Chronic Plantar FasciitisNCT07182201
Effect of Foot Core Control Training on Dorsiflexion Function and Gait Biomechanical Characteristics of Patients With Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
A study testing CPF Conventional training in people with Chronic Plantar Fasciitis and Functional Hallux Limitus, run by Peking University Third Hospital.
Trial summary
The pain and abnormal gait postures observed in CPF patients may be associated with impaired foot function. However, few studies have examined the dorsiflexion function of the big toe in CPF patients, and the effectiveness of foot core control training in alleviating pain and improving gait remains unclear. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Plantar Fasciitis, Functional Hallux Limitus
- What is being tested?
- CPF Conventional training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 22 Sep 2025to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- (1) Ultrasound findings indicating plantar fascia thickness>4 mm or 20% thickening compared to the contralateral side; (2) Age 25-45 years; (3) Ankle dorsiflexion range <65° in weight-bearing standing position; (4) Persistent heel pain lasting ≥3 months but ≤1 year; (5) No prior treatment within 1 month prior to hospital admission; (6) Subjects without prior CPF surgical intervention.
Who cannot join
- (1) Concurrent presence of severe malignant diseases; (2) Abnormal conditions such as skin ulcers or infections on the sole; (3) Concurrent neurological or immunological disorders; (4) Concurrent heel deformity or fracture; (5) Secondary CPF caused by rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or other conditions; (6) Concurrent cognitive impairment, mental abnormalities, or difficulty completing relevant assessment scales.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
The pain and abnormal gait postures observed in CPF patients may be associated with impaired foot function. However, few studies have examined the dorsiflexion function of the big toe in CPF patients, and the effectiveness of foot core control training in alleviating pain and improving gait remains unclear. Restricted movement of the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ1) may severely compromise foot function, leading to gait pattern alterations and subsequent instability. To address this, our study aims to improve symptoms, functional outcomes, and gait through foot core control training interventions. We recorded kinematic parameters and biomechanical data during the foot's plantar phase at toe-off before and after functional training for CPF patients. Comparative analysis between intervention groups revealed whether foot core control training can effectively enhance big toe dorsiflexion function and gait biomechanics in CPF patients. This research clarifies the therapeutic efficacy of foot core control training for CPF patients.
- Being tested
- Foot core control training, CPF Conventional training
- Medical subject headings
- Fasciitis, Plantar
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Foot core control trainingBehavioural
(1) Toe Yoga : When MTPJ1 actively dorsiflexes, the other four toes remain in contact with the ground. The subject lifts the big toe while the remaining four toes stay on the ground; conversely, when the big toe contacts the ground, the other four toes lift upward, alternating this pattern. (2)Doming: While keeping MTPJ1 in contact with the ground, elevate the foot arch. This exercise strengthens intrinsic foot muscle strength, helping stabilize the arch and first metatarsal. The subject tightens the toes, bringing the forefoot toward the heel to form and enhance the arch. Maintain all toes firmly planted on the ground, ensuring no ankle inversion, no forced flexion or extension of toes, and hold at maximum position. Perform training seated to avoid compensatory movements by external muscles during exercise. (3) Toe Abduction Exercises(4)Dynamic Exercise Progression
CPF Conventional trainingBehavioural
The key points of the exercise are as follows: (1) Fascia ball release of plantar fascia (2) Plantar fascia stretching (3) Gastrocnemius muscle stretching (4) Toe grab towel
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Foot core control training combined + regular CPF training | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Foot core control training; Behavioral: CPF Conventional training |
| regular CPF training | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: CPF Conventional training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Vicon 3D gait test
subjects wore athletic shorts, fully exposing the waist and the area below the mid-thigh. After reflective markers were attached, subjects familiarized themselves with the movement collection requirements and procedures according to the testing protocol. They stood in the center of the testing room with their feet shoulder-width apart and upper limbs resting naturally at their sides, maintaining the subtalar joint in a neutral position. A static test was conducted to collect reference data for defining the coordinate systems of the bone segments. Subsequently, participants performed walking, jogging, side-cutting, jumping, and single-leg balance tasks at a self-selected comfortable pace. Sufficient rest was provided between trials to prevent fatigue. Five valid trials were collected for each movement, and the average of three trials was used for analysis.
Measured: 30 minutes
Evaluation of dorsiflexion function of big toe
Goniometric measurement: The subject removes footwear and stands weight-bearing on a yoga mat, actively dorsiflexing the big toe. The tester measures the dorsiflexion angle of the big toe using a goniometer. The goniometer's axis is aligned with the big toe's MTPJ1, with the fixed arm parallel to the first metatarsal and the movable arm parallel to the first proximal phalanx. The movable arm is adjusted according to the subject's dorsiflexion angle, with measurements recorded. Three trials are performed and averaged.
Vicon measurement: The subject's MTPJ1 angle during walking is recorded using Vicon technology.
