AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastric Cancer (GC)SAHNCT07180966

Development and Validation of the Surgical Assessment and Healthcare (SAH) Index for Gastric Cancer Treatment Evaluation

An observational study of Gastric Cancer (GC), run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study develops the Surgical Assessment and Healthcare (SAH) Index, a new tool to fairly evaluate gastric cancer surgery outcomes. Gastric cancer is a serious disease that often requires major surgery, but it can be difficult to compare how well different hospitals or surgeons perform because patients have… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Gastric Cancer (GC)
How many people
780 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
2 Jan 2019to 28 Jul 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for gastric adenocarcinoma in 2019. The cohort represents a real-world surgical population with complete clinical, pathological, and molecular characterization including TNM staging, Lauren classification, and biomarker status (HER2, MSI, MMR). Patients span all age groups, tumor stages, and surgical approaches, providing a representative sample for SAH Index development and validation. Long-term follow-up data available for survival and complication analysis. This describes your 780-patient cohort while staying under character limits and highlighting the comprehensive nature of your dataset.

Who may be able to join

  • Age: 18 years and older Diagnosis: Histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma Treatment: Underwent surgical resection in 2019 Data availability: Complete clinical, pathological, and molecular marker data Follow-up: Minimum 6 months post-operative follow-up data available

Who cannot join

  • Histology: Non-adenocarcinoma gastric tumors Surgery type: Emergency surgery or palliative procedures only Data quality: Missing essential clinical, pathological, or molecular data required for SAH Index development Follow-up: Lost to follow-up within 30 days post-surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025

Other trials in China

About this study

This study develops the Surgical Assessment and Healthcare (SAH) Index, a new tool to fairly evaluate gastric cancer surgery outcomes. Gastric cancer is a serious disease that often requires major surgery, but it can be difficult to compare how well different hospitals or surgeons perform because patients have different levels of risk before surgery.

The SAH Index will help solve this problem by creating a standardized way to account for patient risk factors when evaluating surgical results. The study analyzes data from 780 patients who had gastric cancer surgery in 2019, looking at factors like patient age, tumor characteristics, molecular markers, and surgical outcomes.

Read more

By combining clinical information (like patient health), pathological details (like tumor type), and molecular features (like genetic markers), the SAH Index will create risk categories that allow fair comparison of surgical outcomes. This tool could help hospitals improve their care, help patients and families understand their treatment options, and help doctors make better treatment decisions.

The study uses only existing medical records and does not involve any new treatments or procedures. The goal is to create a practical tool that can be used by hospitals and doctors to better evaluate and improve gastric cancer surgery outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Gastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with significant variation in surgical outcomes across healthcare institutions. Current outcome reporting lacks adequate risk adjustment, making it difficult to distinguish between differences in patient populations versus actual care quality. This limitation hampers quality improvement efforts and evidence-based decision making.

This retrospective cohort study addresses this gap by developing the Surgical Assessment and Healthcare (SAH) Index, a comprehensive risk-adjustment tool specifically designed for gastric cancer surgery evaluation. The study leverages a unique dataset combining clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of 780 consecutive gastric cancer patients who underwent surgical resection in 2019.

The SAH Index development follows established risk prediction modeling methodology. Univariate analysis will identify potential predictors across four domains: clinical factors (demographics, comorbidities, performance status), surgical factors (procedure type, surgeon experience), pathological factors (tumor stage, grade, Lauren classification), and molecular factors (HER2, microsatellite instability, mismatch repair status, PD-L1 expression). Multivariable Cox regression and logistic regression models will be constructed for survival and morbidity outcomes, respectively.

Model development includes variable selection using backward elimination, assessment of multicollinearity, and evaluation of interaction terms. Internal validation will employ bootstrap resampling techniques to assess model stability and prevent overfitting. The final SAH Index will stratify patients into distinct risk categories with corresponding risk-adjusted outcome predictions.

Performance metrics include discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test), and clinical utility assessment. The index will be validated against existing risk stratification tools and tested for its ability to detect outcome differences between healthcare providers after risk adjustment.

This study represents the first comprehensive attempt to create a gastric cancer-specific surgical risk index incorporating molecular biomarkers, addressing a critical need in surgical quality assessment and comparative effectiveness research.

Keywords
SAH Index; Risk adjustment; Gastric cancer surgery;, Prognostic model; Surgical outcomes;, Molecular biomarkers; HER2; Microsatellite instability; Mismatch repair;, Risk stratification; Quality assessment; Postoperative complications; Overall survival;, TNM staging; Lauren classification; Cox regression; Predictive modeling; Healthcare quality; Surgical evaluation; Risk prediction
Medical subject headings
Stomach Neoplasms, Microsatellite Instability, Postoperative Complications

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Development of SAH Index for Risk-Adjusted Gastric Cancer Surgical Evaluation

    Development and internal validation of the Surgical Assessment and Healthcare (SAH) Index incorporating clinical, pathological, and molecular factors to predict surgical outcomes in gastric cancer patients. Performance assessed by discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test), and risk stratification accuracy.

    Measured: 5 years post-surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Sep 2025
  2. Study start2 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion28 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion28 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
780 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07180966
Sponsor's protocol ID
SAH-INDEX
Other IDs
2025-594
Acronym
SAH
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
12 Sep 2025
Last updated
26 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual patient data will not be shared to protect patient privacy and comply with institutional data governance policies. The study involves retrospective analysis of clinical records containing sensitive medical information. De-identified aggregate results and statistical findings will be published to contribute to scientific knowledge while maintaining patient confidentiality.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gastric Cancer (GC), run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Development of SAH Index for Risk-Adjusted Gastric Cancer Surgical Evaluation (time frame: 5 years post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in