Double IncontinenceNCT07212387
Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Double Incontinence
A study testing Sacral neurostimulation in people with Double Incontinence and Faecal Incontinence, run by University Hospital Ostrava at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
This is a prospective study evaluating the effect of a treatment method of sacral neuromodulation (SNM), the use of which is approved and recommended for the treatment of both faecal incontinence (FI) and urinary incontinence (UI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Double Incontinence, Faecal Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- Sacral neurostimulation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- Nov 2025to Dec 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult women over 18 years of age
- Consent to participate in the study
- Willingness to undergo examination, treatment and follow-up according to the protocol
- DI symptoms characterized by:
- Grade III fecal incontinence (patient is unable to consciously hold in wind, loose or hard stools)
- At least 2 episodes of fecal incontinence during the week (according to bladder and bowel diary)
Show all 10Show fewer
- At least 1 episode of involuntary urine leakage per day (according to bladder and bowel diary)
- Total score of the ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire
- DI symptoms for more than 6 months
- Failure of previous conservative treatment
Who cannot join
- Rapidly progressing neurological diseases
- Known severe congenital malformations of the anorectum and/or lower urinary tract
- Presence of a foreign body in the urinary tract - urolithiasis, urinary catheter, ureteral stent
- Pregnancy, lactation
- Active urinary tract infection
- Active malignant disease
Show all 16Show fewer
- Clinically significant pelvic organ prolapse
- Active inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis)
- In the case of an associated lesion of the external anal sphincter, a defect greater than 90 degrees
- Previous pelvic radiotherapy less than 12 months prior to study enrolment
- Previous pelvic organ descent surgery less than 12 months prior to study enrolment
- Previous stress urinary incontinence surgery less than 12 months prior to study enrolment
- Previous childbirth less than 12 months prior to study enrollment
- Anatomical malformations of the sacrum that preclude implantation of the SNM electrode
- Low patient compliance
- Inability to control the neurostimulator
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Czechia1 site
University Hospital Ostrava
Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region, 708 52
Milan Tesař, MD, Ph.D., 0042059737 ext. 5707, milan.tesar@fno.cz
Milan Tesař, MD, Ph.D.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Coexisting Faecal and Urinary Incontinence ("Double Incontinence")
This is a prospective study evaluating the effect of a treatment method of sacral neuromodulation (SNM), the use of which is approved and recommended for the treatment of both faecal incontinence (FI) and urinary incontinence (UI). A new aspect of the study is monitoring the effect of SNM in patients with both types of incontinence (faecal and urinary) occurring simultaneously. The study will use diagnostic methods and procedures that are part of the usual examination algorithm. The study will not impose any burden on patients beyond the scope of routine examination and treatment procedures.
Read the detailed description
Faecal incontinence (FI) is defined as the involuntary loss of solid or liquid stool in patients. Incontinence harms the patient psychologically, socially and medically. FI is associated with an increased incidence of various skin conditions and inflammatory diseases, including multiple urinary tract infections.
Treatment of FI usually begins with non-invasive strategies such as dietary and lifestyle changes, physiotherapy with biofeedback, and pharmacotherapy. If conservative methods do not improve symptoms, surgical options are considered, such as sphincter reconstruction, anal sphincter augmentation, and artificial sphincter. Neurostimulation methods, including sacral neuromodulation (SNM), are another option.
Participation in the study will be offered to patients with proven DI who have failed primary conservative treatment. Eligible patients will be indicated to perform the 1st phase of SNM, which consists of inserting a stimulating electrode into the sacral root area and connecting it to an external stimulation source according to the standard procedure [21].
