Breast CancerPhase 3ADAPT-TN-IVNCT07178730
NeoAdjuvant Therapy Comparing Sacituzumab Govitecan+Pembrolizumab vs. SoC Chemotherapy in Clinical Stage II-III, Triple-negative Early Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Sacituzumab govitecan, Pembrolizumab 25 mg/1 ML Intravenous Solution [KEYTRUDA] and SoC Chemotherapy in people with Breast Cancer and Triple-negative Breast Cancer, run by Women's Cancer Study Group GmbH at 26 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
TNBC is a heterogeneous disease with distinct pathological, genetic, and clinical features among subtypes. Treatment results for high-risk primary TNBC remain poor compared to other breast cancer subtypes. Preoperative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with stage II or III primary TNBC. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Triple-negative Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Sacituzumab govitecan, Pembrolizumab 25 mg/1 ML Intravenous Solution [KEYTRUDA] and SoC Chemotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 765 participants
- Where
- 26 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 30 Aug 2026to 31 Mar 2033
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Minimal eligibility criteria to be met for registration in the clinical trial:
- TNBC: ER = 0%, PR = 0%, and HER2- (i.e., immunohistochemistry [IHC] with DAKO score ≤ 1 or fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]-negative)
- or TNBC-like: ER ≤ 10% positive cells in IHC, PR < 10% positive cells in IHC, and HER2- (i.e., IHC with DAKO score ≤ 1 or FISH negative)
- All patients, independent from gender
- ≥18 years at diagnosis
- Histologically confirmed unilateral, primary invasive carcinoma of the breast Note: bilateral, multicentric, or multifocal carcinoma may be included, if there is a clear target (primary) lesion, that is subject to treatment decisions and solely evaluated and documented for study purposes. Histological confirmation of all lesions as TNBC is mandatory.
Show all 35Show fewer
- Clinical stage II-III at baseline
- No clinical evidence for distant metastasis (M0)
- Cognitive and language skills to complete quality of life (QoL) questionnaires
- Additional eligibility criteria to be met for assignment to cohort I or II:
- Completed 9-12 weeks of NACT with CARBO + PEM or PAC q1w + PEM q3w with the last dose of NACT given less than 2 weeks ago. Patients may also be considered if their NACT treatment was switched to nab-PAC due to intolerance to PAC.
- Patients with progressive disease during taxane-CARBO treatment are allowed to participate in cohort II after consultation with sponsor, provided that at least 6-9 weeks of NACT with taxane-CARBO q1w and PEM q3w have been administered
- Patients experiencing toxicities due to PEM, in case of contraindications or other medical reasons against PEM administration (with or without permanent discontinuation of PEM) can nevertheless be included, even if PEM will not be administered anymore. The number of patients starting the study without PEM is limited to 10%.
- Tumour block available for central pathology review
- Performance Status ECOG ≤ 1 or Karnofsky Index ≥ 80%
- Written informed consent prior to beginning specific protocol procedures, including expected cooperation of the patients for the treatment and follow-up, must be obtained and documented according to the local regulatory requirements
- The patient must be capable of giving informed consent and be willing and able to comply with the requirements and restrictions in this protocol and accessible for treatment and follow-up
- Laboratory requirements (female and male patients, ≤ 14 days old)
- Neutrophils > 1.5 109/L,
- Platelets > 100 109/L,
- Total bilirubin < 1 x upper level of normal (ULN),
- ASAT (sGOT) < 2.5 x ULN,
- ALAT (sGPT) < 2.5 x ULN,
- Creatinine ≤1.5 × ULN OR clearance ≥30 mL/min for participant with creatinine levels >1.5 × institutional ULN
- Clinical assessments:
- Normal Electrocardiogram (ECG) (within 42 days prior to induction treatment)
- Negative pregnancy test (urine or serum) within ≤ 14 days prior to registration in premenopausal patients and immediate implementation of adequate contraceptive measures.
- Note: Pregnancy testing is to be repeated according to Schedule of Activities.
