AzTrials
AzTrials

AI (Artificial Intelligence)AINCT07171502

AI-Assisted Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block: Model Development and Performance Assessment

A study testing AI Annotation and manual annotation in people with AI (Artificial Intelligence) and Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study intends to have experts with over 10 years of experience in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia acquire 1,000 target images. These images will be annotated by both an AI model and human experts, and the model's annotations will be evaluated by a panel of 10 specialists. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
What is being tested?
AI Annotation and manual annotation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
30 Sep 2025to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18-70 years
  • BMI between 19-23 kg·m-²
  • ASA physical status classification I-II
  • Normal orientation and able to cooperate with physical examination.

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal
  • Infection, trauma, skin defect, deformity, or other abnormalities at the intended nerve block site
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

    Shanghai

Other trials in China

About this study

This study intends to have experts with over 10 years of experience in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia acquire 1,000 target images. These images will be annotated by both an AI model and human experts, and the model's annotations will be evaluated by a panel of 10 specialists. The primary outcome is the accuracy of identifying the target anatomical structures in the annotated images. Secondary outcomes include the number of true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative structures, the time required for annotation, and the potential application of the AI model in assisting the performance of ultrasound-guided regional blocks.

Being tested
AI Annotation, manual annotation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AI AnnotationDevice

    Use the AI model to assist in annotating the target images.

  • manual annotationOther

    Use the manual to annotate the target images.

Study groups in NCT07171502
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AI AnnotationExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: AI Annotation
Manual AnnotationPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: manual annotation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The accuracy of identifying the target anatomical structures in the annotated images.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. The number of true positive (TP) structures

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months

  2. The number of false positive (FP) structures

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months

  3. The number of true negative (TN) structures

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months

  4. The number of false negative (FN) structures

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months

  5. The annotation time (time from the start to the end of annotation)

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months

  6. An evaluation of the AI model if applied to assist in performing ultrasound-guided regional blocks: a) its impact on block failure rate (increase, no effect, decrease); b) its impact on the incidence of adverse events (increase, no effect, decrease)

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Sep 2025
  2. Study start30 Sep 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07171502
Sponsor's protocol ID
AI-Sacral Plexus
Acronym
AI
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
8 Sep 2025
Last updated
6 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AI Annotation and manual annotation in people with AI (Artificial Intelligence) and Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The accuracy of identifying the target anatomical structures in the annotated images. (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in