Frontal Fibrosing AlopeciaNCT07190534
The Effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine Versus Methotrexate in the Treatment of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia in Routine Clinical Care: a Patient Preference Trial (FFA Trial)
An observational study of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia and Cicatricial Alopecia, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a type of scarring hair loss that mostly affects women and causes permanent hair loss. Two medicines, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and methotrexate (MTX), are often used to treat FFA, but it is not yet clear which treatment works better. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia, Cicatricial Alopecia
- What is being tested?
- Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Methotrexate (MTX)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Nov 2025to May 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants will be recruited from dermatology outpatient clinics at Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam. The study population consists of adults who have been diagnosed with frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) during routine clinical care and are considering systemic treatment with hydroxychloroquine or methotrexate.
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years or older
- Diagnosis of frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA)
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
- Adequate understanding of the Dutch language
- No known contraindications or allergies to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or methotrexate (MTX)
Who cannot join
- Histopathological different diagnosis than FFA.
- Inability to adhere to the study protocol, including medication intake, clinic visits, and questionnaire completion.
- Patients who are ineligible for the HCQ arm (due to contraindications), are automatically included in the MTX arm.
- Contraindications HCQ: retinopathy and/or maculopathy/myasthenia gravis/body weight less than 35 kg
- Patients who are ineligible for the MTX arm (due to contraindications), are automatically included in the HCQ arm.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Netherlands1 site
Erasmus MC University Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015GD
Mathias Willaert, MD, +31 10 704 01 10, FFA@erasmusmc.nl
About this study
Official title: The Effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine Versus Methotrexate in the Treatment of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia in Routine Clinical Care: a Patient Preference Trial
Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a type of scarring hair loss that mostly affects women and causes permanent hair loss. Two medicines, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and methotrexate (MTX), are often used to treat FFA, but it is not yet clear which treatment works better. This study aims to compare the effects of HCQ and MTX in everyday clinical care.
Adults with FFA who choose to start either HCQ or MTX and will be followed for up to 48 weeks.
Read more
The main goal is to see how well each medicine helps reduce disease activity, measured by a tool called the Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) after 6 months. At each clinic visit, participants will also complete short questionnaires about symptoms, quality of life, and general well-being.
By collecting this information, the study hopes to provide better evidence about how well HCQ and MTX work for FFA, which may help guide future treatment recommendations.
Read the detailed description
Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a form of primary cicatricial alopecia characterized by progressive, irreversible hair loss. It typically affects postmenopausal women. The disease presents with frontotemporal hairline recession, eyebrow loss, and perifollicular inflammation. Although the exact cause remains unclear, an autoimmune-mediated destruction of follicular stem cells is suspected.
Treatment options are limited and largely empirical. Among systemic therapies, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and methotrexate (MTX) are the most commonly prescribed in clinical practice. Both drugs are used off-label, and there is no consensus on their effectiveness. Existing studies are mostly retrospective or small-scale. As a result, clinical decision-making is highly variable and evidence-based guidelines are lacking.
This multicenter, prospective patient preference trial has been designed to evaluate the effectiveness of HCQ compared with MTX in adults with FFA under routine clinical care conditions.
Study procedures:
Eligible patients (≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of FFA will be recruited at dermatology outpatient clinics.
Patients will select either HCQ (400 mg daily) or MTX (15 mg weekly, with folate supplementation), according to shared decision-making and standard prescribing protocols.
Follow-up will occur at regular intervals consistent with standard care: baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks.
The primary outcome is the change in Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) between baseline and 24 weeks. FFASS is a validated composite tool incorporating clinical signs, hairline recession, and patient symptoms.
Secondary outcomes include disease severity across all time points, patient-reported health-related quality of life (Skindex-29, CASIS), adverse events, discontinuation rates, and cost-effectiveness based on health economics instruments (EQ-5D-5L with bolt-ons, ICECAP-A, iMCQ, iPCQ). All FFASS assessments will be performed by two raters using standardized clinical photography and trichoscopy.
Sample size and feasibility:
As FFA is a rare disease, no formal power calculation was performed. Recruitment will continue for 12 months, aiming for a minimum of 25 patients per treatment arm (50 total). This sample size is consistent with exploratory studies in rare conditions and is expected to generate meaningful preliminary evidence.
Statistical analysis:
Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Primary endpoint comparisons (change in FFASS from baseline to week 24) will be performed using independent-samples tests or non-parametric equivalents, as appropriate. Longitudinal changes will be analyzed with linear mixed-effects models to account for repeated measures and potential confounding factors (e.g., age, sex, disease duration, baseline severity). Because treatment allocation is preference-based rather than randomized, baseline characteristics will be carefully compared and adjusted for in multivariate analyses. Propensity score methods may be applied to further control for allocation bias. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed with similar mixed models or descriptive statistics, depending on variable type.