- The following age-specific requirements apply:
- Women aged <50 years will be considered post-menopausal if they have been amenorrhoeic for 12 months or more following cessation of exogenous hormonal treatments and if they have luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels in the post-menopausal range for the site.
- Women aged ≥ 50 years will be considered post-menopausal if they have been amenorrhoeic for 12 months or more following cessation of all exogenous hormonal treatments.
- Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the contraception methods outlined for women of child-bearing potential and need to discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to randomization/study enrolment. For most forms of HRT, at least 2-4 weeks will elapse between the cessation of therapy and the blood draw; this interval depends on the type and dosage of HRT. Following confirmation of their post-menopausal status, they can participate without use of a contraceptive method.
- Female patients of childbearing potential who are sexually active with a non-sterilized male partner must use at least one highly effective method of contraception, presented in Table 1 (see Section 4.4.2), from the time of enrolment and must agree to continue using such precautions for 7 months after the last dose of IMP. Not all methods of contraception are highly effective. Female patients must refrain from breastfeeding while on study and for 7 months after the last dose of IMP. Complete heterosexual abstinence for the duration of the study and drug washout period is an acceptable contraceptive method if it is line with the patient's usual lifestyle (consideration must be made to the duration of the clinical trial); however, periodic, or occasional abstinence, the rhythm method, and the withdrawal method are not acceptable.
- Female patients must not donate, or retrieve for their own use, ova from the time of randomization and throughout the study treatment period, and for at least 7 months after the final study drug administration. They should refrain from breastfeeding throughout this time. Preservation of ova may be considered prior to enrolment in this study.
- A male participant must agree to use a contraception as detailed in Appendix C of this protocol during the treatment period and for at least 7 months after the last dose of study treatment and refrain from donating sperm during this period.
Who cannot join
- Known hypersensitivity to the compounds or incorporated substances of the IMPs
- Prior malignancy with a disease-free survival of < 5 years, except curatively treated basalioma of the skin or pTis of the cervix uteri
- Any history of invasive breast cancer
- Previous or concurrent treatment with cytotoxic agents for any non-oncological reason unless clarified with sponsor
- Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs
- Participation in another interventional clinical trial with or without any investigational, not marketed drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the respective drug, whichever is longer, prior to study entry. In case of other interventional trial contact Sponsor.
Show all 20Show fewer
- Concurrent pregnancy: patients of childbearing potential or potentially childbearing partners of male patients must implement a highly effective (less than 1% failure rate) non-hormonal contraceptive measures during the study treatment
- Breast feeding woman
- Reasons indicating risk of poor compliance
- Patients not able to consent
- Known polyneuropathy ≥ grade 2
- Severe and relevant co-morbidity that would interact with the application of cytotoxic agents or the participation in the study including recovery from major surgery, autoimmune disease, known psychiatric/substance abuse disorders, acute cystitis, ischuria, and chronic kidney disease
- Uncontrolled infection requiring i.v. antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals
- History of pneumonitis haemolytic anaemia, myocarditis, sclerosing cholangitis and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, medical history of allogenic stem cell transplants, or solid organ transplant
- Active primary immunodeficiency, known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Patients should be tested for HIV prior to randomization if required by local regulations or ethics committee. Patients who test positive for HIV-antibody are excluded.
- Active hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV). In patients with a history of HBV or HCV, patients with the following detectable viral loads will be excluded.
- Patients who test positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Patients who test positive for hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) will require HBV DNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for confirmation of active disease.
- Patients who test positive for HCV antibody will require HCV RNA by quantitative PCR for confirmation of active disease. Patients with a known history of HCV or a positive HCV antibody test will not require an HCV antibody test at enrolment and will only require HCV RNA by quantitative PCR for confirmation of active disease.
- Patients who received live vaccines within 30 days prior to randomization.
- Patients who are submitted to an institution by virtue of an order of a court or a governmental authority must be excluded from participation.
Trial locations and contacts
26 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
26 sites in 1 country
Germany26 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Aachen AöR, Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52074
Elmar Stickeler, Prof. Dr.
Elmar Stickeler, Prof. Dr.
