Obese PatientsFIDGETNCT07194317
A Feasibility Study to Determine the Most Appropriate Digital Dietary Assessment Tool in Patients With Obesity Initiating GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Treatment
A study testing Testing 3 different digital dietary assessment tools in a random order (Nutritics-Libro, MyFood24 and Intake24) in people with Obese Patients, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
New medications that work on gut hormones such as semaglutide (Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Mounjaro) are helping many people lose weight and are now recommended for treating obesity by the NHS. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Obese Patients
- What is being tested?
- Testing 3 different digital dietary assessment tools in a random order (Nutritics-Libro, MyFood24 and Intake24)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2025to 1 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged >18 years
- Living with obesity as diagnosed by healthcare professional.
- Referral to T3WMS at GSTT and currently on the service waiting list
- Eligible for GLP-1 receptor agonist (Wegovy) prescription
- Have an active MyChart account
- Have an email address
Show all 10Show fewer
- Access to a digital device such as a smart phone, computer or tablet where you can access the internet
- Not following a meal replacement diet, for example soups / shakes
- Able to provide informed consent.
- Able to complete surveys in English.
Who cannot join
- Adults aged >18 years
- Living with obesity as diagnosed by healthcare professional.
- Referral to T3WMS at GSTT and currently on the service waiting list
- Eligible for GLP-1 receptor agonist (Wegovy) prescription
- Have an active MyChart account
- Have an email address
Show all 14Show fewer
- Access to a digital device such as a smart phone, computer or tablet where you can access the internet
- Not following a meal replacement diet, for example soups / shakes
- Able to provide informed consent.
- Able to complete surveys in English.
- Not able to provide informed consent
- Not able to complete surveys in English
- Has an eating disorder
- Taking part in another research trial that involves dietary modification
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust
London, Southwark, SE1 9NH
About this study
New medications that work on gut hormones such as semaglutide (Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Mounjaro) are helping many people lose weight and are now recommended for treating obesity by the NHS. While these treatments are effective for weight loss, we don't yet know how they affect what people eat or their overall nutrition. Understanding diet before, during, and after treatment is important. Traditional ways of tracking diet, like paper food diaries, can be difficult to use and are time consuming for clinicians to interpret and record in clinical notes. Digital tools like MyFood24, Nutritics-Libro, and Intake24 may offer a better way to record what people eat, but we need to find out if they can be easily used in everyday healthcare settings. The FIDGET study will test how well these digital diet tools can be used in clinics and linked with electronic health records. The study will use surveys and group discussions to understand how patients and healthcare professionals feel about using these tools.
Read the detailed description
Gut hormone-based therapies including the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist semaglutide (Wegovy) and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/ GLP-1 receptor agonist Tirzepatide (Mounjaro) are increasingly effective in weight management, leading to their recommendations for obesity treatment in the UK's National Health Service (NHS). These medications support weight loss; however, their impact on dietary intake and nutritional status remains unexplored. Assessing diet is essential before, during and after treatment. Several digital dietary assessment tools address limitations of traditional paper-based methods; however, feasibility of integrating these digital tools into routine clinical workflows has not been assessed. The Feasibility of Digital Dietary Assessment (FIDGET) study will evaluate integration of digital dietary recording tools (MyFood24, Nutritics-Libro and Intake24) into routine clinical workflows and electronic health record, using a randomised crossover design with mixed-methods evaluation (quantitative cross-sectional surveys, qualitative focus groups).
- Conditions
- Obese Patients
- Being tested
- Testing 3 different digital dietary assessment tools in a random order (Nutritics-Libro, MyFood24 and Intake24)
- Keywords
- Digital health, Diet Assessment, Acceptability testing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Testing 3 different digital dietary assessment tools in a random order (Nutritics-Libro, MyFood24 and Intake24)Device
55 participants will be recruited (target to complete the study n=50). The acceptability trial will be conducted remotely. A baseline questionnaire will capture demographic data. Over three weeks participants will be asked to record three random consecutive days of dietary intake each week using a different tool. Participants will be randomised to the order they complete the tools. To minimise potential biases. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the six possible tool completion sequences (Table 1) using a relevant participant randomization package (e.g., rempsyc) in R (v4.4.2), which is a free, open-source statistical software used for data analysis and randomisation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility and acceptability | Other | Participants will record their dietary intake over three weeks, using a different tool for three consecutive days each week. The digital tools are: MyFood24, Nutritics-Libro and Intake24.The order sequence to complete will be from auto number generation. Receives: Device: Testing 3 different digital dietary assessment tools in a random order (Nutritics-Libro, MyFood24 and Intake24) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Usability
Participants will complete a questionnaire to assess their experience and acceptability of using the tool. The System Usability Scale (SUS) will be used to measure the usability of the digital dietary assessment tools. A higher score denotes the system is more user friendly.
