AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreas NeoplasmsPERSPECTIVENCT07173257

PROMs After Pancreatectomy

An observational study of Pancreas Neoplasms and Pancreatitis, run by University of Arizona at 2 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The standard of care for a patient with resectable pancreatic is to perform pancreatic resection which, even in the modern era is associated with significant complications and impact on quality of life, often in the setting of poor survival even in the best scenario. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pancreas Neoplasms, Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Cyst
How many people
250 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
3 Apr 2023to Dec 2026
How long will I take part?
2 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients seen at Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Clinics for pancreatic resections will be considered for the study.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients >18 years old who undergo pancreatic resection for any indication of any race, gender, or ethnicity who are fluent in English

Who cannot join

  • <18 years old
  • Deemed not to have capacity to consent.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic - Phoenix

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85054

    Paul Hong, MD, 602-490-9701, Hong.Tanpo@mayo.edu

    Zhi V. Fong, MD, MPH

    Recruiting
  • The University of Arizona

    Tucson, Arizona, 85724

    Nicholas Galouzis, MD, 520-626-7754, galouzis@arizona.edu

    Maria Fotinos, B.S., 520-621-3023, mariakhawam@arizona.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Patient Reported Outcomes Measures in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Resections

The standard of care for a patient with resectable pancreatic is to perform pancreatic resection which, even in the modern era is associated with significant complications and impact on quality of life, often in the setting of poor survival even in the best scenario. Currently, there is a lack of data on patient quality of life after such procedures, how quality of life changes throughout the course of care, and whether patients who undergo these procedures are satisfied with their decision. This research is aimed to understand the impact of pancreatic surgery on patients' quality of life, how that impact changes over time, and patient satisfaction (or regret) with their decisions. This work will help improve the pre-operative conversation to help patients decide whether undergoing a pancreatic resection aligns with their post-operative goals of care.

Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Cyst

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline in Quality of Life Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 Scale up to 24 Months Post-Operatively

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated 30-item questionnaire assessing cancer-specific quality of life. The Global Health Status/QoL scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better quality of life.

    Unit of Measure: points Metric: Mean change from baseline Aggregation Method: Mean (SD) across participants

    Measured: Baseline, Immediately Post-Op, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery

  2. Change from Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Pancreatic Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-PAN26) Subscale Scores up to 24 Months Post-Operatively

    The EORTC QLQ-PAN26 is a 26-item, disease-specific questionnaire designed for patients with pancreatic cancer. It is used alongside the core EORTC QLQ-C30. PAN26 assesses multiple domains, including pancreatic pain, digestive symptoms, altered bowel habits, hepatic symptoms, and emotional effects. Each subscale is linearly transformed to a score from 0 to 100.

    For symptom subscales, higher scores = worse symptoms. For functioning domains, higher scores = greater impairment.

    Unit of Measure: points (0-100) per subscale Metric: mean change from baseline Aggregation: mean (SD) across participants

    Measured: Baseline, Immediately Post-op, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change from Baseline in Social Functioning (PROMIS) up to 24 Months Post-Operatively

    PROMIS Social Isolation 8a Short Form T-score (higher = more isolation), change from baseline

    Measured: Baseline, Immediately Post-Op, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery

  2. Change from Baseline in Emotional Functioning (PROMIS) up to 24 Months Post-Operatively

    PROMIS Depression 4a Short Form T-score (mean 50, SD 10; higher = more depressive symptoms), change from baseline up to 24 months post-operatively

    Measured: Baseline, Immediately Post-Op, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery

  3. Change from Baseline in Shared Decision-Making up to 24 Months Post-Operatively

    Change from Baseline in Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) Score (0-100; higher = better) up to 24 months post-operatively

    Unit: points Metric: mean change from baseline Aggregation: mean (SD)

    Measured: Baseline, Immediately Post-Op, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery

  4. Change from Baseline in Grit Scale (Duckworth 12-item) Total Score up to 12 Months Post-Operatively

    The Grit Scale is a 12-item validated self-report questionnaire that measures perseverance of effort and consistency of interests. Each item is scored from 1 ("Not at all like me") to 5 ("Very much like me"). Total scores are averaged, yielding a range of 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater grit.