Universitaetsklinikum Augsburg, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtsmedizin
Augsburg, Bavaria, 86156
Gesundheitszentrum Wetterau gGmbH, Gynäkologische Ambulanz
Bad Nauheim, Hesse, 61231
Universitaetsklinikum Bonn AöR, Senologie
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53127
University Hospital Cologne AöR, Brustkrebszentrum
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937
Medical University Of Lausitz Carl Thiem, Frauenklinik
Cottbus, Brandenburg, 03048
Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Frauenklinik Dortmund
Dortmund, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44137
St.-Antonius-Hospital gGmbH, Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie
Eschweiler, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52249
Universitaetsklinikum Essen AöR Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45147
Onkodok GmbH Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis
Gütersloh, North Rhine-Westphalia, 33332
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie
Hamburg, 20246
Lisa Steinhilper, Dr. med.
Lisa Steinhilper, Dr. med.
St. Barbara-Klinik Hamm GmbH, Brustzentrum
Hamm, North Rhine-Westphalia, 59073
Wlodzimierz Badur, Dr. med.
Wlodzimierz Badur, Dr. med.
SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe
Heilbronn, Baden-Wurttemberg, 74078
Gemeinschaftspraxis Frauenärzte am Bahnhofsplatz
Hildesheim, Lower Saxony, 31134
Klinikum Kassel GmbH, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe
Kassel, Hesse, 34125
Brustzentrum Rhein-Ruhr Servicegesellschaft mbH
Mönchengladbach, North Rhine-Westphalia, 41061
Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen AöR, Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe
München, Bavaria, 80336
Rachel Würstlein, Prof. Dr.
Nadia Harbeck, Prof. Dr.
Klinikum der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen (TUM Klinikum), Brustzentrum
München, Bavaria, 81675
St. Franziskus-Hospital GmbH, MVZ MediaVita
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48145
Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053
Klinikum Obergoeltzsch Rodewisch Frauenklinik / Brustzentrum
Rodewisch, Saxony, 08228
MKS St. Paulus GmbH, Märkisches Brustzentrum
Schwerte, North Rhine-Westphalia, 58239
Praxisnetz Hämatologie / internistische Onkologie
Troisdorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53840
GRN Gesundheitszentren Rhein-Neckar gGmbH, Brustzentrum Weinheim
Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69469
Marien-Hospital Witten, Brustzentrum
Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, 58452
Haematologisch Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080
About this study
Official title: NeoAdjuvant Dynamic Marker - Adjusted Personalized Therapy Comparing Sacituzumab Govitecan+Pembrolizumab vs. SoC Chemotherapy in Clinical Stage II-III, Triple-negative Early Breast Cancer
TNBC is a heterogeneous disease with distinct pathological, genetic, and clinical features among subtypes. Treatment results for high-risk primary TNBC remain poor compared to other breast cancer subtypes. Preoperative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with stage II or III primary TNBC. Multiple lines of clinical evidence demonstrate that TNBC patients who achieve a pCR to NACT, (ypT0/is ypN0), have an excellent long-term prognosis. A meta-analysis of individual patient data confirmed a strong association of pCR after NACT with improved long-term event-free survival (EFS, hazard ratio [HR] 0.24) and overall survival (OS, HR 0.16) benefit. Taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant regimens generally result in pCR rates between 25-50% [REFs], whereas the addition of platinum increases pCR rates to approximately 50-55%.
The KEYNOTE-522 trial has demonstrated that the addition of the immune-checkpoint inhibitor PEM to anthracycline- (AC), taxane- and platinum-based NACT resulted in a significant increase in pCR rates to nearly 65%, associated with a significant reduction of recurrences (EFS, HR 0.65 at 5 years) and improvement of OS (HR 0.66). Based on these results, the KEYNOTE-522 regimen has been approved by the FDA and EMA and has become the standard of care for patients with stage II or III TNBC.
Read more
Despite this significant progress, two major questions remain unresolved which will be investigated in the ADAPT-TN-IV trial:
- Do all patients require the full 6 months of NACT as per KEYNOTE-522 or is there a subgroup of patients who are sufficiently treated with 12 weeks of NACT plus PEM?