After 2 weeks of stimulation in the test phase, its effectiveness will be evaluated. A positive treatment response is defined as:
An improvement of more than 50% in any of the DI symptoms (according to the bladder and bowel diary in 3 days or 7 days, respectively) and the patient also rates the improvement of her condition as 1 ("very much improved") or 2 ("much improved") using the PGI-I scale An improvement of at least 2 DI symptoms by more than 25% (according to the bladder and bowel diary in 3 days or 7 days, respectively) and the patient also rates the improvement of her condition as 1 ("very much improved") or 2 ("much improved") using the PGI-I scale If the patient achieves a positive treatment response at the end of the test phase, she will be indicated for the 2nd phase of SNM, during which the external stimulation source will be replaced by an implanted stimulation generator. The patient will then continue to be monitored 3, 6 and 12 months after implantation. This will terminate the patient's participation in the study and they will continue to receive treatment or follow-up according to the current clinical recommendations for the treatment of FI and UI.
If the patient does not achieve a positive treatment response at the end of the test phase, the electrode and external stimulator will be removed, the patient will be excluded from the study and will be further monitored or treated according to the current clinical recommendations for the treatment of FI and UI.
Urinary incontinence (UI) is defined as any involuntary leakage of urine. UI has a major impact on the quality of life of affected patients, as well as clearly documented health and socioeconomic consequences.
Conservative (pelvic floor muscle training), semi-invasive (application of so-called "bulking agents" into the urethra) and surgical methods (implantation of tension-free homologous or heterologous bands under the urethra) are used in the treatment of female stress incontinence.
Pharmacotherapy is mainly used in the treatment of urge incontinence. In those patients in whom it is not sufficiently effective or is accompanied by adverse effects, treatment with botulinum toxin applied to the bladder wall or various neuromodulation methods is recommended.
Coexistent fecal and urinary incontinence (double incontinence - DI) is a condition in which symptoms of FI and UI are expressed simultaneously.
Given its high prevalence, DI represents a significant cost to society and healthcare systems. Patients with DI face a number of significant problems that affect their physical (skin irritation and infection, unpleasant odour, hygiene problems, insufficient sleep, etc.) and psychological health (anxiety and depression, social isolation, disrupted relationships, etc.) and quality of life.
Therefore, the treatment of DI is very complex, multidisciplinary and it is very difficult to create uniform clinical recommendations.
Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) delivers painless electrical impulses to the sacral nerves to improve pelvic organ function. Currently approved indications include urge urinary incontinence, non-obstructive urinary retention, and faecal incontinence. Further studies investigating the treatment outcomes of SNS in patients with DI are therefore highly desirable and needed.
Investigational tools used during the study Patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) - is a simple screening tool that was created to assess the effect of treatment on a given pathological condition. It is a Likert scale with a rating from 1 ("very much improvement") to 7 ("very much deterioration").
Bladder and bowel diary - is a basic screening tool for assessing the severity of urinary and faecal incontinence symptoms. The patient records data on the time and amount of fluids consumed and data on the time and volume of urine excreted in the diary. She also adds data on the number of episodes of urgency and urinary incontinence. Similarly, she records the number of defecations and data on the number of episodes of urgency and faecal incontinence. The patient records data on urination for 3 days, data on stool for a total of 7 days.
The Wexner Questionnaire - Wexner Score, is a widely used and recognized tool for assessing the severity of faecal incontinence. It serves to objectify and quantify symptoms, which is crucial for diagnosing, monitoring progression, and evaluating the effectiveness of FI treatment. The Wexner Score focuses on five key parameters related to faecal incontinence: gas leakage, liquid stool leakage, solid stool leakage, wearing pads/protective devices, and lifestyle changes. Each of these five parameters is scored on a scale from 0 to 4, where 4 is the worst, and the maximum possible score is 20 points - indicating complete faecal incontinence.
The Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) is a specific quality of life questionnaire designed to assess the impact of FI on various aspects of a patient's life. Unlike incontinence severity scores (such as the Wexner or St. Mark's scores), which only quantify the frequency and type of leakage, the FIQL focuses on how incontinence affects the patient's daily life, psychological well-being, and social interactions. Patients typically rate their feelings or the frequency of the problems on a Likert scale (from 1 to 5, with higher numbers indicating better quality of life or less impact).
The International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence short form (ICIQ-UI SF) is one of the most commonly used tools to assess the effectiveness of interventions in functional urology. This validated questionnaire consists of 3 questions that assess the frequency, severity, and overall impact of incontinence on quality of life. The total score can range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating greater severity of urinary incontinence.
