Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousPhase 4ALPRONCT07183462
Azithromycin and Ampicillin for Late PPROM
A Phase 4 study testing Intravenous Ampicillin followed by Oral Amoxicillin and Ampicillin/Amoxicillin plus single-dose PO Azithromycin in people with Pregnancy Complications, Infectious and Premature Birth, run by Sheba Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether adding azithromycin to the standard antibiotic treatment (ampicillin) improves newborn outcomes in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks of pregnancy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Premature Birth, Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
- What is being tested?
- Intravenous Ampicillin followed by Oral Amoxicillin and Ampicillin/Amoxicillin plus single-dose PO Azithromycin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 311 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- 10 Sep 2025to 31 Jul 2029
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Maternal age 18-50
- Premature rupture of membranes
- Gestational age 34.0 and 36.4 weeks
- Singleton pregnancy
Who cannot join
- Multiple gestations
- Individuals in active labor (defined as 3 cm dilatation and 80% effacement or more. or regular uterine construction of more than 4 in 10 minutes)
- Meconium stain amniotic fluid
- Non-reassuring fetal heart rate or status
- Maternal or fetal indication for labor:
- Suspected Chorioamnionitis
Show all 12Show fewer
- Suspected placental abruption
- Any maternal morbidity requiring labor
- Cervical cerclage in place.
- Major fetal malformation or known chromosomal abnormalities.
- Stillbirth.
- Sensitivity to Macrolides Antibiotics
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Sheba medical center
Ramat Gan, Israel
noa gonen, 972543955584, gonen.noa7@gmail.com
About this study
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether adding azithromycin to the standard antibiotic treatment (ampicillin) improves newborn outcomes in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks of pregnancy.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Read more
Does the combination of ampicillin and azithromycin lower the risk of serious neonatal health problems compared to ampicillin alone?
Researchers will compare two antibiotic regimens:
Ampicillin alone, which is the current standard care Ampicillin with azithromycin, a broader regimen that may better prevent infections and prolong pregnancy
Participants will:
Receive one of the two antibiotic treatments during hospitalization. Be monitored until delivery for signs of infection and labor
All participants will stay in the hospital until delivery. The study also looks at how the antibiotic choice may affect the time between membrane rupture and delivery, maternal infections, and the need for neonatal intensive care.
Read the detailed description
Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurs in 1-3% of all pregnancies and accounts for approximately 30% of all preterm births. It is associated with significant maternal, fetal, and neonatal risks, including infections, respiratory complications, and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. The management of PPROM before 34 weeks is well established and includes corticosteroids and antibiotic therapy to prolong latency and reduce infectious complications. However, optimal management of PPROM in the late preterm period (34.0 to 36.6 weeks) remains under debate.
Historically, immediate delivery was recommended after PPROM at 34 weeks or later. More recent evidence, however, suggests that expectant management may reduce neonatal respiratory morbidity, mechanical ventilation, and NICU stays, even in the late preterm period. As a result, expectant management has become more accepted. In this setting, prophylactic antibiotics are commonly used to reduce maternal and neonatal infections. While ampicillin is the standard agent used for GBS prophylaxis, it is unclear whether broader antibiotic coverage might lead to better neonatal outcomes by delaying delivery or preventing ascending infections.
In early preterm PPROM (<32 weeks), a combination of ampicillin and erythromycin (or azithromycin) has demonstrated improved outcomes in large trials. However, few studies have addressed the benefits of such regimens in late PPROM, and no randomized controlled trials to date have compared different antibiotic regimens in this specific population.
This multicenter randomized controlled trial will compare two antibiotic regimens in women with PPROM between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks of gestation:
Control group (standard care): Intravenous ampicillin 2 g every 6 hours for 48 hours, followed by oral amoxicillin 500 mg every 8 hours for 5 days.
Intervention group: Same regimen as the control group, with the addition of a single dose of PO azithromycin 1 g administered at the start of treatment.
