Allergy DrugDes-Al-PenNCT07194824
A Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Inhospital Model Hospitalized Patients
A study testing Pragmatic allergy management according to risk stratification in people with Allergy Drug and Allergy Penicillin, run by Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa at 2 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Design, implementation and analysis of an allergy assessment and management model beta-lactams in hospitalized patients Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergy Drug, Allergy Penicillin
- What is being tested?
- Pragmatic allergy management according to risk stratification
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 165 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 4 Apr 2024to 25 May 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- Ability to understand the study after reading the patient information sheet (Appendix II) and providing signed consent for participation (Appendix III: informed consent form).
- Patients with a reported allergy to penicillin and/or cephalosporins that has not been investigated or with inconclusive prior testing.
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Spain2 sites
Althaia
Manresa, Barcelona, 08243
C/ dr.Joan Soler 1-3
Manresa, Barcelona, 08243
About this study
Official title: Design, Implementation and Analysis of a Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Model in Hospitalized Patients
Design, implementation and analysis of an allergy assessment and management model beta-lactams in hospitalized patients
Read the detailed description
To evaluate the impact of a healthcare process for risk stratification based on the clinical history and the application of a structured questionnaire, on the Proportion of hospitalized patients in whom the penicillin allergy label is removed
- Conditions
- Allergy Drug, Allergy Penicillin
- Being tested
- Pragmatic allergy management according to risk stratification
- Keywords
- De-labelling, Allergy manegement, beta-lactans allergy
- Medical subject headings
- Drug Hypersensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pragmatic allergy management according to risk stratificationOther
Intervention based on allergy risk stratification. Tipus A) Patients in this group can undergo direct delabeling without the need for exposure, with this being documented in the EMR. If the patient refuses, an exposure to penicillin and/or cephalosporin will be performed. Once completed, de-labeling can proceed without the need for re-exposure.
Tipus B) Indication for use of a penicillin: Oral exposure to 250 mg of amoxicillin.
- Indication for cephalosporin : administration of a cephalosporin that exhibits the lowest level of cross-reactivity with penicillin.
Re-exposure to penicillin/ cephalosporin or both is performed at least 2 weeks after the first tolerated exposure. De-labeling is performed when tolerance to re-exposure is verified.
Tipus C) These high-risk patients are managed following the protocol for the treatment of patients with beta-lactam allergy, referring them to allergy consultation for further specific test.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with an active allergy label for beta-lactams admitted to hospital | Experimental | Clinical evaluation involving a review of the patient's history and a structured questionnaire, allows stratification of allergy risk into 3 categories, and managed accordingly. 1) Tipus A) Patients with a non-immune-mediated adverse reaction or with posterior tolerance. 2) Grup B) Patients with low risk potentiallly immune-mediated mechanism are considered candidates for exposure and re-exposure to penicillin and/or cephalosporins, as clinically indicted.
3) Grup C) Patients with a previous adverse reaction considered high-risk Type C, IgE-mediated or non-immediate Type II-IV reactions, Receives: Other: Pragmatic allergy management according to risk stratification |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of patients hospitalized in which the penicillin allergy label is removed
Proportion of patients hospitalized in which the penicillin allergy label is removed
Measured: At enrollment time
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Sep 2025
- Study start4 Apr 2024
- Primary completion23 May 2025
- Study completion25 May 2025
Why it stopped: Due to clear evidence of the intervention's effectiveness on a pre-planned interim analysis
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Allergy DrugStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Clinical evaluation study of a new care process, prospective, open, carried out in a single centre, ALTHAIA University Assistance Network of Manresa.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 165 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07194824
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23/028
- Acronym
- Des-Al-Pen
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 13 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Penicillin Allergy in Antibiotic Resistance Workgroup. Penicillin Allergy Testing Should Be Performed Routinely in Patients with Self-Reported Penicillin Allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Mar-Apr;5(2):333-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.010. No abstract available.
PubMed 28283158MacLaughlin EJ, Saseen JJ, Malone DC. Costs of beta-lactam allergies: selection and costs of antibiotics for patients with a reported beta-lactam allergy. Arch Fam Med. 2000 Aug;9(8):722-6. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.8.722.
PubMed 10927711Macy E, Contreras R. Health care use and serious infection prevalence associated with penicillin "allergy" in hospitalized patients: A cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Mar;133(3):790-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
PubMed 24188976Gray MP, Kellum JA, Kirisci L, Boyce RD, Kane-Gill SL. Long-Term Outcomes Associated With beta-Lactam Allergies. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412313. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12313.