- Can incorporation of ADCs into the KEYNOTE-522 regimen improve response and outcomes in patients without an optimal early response? The outcome of patients with residual disease after 24 weeks of NACT and PEM remains suboptimal and there is an urgent need for more effective strategies. ADCs such as SG have demonstrated superior efficacy compared to standard chemotherapy in metastatic TNBC, resulting in substantially higher response rates and improved progression-free (PFS) and OS. Combination studies of ADCs and immunotherapy in metastatic TNBC have demonstrated significant activity, suggesting possible synergistic activity It is therefore a logical next step to investigate, whether the incorporation of SG in the NACT regimen can improve pCR rates and EFS results in patients who have residual clinical disease after 12 weeks of NACT with CARBO/PAC + PEM.
Read the detailed description
The trial will have two cohorts.
COHORT I - SoC DE-ESCALATION Cohort I will include patients with clinical stage II TNBC who have achieved a cCR to 12 weeks of NACT with CARBO/ PAC, and PEM. The trial will evaluate whether these patients can be safely spared from further chemotherapy (CTx) and directly proceed to surgery.
If it is unclear whether patients have a cCR, a tumour biopsy (by ultrasound or mammography/MRI-guided) is required to confirm that there is no evidence of residual invasive disease.
After surgery, patients with a pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) will not receive further chemotherapy, but continue otherwise on SoC treatment.
Patients with residual disease should be considered for postoperative SoC treatment, which might include further CTx (e.g., AC or AC x4) plus PEM or OLA (in patients with gBRCA mutations).
COHORT II - ADC-INTENSIFICATION (STUDY TREATMENT) vs. SoC Cohort II will include all clinical stage III-patients and stage II patients without a cCR after 12 weeks of NACT with CARBO/ PAC and PEM.
If it is unclear whether patients have a cCR, a tumour biopsy (by ultrasound or mammography/MRI-guided) is required to confirm that there is no evidence of residual invasive disease.
These patients will be randomized 1:1 to further neoadjuvant treatment in either
- Arm 1: neoadjuvant SG+PEM, followed by surgery and pCR-dependent post-neoadjuvant SoC treatment or
- Arm 2: SoC CTx+SoC, followed by surgery and pCR-dependent post-neoadjuvant SoC treatment
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Triple-negative Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Sacituzumab govitecan, Pembrolizumab 25 mg/1 ML Intravenous Solution [KEYTRUDA], SoC Chemotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sacituzumab govitecanDrug
Also called Trodelvy
SG is administered at 10 mg/kg as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.
The dose of SG will be calculated based on actual weight at randomization (using weight obtained either at enrolment or on Cycle 1 Day 1) and remains constant throughout the study, unless there is a > 10% change in body weight from baseline. Modifications to the study drug doses administered should be made for a > 10% change in body weight from baseline and according to local and regional prescribing standards. Dose modifications for changes in body weight < 10% may be made according to local institutional guidelines.
SG is administered via i.v. infusion as described below with additional information available in the current version of the SmPC.
Pembrolizumab 25 mg/1 ML Intravenous Solution [KEYTRUDA]Drug
Also called Keytruda
Pembrolizumab 200 mg will be administered as a 30-minute i.v. infusion every 3 weeks.
SoC ChemotherapyDrug
Also called diverse
Standard of care chemotherapy as per common treatment guidelines and recommendations
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (non-randomized) | Other | Cohort I will include patients with clinical stage II disease at baseline who have a cCR after up to 12 weeks of NACT with CARBO/PAC and PEM.
After surgery, patients with a pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) will not receive further chemotherapy (CTx) but continue on SoC treatment according to current valid treatment guidelines for breast cancer at investigator´s discretion.
