LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCERSUNICURE-HDNCT07213427
Outcomes of Image-guided High-dose-rate Uterovaginal Brachytherapy With Single Implantation
An observational study of LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCERS, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.
Trial summary
Background and Rationale: Locally advanced cervical cancer remains a major public health concern worldwide and in France. Standard-of-care management involves concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy, which is critical for local tumour control and survival. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCERS
- What is being tested?
- data collection
- How many people
- 363 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2025to Jun 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO 2018: IB3-IV) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy
Who may be able to join
- Women aged 18 years or older
- Diagnosis of locally advanced cervical cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or other)
- FIGO stage IB3-IV
- Treatment with chemoradiotherapy followed by uterovaginal brachytherapy with implantation in the operating room
- Informed and not opposed to the collection of her data for research purposes
Who cannot join
- Lack of information regarding follow-up
- Patient under legal protection measures -
About this study
Official title: UNICURE-HD - Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Image-guided High-dose-rate Uterovaginal Brachytherapy With Single Implantation: a French Multicentre Study
Background and Rationale:
Locally advanced cervical cancer remains a major public health concern worldwide and in France. Standard-of-care management involves concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy, which is critical for local tumour control and survival. Conventional high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy protocols often require multiple implantations under anaesthesia, entailing increased logistical demands, operating room use, and patient discomfort.
Read more
The UNICURE-HD study investigates a simplified brachytherapy approach - a single intraoperative implantation delivering all planned fractions - combined with image guidance (MRI and/or CT) and 3D dosimetry, in order to assess whether it can maintain oncological outcomes while reducing treatment complexity and resource consumption.
Objectives:
Primary objective: To evaluate local control at 3 and 5 years after completion of chemoradiotherapy and image-guided HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy with single implantation.
Secondary objectives: To assess pelvic nodal control, para-aortic nodal control, distant control, progression-free survival, overall survival, and acute/late severe toxicities (CTCAE v5.0 ≥ grade 3). Prognostic factors will be analysed, and exploratory predictive models will be developed.
Study Design:
This is a retrospective, observational, multicentre study involving six French cancer centres (Pitié-Salpêtrière, Saint-Louis, Tenon, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Centre Oscar Lambret, CHU de La Réunion). Eligible patients are women ≥18 years, diagnosed with FIGO 2018 stage IB3-IV cervical cancer, treated between January 2014 and June 2024 with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by image-guided HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy using a single implantation.
Methods:
Data will be extracted from medical records (electronic or paper), pseudonymised locally, and entered into a secure AP-HP-hosted database compliant with GDPR and the MR004 framework. Variables collected include demographics, tumour characteristics, EBRT details, brachytherapy technique (endocavitary vs hybrid/interstitial), dosimetric parameters (EQD2 for HR-CTV, IR-CTV, OARs), and outcomes. Imaging protocols, applicator types, and treatment times will also be recorded.
Statistical analysis will use descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival estimation, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression. Predictive models (LASSO, random forests) will be explored. Analyses will be conducted in R software.
Sample Size:
Approximately 400 patients are expected, representing all eligible cases treated over the 10-year period in the participating centres.
Ethics and Regulatory Compliance:
The study follows GDPR and French data protection regulations (MR004). Ethics opinion has been requested from the Sorbonne Université Ethics Committee. Each centre will retain the correspondence table linking identifiers to pseudonyms locally; no directly identifying data will be shared.
Potential Impact:
If the single-implantation HDR brachytherapy strategy achieves equivalent tumour control and toxicity profiles compared to multi-implant protocols, it could streamline cervical cancer management, reduce anaesthetic risk, improve patient comfort, and optimise resource use in high-volume oncology departments. This could have significant implications for accessibility and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer care, particularly in settings with limited resources.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale Cervical cancer remains a major global health concern, ranking among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in women in low- and middle-income countries, but also persisting as a significant public health problem in high-income countries such as France. The prognosis of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) has markedly improved over the past two decades thanks to the standardisation of concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy, in accordance with international guidelines (e.g., GEC-ESTRO, ABS, ESGO).