The primary outcome is a composite of neonatal adverse outcomes, including:
Use of respiratory support (CPAP, HFNC, mechanical ventilation, ECMO) Neonatal sepsis (confirmed by positive blood culture) Hypoglycemia requiring treatment Hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy Stillbirth or neonatal death within 72 hours
Secondary neonatal outcomes include:
Components of the primary outcome analyzed individually RDS, need for resuscitation, surfactant use, TTN, IVH, NEC, NICU stay duration, pneumothorax, asphyxia, convulsions, placental pathology, and others Maternal outcomes include Latency from randomization to delivery Chorioamnionitis, fever, bacteremia, placental abruption, cesarean delivery Composite maternal morbidity Postpartum infections, need for ICU admission, wound complications Length of postpartum hospital stay and breastfeeding initiation
Participants will be hospitalized from diagnosis until delivery. Management will include:
Regular maternal vital signs and infection monitoring Twice-daily fetal heart rate monitoring Corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation (in selected patients) Ultrasound to assess fetal well-being No tocolysis will be administered Labor will be induced at 37 weeks or earlier if indicated
Inclusion criteria:
Women aged 18-50 years with singleton pregnancy PPROM diagnosed between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks No active labor or signs of infection at presentation
Exclusion criteria:
Multiple gestation, chorioamnionitis, abnormal fetal heart rate, cerclage, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, fetal malformations, or GBS macrolide allergy Diagnosis of PPROM will be based on history and physical exam, including pooling seen on sterile speculum exam. When necessary, AmniSure testing will confirm membrane rupture.
Eligible women will be approached within 24 hours of admission. After obtaining informed consent, participants will be randomized (1:1) and stratified by center and gestational age (<35 weeks or ≥35 weeks). Women will remain inpatients until delivery, and labor will be induced no later than 37.0 weeks, unless earlier delivery is indicated.
Placental pathology and culture will be performed in all participants after delivery.
The sample size is based on an expected 50% rate of the composite neonatal outcome in the control group. A total of 296 women will provide 80% power to detect a 33% relative reduction in the primary outcome (from 50% to 33.5%) with a 5% alpha level. Including a 5% loss to follow-up, 311 women will be enrolled.
Data will be collected using REDCap, and participant confidentiality will be maintained through study ID numbers. Results may be used in future research but will remain de-identified.
Ethics approval will be obtained at each participating site. All participants will provide written informed consent, and the study will be conducted under standard GCP (Good Clinical Practice) guidelines.
This trial aims to provide the first direct comparison of two antibiotic regimens in the setting of late preterm PPROM, potentially impacting future recommendations on latency antibiotic therapy and neonatal outcomes.
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Premature Birth, Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Latency Period, Prematurity
- Being tested
- Intravenous Ampicillin followed by Oral Amoxicillin, Ampicillin/Amoxicillin plus single-dose PO Azithromycin
- Medical subject headings
- Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Premature Birth, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intravenous Ampicillin followed by Oral AmoxicillinDrug
This intervention consists of intravenous Ampicillin 2 grams every 6 hours for 48 hours, followed by oral Amoxicillin 500 mg every 8 hours for 5 days
Ampicillin/Amoxicillin plus single-dose PO AzithromycinDrug
This intervention includes intravenous Ampicillin 2 grams every 6 hours for 48 hours, followed by oral Amoxicillin 500 mg every 8 hours for 5 days, plus a single dose of oral Azithromycin 1 gram administered once at the start of treatment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard antibiotic regimen (Ampicillin and Amoxicillin) | Active comparator | Participants in the control arm receive the standard antibiotic regimen for late PPROM, consisting of intravenous Ampicillin 2g every 6 hours for 48 hours, followed by oral Amoxicillin 500mg every 8 hours for 5 days, administered according to current clinical guidelines Receives: Drug: Ampicillin/Amoxicillin plus single-dose PO Azithromycin |
| Intervention Arm - Standard Antibiotics with Azithromycin | Experimental | Participants in this arm will receive the standard antibiotic regimen of intravenous Ampicillin followed by oral Amoxicillin, plus a single dose of 1 gram oral Azithromycin Receives: Drug: Intravenous Ampicillin followed by Oral Amoxicillin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
A composite of neonatal adverse outcomes
A composite of neonatal adverse outcomes defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following events within 72 hours after birth:
use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or high-flow nasal cannula, supplemental oxygen with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥0.30 for ≥4 continuous hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), mechanical ventilation, neonatal sepsis (defined as positive blood culture), hypoglycemia requiring treatment, hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy, stillbirth, or neonatal death within 72 hours after delivery
The composite will be reported as the number of infants who experience at least one of the listed adverse outcomes.