Measured: Following each test period of 1 week
Usability and context of use
Participants will complete a questionnaire to assess their experience and acceptability of using the tool. The modified version of the Rawl Usability Questionnaire - this measures the usability of specific features of digital applications and context of use.
Measured: Following each test period of 1 week]
Secondary outcomes (1)
Patient experience and acceptability
This is a qualitative outcome. A purposive sub-sample of 10 participants from the testing phase will be invited participate in one of two online focus groups to discuss their experiences of the dietary assessment tools. The focus group questions were designed to assess two main domains (patient experience and acceptability).The Quadruple Aim framework and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) guided the development of the questions to capture participants' overall experience including tool usability, perceived usefulness and accuracy, impact on daily routine and satisfaction.
Measured: Within 4 months of completion of the tool testing
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Sep 2025
- Study start1 Sep 2025
- Primary completion13 Mar 2026
- Study completion1 Apr 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obese PatientsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Over three weeks participants will be asked to record three consecutive days of dietary intake each week using a different tool. Participants will be assigned to an order they complete the three tools from six different sequence options. The order will be assigned based on auto number generation.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King's College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07194317
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 347758
- Acronym
- FIDGET
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 29 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Christensen S, Robinson K, Thomas S, Williams DR. Dietary intake by patients taking GLP-1 and dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists: A narrative review and discussion of research needs. Obes Pillars. 2024 Jul 25;11:100121. doi: 10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100121. eCollection 2024 Sep.
PubMed 39175746Burrows TL, Rollo ME, Williams R, Wood LG, Garg ML, Jensen M, Collins CE. A Systematic Review of Technology-Based Dietary Intake Assessment Validation Studies That Include Carotenoid Biomarkers. Nutrients. 2017 Feb 14;9(2):140. doi: 10.3390/nu9020140.
PubMed 28216582Basso M, Zhang L, Savva GM, Cohen Kadosh K, Traka MH. Relative Validity of the Food Recording Smartphone App Libro in Young People Vulnerable to Eating Disorder: A Preliminary Cross-Over Study. Nutrients. 2025 May 27;17(11):1823. doi: 10.3390/nu17111823.
PubMed 40507092Astrup A. Reflections on the discovery GLP-1 as a satiety hormone: Implications for obesity therapy and future directions. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Jul;78(7):551-556. doi: 10.1038/s41430-024-01460-6. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
PubMed 38890501
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Feasibility Study to Determine the Most Appropriate Digital Dietary Assessment Tool in Patients With Obesity Initiating GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07194317
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FIDGET / 347758
- Conditions
- Obese Patients
- Keywords
- Digital health, Diet Assessment, Acceptability testing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- King's College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
New medications that work on gut hormones such as semaglutide (Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Mounjaro) are helping many people lose weight and are now recommended for treating obesity by the NHS. While these treatments are effective for weight loss, we don't yet know how they affect what people eat or their overall nutrition. Understanding diet before, during, and after treatment is important. Traditional ways of tracking diet, like paper food diaries, can be difficult to use and are time consuming for clinicians to interpret and record in clinical notes. Digital tools like MyFood24, Nutritics-Libro, and Intake24 may offer a better way to record what people eat, but we need to find out if they can be easily used in everyday healthcare settings. The FIDGET study will test how well these digital diet tools can be used in clinics and linked with electronic health records. The study will use surveys and group discussions to understand how patients and healthcare professionals feel about using these tools.
