AzTrials
AzTrials

Body ImageTech4D-PredictNCT07205029

"Predictive Models of the Morphological Evolution of the Human Body to Improve Adherence and Motivation in Dietetic-nutritional Treatments of Overweight and Obesity" [Modelos Predictivos de Evolución Corporal Para Mejorar la Adherencia en Tratamientos de Sobrepeso y Obesidad]

A study testing Experimental: Nutritional and Virtual reality intervention in people with Body Image and Executive Function (Cognition), run by Jorge Azorin Lopez at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of a personalized intervention based on the benefits of 4D body modeling and virtual reality techniques, combined with a dietary-nutritional treatment focused on the Mediterranean Diet, as a tool to improve motivation for change, adherence to treatment and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
Experimental: Nutritional and Virtual reality intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
133 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
15 Jan 2022to 30 Aug 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • a BMI greater than 24.9 kg/m2 [overweight (25 ≥ BMI < 30) and obese (BMI ≥ 30)] according to the BMI classification of the WHO;
  • the ability to read and write fluently;
  • Spanish as a mother tongue.

Who cannot join

  • currently being or having been in dietetic-nutritional treatment supervised by a nutritionist in the last year;
  • the presence of an endocrine-metabolic disorder (including thyroid, pituitary gland, and adrenal gland problems and metabolic syndrome);
  • the presence of a previous history of neurological disease (e.g., stroke or Parkinson's disease) or a history of head trauma;
  • the presence of a history of severe psychopathology according to the diagnostic criteria of the DSM-IV-TR;
  • currently receiving psychiatric treatment.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • University of Alicante

    Alicante, Alicante, 03690

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: "Predictive Models of Human Body Morphological Evolution to Improve Adherence and Motivation in Dietary-Nutritional Treatments for Overweight and Obesity" [Modelos Predictivos de la Evolución Morfológica Del Cuerpo Humano Para Mejorar la Adherencia y Motivación en Tratamientos Dietético-nutricionales Del Sobrepeso y la Obesidad].

The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of a personalized intervention based on the benefits of 4D body modeling and virtual reality techniques, combined with a dietary-nutritional treatment focused on the Mediterranean Diet, as a tool to improve motivation for change, adherence to treatment and health parameters in patients with overweight and obesity. The main research questions to be addressed are:

  • How can a 4D computer vision model combined with virtual reality improve clinical diagnoses, the analysis of morphological changes in the human body over time, and adherence to dietary-nutritional treatment?
  • Does adherence to an intensive multifactorial dietary-nutritional treatment based on the Mediterranean Diet (MD), supported by 4D immersive virtual reality technology, lead to improvements in cognitive functioning?
  • What impact does a nutritional intervention program based on the Mediterranean Diet and the use of virtual reality have on body image perception?
  • Can an intensive intervention based on the Mediterranean Diet and 4D virtual reality technology improve overall health? Researchers will compare the control group (which will receive nutritional recommendations based on the Mediterranean Diet) with the experimental group (which will receive nutritional recommendations based on the Mediterranean Diet and visualize their morphological changes through VR) to determine whether a personalized intervention based on the benefits of 4D modeling and virtual reality, combined with a Mediterranean Diet-focused treatment, is effective in addressing overweight and obesity.
Read more

Participants are expected to:

  • Follow the dietary-nutritional recommendations throughout the 6-month intervention.
  • Visit the clinic once a month for follow-up.
  • Complete all clinical and psychological assessments.
Being tested
Experimental: Nutritional and Virtual reality intervention, Control: Nutritional intervention
Keywords
obesity treatment, Virtual Reality intervention, Executive function in overweight and obese individuals, Body image perception, 4D model
Medical subject headings
Obesity, Overweight

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Experimental: Nutritional and Virtual reality interventionCombination product

    Over a 6-month period, the experimental group received nutritional recommendations based on the Mediterranean Diet from the nutritionist. In each session, the participant went through the 4D body modelling machine, which captures the morphological changes of each participant over time. The experimental group observed the changes in their bodies through immersive virtual reality goggles. After visualising their bodies, all participants in the experimental group completed a questionnaire designed to assess their perception of body image. Personal and sociodemographic data, clinical information, general health status, anthropometric, nutritional, and lifestyle data, as well as psychological and neuropsychological variables, were collected at two time points: at the beginning (pre-test measures) and at the end of the intervention (post-test measures).