Data management and quality assurance:
Data will be collected and stored in the validated Castor EDC platform, with patient information pseudonymized. Photos and clinical data will be retained securely for a minimum of 10 years, in line with Erasmus MC guidelines and FAIR data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). Privacy and confidentiality will be strictly maintained, and access will be restricted to authorized research team members.
Risks and burden:
Both HCQ and MTX are well-established systemic treatments in dermatology, prescribed within their standard safety monitoring frameworks. The study does not require additional clinic visits beyond routine care. The only extra element is the completion of short questionnaires, taking approximately 5-15 minutes at specified visits. Risks are therefore considered negligible.
This study addresses an urgent knowledge gap in FFA by providing prospective, systematically collected real-world data on the effectiveness and tolerability of HCQ and MTX. The results are expected to inform future treatment guidelines and improve evidence-based care for this rare and burdensome condition.
- Conditions
- Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia, Cicatricial Alopecia
- Being tested
- Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), Methotrexate (MTX)
- Keywords
- Frontal fibrosing alopecia, FFA, Cicatricial alopecia, Scarring alopecia, Hair disease, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate
- Medical subject headings
- Alopecia, Hair Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)Drug
Also called Plaquenil
400 mg orally once daily
Methotrexate (MTX)Drug
Also called MTX
15 mg weekly, orally or subcutaneously (+ concomitant medication: Folic acid 10 mg once weekly, taken 24 hours after MTX)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxychloroquine group | Intervention: hydroxychloroquine Receives: Drug: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) | |
| Methotrexate group | Intervention: methotrexate Receives: Drug: Methotrexate (MTX) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) change
The FFASS is a validated scoring system (range 0-25) that captures extent of hairline recession, eyebrow loss, clinical signs of inflammation, and patient symptoms. The primary endpoint is the mean change in FFASS from baseline to 24 weeks, comparing the hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate cohorts.
Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
FFASS change over time
Longitudinal change in disease severity as measured by FFASS across all follow-up visits.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Change in patient-reported HRQoL measured by Skindex-29 (dermatology-specific).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Change in patient-reported HRQoL measured by CASIS (hair disease-specific) questionnaire
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Adverse Events and Safety
Number, type, and severity of adverse events associated with hydroxychloroquine or methotrexate, as reported during routine care monitoring.
Measured: Baseline through Week 48
Cost-Effectiveness and Health Economic Outcomes
Assessment of productivity losses, health care utilization, and broader well-being using EQ-5D-5L
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Cost-Effectiveness and Health Economic Outcomes
Assessment of productivity losses, health care utilization, and broader well-being using iMCQ/iPCQ
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Cost-Effectiveness and Health Economic Outcomes
Assessment of productivity losses, health care utilization, and broader well-being using ICECAP-A
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Sep 2025
- Study startNov 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Frontal Fibrosing AlopeciaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Erasmus Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rick Waalboer-Spuij, MD, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07190534
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14475
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine Versus Methotrexate in the Treatment of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia in Routine Clinical Care: a Patient Preference Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07190534
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 14475
- Conditions
- Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia, Cicatricial Alopecia
- Keywords
- Frontal fibrosing alopecia, FFA, Cicatricial alopecia, Scarring alopecia, Hair disease, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a type of scarring hair loss that mostly affects women and causes permanent hair loss. Two medicines, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and methotrexate (MTX), are often used to treat FFA, but it is not yet clear which treatment works better. This study aims to compare the effects of HCQ and MTX in everyday clinical care.
Adults with FFA who choose to start either HCQ or MTX and will be followed for up to 48 weeks.
The main goal is to see how well each medicine helps reduce disease activity, measured by a tool called the Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) after 6 months. At each clinic visit, participants will also complete short questionnaires about symptoms, quality of life, and general well-being.
By collecting this information, the study hopes to provide better evidence about how well HCQ and MTX work for FFA, which may help guide future treatment recommendations.
Detailed description
Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a form of primary cicatricial alopecia characterized by progressive, irreversible hair loss. It typically affects postmenopausal women. The disease presents with frontotemporal hairline recession, eyebrow loss, and perifollicular inflammation. Although the exact cause remains unclear, an autoimmune-mediated destruction of follicular stem cells is suspected.
Treatment options are limited and largely empirical. Among systemic therapies, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and methotrexate (MTX) are the most commonly prescribed in clinical practice. Both drugs are used off-label, and there is no consensus on their effectiveness. Existing studies are mostly retrospective or small-scale. As a result, clinical decision-making is highly variable and evidence-based guidelines are lacking.
This multicenter, prospective patient preference trial has been designed to evaluate the effectiveness of HCQ compared with MTX in adults with FFA under routine clinical care conditions.
Study procedures:
Eligible patients (≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of FFA will be recruited at dermatology outpatient clinics.