Detailed description
Gut hormone-based therapies including the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist semaglutide (Wegovy) and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/ GLP-1 receptor agonist Tirzepatide (Mounjaro) are increasingly effective in weight management, leading to their recommendations for obesity treatment in the UK's National Health Service (NHS). These medications support weight loss; however, their impact on dietary intake and nutritional status remains unexplored. Assessing diet is essential before, during and after treatment. Several digital dietary assessment tools address limitations of traditional paper-based methods; however, feasibility of integrating these digital tools into routine clinical workflows has not been assessed. The Feasibility of Digital Dietary Assessment (FIDGET) study will evaluate integration of digital dietary recording tools (MyFood24, Nutritics-Libro and Intake24) into routine clinical workflows and electronic health record, using a randomised crossover design with mixed-methods evaluation (quantitative cross-sectional surveys, qualitative focus groups).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Over three weeks participants will be asked to record three consecutive days of dietary intake each week using a different tool. Participants will be assigned to an order they complete the three tools from six different sequence options. The order will be assigned based on auto number generation.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility and acceptability | Other | Device: Testing 3 different digital dietary assessment tools in a random order (Nutritics-Libro, MyFood24 and Intake24)Participants will record their dietary intake over three weeks, using a different tool for three consecutive days each week. The digital tools are: MyFood24, Nutritics-Libro and Intake24.The order sequence to complete will be from auto number generation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Adults aged >18 years
- Living with obesity as diagnosed by healthcare professional.
- Referral to T3WMS at GSTT and currently on the service waiting list
- Eligible for GLP-1 receptor agonist (Wegovy) prescription
- Have an active MyChart account
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Adults aged >18 years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Testing 3 different digital dietary assessment tools in a random order (Nutritics-Libro, MyFood24 and Intake24)55 participants will be recruited (target to complete the study n=50). The acceptability trial will be conducted remotely. A baseline questionnaire will capture demographic data. Over three weeks participants will be asked to record three random consecutive days of dietary intake each week using a different tool. Participants will be randomised to the order they complete the tools. To minimise potential biases. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the six possible tool completion sequences (Table 1) using a relevant participant randomization package (e.g., rempsyc) in R (v4.4.2), which is a free, open-source statistical software used for data analysis and randomisation. | Device | Feasibility and acceptability |
Primary outcome
Usability
Time frame: Following each test period of 1 week
Participants will complete a questionnaire to assess their experience and acceptability of using the tool. The System Usability Scale (SUS) will be used to measure the usability of the digital dietary assessment tools. A higher score denotes the system is more user friendly.
Usability and context of use
Time frame: Following each test period of 1 week]
Participants will complete a questionnaire to assess their experience and acceptability of using the tool. The modified version of the Rawl Usability Questionnaire - this measures the usability of specific features of digital applications and context of use.
1 secondary outcome
Patient experience and acceptability
Time frame: Within 4 months of completion of the tool testing
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 39175746Christensen S, Robinson K, Thomas S, Williams DR. Dietary intake by patients taking GLP-1 and dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists: A narrative review and discussion of research needs. Obes Pillars. 2024 Jul 25;11:100121. doi: 10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100121. eCollection 2024 Sep.
- Results publication: PubMed 28216582Burrows TL, Rollo ME, Williams R, Wood LG, Garg ML, Jensen M, Collins CE. A Systematic Review of Technology-Based Dietary Intake Assessment Validation Studies That Include Carotenoid Biomarkers. Nutrients. 2017 Feb 14;9(2):140. doi: 10.3390/nu9020140.
- Results publication: PubMed 40507092Basso M, Zhang L, Savva GM, Cohen Kadosh K, Traka MH. Relative Validity of the Food Recording Smartphone App Libro in Young People Vulnerable to Eating Disorder: A Preliminary Cross-Over Study. Nutrients. 2025 May 27;17(11):1823. doi: 10.3390/nu17111823.
- Results publication: PubMed 38890501Astrup A. Reflections on the discovery GLP-1 as a satiety hormone: Implications for obesity therapy and future directions. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Jul;78(7):551-556. doi: 10.1038/s41430-024-01460-6. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Obese Patients
Not yet recruiting
OBEDIAM: Therapeutic Patient Education in Adults Living With Obesity, Diabetes, and Metabolic Disorders
Obesity (BMI>30)
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment Satisfaction of Once-Weekly Tirzepatide in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Axomove Therapy Medical Device to Facilitate Adapted Physical Activity for Patients With Obesity
Obese Adults
Active, not recruiting
Mindfulness Based Eating Awareness Training for Bariatric Surgery Patients
Obesity, Morbid, Eating Disorder Symptom
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Oxytocin for Respiratory Compromise and Hypoventilation Induced by Drugs
Obesity & Overweight, Respiratory Depression
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Testing 3 different digital dietary assessment tools in a random order (Nutritics-Libro, MyFood24 and Intake24) in people with Obese Patients, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Usability (time frame: Following each test period of 1 week). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07194317, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2026.