. m-WCAS

    Modified Wood's Clinical Asthma Score (mWCAS) a combined score of saturation, inspiratory wheezes, expiratory wheezes, retractions, general condition, each scored 1-4, with 1 being the best and 4 being the worst

    Measured: one hour

  2. respiratory rate

    respiration per minute

    Measured: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. saturation

    percent

    Measured: 1 hour

  2. pulse

    hearth rate

    Measured: 1 hour

  3. apneas

    Number of apneas >10 seconds

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Sep 2025
  2. Study start24 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07170085
Sponsor's protocol ID
HCA-PC
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
5 Sep 2025
Last updated
23 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in