The International Consultation of Incontinence-Overactive Bladder (ICIQ-OAB) is a validated questionnaire used to assess the effectiveness of treatment for urge incontinence and overactive bladder. It consists of 4 questions, focusing on the main symptoms of frequency, nocturia, urgency and urge incontinence. Each question has a sub-question assessing the impact of a specific symptom on quality of life. The total symptom score can be 0-16, the impact score on quality of life can take values of 0-40. In both cases, the higher the score, the greater the severity of urinary incontinence and the greater the negative impact on quality of life.
The Incontinence - Quality of Life (I-QoL) questionnaire is a validated questionnaire assessing the impact of urinary incontinence on patients' quality of life. It consists of 22 questions that the patient answers using a Likert scale from 1 ("Always") to 5 ("Never"). The higher the total score, the better the quality of life, or the smaller the impact of incontinence on quality of life.
Monitoring of the number and severity of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) will be carried out according to Good Clinical Practice standards.
- Being tested
- Sacral neurostimulation
- Keywords
- Double incontinence, Faecal incontinence, Urinary incontinence, Sacral neurostimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Encopresis, Urinary Incontinence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sacral neurostimulationProcedure or surgery
Sacral neurostimulation (SNS), or sacral neuromodulation (SNM), is a minimally invasive, reversible treatment for bladder and bowel control problems, including overactive bladder and fecal incontinence.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sacral neuromodulation | Experimental | Female patients with double incontinence (DI) will be enrolled into this study group. The study subjects will undergo sacral neurostimulation (SNM). Receives: Procedure: Sacral neurostimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall effect of SNM
Evaluation of the overall effect of SNM in patients with DI from the patient's perspective using the so-called "patients reported outcome measures" (PROM) with the Patient Global Impression - Improvement questionnaire will be performed.
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
The number of responders at the end of the test phase
The number of responders at the end of the test phase will be observed
Measured: 2 weeks for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
Bladder and bowel diary - the number of FI episodes
The number of FI episodes from the bladder and bowel diary will be observed for the monitored period of 3 and 7 days
Measured: 3 and 7 days
Bladder and bowel diary - the number of faecal urgency episodes
The number of faecal urgency episodes from the bladder and bowel diary will be observed for the monitored period of 3 and 7 days
Measured: 3 and 7 days
Bladder and bowel diary - the number of UI episodes
The number of UI episodes from the bladder and bowel diary will be observed for the monitored period of 3 and 7 days
Measured: 3 and 7 days
Bladder and bowel diary - the number of urinary urgency episodes
The number of urinary urgency episodes from the bladder and bowel diary will be observed for the monitored period of 3 and 7 days
Measured: 3 and 7 days
Wexner questionnaire total score
The Wexner questionnaire total score will be observed and recorded
Measured: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
FIQL questionnaire total score
The FIQL (Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale) questionnaire total score will be observed and recorded
Measured: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
ICIQ-SF questionnaire total score
The ICIQ-SF (International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire) questionnaire total score will be observed and recorded
Measured: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
ICIQ-OAB questionnaire total score
The ICIQ-OAB (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Overactive Bladder) questionnaire total score will be observed and recorded
Measured: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
I-QoL questionnaire total score
The I-QoL (Incontinence - Quality of Life ) questionnaire total score will be observed and recorded
Measured: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
Number and severity of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE)
The number and severity of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) will be observed and recorded
Measured: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2025
- Study startNov 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionNov 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Double IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The study subjects will be enrolled in one experimental group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Ostrava
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Milan Tesař, MD, Ph.D., Principal investigator, University Hospital Ostrava
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07212387
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FNO-Urology-DI
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan to make the individual participant data available to other researchers. The data may be provided upon reasonable request.
Publications
Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, Martin ML, Buesching DP. Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology. 1996 Jan;47(1):67-71; discussion 71-2. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80384-7.