  • Control: Nutritional interventionCombination product

    Over a 6-month period, the control group received nutritional recommendations based on the Mediterranean Diet from the nutritionist. In each session, the participant went through the 4D modelling machine, which captures the morphological changes of each individual over time. The control group did not visualise these morphological changes through the virtual reality goggles. Personal and sociodemographic data, clinical information, general health status, anthropometric, nutritional, and lifestyle data, as well as psychological and neuropsychological variables, were collected at two time points: at the beginning (pre-test measures) and at the end of the intervention (post-test measures).

Study groups in NCT07205029
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control groupActive comparatorOver a 6-month period, the control group received nutritional recommendations based on the Mediterranean Diet from the nutritionist. In each session, the participant went through the 4D modelling machine, which captures the morphological changes of each individual over time. The control group did not visualise these morphological changes through the virtual reality goggles. Personal and sociodemographic data, clinical information, general health status, anthropometric, nutritional, and lifestyle data, as well as psychological and neuropsychological variables, were collected at two time points: at the beginning (pre-test measures) and at the end of the intervention (post-test measures).
Receives: Combination Product: Control: Nutritional intervention
Experimental groupExperimentalOver a 6-month period, the experimental group received nutritional recommendations based on the Mediterranean Diet from the nutritionist. In each session, the participant went through the 4D body modelling machine, which captures the morphological changes of each participant over time. The experimental group observed the changes in their bodies through immersive virtual reality goggles. After visualising their bodies, all participants in the experimental group completed a questionnaire designed to assess their perception of body image. Personal and sociodemographic data, clinical information, general health status, anthropometric, nutritional, and lifestyle data, as well as psychological and neuropsychological variables, were collected at two time points: at the beginning (pre-test measures) and at the end of the intervention (post-test measures).
Receives: Combination Product: Experimental: Nutritional and Virtual reality intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Body Mass Index (BMI)

    BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m²). According to the WHO classification, overweight will be defined as a BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m² and obesity as a BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m².

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  2. Weight

    Body weight (kg) measured using a calibrated digital scale, a TANITA MC-780MA P digital scale (TANITA Corporation, Arlington Heights, IL, USA). Unit of Measure: kilograms (kg).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  3. Height

    Height measured in standing position without shoes using a SECA 213 portable stadiometer (SECA, Hamburg, Germany). Unit of Measure: meters (m)

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  4. Body fat

    Body fat percentage measured using a TANITA MC-780MA P digital scale (TANITA Corporation, Arlington Heights, IL, USA). Unit of Measure: percent (%)

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  5. Visceral fat

    Visceral fat percentage measured using the TANITA MC-780MA P digital scale. Unit of Measure: percent (%).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  6. Trunk fat

    Fat percentage in the trunk region measured using the TANITA MC-780MA P digital scale. Unit of Measure: percent (%).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  7. Fat in Right Arm

    Fat percentage in the right arm measured using the TANITA MC-780MA P digital scale. Unit of Measure: percent (%).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  8. Fat in Left Arm

    Fat percentage in the left arm measured using the TANITA MC-780MA P digital scale. Unit of Measure: percent (%).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  9. Fat in Right Leg

    Fat percentage in the right leg measured using the TANITA MC-780MA P digital scale. Unit of Measure: percent (%).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  10. Fat in Left Leg

    Fat percentage in the left leg measured using the TANITA MC-780MA P digital scale. Unit of Measure: percent (%).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  11. Waist Circumference

    Waist measured with a flexible measuring tape with 0.1 cm precision. Measurements performed twice. Unit of Measure: centimeters (cm).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  12. Hip Circumference

