AzTrials
AzTrials

Aggression ChildhoodNCT07191782

Examining the Efficacy of the PRAISE With Coaching Program

A study testing Universal, classroom-based, Bullying and Aggression Prevention Program in people with Aggression Childhood and Bullying Victimization, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The PReventing Aggression In Schools Everyday (PRAISE) Program has evidence of impact when run by research staff. PRAISE was adapted using community-based participatory research to a coaching model whereby school-staff are trained to facilitate the program and receive ongoing coaching from research staff. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Universal, classroom-based, Bullying and Aggression Prevention Program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,008 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
26 Sep 2025to 30 Dec 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Student Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in one of the participating school sites
  • In a 3rd-5th grade classroom participating in the study

Staff Inclusion Criteria:

  • Employed by one of the participating school sites
  • Teach and/or provide services to students in 3rd-5th grade

Students Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not speak English
  • Special education students not integrated in a regular education classroom
  • Student not in Grades 3-5 at the participating school sites

Teacher Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not speak English
  • Do not teach/provide services with 3rd-5th grade students at the participating school sites

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Tracy E Waasdorp, PhD MSed contact

2676370861

waasdorpt@chop.edu

Brooke Paskewich, PsyD contact

2155903193

paskewich@chop.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146-2305

    267-426-9286

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Examining the Efficacy of the PRAISE With Coaching Program in Reducing Peer Aggression and Bullying

The PReventing Aggression In Schools Everyday (PRAISE) Program has evidence of impact when run by research staff. PRAISE was adapted using community-based participatory research to a coaching model whereby school-staff are trained to facilitate the program and receive ongoing coaching from research staff. The overall objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of the adapted PRAISE program when facilitated by in-school staff.

Read the detailed description

PRAISE is an aggression and bullying prevention program that includes curriculum to help 3rd through 5th graders learn skills to identify feelings, use calming-down strategies, interpret others' intentions accurately, and consider choices when responding to conflict. PRAISE also has lessons on increasing empathy and perspective-taking, and empowering students to be positive bystanders.

Using a randomized control trial of at least 8 elementary schools (3rd-5th grade) we will examine 2 aims:

Aim 1: Examine the efficacy of PRAISE at reducing students' peer aggression and bullying and improving social problem-solving skills, positive bystander behaviors, and self-efficacy for non-violence.

Aim 2. Examine the moderating role of implementation and student- and facilitator-related factors on the main outcomes of interest.

Being tested
Universal, classroom-based, Bullying and Aggression Prevention Program
Keywords
late elementary school, universal classroom-based, aggression prevention, bullying prevention, relational aggression, coaching
Medical subject headings
Social Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Universal, classroom-based, Bullying and Aggression Prevention ProgramBehavioural

    PRAISE is a universal, classroom-based aggression and bullying prevention program that addresses all forms (physical, verbal, relational, cyber), with a strong focus on the relational and reactive behaviors. All emotional and social skills taught focus on applying and practicing the skills within peer relationships. This program has gone through iterative development and adaptations using a community-based participatory approach whereby the elementary students and staff were active partners with researchers in refining the program. Specific attention was paid to ensuring that the program is feasible for schools to implement and sustain while also being relevant and relatable for students from a variety of backgrounds and school communities (e.g., under-resourced, higher levels of community violence). This updated PRAISE includes ~14 sessions (amounts can vary by grade) and training and coaching for school-based facilitators of the program.

Study groups in NCT07191782
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Comparison SchoolsNo interventionThese schools do not receive the PRAISE intervention. These schools can have their standard aggression and bullying practices such as community meeting, restorative circles, Second Step program, and the Olweus program. We will measure what classrooms in the comparison condition are doing, but we will not intervene.
Intervention SchoolsExperimentalThese schools will receive the PRAISE program which includes training and coaching from the research team.
Receives: Behavioral: Universal, classroom-based, Bullying and Aggression Prevention Program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Knowledge of Social Information Processing

    Student self-report of social information processing knowledge will be gathered using the Knowledge of Anger Problem Solving measure (9 items) where items are scored a 1 if correct and 0 if incorrect and summed (Range: 0-9), higher scores reflect better social information processing