PubMed 8560665Jackson S, Donovan J, Brookes S, Eckford S, Swithinbank L, Abrams P. The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing. Br J Urol. 1996 Jun;77(6):805-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.00186.x.
PubMed 8705212Lim R, Liong ML, Lim KK, Leong WS, Yuen KH. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires (ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-LUTSqol). Urology. 2019 Nov;133:91-95. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
PubMed 31415780Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97. doi: 10.1007/BF02050307.
PubMed 8416784Sultan AH, Monga A, Lee J, Emmanuel A, Norton C, Santoro G, Hull T, Berghmans B, Brody S, Haylen BT. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female anorectal dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Jan;36(1):10-34. doi: 10.1002/nau.23055. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
PubMed 27770550Matzel KE, Chartier-Kastler E, Knowles CH, Lehur PA, Munoz-Duyos A, Ratto C, Rydningen MB, Sorensen M, van Kerrebroeck P, de Wachter S. Sacral Neuromodulation: Standardized Electrode Placement Technique. Neuromodulation. 2017 Dec;20(8):816-824. doi: 10.1111/ner.12695. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
PubMed 28975677Chodez M, Trilling B, Thuillier C, Boillot B, Barbois S, Faucheron JL. Results of sacral nerve neuromodulation for double incontinence in adults. Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Dec;18(12):1147-51. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1231-z. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
PubMed 25380739Duelund-Jakobsen J, Lehur PA, Lundby L, Wyart V, Laurberg S, Buntzen S. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence - efficacy confirmed from a two-centre prospectively maintained database. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2411-7. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
PubMed 26490052Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Hull T, McCallum R, Chan M, Ayscue JM, Shobeiri AS, Margolin D, England M, Kaufman H, Snape WJ, Mutlu E, Chua H, Pettit P, Nagle D, Madoff RD, Lerew DR, Mellgren A. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):441-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf8ed0.
PubMed 20160636Kaiser AM, Orangio GR, Zutshi M, Alva S, Hull TL, Marcello PW, Margolin DA, Rafferty JF, Buie WD, Wexner SD. Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence. Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2277-301. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3464-3. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
PubMed 24609699Brazzelli M, Murray A, Fraser C. Efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary urge incontinence: a systematic review. J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):835-41. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00326-5.
PubMed 16469561Noblett KL, Cadish LA. Sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of refractory voiding and bowel dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;210(2):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
PubMed 23899452Baudouin C, Simitzis-Le Flohic AM, Peirone D, Le Fichoux Y, Gastaud P. [Acanthamoeba keratitis in subjects with contact lenses]. Presse Med. 1990 Nov 17;19(38):1759-61. French.
PubMed 2147501Meschia M, Buonaguidi A, Pifarotti P, Somigliana E, Spennacchio M, Amicarelli F. Prevalence of anal incontinence in women with symptoms of urinary incontinence and genital prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Oct;100(4):719-23. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02215-9.
PubMed 12383540Gonzalez-Argente FX, Jain A, Nogueras JJ, Davila GW, Weiss EG, Wexner SD. Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females with anal incontinence or rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Jul;44(7):920-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02235476.
PubMed 11496068
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Coexisting Faecal and Urinary Incontinence ("Double Incontinence")
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07212387
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FNO-Urology-DI
- Keywords
- Double incontinence, Faecal incontinence, Urinary incontinence, Sacral neurostimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital OstravaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective study evaluating the effect of a treatment method of sacral neuromodulation (SNM), the use of which is approved and recommended for the treatment of both faecal incontinence (FI) and urinary incontinence (UI). A new aspect of the study is monitoring the effect of SNM in patients with both types of incontinence (faecal and urinary) occurring simultaneously. The study will use diagnostic methods and procedures that are part of the usual examination algorithm. The study will not impose any burden on patients beyond the scope of routine examination and treatment procedures.
Detailed description
Faecal incontinence (FI) is defined as the involuntary loss of solid or liquid stool in patients. Incontinence harms the patient psychologically, socially and medically. FI is associated with an increased incidence of various skin conditions and inflammatory diseases, including multiple urinary tract infections.