    Hip measured with a flexible measuring tape with 0.1 cm precision. Measurements performed twice. Unit of Measure: centimeters (cm).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  13. Waist-Hip Ratio (WHR)

    Calculated as the ratio of waist to hip circumference. Unit of Measure: ratio (unitless).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  14. Wrist Circumference

    Measured using a flexible measuring tape with 0.1 cm precision. Measurements performed twice. Unit of Measure: centimeters (cm).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  15. Muscle Mass

    Total body muscle mass measured using the TANITA MC-780MA P digital scale. Unit of Measure: kilograms (kg).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  16. Total Body Water

    Total body water percentage measured using the TANITA MC-780MA P digital scale. Unit of Measure: percent (%).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  17. Glucose Level

    Capillary glucose measured using the Accutrend® Plus device (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) from 15-40 μL blood collected via finger prick (Accu-Chek® Softclix® Pro lancing device). Unit of Measure: mg/dL

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  18. Total Cholesterol

    Capillary total cholesterol measured using the Accutrend® Plus device (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) from 15-40 μL blood collected via finger prick (Accu-Chek® Softclix® Pro lancing device). Unit of Measure: mg/dL

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  19. Triglycerides

    Capillary triglycerides measured using the Accutrend® Plus device (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) from 15-40 μL blood collected via finger prick (Accu-Chek® Softclix® Pro lancing device). Unit of Measure: mg/dL

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  20. Systolic Blood Pressure

    Measured using the M7 Intelli IT sphygmomanometer (OMRON, M7, Corp., Kyoto, Japan). Unit of Measure: mmHg.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  21. Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Measured using the M7 Intelli IT sphygmomanometer (OMRON, M7, Corp., Kyoto, Japan). Unit of Measure: mmHg.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  22. Interleukin 6 (IL-6)

    IL-6 measured from peripheral blood obtained via venipuncture using a bead-based multiplex assay (xMAP) with Luminex 200 flow cytometer. Unit of Measure: pg/mL.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  23. Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α)

    TNF-α measured from peripheral blood obtained via venipuncture using a bead-based multiplex assay (xMAP) with Luminex 200 flow cytometer. Unit of Measure: pg/mL.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  24. C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    Measured in serum samples via immunonephelometry using a Dade Behring BNII nephelometer. Unit of Measure: mg/L.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  25. Cognition: executive function

    Executive function assessed using the computerized General Cognitive Assessment Battery (CAB) from CogniFit. The battery includes neuropsychological tests evaluating cognitive flexibility, divided attention, planning, visual and auditory perception, spatial perception, contextual memory, short-term visual and auditory memory, non-verbal memory, working memory, processing speed, naming, estimation, monitoring, response time, visual scanning, recognition, hand-eye coordination, focused attention, and inhibition. Test duration ranges from 25 to 45 minutes. Scores range from 0 to 800, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. Unit of Measure: CAB score (0-800).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  26. Body Image perception

    Body image perception assessed using the Spanish short version of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ). The questionnaire contains 45 items divided into two parts: General body image perception: scored on a Likert scale from 1 (Totally disagree) to 5 (Totally agree); and Satisfaction with specific body areas: scored on a Likert scale from 1 (Very dissatisfied) to 5 (Very satisfied). Higher scores indicate a more positive body image perception. Unit of Measure: points (Minimum Value: 45 - Maximum Value: 225).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  27. 3D and 4D Imaging

    Morphological 4D images of participants were captured during each session using a 3D imaging system equipped with RGB-D devices. The 4D model represents morphological changes over time. Using cost-effective, wide-spectrum 3D acquisition technologies (RGB-D sensors), a 4D model was constructed as the core of a system for visualizing the human body over time. This model allows for precise and realistic visualization of body changes. Throughout the intervention, 3D morphological images of the participants were obtained, allowing them to observe their physical evolution through immersive Virtual Reality (VR)-a feature available only to the experimental group.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Nutritional and Lifestyle measures: Physical Activity