Unit of Measure: Number of infants with ≥1 adverse outcome
Measured: From the time of birth until 72 hours postpartum
Secondary outcomes (34)
Number of Infants With Severe Respiratory Morbidity
Includes infants requiring CPAP or high-flow nasal cannula for ≥12 hours or mechanical ventilation, or neonatal death
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Infants Requiring Resuscitation at Birth
Any newborn requiring active resuscitation immediately after birth
Measured: At birth
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Based on clinical signs, FiO₂ >0.21, and characteristic chest X-ray findings
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants Receiving Surfactant Therapy
Administration of surfactant during hospitalization
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn
Tachypnea resolving within 72 hours after birth
Measured: Within first 72 hours after birth
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Clinical diagnosis of NEC during hospitalization
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Infants With Grade 3 or 4 Intraventricular Hemorrhage
Diagnosed by cranial ultrasound or imaging during hospitalization
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Infants With Feeding Intolerance
Clinical diagnosis of feeding intolerance during hospitalization
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Infants With NICU Stay Exceeding 3 Days
Length of NICU admission greater than three days
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Pneumothorax
Radiologically confirmed pneumothorax during hospitalization
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
Clinical diagnosis during hospitalization
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Birth Asphyxia
Clinical diagnosis of perinatal asphyxia during hospitalization
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Periventricular Leukomalacia
Diagnosed by imaging during hospitalization
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants With Neonatal Convulsions
Clinically diagnosed seizures during hospitalization
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Neonatal Deaths
Death of the newborn during hospitalization
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Distribution of Placental Histopathology Lesion Types
Classification of placental lesions according to standardized pathology criteria, including maternal vascular malperfusion lesions, fetal vascular malperfusion lesions, inflammatory lesions, and other abnormalities. Each placenta will be categorized based on pathology report
Measured: Within 6 weeks after delivery, upon receipt of pathology results
Number of Infants With Positive Placental Cultures
Number of infants whose placental tissue culture was positive for bacterial growth
Measured: Within 6 weeks after delivery, upon receipt of culture results
Distribution of Bacterial Species in Positive Placental Cultures
Identification and classification of bacterial species isolated from positive placental tissue cultures. Each positive culture will be categorized by bacterial genus and speciesWithin 4 weeks after delivery, upon receipt of culture results
Measured: Within 4 weeks after delivery, upon receipt of culture results
Latency From Randomization to Delivery
Number of days from randomization until delivery
Measured: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants Completing Full Course of Antenatal Corticosteroids
Completion of full corticosteroid course for fetal lung maturity
Measured: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants With Placental Abruption
Clinically diagnosed placental abruption
Measured: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants With Intrapartum Fever (≥ 38°C)
Maternal fever occurring during labor
Measured: During labor
Number of Participants Diagnosed With Clinical Chorioamnionitis
Diagnosis based on uterine tenderness and/or maternal fever related to suspected uterine infection
Measured: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants With Bacteremia (Positive Blood Culture)
Positive maternal blood cultures indicating bacteremia
Measured: From randomization until 72 hours postpartum
Number of Participants Undergoing Unplanned Cesarean Delivery
Cesarean delivery not planned before labor onset
Measured: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants With Postpartum Endometritis
Clinical diagnosis of postpartum endometritis
Measured: From delivery until 6 weeks post partum
Number of Participants With Postpartum Wound Infection or Dehiscence
Clinical diagnosis of wound infection or dehiscence after delivery
Measured: from birth and up to 6 weeks postpartum
Number of Participants With Composite Adverse Maternal Outcome
A composite of maternal adverse outcomes defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following events within 6 weeks postpartum: bacteremia, ICU admission, hysterectomy, or need for drainage or relaparotomy
Measured: From randomization until 6 weeks postpartum
Length of Postpartum Hospital Stay
Number of days hospitalized postpartum