PubMed 38758551Castells M, Khan DA, Phillips EJ. Penicillin Allergy. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 12;381(24):2338-2351. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1807761. No abstract available.
PubMed 31826341Blumenthal KG, Saff RR, Banerji A. Evaluation and management of a patient with multiple drug allergies. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):197-203. doi: 10.2500/aap.2014.35.3739.
PubMed 24801461Romano A, Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Barbaud A, Bircher AJ, Brockow K, Caubet JC, Celik G, Cernadas J, Chiriac AM, Demoly P, Garvey LH, Mayorga C, Nakonechna A, Whitaker P, Torres MJ. Towards a more precise diagnosis of hypersensitivity to beta-lactams - an EAACI position paper. Allergy. 2020 Jun;75(6):1300-1315. doi: 10.1111/all.14122.
PubMed 31749148Inglis JM, Caughey GE, Smith W, Shakib S. Documentation of penicillin adverse drug reactions in electronic health records: inconsistent use of allergy and intolerance labels. Intern Med J. 2017 Nov;47(11):1292-1297. doi: 10.1111/imj.13558.
PubMed 28742226Chaudhry SB, Veve MP, Wagner JL. Cephalosporins: A Focus on Side Chains and beta-Lactam Cross-Reactivity. Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Jul 29;7(3):103. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030103.
PubMed 31362351Dona I, Torres MJ, Celik G, Phillips E, Tanno LK, Castells M. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of drug allergy. Allergy. 2024 Mar;79(3):613-628. doi: 10.1111/all.15970. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
PubMed 38084822Stone CA Jr, Trubiano J, Coleman DT, Rukasin CRF, Phillips EJ. The challenge of de-labeling penicillin allergy. Allergy. 2020 Feb;75(2):273-288. doi: 10.1111/all.13848. Epub 2019 May 26.
PubMed 31049971Pano-Pardo JR, Rodilla EM, Sacristan SC, Saldana JLC, Parraga LP, Leon JLDP, Genti PR, Oviedo AR, Jaen MJT, Vidal-Cortes P, Sanz CC. Management of patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy. Executive summary of guidance from the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and the Spanish Society of Intensive Medicine and Coronary Care Units (SEMICYUC). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2023 Mar;41(3):181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2022.08.010. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
PubMed 36707291Blumenthal KG, Peter JG, Trubiano JA, Phillips EJ. Antibiotic allergy. Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):183-198. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32218-9. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
PubMed 30558872
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Design, Implementation and Analysis of a Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Model in Hospitalized Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07194824
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Des-Al-Pen / 23/028
- Conditions
- Allergy Drug, Allergy Penicillin
- Keywords
- De-labelling, Allergy manegement, beta-lactans allergy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Due to clear evidence of the intervention's effectiveness on a pre-planned interim analysis
- Enrolment
- 165 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de ManresaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Design, implementation and analysis of an allergy assessment and management model beta-lactams in hospitalized patients
Detailed description
To evaluate the impact of a healthcare process for risk stratification based on the clinical history and the application of a structured questionnaire, on the Proportion of hospitalized patients in whom the penicillin allergy label is removed
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Clinical evaluation study of a new care process, prospective, open, carried out in a single centre, ALTHAIA University Assistance Network of Manresa.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with an active allergy label for beta-lactams admitted to hospital | Experimental | Other: Pragmatic allergy management according to risk stratificationClinical evaluation involving a review of the patient's history and a structured questionnaire, allows stratification of allergy risk into 3 categories, and managed accordingly. 1) Tipus A) Patients with a non-immune-mediated adverse reaction or with posterior tolerance. 2) Grup B) Patients with low risk potentiallly immune-mediated mechanism are considered candidates for exposure and re-exposure to penicillin and/or cephalosporins, as clinically indicted. 3) Grup C) Patients with a previous adverse reaction considered high-risk Type C, IgE-mediated or non-immediate Type II-IV reactions, |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- Ability to understand the study after reading the patient information sheet (Appendix II) and providing signed consent for participation (Appendix III: informed consent form).