    Physical activity over the previous 7 days assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), Spanish Version, including 7 questions on frequency, duration, and intensity (vigorous and moderate), walking, and time spent sitting on a typical weekday. Higher scores indicate higher levels of physical activity. Unit of Measure: MET-minutes/week.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  2. Nutritional and Lifestyle measures: Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet

    Assessed using the 14-item PREDIMED Mediterranean Diet Adherence Questionnaire. Each item scores 0 or 1. Total scores range from 0 to 14, with scores ≥ 8 indicating good adherence and < 8 indicating low adherence to the Mediterranean Diet. Higher scores indicate better adherence. Unit of Measure: points (Minimum Value: 0 - Maximum Value: 14).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  3. Nutritional and Lifestyle measures: Food Frequency Questionnaire

    Dietary habits assessed using a 118-item Food Frequency Questionnaire adapted for the Spanish population. Scores range from 0 (never or <1/month) to 8 (+6 times per day). Higher scores indicate higher frequency of consumption of the specified food items. Unit of Measure: frequency (Minimum Value: 0 - Maximum Value: 8).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  4. Nutritional and Lifestyle measures: 24-Hour Dietary Recall

    Dietary intake assessed via three 24-hour dietary recalls (two weekdays and one weekend/holiday) to estimate nutrient and caloric intake. Higher values indicate higher intake. Unit of Measure: kilocalories (kcal) and grams of macronutrients per day.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  5. Psychological measures: Premorbid Intelligence

    Premorbid intelligence estimated based on the correct accentuation of 30 words, assessed using the Word Accentuation Test (TAP). The number of correct responses corresponds to an estimated IQ score based on the WAIS-IV scale. Higher scores indicate higher estimated premorbid intelligence. Unit of Measure: IQ points.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  6. Psychological Measures: Emotional Eating

    Assesses the influence of emotions on food choices through the Emotional Eater Questionnaire (CCE). 10 items scored on a Likert scale from 0 (Never) to 3 (Always). Higher scores indicate greater emotional influence on eating habits. Unit of Measure: points (Minimum Value: 0 - Maximum Value: 30).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  7. Psychological Measures: Prefrontal Symptoms

    Self-reported measure of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral disturbances in daily life, assessed using the Prefrontal Symptom Inventory, ISP-20 (Abbreviated Version). 20 items scored on a Likert scale from 0 (Never/almost never) to 4 (Always/almost always). Higher scores indicate more severe prefrontal symptoms. Unit of Measure: points (Minimum Value: 0 - Maximum Value: 80).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  8. Psychological Measures: Impulsivity

    Measures impulsivity across three subscales: cognitive (8 items), motor (10 items), and non-planning (12 items), assessed using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, BIS-11. Each item scored 0-4 (0=Rarely/Never, 4=Almost Always). Higher scores indicate greater impulsivity. Unit of Measure: points (Minimum Value: 0 - Maximum Value: 120).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  9. Psychological Measures: Health-Related Quality of Life

    Assesses physical and mental health-related quality of life using the Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12). 12 items scored from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. Unit of Measure: points (Minimum Value: 0 - Maximum Value: 100).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  10. Psychological Measures: Depression

    21-item self-report questionnaire assessing depressive symptoms, measured using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Items scored 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Severely). Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. Unit of Measure: points (Minimum Value: 0 - Maximum Value: 63).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

  11. Psychological Measures: Life Satisfaction

    Measures global life satisfaction using the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). 5 items scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=Completely disagree, 7=Completely agree). Higher scores indicate greater life satisfaction. Unit of Measure: points (Minimum Value: 5 - Maximum Value: 35).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Oct 2025
  2. Study start15 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2022
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
133 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07205029
Sponsor's protocol ID
UA-2021-11-18
Other IDs
PID2023-149562OB-I00
Acronym
Tech4D-Predict
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
18 Sep 2025
Last updated
3 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: At this time, the data cannot be shared because the patent registration process for the developed software is still ongoing. Until this stage is completed, it is not possible to consider sharing the Individual Participant Data (IPD) with other researchers. However, the project has been granted an extension and is currently in the analysis phase and in the process of creating a global database that integrates all the collected variables. Once this process is completed and the legal issues related to the patent are resolved, the data is expected to be published and made publicly available.