Patients will select either HCQ (400 mg daily) or MTX (15 mg weekly, with folate supplementation), according to shared decision-making and standard prescribing protocols.
Follow-up will occur at regular intervals consistent with standard care: baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks.
The primary outcome is the change in Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) between baseline and 24 weeks. FFASS is a validated composite tool incorporating clinical signs, hairline recession, and patient symptoms.
Secondary outcomes include disease severity across all time points, patient-reported health-related quality of life (Skindex-29, CASIS), adverse events, discontinuation rates, and cost-effectiveness based on health economics instruments (EQ-5D-5L with bolt-ons, ICECAP-A, iMCQ, iPCQ). All FFASS assessments will be performed by two raters using standardized clinical photography and trichoscopy.
Sample size and feasibility:
As FFA is a rare disease, no formal power calculation was performed. Recruitment will continue for 12 months, aiming for a minimum of 25 patients per treatment arm (50 total). This sample size is consistent with exploratory studies in rare conditions and is expected to generate meaningful preliminary evidence.
Statistical analysis:
Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Primary endpoint comparisons (change in FFASS from baseline to week 24) will be performed using independent-samples tests or non-parametric equivalents, as appropriate. Longitudinal changes will be analyzed with linear mixed-effects models to account for repeated measures and potential confounding factors (e.g., age, sex, disease duration, baseline severity). Because treatment allocation is preference-based rather than randomized, baseline characteristics will be carefully compared and adjusted for in multivariate analyses. Propensity score methods may be applied to further control for allocation bias. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed with similar mixed models or descriptive statistics, depending on variable type.
Data management and quality assurance:
Data will be collected and stored in the validated Castor EDC platform, with patient information pseudonymized. Photos and clinical data will be retained securely for a minimum of 10 years, in line with Erasmus MC guidelines and FAIR data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). Privacy and confidentiality will be strictly maintained, and access will be restricted to authorized research team members.
Risks and burden:
Both HCQ and MTX are well-established systemic treatments in dermatology, prescribed within their standard safety monitoring frameworks. The study does not require additional clinic visits beyond routine care. The only extra element is the completion of short questionnaires, taking approximately 5-15 minutes at specified visits. Risks are therefore considered negligible.
This study addresses an urgent knowledge gap in FFA by providing prospective, systematically collected real-world data on the effectiveness and tolerability of HCQ and MTX. The results are expected to inform future treatment guidelines and improve evidence-based care for this rare and burdensome condition.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxychloroquine group | – | Drug: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)Intervention: hydroxychloroquine |
| Methotrexate group | – | Drug: Methotrexate (MTX)Intervention: methotrexate |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants will be recruited from dermatology outpatient clinics at Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam. The study population consists of adults who have been diagnosed with frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) during routine clinical care and are considering systemic treatment with hydroxychloroquine or methotrexate.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 18 years or older
- Diagnosis of frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA)
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
- Adequate understanding of the Dutch language
- No known contraindications or allergies to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or methotrexate (MTX)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Histopathological different diagnosis than FFA.
- Inability to adhere to the study protocol, including medication intake, clinic visits, and questionnaire completion.
- Patients who are ineligible for the HCQ arm (due to contraindications), are automatically included in the MTX arm.
- Contraindications HCQ: retinopathy and/or maculopathy/myasthenia gravis/body weight less than 35 kg
- Patients who are ineligible for the MTX arm (due to contraindications), are automatically included in the HCQ arm.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)Also: Plaquenil400 mg orally once daily | Drug | Hydroxychloroquine group |
| Methotrexate (MTX)Also: MTX15 mg weekly, orally or subcutaneously (+ concomitant medication: Folic acid 10 mg once weekly, taken 24 hours after MTX) | Drug | Methotrexate group |
Primary outcome
Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) change
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
The FFASS is a validated scoring system (range 0-25) that captures extent of hairline recession, eyebrow loss, clinical signs of inflammation, and patient symptoms. The primary endpoint is the mean change in FFASS from baseline to 24 weeks, comparing the hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate cohorts.
7 secondary outcomes
FFASS change over time
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Adverse Events and Safety
Time frame: Baseline through Week 48
Cost-Effectiveness and Health Economic Outcomes
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Cost-Effectiveness and Health Economic Outcomes
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Cost-Effectiveness and Health Economic Outcomes
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2025.
Related trials for Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Trial of Delgocitinib 20 mg/g Cream in Subjects With Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia (FFA)
Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia
Recruiting
Facial Papules in Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia (FFA)
Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia
RecruitingPhase 2
Deucravacitinib in the Treatment of Cicatricial Alopecias
Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia, Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia and Cicatricial Alopecia, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mathias Willaert, MD (+31 10 704 01 10, FFA@erasmusmc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) change (time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2025.