Measured: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Participants Who Initiated Breastfeeding
Initiation of breastfeeding during hospital stay
Measured: From delivery through maternal hospital discharge or up to 28 days postpartum, whichever comes first
Number of Participants Requiring Hospital Readmission
Any hospital readmission within 6 weeks postpartum
Measured: Up to 6 weeks postpartum
Number of Participants With Antepartum Hemorrhage
Clinically diagnosed bleeding before delivery
Measured: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants With Uterine Rupture
Clinically diagnosed uterine rupture during labor or delivery
Measured: During labor or delivery
Number of Participants With Umbilical Cord Prolapse
Clinically diagnosed cord prolapse
Measured: From randomization until delivery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2025
- Study start10 Sep 2025
- Primary completion30 Jun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives the standard antibiotic regimen, while the other group receives the standard regimen plus a single dose of intravenous Azithromycin. Both groups are followed concurrently to compare outcomes.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 311 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Noa Gonen, MD, Study chair, Sheba Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07183462
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHEBA-05-1755-24-NG-CTIL
- Other IDs
- MOH_2025-04-30_014029
- Acronym
- ALPRO
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 18 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Azithromycin and Ampicillin for Late PPROM
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07183462
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALPRO / SHEBA-05-1755-24-NG-CTIL
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Premature Birth, Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Latency Period, Prematurity
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 311 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- 10 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether adding azithromycin to the standard antibiotic treatment (ampicillin) improves newborn outcomes in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks of pregnancy.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Does the combination of ampicillin and azithromycin lower the risk of serious neonatal health problems compared to ampicillin alone?
Researchers will compare two antibiotic regimens:
Ampicillin alone, which is the current standard care Ampicillin with azithromycin, a broader regimen that may better prevent infections and prolong pregnancy
Participants will:
Receive one of the two antibiotic treatments during hospitalization. Be monitored until delivery for signs of infection and labor
All participants will stay in the hospital until delivery. The study also looks at how the antibiotic choice may affect the time between membrane rupture and delivery, maternal infections, and the need for neonatal intensive care.
Detailed description
Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurs in 1-3% of all pregnancies and accounts for approximately 30% of all preterm births. It is associated with significant maternal, fetal, and neonatal risks, including infections, respiratory complications, and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. The management of PPROM before 34 weeks is well established and includes corticosteroids and antibiotic therapy to prolong latency and reduce infectious complications. However, optimal management of PPROM in the late preterm period (34.0 to 36.6 weeks) remains under debate.
Historically, immediate delivery was recommended after PPROM at 34 weeks or later. More recent evidence, however, suggests that expectant management may reduce neonatal respiratory morbidity, mechanical ventilation, and NICU stays, even in the late preterm period. As a result, expectant management has become more accepted. In this setting, prophylactic antibiotics are commonly used to reduce maternal and neonatal infections. While ampicillin is the standard agent used for GBS prophylaxis, it is unclear whether broader antibiotic coverage might lead to better neonatal outcomes by delaying delivery or preventing ascending infections.
In early preterm PPROM (<32 weeks), a combination of ampicillin and erythromycin (or azithromycin) has demonstrated improved outcomes in large trials. However, few studies have addressed the benefits of such regimens in late PPROM, and no randomized controlled trials to date have compared different antibiotic regimens in this specific population.
This multicenter randomized controlled trial will compare two antibiotic regimens in women with PPROM between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks of gestation:
Control group (standard care): Intravenous ampicillin 2 g every 6 hours for 48 hours, followed by oral amoxicillin 500 mg every 8 hours for 5 days.
Intervention group: Same regimen as the control group, with the addition of a single dose of PO azithromycin 1 g administered at the start of treatment.