Treatment of FI usually begins with non-invasive strategies such as dietary and lifestyle changes, physiotherapy with biofeedback, and pharmacotherapy. If conservative methods do not improve symptoms, surgical options are considered, such as sphincter reconstruction, anal sphincter augmentation, and artificial sphincter. Neurostimulation methods, including sacral neuromodulation (SNM), are another option.
Participation in the study will be offered to patients with proven DI who have failed primary conservative treatment. Eligible patients will be indicated to perform the 1st phase of SNM, which consists of inserting a stimulating electrode into the sacral root area and connecting it to an external stimulation source according to the standard procedure [21].
After 2 weeks of stimulation in the test phase, its effectiveness will be evaluated. A positive treatment response is defined as:
An improvement of more than 50% in any of the DI symptoms (according to the bladder and bowel diary in 3 days or 7 days, respectively) and the patient also rates the improvement of her condition as 1 ("very much improved") or 2 ("much improved") using the PGI-I scale An improvement of at least 2 DI symptoms by more than 25% (according to the bladder and bowel diary in 3 days or 7 days, respectively) and the patient also rates the improvement of her condition as 1 ("very much improved") or 2 ("much improved") using the PGI-I scale If the patient achieves a positive treatment response at the end of the test phase, she will be indicated for the 2nd phase of SNM, during which the external stimulation source will be replaced by an implanted stimulation generator. The patient will then continue to be monitored 3, 6 and 12 months after implantation. This will terminate the patient's participation in the study and they will continue to receive treatment or follow-up according to the current clinical recommendations for the treatment of FI and UI.
If the patient does not achieve a positive treatment response at the end of the test phase, the electrode and external stimulator will be removed, the patient will be excluded from the study and will be further monitored or treated according to the current clinical recommendations for the treatment of FI and UI.
Urinary incontinence (UI) is defined as any involuntary leakage of urine. UI has a major impact on the quality of life of affected patients, as well as clearly documented health and socioeconomic consequences.
Conservative (pelvic floor muscle training), semi-invasive (application of so-called "bulking agents" into the urethra) and surgical methods (implantation of tension-free homologous or heterologous bands under the urethra) are used in the treatment of female stress incontinence.
Pharmacotherapy is mainly used in the treatment of urge incontinence. In those patients in whom it is not sufficiently effective or is accompanied by adverse effects, treatment with botulinum toxin applied to the bladder wall or various neuromodulation methods is recommended.
Coexistent fecal and urinary incontinence (double incontinence - DI) is a condition in which symptoms of FI and UI are expressed simultaneously.
Given its high prevalence, DI represents a significant cost to society and healthcare systems. Patients with DI face a number of significant problems that affect their physical (skin irritation and infection, unpleasant odour, hygiene problems, insufficient sleep, etc.) and psychological health (anxiety and depression, social isolation, disrupted relationships, etc.) and quality of life.
Therefore, the treatment of DI is very complex, multidisciplinary and it is very difficult to create uniform clinical recommendations.
Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) delivers painless electrical impulses to the sacral nerves to improve pelvic organ function. Currently approved indications include urge urinary incontinence, non-obstructive urinary retention, and faecal incontinence. Further studies investigating the treatment outcomes of SNS in patients with DI are therefore highly desirable and needed.
Investigational tools used during the study Patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) - is a simple screening tool that was created to assess the effect of treatment on a given pathological condition. It is a Likert scale with a rating from 1 ("very much improvement") to 7 ("very much deterioration").
Bladder and bowel diary - is a basic screening tool for assessing the severity of urinary and faecal incontinence symptoms. The patient records data on the time and amount of fluids consumed and data on the time and volume of urine excreted in the diary. She also adds data on the number of episodes of urgency and urinary incontinence. Similarly, she records the number of defecations and data on the number of episodes of urgency and faecal incontinence. The patient records data on urination for 3 days, data on stool for a total of 7 days.
