AzTrials
AzTrials

RadiographyRRASPNCT07200557

Reassessing the Role of Routine Radiographs After Spinal Fusion Surgery

An observational study of Radiography and Spinal Fusion, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Routine radiographs are commonly obtained after spinal fusion surgery to monitor postoperative evolution and detect complications. However, the actual contribution of these radiographs to clinical decision-making remains unclear. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Radiography, Spinal Fusion
How many people
978 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
1 May 2025to 31 Aug 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery (2011-2021) for degenerative conditions at University Hospitals Leuven

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at UZ Leuven, including the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine for a degenerative condition
  • Adults of 18 years and older
  • Follow up at least 3 months after surgery

Who cannot join

  • Non-degenerative (kypho) scoliosis
  • Indications other than degenerative conditions and (adult) isthmic spondylolisthesis (e.g. tumor, septic arthritis, trauma,…)
  • Chronic neuromuscular disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • UZ Leuven

    Leuven

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Routine radiographs are commonly obtained after spinal fusion surgery to monitor postoperative evolution and detect complications. However, the actual contribution of these radiographs to clinical decision-making remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study evaluates the frequency and clinical impact of routine postoperative radiographs in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery at University Hospitals Leuven.

Read the detailed description

Routine radiographs are commonly obtained after spinal fusion surgery to assess implant position, fusion progress, and potential complications. Yet, their actual contribution to patient care remains uncertain, and routine use may expose patients to unnecessary radiation and increase healthcare costs.

In this retrospective cohort study, the investigators will evaluate the clinical utility of routine radiographs during the first postoperative year after spinal fusion surgery at University Hospitals Leuven (2011-2021).

The investigators will review each follow-up visit to record the clinical course, radiographic findings, and whether these influenced further diagnostic tests or therapeutic interventions.

The investigators will primarily assess how often radiographs lead to a change in management. Secondary analyses will determine the proportion of abnormal versus normal radiographs, the relationship between clinical course and imaging results, and whether demographic or surgical factors predict radiographic utility.

By analyzing nearly 1,000 patients and more than 2,800 visits, the investigators will provide one of the most comprehensive evaluations of routine postoperative radiographs to date, aiming to guide more efficient, evidence-based follow-up strategies.

Keywords
Routine radiographs, Spinal fusion, Clinical utility, Spinal fusion surgery, Radiographs

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07200557
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery (2011-2021) at University Hospitals LeuvenRetrospective cohort of adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent spinal fusion surgery for degenerative spinal conditions at University Hospitals Leuven between 2011 and 2021. Patients were followed for at least 12 months after surgery, with data collected from postoperative follow-up visits, including clinical course, radiographic findings, and subsequent management decisions.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of radiographs that led to further diagnostic tests or therapeutic interventions within 12 months post-surgery

    Percentage of follow-up visits with routine radiographs in which the radiograph resulted in further diagnostic testing (e.g., CT, MRI) or a therapeutic intervention (e.g., medication change, reoperation).

    Measured: Within 12 months after spinal fusion surgery

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Proportion of abnormal versus normal radiographs

    Percentage of routine postoperative radiographs classified as abnormal compared to those classified as normal, based on radiologist or surgeon interpretation.

    Measured: Within 12 months after spinal fusion surgery

  2. Correlation between clinical course and management decisions

    Percentage of follow-up visits in which the patient was symptomatic versus asymptomatic, compared to the percentage of those visits that resulted in further diagnostic testing or therapeutic intervention.

    Measured: Within 12 months after spinal fusion surgery

  3. Correlation of demographic factors with radiographic utility

    Percentage of radiographs leading to additional diagnostic tests or therapeutic interventions, stratified by demographic variables (age in years, sex, body mass index in kg/m²).

    Measured: Within 12 months after spinal fusion surgery

  4. Correlation of surgical factors with radiographic utility

    Percentage of radiographs leading to additional diagnostic tests or therapeutic interventions, stratified by surgical variables (fusion level: cervical, thoracic, lumbar; number of fused segments; type of instrumentation).

    Measured: Within 12 months after spinal fusion surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Oct 2025
  2. Study start1 May 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2025
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
978 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07200557
Sponsor's protocol ID
S68783
Acronym
RRASP
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
10 Sep 2025
Last updated
1 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: This is a retrospective, single-center study. No individual participant data will be made publicly available. Summary results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Radiography and Spinal Fusion, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of radiographs that led to further diagnostic tests or therapeutic interventions within 12 months post-surgery (time frame: Within 12 months after spinal fusion surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in