Patients with residual disease should be considered for postoperative SoC treatment, which may include further CTx (e.g., AC/EC x 4, q2w or q3w or Capecitabine) plus PEM or Olaparib (in patients with gBRCA mutations) according to current valid treatment guidelines for breast cancer and per investigator´s discretion. Receives: Drug: SoC Chemotherapy |
| Cohort II (randomized) - Sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab (SG+PEM) | Experimental | neoadjuvant SG+PEM (4 cycles), followed by surgery and pCR-dependent post-neoadjuvant SoC treatment according to current valid treatment guidelines for breast cancer and per investigator´s discretion. Receives: Drug: Sacituzumab govitecan; Drug: Pembrolizumab 25 mg/1 ML Intravenous Solution [KEYTRUDA] |
| Cohort II (randomized) - Standard-of-care chemotherapy + pembrolizumab (SoC CTx+PEM) | Active comparator | SoC, e.g., AC x 4 + PEM or EC x 4 + PEM, followed by surgery and pCR-dependent post-neoadjuvant SoC treatment, e.g., AC x 4 * PEM or EC x 4 + PEM, or Capecitabine + PEM or Olaparib (in patients with gBRCA mutations), according to current valid treatment guidelines for breast cancer and per investigator´s discretion. Receives: Drug: Pembrolizumab 25 mg/1 ML Intravenous Solution [KEYTRUDA]; Drug: SoC Chemotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cohort I: 3-year event-free survival (EFS)
EFS after 36 months defined as time from registration to any invasive breast cancer event, death, or secondary malignancy (same definition as iDFS) according to STEEP 2.0 criteria [103]
Measured: EFS 3 years
Cohort II: superiority of neoadjuvant treatment with SG+PEM vs. SoC with regards to event-free survival (EFS)
EFS after 36 months defined as time from registration to any invasive breast cancer event, death, or secondary malignancy or local progress precluding surgery in neoadjuvant treated patients
Measured: EFS 3 years
Cohort II: superiority of neoadjuvant treatment with SG+PEM vs. SoC with regards to pathological complete response (pCR) rates
pCR defined as no invasive disease in breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/is, ypN0) in patients of both arms
Measured: EFS 3 years
Secondary outcomes (11)
clinical response after 12 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NACT)
Clinical response measured by tumour size in mm by palpation, ultrasound, mammography, or MRI
Measured: 12 weeks NACT
distant disease-free survival (dDFS)
distant disease-free survival (dDFS)
Measured: 3 years
relapse-free survival (RFS)
relapse-free survival (RFS)
Measured: 3 years
locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS)
locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS)
Measured: 3 years
overall survival (OS)
OS defined as time from first diagnosis to death
Measured: 3 years
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) via questionnaires EORTC-QLQ-C30, version 3.0,
Change of Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)between baseline, after completion of SoC neoadjuvant treatment, and on following defined timepoints:
Measured: Cohort I: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, at cycle 3, at cycle 5, at end of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)via questionnaires EORTC QLQ-BR42
Change of Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)between baseline, after completion of SoC neoadjuvant treatment, and on following defined timepoints:
Measured: Cohort I: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, at cycle 3, at cycle 5, at end of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)via CANKADO active
Change of Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)between baseline, after completion of SoC neoadjuvant treatment, and on following defined timepoints:
Measured: Cohort I: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, at cycle 3, at cycle 5, at end of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)via questionnaires EORTC-QLQ-C30, version 3.0,
Change of Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)between baseline, after completion of SoC neoadjuvant treatment, and on following defined timepoints:
Measured: Cohort II: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at cycle 3 of prolonged neoadjuvant treatment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
HRQoL via questionnaires EORTC QLQ-BR42
Change of HRQoL between baseline, after completion of SoC neoadjuvant treatment, and on following defined timepoints:
Measured: Cohort II: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at cycle 3 of prolonged neoadjuvant treatment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
HRQoL via CANKADO active
Change of HRQoL between baseline, after completion of SoC neoadjuvant treatment, and on following defined timepoints:
Measured: Cohort II: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at cycle 3 of prolonged neoadjuvant treatment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Sep 2025
