Radiofrequency in Patients Post Covid 19 With Respiratory Sequelae.

The new post-pandemic era has left sequelae in patients who presented the signs and symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 and subsequently faced a positive for COVID-19. Such sequelae will be evident at various systemic levels of the affected patienta in the short, medium and long term future. One of these levels is respiratory complications and injuries that have been documented throughout all scientific research since the beginning of passive infections worldwide.

SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted by penetrating the respiratory route (mostly), by fluid contact, and to a lesser extent, through the ocular pathway. In the field of neurology system, different forms of RF, nerve infiltrations, lymph node injuries, plantar fasciitis, spinal (peripheral) nerve disorders, etc. have been documented.

If the investigators focus on one of the most prevalent symptoms (those that affect the respiratory system), the bibliography that endorses that the RFMCR could improve has been referenced.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combined manual therapy and 448 kHz radiofrequency treatment in the recovery of lung capacity in patients with post-COVID-19 sequelae. The work proposed here aims to demonstrate the advantages of establishing RF as an excellent treatment for post-COVID-19 sequelae, due to its ability to reinforce immune action, modulate the inflammatory response and activate cellular and tissue regeneration.

The specific objectives of this research work are:

1. To analyze the evolution of lung capacity using an espirometry in patients treated with the combined protocol.
2. To evaluate the improvement in dysnea and tough 3. To determine the impact of treatment on quality of life. 4. To examine the tolerance, safety and possible side effects of the combined treatment in post-COVID-19 patients. REGULATIONS
3. This clinical study will be carried out in accordance with the protocol, the principles established in the current revised version of the Declaration of Helsinki (Fortaleza, 2013) and in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements.
4. The researcher is aware, when signing the protocol, of the obligation to adhere to the instructions and procedures described in it, and will ensure that the established provisions are strictly adhered to.
5. The study will not begin until the approval of the Research Ethics Committee has been obtained.
6. The principal investigator is responsible for ensuring that this protocol, the informed consent document, and any other information that is presented or facilitated to the possible subjects is reviewed and approved by the CEI. The Researcher agrees to allow direct access to the REC to all relevant documents. INFORMED CONSENT.
7. In this case, patients must give their consent prior to being included in the study. The content and the procedure for obtaining it must be in accordance with all applicable legal requirements.
8. The investigator is responsible for obtaining the written informed consent of each patient participating in this study, after having explained in an understandable way, the nature, objectives, methods, expected benefits and possible risks of the study. The investigator must also explain to them that patients are completely free to refuse to participate in the study or to withdraw from it at any time, for whatever reason.
9. The study patients will give their consent, signing the corresponding model. For this purpose, each informed consent must be signed by both the investigator and the patient. CONFIDENTIALITY.
10. All information related to the study is considered confidential in compliance with the confidentiality and custody of the data collected, in accordance with the 3/2018 Law on the protection of personal data (LOPDGDD), (article 5). Article 5.1 .f) of the RGPD states that personal data will be treated in such a way as to guarantee confidentiality and integrity
11. In order to guarantee the confidentiality of the study data, only the main researcher and her team of collaborators will have access to it, the CEI and the pertinent health authorities.

FINANCING

1. The financing is assumed by the Gema León Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Clinic. There is no direct economic consideration for this, although there is a dedication of time and work by the team of physiotherapists (social security, payroll, personal income tax, etc.) that is not economically remunerated and is assumed or absorbed this way. In addition, the RFMCR technology (equipment and accessories) will be provided by the company INDIBA S.A., through a temporary assignment without any financial compensation either from the Gema León Physiotherapy Clinic, or from any patient. The treatment of these is completely free for them.
2. The patient must travel to the clinic facilities and it is the researcher who will be responsible for the treatment in it.
3. No difficulties are foreseen in its performance since it will be carried out using a schedule adapted to the patient that allows the study to be monitored.

It is intended to carry out a longitudinal study with the participation of 96 patients with lung capacity alterations, who confirmed a positive test for COVID-19. The sample size for our study is large enough to detect a clinically important difference in the primary outcome (s). For this, the investigators reviewed references at the bibliographic level, in which paired studies obtained a statistically significant value, being able to support our study.

If the sample size was insufficient but statistically significant, the investigators would resort to expanding the sample.