The Wexner Questionnaire - Wexner Score, is a widely used and recognized tool for assessing the severity of faecal incontinence. It serves to objectify and quantify symptoms, which is crucial for diagnosing, monitoring progression, and evaluating the effectiveness of FI treatment. The Wexner Score focuses on five key parameters related to faecal incontinence: gas leakage, liquid stool leakage, solid stool leakage, wearing pads/protective devices, and lifestyle changes. Each of these five parameters is scored on a scale from 0 to 4, where 4 is the worst, and the maximum possible score is 20 points - indicating complete faecal incontinence.
The Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) is a specific quality of life questionnaire designed to assess the impact of FI on various aspects of a patient's life. Unlike incontinence severity scores (such as the Wexner or St. Mark's scores), which only quantify the frequency and type of leakage, the FIQL focuses on how incontinence affects the patient's daily life, psychological well-being, and social interactions. Patients typically rate their feelings or the frequency of the problems on a Likert scale (from 1 to 5, with higher numbers indicating better quality of life or less impact).
The International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence short form (ICIQ-UI SF) is one of the most commonly used tools to assess the effectiveness of interventions in functional urology. This validated questionnaire consists of 3 questions that assess the frequency, severity, and overall impact of incontinence on quality of life. The total score can range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating greater severity of urinary incontinence.
The International Consultation of Incontinence-Overactive Bladder (ICIQ-OAB) is a validated questionnaire used to assess the effectiveness of treatment for urge incontinence and overactive bladder. It consists of 4 questions, focusing on the main symptoms of frequency, nocturia, urgency and urge incontinence. Each question has a sub-question assessing the impact of a specific symptom on quality of life. The total symptom score can be 0-16, the impact score on quality of life can take values of 0-40. In both cases, the higher the score, the greater the severity of urinary incontinence and the greater the negative impact on quality of life.
The Incontinence - Quality of Life (I-QoL) questionnaire is a validated questionnaire assessing the impact of urinary incontinence on patients' quality of life. It consists of 22 questions that the patient answers using a Likert scale from 1 ("Always") to 5 ("Never"). The higher the total score, the better the quality of life, or the smaller the impact of incontinence on quality of life.
Monitoring of the number and severity of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) will be carried out according to Good Clinical Practice standards.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- The study subjects will be enrolled in one experimental group
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sacral neuromodulation | Experimental | Procedure: Sacral neurostimulationFemale patients with double incontinence (DI) will be enrolled into this study group. The study subjects will undergo sacral neurostimulation (SNM). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Adult women over 18 years of age
- Consent to participate in the study
- Willingness to undergo examination, treatment and follow-up according to the protocol
- DI symptoms characterized by:
- Grade III fecal incontinence (patient is unable to consciously hold in wind, loose or hard stools)
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Rapidly progressing neurological diseases
- Known severe congenital malformations of the anorectum and/or lower urinary tract
- Presence of a foreign body in the urinary tract - urolithiasis, urinary catheter, ureteral stent
- Pregnancy, lactation
- Active urinary tract infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sacral neurostimulationSacral neurostimulation (SNS), or sacral neuromodulation (SNM), is a minimally invasive, reversible treatment for bladder and bowel control problems, including overactive bladder and fecal incontinence. | Procedure or surgery | Sacral neuromodulation |
Primary outcome
Overall effect of SNM
Time frame: 18 months
Evaluation of the overall effect of SNM in patients with DI from the patient's perspective using the so-called "patients reported outcome measures" (PROM) with the Patient Global Impression - Improvement questionnaire will be performed.
11 secondary outcomes
The number of responders at the end of the test phase
Time frame: 2 weeks for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
Bladder and bowel diary - the number of FI episodes
Time frame: 3 and 7 days
Bladder and bowel diary - the number of faecal urgency episodes
Time frame: 3 and 7 days
Bladder and bowel diary - the number of UI episodes
Time frame: 3 and 7 days
Bladder and bowel diary - the number of urinary urgency episodes
Time frame: 3 and 7 days
Wexner questionnaire total score
Time frame: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
FIQL questionnaire total score
Time frame: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
ICIQ-SF questionnaire total score
Time frame: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
ICIQ-OAB questionnaire total score
Time frame: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
I-QoL questionnaire total score
Time frame: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
Number and severity of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE)
Time frame: 18 months for the patient, 4 years for the investigator
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2025.