The primary outcome is a composite of neonatal adverse outcomes, including:
Use of respiratory support (CPAP, HFNC, mechanical ventilation, ECMO) Neonatal sepsis (confirmed by positive blood culture) Hypoglycemia requiring treatment Hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy Stillbirth or neonatal death within 72 hours
Secondary neonatal outcomes include:
Components of the primary outcome analyzed individually RDS, need for resuscitation, surfactant use, TTN, IVH, NEC, NICU stay duration, pneumothorax, asphyxia, convulsions, placental pathology, and others Maternal outcomes include Latency from randomization to delivery Chorioamnionitis, fever, bacteremia, placental abruption, cesarean delivery Composite maternal morbidity Postpartum infections, need for ICU admission, wound complications Length of postpartum hospital stay and breastfeeding initiation
Participants will be hospitalized from diagnosis until delivery. Management will include:
Regular maternal vital signs and infection monitoring Twice-daily fetal heart rate monitoring Corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation (in selected patients) Ultrasound to assess fetal well-being No tocolysis will be administered Labor will be induced at 37 weeks or earlier if indicated
Inclusion criteria:
Women aged 18-50 years with singleton pregnancy PPROM diagnosed between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks No active labor or signs of infection at presentation
Exclusion criteria:
Multiple gestation, chorioamnionitis, abnormal fetal heart rate, cerclage, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, fetal malformations, or GBS macrolide allergy Diagnosis of PPROM will be based on history and physical exam, including pooling seen on sterile speculum exam. When necessary, AmniSure testing will confirm membrane rupture.
Eligible women will be approached within 24 hours of admission. After obtaining informed consent, participants will be randomized (1:1) and stratified by center and gestational age (<35 weeks or ≥35 weeks). Women will remain inpatients until delivery, and labor will be induced no later than 37.0 weeks, unless earlier delivery is indicated.
Placental pathology and culture will be performed in all participants after delivery.
The sample size is based on an expected 50% rate of the composite neonatal outcome in the control group. A total of 296 women will provide 80% power to detect a 33% relative reduction in the primary outcome (from 50% to 33.5%) with a 5% alpha level. Including a 5% loss to follow-up, 311 women will be enrolled.
Data will be collected using REDCap, and participant confidentiality will be maintained through study ID numbers. Results may be used in future research but will remain de-identified.
Ethics approval will be obtained at each participating site. All participants will provide written informed consent, and the study will be conducted under standard GCP (Good Clinical Practice) guidelines.
This trial aims to provide the first direct comparison of two antibiotic regimens in the setting of late preterm PPROM, potentially impacting future recommendations on latency antibiotic therapy and neonatal outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives the standard antibiotic regimen, while the other group receives the standard regimen plus a single dose of intravenous Azithromycin. Both groups are followed concurrently to compare outcomes.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard antibiotic regimen (Ampicillin and Amoxicillin) | Active comparator | Drug: Ampicillin/Amoxicillin plus single-dose PO AzithromycinParticipants in the control arm receive the standard antibiotic regimen for late PPROM, consisting of intravenous Ampicillin 2g every 6 hours for 48 hours, followed by oral Amoxicillin 500mg every 8 hours for 5 days, administered according to current clinical guidelines |
| Intervention Arm - Standard Antibiotics with Azithromycin | Experimental | Drug: Intravenous Ampicillin followed by Oral AmoxicillinParticipants in this arm will receive the standard antibiotic regimen of intravenous Ampicillin followed by oral Amoxicillin, plus a single dose of 1 gram oral Azithromycin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Maternal age 18-50
- Premature rupture of membranes
- Gestational age 34.0 and 36.4 weeks
- Singleton pregnancy
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Multiple gestations
- Individuals in active labor (defined as 3 cm dilatation and 80% effacement or more. or regular uterine construction of more than 4 in 10 minutes)
- Meconium stain amniotic fluid
- Non-reassuring fetal heart rate or status
- Maternal or fetal indication for labor:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous Ampicillin followed by Oral AmoxicillinThis intervention consists of intravenous Ampicillin 2 grams every 6 hours for 48 hours, followed by oral Amoxicillin 500 mg every 8 hours for 5 days | Drug | Intervention Arm - Standard Antibiotics with Azithromycin |
| Ampicillin/Amoxicillin plus single-dose PO AzithromycinThis intervention includes intravenous Ampicillin 2 grams every 6 hours for 48 hours, followed by oral Amoxicillin 500 mg every 8 hours for 5 days, plus a single dose of oral Azithromycin 1 gram administered once at the start of treatment | Drug | Standard antibiotic regimen (Ampicillin and Amoxicillin) |
Primary outcome
A composite of neonatal adverse outcomes
Time frame: From the time of birth until 72 hours postpartum
A composite of neonatal adverse outcomes defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following events within 72 hours after birth: use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or high-flow nasal cannula, supplemental oxygen with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥0.30 for ≥4 continuous hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), mechanical ventilation, neonatal sepsis (defined as positive blood culture), hypoglycemia requiring treatment, hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy, stillbirth, or neonatal death within 72 hours after delivery The composite will be reported as the number of infants who experience at least one of the listed adverse outcomes. Unit of Measure: Number of infants with ≥1 adverse outcome
34 secondary outcomes
Number of Infants With Severe Respiratory Morbidity
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Infants Requiring Resuscitation at Birth
Time frame: At birth
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants Receiving Surfactant Therapy
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn
Time frame: Within first 72 hours after birth
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Infants With Grade 3 or 4 Intraventricular Hemorrhage
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Infants With Feeding Intolerance
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first.