The participants were divided into three groups:

• Group 1 or Placebo: the radiofrequency is turn off during the treatment
• Group 2 or conventional: Respiratory manual tecniques are carried out during the treatments to improve lung capacity
• Group 3 or experimental: Radiofrequency 448kz and manual tecniques are applied. They will be evaluated at the beginning, a second evaluation after 3 weeks and a third final control after 12 sessions. A fourth evaluation will be carried out after the last and final evaluation, 6 weeks after finishing the treatment.

Each of the participants will be informed of the study, the objective, its possible benefits and the side effects that could arise. A) Therefore, each patient must give their free and confirmed consent through signature. Among the items in the methodology, the following stand out:

Primary outcome: Spirometry was performed at the beginning of the first, sixth, and twelfth sessions, and one and a half months after completing treatment. All spirometry tests were performed in the same manner: the patient was seated with their feet flat on the floor and a nose clip was placed on the patient and they were asked to take two normal breaths, and on the third, to take a maximum inhalation and a maximum exhalation. We obteined the following parameters: FVC (Forced Vital Capacity), FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second), FVC/FEV1 (Ratio of FVC to volume expired in 1 second), PEF (Peak Expiratory Flow), PEFT (Peak Expiratory Flow Time), FEF50% (Forced expiratory flow at 50% of expiration), FEF25% - FEF75% (Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of expiration), FEF50%/FIF50 (Ratio of forced expiratory flow at 50% of expiration to forced inspiratory flow at 50% of inspiration) and FEV1/FEV0.5 (Ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced expiratory volume in the first 0.5 s)

Secondary outcome: The Sadoul Dyspnea Scale is internationally validated to evaluate the feeling of the patient´sdyspnea and has a 6-grade classification: Grade 0 (No dyspnea), Grade 1 (Dyspnea after significant exertion or climbing two flights of stairs), Grade 2 (Dyspnea when climbing one flight of stairs or with brisk walking on a slight incline), Grade 3 (Dyspnea during brisk walking on level ground), Grade 4 (Dyspnea occurs with slow walking), Grade 5 (Dyspnea with minimal exertion)

Tertiary outcome: Chest measuremnets. All chest measurements, were taken at the first and last measurement sessions, following the same protocol. These measurements were taken with the subject standing in a neutral position and at three different levels, using the following reference points at each level: the axillary line, the tip of the xiphoid bone, and the level of the tenth rib. In addition, three measurements were taken at each level at maximum inspiration, maximum expiration, and neutral.

The therapeutic protocol will be executed in the facilities of the Gema León Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Clinic (Cordoba, Spain). Depending on the group of treatments the protocol will consist in:

• Group 1 or Placebo: the radiofrequency is turn off during the treatment
• Group 2 or conventional: Respiratory manual tecniques are carried out during the treatments to improve lung capacity,
• Group 3 or experimental: the same manual tecniques of the group 2 are applied while we use the radiofrequency. We divide the treatment in 3 phases:

PHASE 1: With the patient in the supine position, treatment was performed along the diaphragm for 10 minutes, of which 5 minutes were spent with the capacitive electrode and the other 5 minutes with the resistive electrode. The plate was placed on the back at the level of the diaphragm.

PHASE 2: The patient was placed in the lateral decubitus position on their right side and 3 minutes were spent with the capacitive electrode and 7 minutes with the resistive electrode. The patient was asked to breathe costal-diaphragmatically throughout the entire duration of the resistive electrode. The plate was placed on the right side, at lung level.

PHASE 3: The same procedure was performed as in the second phase, only this time on the contralateral side.

Such RF therapeutic protocol will be implemented by application with an INDIBA® Activ device, whose function is to reduce inflammation, stimulate immunity and promote tissue regeneration. This will consist of a 45-minute treatment. A total of 12 sessions will be scheduled (two per week), and all processes will be documented from the beginning of therapy (the resources used will be provided by INDIBA and the Gema León Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Clinic, whose supervision will be carried out by the direction of both).

Another variables which they are gonna be take into account are sex, age, weight, height, smoker, vaccination, number of days with symptoms and type of symptom.

The statistical analysis is based on variables of nominal type mostly, which are suitable for the Chi square test with a significance value of 95% for the results (p <0.05). However, if there are numerical data that must be compared between groups, the analysis will be used for ANOVA test with the same significance value for the comparison between results.