Publications

  • González, Mariela. (2018). Validación del Cuestionario de Comedor Emocional (CCE) en Chile. Gen, 72(1), 21-24. Recuperado en 21 de noviembre de 2021, de http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S001635032018000100005&lng=es&tlng=es.

  • Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Fernandez-Jarne E, Serrano-Martinez M, Wright M, Gomez-Gracia E. Development of a short dietary intake questionnaire for the quantitative estimation of adherence to a cardioprotective Mediterranean diet. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Nov;58(11):1550-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602004.

    PubMed 15162136
  • Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.

    PubMed 12900694
  • Botella L, Corbella S, Belles L, Pacheco M, Maria Gomez A, Herrero O, Ribas E, Pedro N. Predictors of therapeutic outcome and process. Psychother Res. 2008 Sep;18(5):535-42. doi: 10.1080/10503300801982773.

    PubMed 18816004
  • Pons D, Atienza FL, Balaguer I, Garcia-Merita ML. Satisfaction with life scale: analysis of factorial invariance for adolescents and elderly persons. Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Aug;91(1):62-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.62.

    PubMed 11011872
  • Rumbo-Rodriguez L, Sanchez-SanSegundo M, Ferrer-Cascales R, Garcia-D'Urso N, Hurtado-Sanchez JA, Zaragoza-Marti A. Comparison of Body Scanner and Manual Anthropometric Measurements of Body Shape: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 8;18(12):6213. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126213.

    PubMed 34201258
  • Zaragoza-Marti A, Sanchez-SanSegundo M, Ferrer-Cascales R, Gabaldon-Bravo EM, Laguna-Perez A, Rumbo-Rodriguez L. Effects of the Mediterranean Lifestyle During the COVID-19 Lockdown in Spain: Preliminary Study. Front Nutr. 2021 Jun 18;8:683261. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.683261. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34222306
  • N. García-D'urso, P. Climent-Pérez, M. Sánchez-Sansegundo, A. Zaragoza-Martí, A. Fuster-Guilló and J. Azorín-López, "A Non-Invasive Approach for Total Cholesterol Level Prediction Using Machine Learning," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 58566-58577, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3178419.

  • Mauricio-Andres Zamora-Hernandez, Jose Andrez Chaves Ceciliano, Alonso Villalobos Granados, John Alejandro Castro Vargas, Jose Garcia-Rodriguez, Jorge Azorin-Lopez, "MDL+ a manufacturing description language to describe and control assembling tasks in industry 4.0", Logic Journal of the IGPL, 2022; jzac032, https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzac032

  • L. F. Borja-Borja, J. Azorín-López, M. Saval-Calvo, A. Fuster-Guilló and M. Sebban, "Architecture for Automatic Recognition of Group Activities Using Local Motions and Context," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 79874-79889, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3195035

  • Azorin-Lopez, Jorge, Fuster-Guilló, Andrés, Saval-Calvo, Marcelo, Villena Martínez, Víctor, Castillo Zaragoza, Juan Miguel, Garcia-d'Urso, Nahuel, Manchón Martínez, Cayetano, Ferrer-Cascales, Rosario, Zaragoza Martí, Ana, Sebban, Marc URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/119300

  • Berbegal-Bernabeu M, Garcia-D'Urso N, Sanchez-Sansegundo M, Vives-Cases C, Tome-Fernandez M, Zaragoza-Marti A. Usefulness of a virtual reality programme for body self-image in obese and overweight patients: a focus on gender differences - a randomised trial. Arch Public Health. 2026 Mar 21;84(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13690-026-01893-4.

    PubMed 41862984

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Experimental: Nutritional and Virtual reality intervention in people with Body Image and Executive Function (Cognition), run by Jorge Azorin Lopez at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Body Mass Index (BMI) (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months). The study lists 27 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07205029, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in