    Unit of Measure: points (1-5) Metric: mean change from baseline Aggregation: mean (SD) across participants

    Measured: Baseline, 6, and 12 months after surgery

  5. Change from Baseline in Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Score up to 24 Months Post-Operatively

    The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) is a validated 6-item self-report measure assessing an individual's ability to "bounce back" from stressful events. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree. After reverse-coding negatively worded items (Items 2, 4, 6), the mean of the six items is computed, yielding a score from 1.00 to 5.00: higher values reflect greater resilience.

    Unit of Measure: points (mean score) Metric: mean change from baseline Aggregation: mean (SD) across participants

    Measured: Baseline, Immediately Post-Op, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

  6. Change from Baseline in COST-FACIT (Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity) Score up to 24 Months Post-Operatively

    The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST-FACIT) is an 11-item validated questionnaire that assesses the financial distress related to medical treatment. Scores range from 0 to 44, with lower scores indicating greater financial toxicity and higher scores indicating better financial well-being.

    Unit of Measure: points (0-44) Metric: mean change from baseline Aggregation: mean (SD) across participants

    Measured: Baseline, Immediately Post-op, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery

  7. Change in Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form (FCRI-SF) Total Score up to 24 Months Post-Operatively

    The Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form (FCRI-SF) is a 9-item validated self-report measure assessing concerns about cancer recurrence. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, yielding a total score between 0 and 36. Higher scores indicate greater fear of recurrence.

    Unit of Measure: points (0-36) Metric: mean change from baseline Aggregation: mean (SD) across participants

    Measured: Immediately Post-op, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery

  8. Change in Patient Decision Regret Scale (Brehaut et al., 2003) Total Score up to 24 Months Post-Operatively

    The Decision Regret Scale (Brehaut et al., 2003) is a validated 5-item questionnaire that assesses regret after health care decisions. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale and transformed to a total score from 0 (no regret) to 100 (high regret), with higher scores reflecting greater regret.

    Units: Points (0-100) Metric: mean change from immediately post-op Aggregation: Mean (SD)

    Measured: Immediately Post-Op, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery

  9. Change in Surgeon Decision Regret Scale (Brehaut et al., 2003) Total Score up to 12 Months Post-Operatively

    The Decision Regret Scale (Brehaut et al., 2003) is a validated 5-item questionnaire that assesses regret after health care decisions. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale and transformed to a total score from 0 (no regret) to 100 (high regret), with higher scores reflecting greater regret.

    Units: Points (0-100) Metric: mean change from immediately post-op Aggregation: Mean (SD)

    Measured: Immediately Post-Op, 3, and 12 months after surgery

  10. Change from Baseline in Neuropathy Symptom Scores Using NCI PRO-CTCAE® Custom Item Subset up to 24 Months Post-Operatively

    Neuropathy symptoms will be assessed using a custom subset of items from the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE®) v1.0 Item Library. Items address neuropathy-related domains such as numbness, tingling, pain, and interference with daily activities. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = None, 4 = Very severe / Almost always / Very much). Scores can be analyzed individually or averaged per domain. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity, frequency, or interference.

    Unit of Measure: points (0-4 per item) Metric: mean change from baseline Aggregation: mean (SD) across participants; frequency distribution of severity levels

    Measured: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2025
  2. Study start3 Apr 2023
  3. Primary completionDec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
250 participants (estimated)
Target duration
2 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07173257
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00002020
Acronym
PERSPECTIVE
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
27 Mar 2025
Last updated
15 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pancreas Neoplasms and Pancreatitis, run by University of Arizona at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline in Quality of Life Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 Scale up to 24 Months Post-Operatively (time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post-Op, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in