- Study start30 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Mar 2033 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2033 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a multicentre, interventional, prospective, two-cohort, two-arm, partially randomized, open-label, controlled neoadjuvant, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG+PEM vs. SoC in stage II-III early TNBC.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 765 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Women's Cancer Study Group GmbH
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Gilead Sciences
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Peter Schmid, PHD Dr, Principal investigator, Westdeutsche Studiengruppe GmbHNadia Harbeck, Prof Dr, Principal investigator, Breast Centre, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynaecology and CCC Munich LMU University Hospital Munich GermanyOleg Gluz, Prof Dr, Principal investigator, Breast Centre, Evang. Bethesda-Hospital Moenchengladbach GermanySherko Kuemmel, Prof Dr, Principal investigator, Breast Centre, Kliniken Essen Mitte Essen GermanyMonika Graeser, PD Dr, Principal investigator, Breast Centre, Marien-Hospital Witten Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07178730
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WSG-AM15 (ADAPT-TN-IV)
- Other IDs
- 2024-516734-35-00
- Acronym
- ADAPT-TN-IV
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- NeoAdjuvant Dynamic Marker - Adjusted Personalized Therapy Comparing Sacituzumab Govitecan+Pembrolizumab vs. SoC Chemotherapy in Clinical Stage II-III, Triple-negative Early Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07178730
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ADAPT-TN-IV / WSG-AM15 (ADAPT-TN-IV)
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Triple-negative Breast Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 765 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Women's Cancer Study Group GmbHUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Gilead Sciences
- Study start
- 30 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2033 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2033 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
TNBC is a heterogeneous disease with distinct pathological, genetic, and clinical features among subtypes. Treatment results for high-risk primary TNBC remain poor compared to other breast cancer subtypes. Preoperative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with stage II or III primary TNBC. Multiple lines of clinical evidence demonstrate that TNBC patients who achieve a pCR to NACT, (ypT0/is ypN0), have an excellent long-term prognosis. A meta-analysis of individual patient data confirmed a strong association of pCR after NACT with improved long-term event-free survival (EFS, hazard ratio [HR] 0.24) and overall survival (OS, HR 0.16) benefit. Taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant regimens generally result in pCR rates between 25-50% [REFs], whereas the addition of platinum increases pCR rates to approximately 50-55%.
The KEYNOTE-522 trial has demonstrated that the addition of the immune-checkpoint inhibitor PEM to anthracycline- (AC), taxane- and platinum-based NACT resulted in a significant increase in pCR rates to nearly 65%, associated with a significant reduction of recurrences (EFS, HR 0.65 at 5 years) and improvement of OS (HR 0.66). Based on these results, the KEYNOTE-522 regimen has been approved by the FDA and EMA and has become the standard of care for patients with stage II or III TNBC.
Despite this significant progress, two major questions remain unresolved which will be investigated in the ADAPT-TN-IV trial:
- Do all patients require the full 6 months of NACT as per KEYNOTE-522 or is there a subgroup of patients who are sufficiently treated with 12 weeks of NACT plus PEM?
- Can incorporation of ADCs into the KEYNOTE-522 regimen improve response and outcomes in patients without an optimal early response? The outcome of patients with residual disease after 24 weeks of NACT and PEM remains suboptimal and there is an urgent need for more effective strategies. ADCs such as SG have demonstrated superior efficacy compared to standard chemotherapy in metastatic TNBC, resulting in substantially higher response rates and improved progression-free (PFS) and OS. Combination studies of ADCs and immunotherapy in metastatic TNBC have demonstrated significant activity, suggesting possible synergistic activity It is therefore a logical next step to investigate, whether the incorporation of SG in the NACT regimen can improve pCR rates and EFS results in patients who have residual clinical disease after 12 weeks of NACT with CARBO/PAC + PEM.
Detailed description
The trial will have two cohorts.
COHORT I - SoC DE-ESCALATION Cohort I will include patients with clinical stage II TNBC who have achieved a cCR to 12 weeks of NACT with CARBO/ PAC, and PEM. The trial will evaluate whether these patients can be safely spared from further chemotherapy (CTx) and directly proceed to surgery.
If it is unclear whether patients have a cCR, a tumour biopsy (by ultrasound or mammography/MRI-guided) is required to confirm that there is no evidence of residual invasive disease.