Measured: 30 minutes
Secondary outcomes (2)
Visual analog scale (VAS)
Measured: 5minutes
ankle and hindfoot function scale (AOFAS)
Measured: 5 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2025
- Study start22 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Plantar FasciitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07182201
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M20250140
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Foot Core Control Training on Dorsiflexion Function and Gait Biomechanical Characteristics of Patients With Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07182201
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M20250140
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The pain and abnormal gait postures observed in CPF patients may be associated with impaired foot function. However, few studies have examined the dorsiflexion function of the big toe in CPF patients, and the effectiveness of foot core control training in alleviating pain and improving gait remains unclear. Restricted movement of the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ1) may severely compromise foot function, leading to gait pattern alterations and subsequent instability. To address this, our study aims to improve symptoms, functional outcomes, and gait through foot core control training interventions. We recorded kinematic parameters and biomechanical data during the foot's plantar phase at toe-off before and after functional training for CPF patients. Comparative analysis between intervention groups revealed whether foot core control training can effectively enhance big toe dorsiflexion function and gait biomechanics in CPF patients. This research clarifies the therapeutic efficacy of foot core control training for CPF patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Foot core control training combined + regular CPF training | Experimental | Behavioral: Foot core control training, Behavioral: CPF Conventional training |
| regular CPF training | Active comparator | Behavioral: CPF Conventional training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- (1) Ultrasound findings indicating plantar fascia thickness>4 mm or 20% thickening compared to the contralateral side; (2) Age 25-45 years; (3) Ankle dorsiflexion range <65° in weight-bearing standing position; (4) Persistent heel pain lasting ≥3 months but ≤1 year; (5) No prior treatment within 1 month prior to hospital admission; (6) Subjects without prior CPF surgical intervention.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- (1) Concurrent presence of severe malignant diseases; (2) Abnormal conditions such as skin ulcers or infections on the sole; (3) Concurrent neurological or immunological disorders; (4) Concurrent heel deformity or fracture; (5) Secondary CPF caused by rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or other conditions; (6) Concurrent cognitive impairment, mental abnormalities, or difficulty completing relevant assessment scales.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Foot core control training(1) Toe Yoga : When MTPJ1 actively dorsiflexes, the other four toes remain in contact with the ground. The subject lifts the big toe while the remaining four toes stay on the ground; conversely, when the big toe contacts the ground, the other four toes lift upward, alternating this pattern. (2)Doming: While keeping MTPJ1 in contact with the ground, elevate the foot arch. This exercise strengthens intrinsic foot muscle strength, helping stabilize the arch and first metatarsal. The subject tightens the toes, bringing the forefoot toward the heel to form and enhance the arch. Maintain all toes firmly planted on the ground, ensuring no ankle inversion, no forced flexion or extension of toes, and hold at maximum position. Perform training seated to avoid compensatory movements by external muscles during exercise. (3) Toe Abduction Exercises(4)Dynamic Exercise Progression | Behavioural | Foot core control training combined + regular CPF training |
| CPF Conventional trainingThe key points of the exercise are as follows: (1) Fascia ball release of plantar fascia (2) Plantar fascia stretching (3) Gastrocnemius muscle stretching (4) Toe grab towel | Behavioural | Foot core control training combined + regular CPF training, regular CPF training |
Primary outcome
Vicon 3D gait test
Time frame: 30 minutes
subjects wore athletic shorts, fully exposing the waist and the area below the mid-thigh. After reflective markers were attached, subjects familiarized themselves with the movement collection requirements and procedures according to the testing protocol. They stood in the center of the testing room with their feet shoulder-width apart and upper limbs resting naturally at their sides, maintaining the subtalar joint in a neutral position. A static test was conducted to collect reference data for defining the coordinate systems of the bone segments. Subsequently, participants performed walking, jogging, side-cutting, jumping, and single-leg balance tasks at a self-selected comfortable pace. Sufficient rest was provided between trials to prevent fatigue. Five valid trials were collected for each movement, and the average of three trials was used for analysis.
Evaluation of dorsiflexion function of big toe
Time frame: 30 minutes
Goniometric measurement: The subject removes footwear and stands weight-bearing on a yoga mat, actively dorsiflexing the big toe. The tester measures the dorsiflexion angle of the big toe using a goniometer. The goniometer's axis is aligned with the big toe's MTPJ1, with the fixed arm parallel to the first metatarsal and the movable arm parallel to the first proximal phalanx. The movable arm is adjusted according to the subject's dorsiflexion angle, with measurements recorded. Three trials are performed and averaged. Vicon measurement: The subject's MTPJ1 angle during walking is recorded using Vicon technology.
2 secondary outcomes
Visual analog scale (VAS)
Time frame: 5minutes
ankle and hindfoot function scale (AOFAS)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
Recruiting
F-18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT-Guided Pain Palliation in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Study of ¹⁷⁷Lutetium-Corticosteroid-Local Anaesthetic Injection vs Corticosteroid-Local Anaesthetic Injection
Plantar Fascitis, Chronic Heel Pain
Not yet recruiting
Radial vs Focused Shockwave Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis
Plantar Fasciitis, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
Tibial Nerve Size and Clinical Features in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
Plantar Fasciitis, Chronic, Tibial Nerve
Recruiting
Acupuncture of Different Treatment Frequency in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
Plantar Fasciitis, Chronic
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Serum CTGF in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
Plantar Fasciitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CPF Conventional training in people with Chronic Plantar Fasciitis and Functional Hallux Limitus, run by Peking University Third Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hongshi Huang (15522336527, cg15522336527@qq.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Vicon 3D gait test (time frame: 30 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2025.