- Patients with a reported allergy to penicillin and/or cephalosporins that has not been investigated or with inconclusive prior testing.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pragmatic allergy management according to risk stratificationIntervention based on allergy risk stratification. Tipus A) Patients in this group can undergo direct delabeling without the need for exposure, with this being documented in the EMR. If the patient refuses, an exposure to penicillin and/or cephalosporin will be performed. Once completed, de-labeling can proceed without the need for re-exposure. Tipus B) Indication for use of a penicillin: Oral exposure to 250 mg of amoxicillin. - Indication for cephalosporin : administration of a cephalosporin that exhibits the lowest level of cross-reactivity with penicillin. Re-exposure to penicillin/ cephalosporin or both is performed at least 2 weeks after the first tolerated exposure. De-labeling is performed when tolerance to re-exposure is verified. Tipus C) These high-risk patients are managed following the protocol for the treatment of patients with beta-lactam allergy, referring them to allergy consultation for further specific test. | Other | Patients with an active allergy label for beta-lactams admitted to hospital |
Primary outcome
Proportion of patients hospitalized in which the penicillin allergy label is removed
Time frame: At enrollment time
Proportion of patients hospitalized in which the penicillin allergy label is removed
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Due to clear evidence of the intervention's effectiveness on a pre-planned interim analysis). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jan 2026.
- Background: PubMed 28283158Penicillin Allergy in Antibiotic Resistance Workgroup. Penicillin Allergy Testing Should Be Performed Routinely in Patients with Self-Reported Penicillin Allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Mar-Apr;5(2):333-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.010. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10927711MacLaughlin EJ, Saseen JJ, Malone DC. Costs of beta-lactam allergies: selection and costs of antibiotics for patients with a reported beta-lactam allergy. Arch Fam Med. 2000 Aug;9(8):722-6. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.8.722.
- Background: PubMed 24188976Macy E, Contreras R. Health care use and serious infection prevalence associated with penicillin "allergy" in hospitalized patients: A cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Mar;133(3):790-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
- Background: PubMed 38758551Gray MP, Kellum JA, Kirisci L, Boyce RD, Kane-Gill SL. Long-Term Outcomes Associated With beta-Lactam Allergies. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412313. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12313.
- Background: PubMed 31826341Castells M, Khan DA, Phillips EJ. Penicillin Allergy. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 12;381(24):2338-2351. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1807761. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24801461Blumenthal KG, Saff RR, Banerji A. Evaluation and management of a patient with multiple drug allergies. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):197-203. doi: 10.2500/aap.2014.35.3739.
- Background: PubMed 31749148Romano A, Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Barbaud A, Bircher AJ, Brockow K, Caubet JC, Celik G, Cernadas J, Chiriac AM, Demoly P, Garvey LH, Mayorga C, Nakonechna A, Whitaker P, Torres MJ. Towards a more precise diagnosis of hypersensitivity to beta-lactams - an EAACI position paper. Allergy. 2020 Jun;75(6):1300-1315. doi: 10.1111/all.14122.
- Background: PubMed 28742226Inglis JM, Caughey GE, Smith W, Shakib S. Documentation of penicillin adverse drug reactions in electronic health records: inconsistent use of allergy and intolerance labels. Intern Med J. 2017 Nov;47(11):1292-1297. doi: 10.1111/imj.13558.
- Background: PubMed 31362351Chaudhry SB, Veve MP, Wagner JL. Cephalosporins: A Focus on Side Chains and beta-Lactam Cross-Reactivity. Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Jul 29;7(3):103. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030103.
- Background: PubMed 38084822Dona I, Torres MJ, Celik G, Phillips E, Tanno LK, Castells M. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of drug allergy. Allergy. 2024 Mar;79(3):613-628. doi: 10.1111/all.15970. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
- Background: PubMed 31049971Stone CA Jr, Trubiano J, Coleman DT, Rukasin CRF, Phillips EJ. The challenge of de-labeling penicillin allergy. Allergy. 2020 Feb;75(2):273-288. doi: 10.1111/all.13848. Epub 2019 May 26.
- Background: PubMed 36707291Pano-Pardo JR, Rodilla EM, Sacristan SC, Saldana JLC, Parraga LP, Leon JLDP, Genti PR, Oviedo AR, Jaen MJT, Vidal-Cortes P, Sanz CC. Management of patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy. Executive summary of guidance from the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and the Spanish Society of Intensive Medicine and Coronary Care Units (SEMICYUC). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2023 Mar;41(3):181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2022.08.010. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Allergy Drug
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Efficacy and Safety of Obinutuzumab Versus Rituximab in Childhood Steroid Dependant and Frequent Relapsing Nephrotic Syndrome
Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome, Steroid-Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Long-term Study of the Medicine Called Abrocitinib in Children Aged 2 Years and Older With Moderate to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About Study Medicine Called PF-08049820 in People With Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema, Atopic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pragmatic allergy management according to risk stratification in people with Allergy Drug and Allergy Penicillin, run by Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa at 2 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Due to clear evidence of the intervention's effectiveness on a pre-planned interim analysis). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of patients hospitalized in which the penicillin allergy label is removed (time frame: At enrollment time). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07194824, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2026.