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

  2. Hostile Attributions

    Student self-report of hostile attributions will be assessed using the Cartoon-Based Hostile Attributional Bias measure, with 2 relational vignettes and 2 physical vignettes, with one question asking whether a behavior was intentional or unintentional. Each vignette has a range of 0 (no bias) to 4 (strong bias). Scores on the 2 items per vignette type (relational, physical) are summed where higher scores reflect a worse outcome.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

  3. Reactive/proactive Aggression

    Measured via student self-report using items drawn from the Peer Conflict Scale -Youth Version measure, the proactive relational (6 items) and reactive relational (6 items) and overt (5 items). Items, with a range of 1-Not at all true to 4-Definitely true, will be averaged per scale. Higher scores indicate more proactive relational, reactive relational and reactive overt aggression.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

  4. Cyberbullying

    Student Self-report on items drawn from the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire will assess two scales: cyberbullying perpetration (7 items) and victimization (7 items) with answers ranging from 1-Never to 5-A few times a week. Items will be averaged such that higher score is more perpetration or victimization experiences.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

  5. Bystander Behaviors

    Self-report of positive bystander behaviors will be assessed using 5 items drawn from the Maryland Safe and Supportive Schools (MDS3) Climate Survey with answers ranging from 1-Never to 5-All the time. Items are averaged with higher scores indicating more use of positive bystander behaviors.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

  6. Relational and Overt Aggression

    Using teacher report on each child in their classroom, the Children's Social Behavior Questionnaire will assess a child's relational (7 items) and overt (4 items) aggression with a range of 1-Never true to 5-Almost always true. Items are averaged per scale with higher scores indicating more relational or overt aggression.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Empathy

    Student self-report of cognitive empathy using the perspective taking scale of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (6 items; Range: 1-Never to 5-All the Time). Items are averaged where higher scores indicated more empathy.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

  2. Peer Bullying-Victimization

    Student self-report of victimization by peers using the Social Experience Questionnaire (SEQ; 10 items, Range: 1-Never to 5-All the time). Items are averaged with higher scores indicated more peer bullying-victimization experiences.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

  3. Academic Engagement

    Teacher report on each child in their classroom will be used to assess academic engagement using the Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (8 items; Range: 1-Never to 5-Almost Always). Items are averaged with higher scores reflecting more engagement.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

  4. Self-efficacy for Non-Violence

    Student self-report of their use of non-aggressive or violent responses when in a conflict with a peer will be assessed using 9 items drawn from the measure developed for the Multisite Violence Prevention Project with a range of 1-Not at to 4-Very confident. Items are averaged with higher scores reflecting more conference in their ability to not use violent or aggressive responses.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

  5. Student-teacher Relationship

    Teacher report on each child in their classroom of their perceived relationships (closeness and conflict) using the Closeness (5 items) and Conflict (5 items) drawn from the Student Teacher Relationship Scales (STRS; Range: 1-Definitely doesn't apply to 5-Definitely applies). Items per scale are averaged such that higher scores indicated more closeness or conflict between teacher and student.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

  6. Class Climate

    Student self-report of their perception of the class academic and social climate using 6 items drawn from the Maryland Safe and Supportive Schools (MDS3) Climate Survey with a range from 1-Strongly Agree to 4-Strongly Disagree. Items are averaged such that higher scores indicate a more positive classroom climate.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

  7. Bullying Perpetration

    Bullying will be assessed using the Behavior Based Bullying measure (9 items; Range: 1- Never to 4- or more times per month), items are averaged where higher scores means more bullying perpetration.

    Measured: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2025
  2. Study start26 Sep 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,008 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07191782
Sponsor's protocol ID
24-022385
Other IDs
1R49CE003566-01-00, 1R49CE003566-01
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
17 Sep 2025
Last updated
22 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Universal, classroom-based, Bullying and Aggression Prevention Program in people with Aggression Childhood and Bullying Victimization, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Tracy E Waasdorp, PhD MSed (2676370861, waasdorpt@chop.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Knowledge of Social Information Processing (time frame: At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in