Number of Infants With NICU Stay Exceeding 3 Days
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Pneumothorax
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Birth Asphyxia
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants Diagnosed With Periventricular Leukomalacia
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Infants With Neonatal Convulsions
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Neonatal Deaths
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Distribution of Placental Histopathology Lesion Types
Time frame: Within 6 weeks after delivery, upon receipt of pathology results
Number of Infants With Positive Placental Cultures
Time frame: Within 6 weeks after delivery, upon receipt of culture results
Distribution of Bacterial Species in Positive Placental Cultures
Time frame: Within 4 weeks after delivery, upon receipt of culture results
Latency From Randomization to Delivery
Time frame: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants Completing Full Course of Antenatal Corticosteroids
Time frame: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants With Placental Abruption
Time frame: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants With Intrapartum Fever (≥ 38°C)
Time frame: During labor
Number of Participants Diagnosed With Clinical Chorioamnionitis
Time frame: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants With Bacteremia (Positive Blood Culture)
Time frame: From randomization until 72 hours postpartum
Number of Participants Undergoing Unplanned Cesarean Delivery
Time frame: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants With Postpartum Endometritis
Time frame: From delivery until 6 weeks post partum
Number of Participants With Postpartum Wound Infection or Dehiscence
Time frame: from birth and up to 6 weeks postpartum
Number of Participants With Composite Adverse Maternal Outcome
Time frame: From randomization until 6 weeks postpartum
Length of Postpartum Hospital Stay
Time frame: From delivery through neonatal hospitalization or up to 28 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Participants Who Initiated Breastfeeding
Time frame: From delivery through maternal hospital discharge or up to 28 days postpartum, whichever comes first
Number of Participants Requiring Hospital Readmission
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks postpartum
Number of Participants With Antepartum Hemorrhage
Time frame: From randomization until delivery
Number of Participants With Uterine Rupture
Time frame: During labor or delivery
Number of Participants With Umbilical Cord Prolapse
Time frame: From randomization until delivery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Dec 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
Active, not recruiting
Self-collection for HPV Testing to Improve Cervical Cancer Prevention (SHIP) Trial (LMI-001-A-S03)
Cervical Carcinoma, Human Papillomavirus Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Omadacycline for Treatment Refractory Mycoplasma Genitalium Urethritis
Mycoplasma Genitalium Infection, Urethritis
Active, not recruiting
Self-collection for HPV Testing to Improve Cervical Cancer Prevention (SHIP) Trial (LMI-001-A-S02)
Cervical Carcinoma, Human Papillomavirus Infection
Not yet recruiting
C2001P-CS3: Testing the Feasibility of Different HPV Screening and Care Strategies for Women Living With HIV
Human Papillomavirus (HPV), HPV Associated Cancers
RecruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of Extended (High) Treatment Dose Antibiotics in Combination With Methenamine Hippurate Compared to the Standard of Care (Either Prophylactic (Low) Dose Antibiotic Treatment or Methenamine Hippurate) in Females With Chronic Urinary Tract Infection
Chronic Urinary Tract Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Noa Gonen, MD study chair
Sheba Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Intravenous Ampicillin followed by Oral Amoxicillin and Ampicillin/Amoxicillin plus single-dose PO Azithromycin in people with Pregnancy Complications, Infectious and Premature Birth, run by Sheba Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Noa Gonen, MD (972-54-3955584, gonen.noa7@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
A composite of neonatal adverse outcomes (time frame: From the time of birth until 72 hours postpartum). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.