After surgery, patients with a pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) will not receive further chemotherapy, but continue otherwise on SoC treatment.
Patients with residual disease should be considered for postoperative SoC treatment, which might include further CTx (e.g., AC or AC x4) plus PEM or OLA (in patients with gBRCA mutations).
COHORT II - ADC-INTENSIFICATION (STUDY TREATMENT) vs. SoC Cohort II will include all clinical stage III-patients and stage II patients without a cCR after 12 weeks of NACT with CARBO/ PAC and PEM.
If it is unclear whether patients have a cCR, a tumour biopsy (by ultrasound or mammography/MRI-guided) is required to confirm that there is no evidence of residual invasive disease.
These patients will be randomized 1:1 to further neoadjuvant treatment in either
- Arm 1: neoadjuvant SG+PEM, followed by surgery and pCR-dependent post-neoadjuvant SoC treatment or
- Arm 2: SoC CTx+SoC, followed by surgery and pCR-dependent post-neoadjuvant SoC treatment
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This is a multicentre, interventional, prospective, two-cohort, two-arm, partially randomized, open-label, controlled neoadjuvant, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG+PEM vs. SoC in stage II-III early TNBC.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (non-randomized) | Other | Drug: SoC ChemotherapyCohort I will include patients with clinical stage II disease at baseline who have a cCR after up to 12 weeks of NACT with CARBO/PAC and PEM. After surgery, patients with a pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) will not receive further chemotherapy (CTx) but continue on SoC treatment according to current valid treatment guidelines for breast cancer at investigator´s discretion. Patients with residual disease should be considered for postoperative SoC treatment, which may include further CTx (e.g., AC/EC x 4, q2w or q3w or Capecitabine) plus PEM or Olaparib (in patients with gBRCA mutations) according to current valid treatment guidelines for breast cancer and per investigator´s discretion. |
| Cohort II (randomized) - Sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab (SG+PEM) | Experimental | Drug: Sacituzumab govitecan, Drug: Pembrolizumab 25 mg/1 ML Intravenous Solution [KEYTRUDA]neoadjuvant SG+PEM (4 cycles), followed by surgery and pCR-dependent post-neoadjuvant SoC treatment according to current valid treatment guidelines for breast cancer and per investigator´s discretion. |
| Cohort II (randomized) - Standard-of-care chemotherapy + pembrolizumab (SoC CTx+PEM) | Active comparator | Drug: Pembrolizumab 25 mg/1 ML Intravenous Solution [KEYTRUDA], Drug: SoC ChemotherapySoC, e.g., AC x 4 + PEM or EC x 4 + PEM, followed by surgery and pCR-dependent post-neoadjuvant SoC treatment, e.g., AC x 4 * PEM or EC x 4 + PEM, or Capecitabine + PEM or Olaparib (in patients with gBRCA mutations), according to current valid treatment guidelines for breast cancer and per investigator´s discretion. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (35 listed)
- TNBC: ER = 0%, PR = 0%, and HER2- (i.e., immunohistochemistry [IHC] with DAKO score ≤ 1 or fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]-negative)
- or TNBC-like: ER ≤ 10% positive cells in IHC, PR < 10% positive cells in IHC, and HER2- (i.e., IHC with DAKO score ≤ 1 or FISH negative)
- All patients, independent from gender
- ≥18 years at diagnosis
- Histologically confirmed unilateral, primary invasive carcinoma of the breast Note: bilateral, multicentric, or multifocal carcinoma may be included, if there is a clear target (primary) lesion, that is subject to treatment decisions and solely evaluated and documented for study purposes. Histological confirmation of all lesions as TNBC is mandatory.