- Background: PubMed 8560665Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, Martin ML, Buesching DP. Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology. 1996 Jan;47(1):67-71; discussion 71-2. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80384-7.
- Background: PubMed 8705212Jackson S, Donovan J, Brookes S, Eckford S, Swithinbank L, Abrams P. The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing. Br J Urol. 1996 Jun;77(6):805-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.00186.x.
- Background: PubMed 31415780Lim R, Liong ML, Lim KK, Leong WS, Yuen KH. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires (ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-LUTSqol). Urology. 2019 Nov;133:91-95. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
- Background: PubMed 8416784Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97. doi: 10.1007/BF02050307.
- Background: PubMed 27770550Sultan AH, Monga A, Lee J, Emmanuel A, Norton C, Santoro G, Hull T, Berghmans B, Brody S, Haylen BT. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female anorectal dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Jan;36(1):10-34. doi: 10.1002/nau.23055. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
- Background: PubMed 28975677Matzel KE, Chartier-Kastler E, Knowles CH, Lehur PA, Munoz-Duyos A, Ratto C, Rydningen MB, Sorensen M, van Kerrebroeck P, de Wachter S. Sacral Neuromodulation: Standardized Electrode Placement Technique. Neuromodulation. 2017 Dec;20(8):816-824. doi: 10.1111/ner.12695. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
- Background: PubMed 25380739Chodez M, Trilling B, Thuillier C, Boillot B, Barbois S, Faucheron JL. Results of sacral nerve neuromodulation for double incontinence in adults. Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Dec;18(12):1147-51. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1231-z. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
- Background: PubMed 26490052Duelund-Jakobsen J, Lehur PA, Lundby L, Wyart V, Laurberg S, Buntzen S. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence - efficacy confirmed from a two-centre prospectively maintained database. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2411-7. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
- Background: PubMed 20160636Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Hull T, McCallum R, Chan M, Ayscue JM, Shobeiri AS, Margolin D, England M, Kaufman H, Snape WJ, Mutlu E, Chua H, Pettit P, Nagle D, Madoff RD, Lerew DR, Mellgren A. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):441-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf8ed0.
- Background: PubMed 24609699Kaiser AM, Orangio GR, Zutshi M, Alva S, Hull TL, Marcello PW, Margolin DA, Rafferty JF, Buie WD, Wexner SD. Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence. Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2277-301. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3464-3. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
- Background: PubMed 16469561Brazzelli M, Murray A, Fraser C. Efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary urge incontinence: a systematic review. J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):835-41. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00326-5.
- Background: PubMed 23899452Noblett KL, Cadish LA. Sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of refractory voiding and bowel dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;210(2):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan to make the individual participant data available to other researchers. The data may be provided upon reasonable request.
Related trials for Double Incontinence
Not yet recruiting
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy
Urinary Incontinence (UI), Prostatectomy
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Autologous Muscle Derived Cells Compared to Placebo for Urinary Sphincter Repair in Post-surgical Female Stress Incontinence
Stress Urinary Incontinence
RecruitingPhase 2
RELIEVE Study: NT 201 Intravesical Administration Using Vibe System (ViXe Combination Product) for the Treatment of Idiopathic Overactive Bladder
Overactive Bladder (OAB)
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Safety and Efficacy of Aloe Vera in the Management of the Symptoms of Interstitial Cystitis
Interstitial Cystitis, Chronic Interstitial Cystitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Skeletal Muscle-derived Cell Implantation for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
Fecal Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Milan Tesař, MD, Ph.D. principal investigator
University Hospital Ostrava
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sacral neurostimulation in people with Double Incontinence and Faecal Incontinence, run by University Hospital Ostrava at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jiří Hynčica (0042059737 ext. 2587, jiri.hyncica@fno.cz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall effect of SNM (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07212387, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2025.