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Known hypersensitivity to the compounds or incorporated substances of the IMPs
- Prior malignancy with a disease-free survival of < 5 years, except curatively treated basalioma of the skin or pTis of the cervix uteri
- Any history of invasive breast cancer
- Previous or concurrent treatment with cytotoxic agents for any non-oncological reason unless clarified with sponsor
- Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sacituzumab govitecanAlso: TrodelvySG is administered at 10 mg/kg as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The dose of SG will be calculated based on actual weight at randomization (using weight obtained either at enrolment or on Cycle 1 Day 1) and remains constant throughout the study, unless there is a > 10% change in body weight from baseline. Modifications to the study drug doses administered should be made for a > 10% change in body weight from baseline and according to local and regional prescribing standards. Dose modifications for changes in body weight < 10% may be made according to local institutional guidelines. SG is administered via i.v. infusion as described below with additional information available in the current version of the SmPC. | Drug | Cohort II (randomized) - Sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab (SG+PEM) |
| Pembrolizumab 25 mg/1 ML Intravenous Solution [KEYTRUDA]Also: KeytrudaPembrolizumab 200 mg will be administered as a 30-minute i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. | Drug | Cohort II (randomized) - Sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab (SG+PEM), Cohort II (randomized) - Standard-of-care chemotherapy + pembrolizumab (SoC CTx+PEM) |
| SoC ChemotherapyAlso: diverseStandard of care chemotherapy as per common treatment guidelines and recommendations | Drug | Cohort I (non-randomized), Cohort II (randomized) - Standard-of-care chemotherapy + pembrolizumab (SoC CTx+PEM) |
Primary outcome
Cohort I: 3-year event-free survival (EFS)
Time frame: EFS 3 years
EFS after 36 months defined as time from registration to any invasive breast cancer event, death, or secondary malignancy (same definition as iDFS) according to STEEP 2.0 criteria [103]
Cohort II: superiority of neoadjuvant treatment with SG+PEM vs. SoC with regards to event-free survival (EFS)
Time frame: EFS 3 years
EFS after 36 months defined as time from registration to any invasive breast cancer event, death, or secondary malignancy or local progress precluding surgery in neoadjuvant treated patients
Cohort II: superiority of neoadjuvant treatment with SG+PEM vs. SoC with regards to pathological complete response (pCR) rates
Time frame: EFS 3 years
pCR defined as no invasive disease in breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/is, ypN0) in patients of both arms
11 secondary outcomes
clinical response after 12 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NACT)
Time frame: 12 weeks NACT
distant disease-free survival (dDFS)
Time frame: 3 years
relapse-free survival (RFS)
Time frame: 3 years
locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS)
Time frame: 3 years
overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 3 years
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) via questionnaires EORTC-QLQ-C30, version 3.0,
Time frame: Cohort I: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, at cycle 3, at cycle 5, at end of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)via questionnaires EORTC QLQ-BR42
Time frame: Cohort I: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, at cycle 3, at cycle 5, at end of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)via CANKADO active
Time frame: Cohort I: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, at cycle 3, at cycle 5, at end of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)via questionnaires EORTC-QLQ-C30, version 3.0,
Time frame: Cohort II: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at cycle 3 of prolonged neoadjuvant treatment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
HRQoL via questionnaires EORTC QLQ-BR42
Time frame: Cohort II: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at cycle 3 of prolonged neoadjuvant treatment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
HRQoL via CANKADO active
Time frame: Cohort II: end of the neoadjuvant treatment, at clinical response assessment, at cycle 3 of prolonged neoadjuvant treatment, at surgery, at start of post-neoadjuvant treatment, 3-monthly during follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Peter Schmid, PHD Dr principal investigator
Westdeutsche Studiengruppe GmbH
Nadia Harbeck, Prof Dr principal investigator
Breast Centre, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynaecology and CCC Munich LMU University Hospital Munich Germany
Oleg Gluz, Prof Dr principal investigator
Breast Centre, Evang. Bethesda-Hospital Moenchengladbach Germany
26 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Sacituzumab govitecan, Pembrolizumab 25 mg/1 ML Intravenous Solution [KEYTRUDA] and SoC Chemotherapy in people with Breast Cancer and Triple-negative Breast Cancer, run by Women's Cancer Study Group GmbH at 26 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 35 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 26 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Anja Braschoß (017682119153, regulatory@wsg-online.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cohort I: 3-year event-free survival (EFS) (time frame: EFS 3 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2026.