Brachytherapy is an essential component of curative treatment, enabling the delivery of high doses to the tumour volume while sparing surrounding organs at risk (OARs) through the steep dose fall-off inherent to the inverse square law. Multiple large-scale studies have demonstrated that omission or suboptimal delivery of brachytherapy significantly compromises local control and survival. However, conventional high-dose-rate (HDR) image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer often requires multiple applicator implantations (usually 2-3) under general or spinal anaesthesia, spread over separate hospitalisations or days.
This traditional multi-implantation schedule, although effective, poses several challenges:
- Logistical complexity: multiple operating room slots, anaesthetic procedures, and inpatient stays are required, which increases healthcare system burden.
- Patient comfort and safety: repeated invasive procedures are associated with increased pain, anxiety, risk of anaesthesia-related complications, and overall reduced quality of life.
- Resource constraints**: in high-volume oncology departments or in resource-limited settings, multiple implantations can delay treatment or limit access for other patients.
- Overall treatment time: prolongation of the total treatment time beyond 50 days is associated with a \~1% decrease in local control per day of delay, underlining the importance of optimising schedules.
To address these challenges, some teams have adopted a *single-implantation* strategy, whereby all HDR brachytherapy fractions are delivered from a single applicator placement, either over consecutive days (with in-patient applicator maintenance) or on the same day with multiple fractions. This approach is less common but potentially offers major advantages in terms of logistics, patient comfort, and cost-efficiency, provided that it maintains oncological efficacy and safety.
Study rationale The UNICURE-HD study aims to comprehensively evaluate the outcomes of image-guided HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy delivered with a single implantation in patients with LACC treated in French reference centres. This large, multicentre retrospective analysis will address a gap in the literature, as most published data on single-implant strategies come from small single-centre series with heterogeneous protocols and limited follow-up.
Given that France benefits from a strong brachytherapy infrastructure and experienced multidisciplinary teams, but also faces increasing demands on operating theatres and inpatient beds, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of single-implant HDR brachytherapy could have significant organisational and economic impact without compromising patient outcomes.
Objectives
Primary objective:
To determine the 3 and 5-year local control rate following chemoradiotherapy and single-implantation image-guided HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy in women with LACC.
Secondary objectives:
- To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
- To assess pelvic nodal control, para-aortic nodal control, and distant metastasis control rates.
- To document the incidence and patterns of severe (grade ≥3, CTCAE v5.0) acute and late toxicities affecting urinary, rectal, gastrointestinal, and vaginal functions.
- To identify clinical, radiological, and dosimetric prognostic factors for local control, PFS, and OS.
- To develop exploratory predictive models for relapse and survival using advanced statistical and machine learning methods.
Study Design:
This is a retrospective, observational, national multicentre study involving six French centres with expertise in gynaecological brachytherapy:
- Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris (Coordinating centre)
- Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris
- Tenon Hospital, Paris
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy
- Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
- CHU de La Réunion
Population:
Inclusion criteria encompass adult women (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed LACC (FIGO 2018 IB3-IV), treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by image-guided HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy using a single implantation, between January 1, 2014, and June 15, 2024.
Non-inclusion criteria include absence of brachytherapy, treatment without concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or missing follow-up data.
Sample size:
An estimated 400 patients are expected, representing all eligible cases during the study period in participating centres.
Treatment Details:
All patients received EBRT to the pelvis (± para-aortic fields if indicated) with a total dose typically ranging from 45-50 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy fractions, delivered using 3D conformal radiotherapy or IMRT/VMAT. Nodal boosts were administered based on disease extent. Concurrent weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m²) or alternative regimens (e.g., carboplatin) were used unless contraindicated.
Brachytherapy was performed using an endocavitary applicator or hybrid/interstitial technique depending on tumour response and anatomy. Imaging for applicator reconstruction included MRI (preferred) and/or CT, with MRI often fused to CT for optimal target delineation. Dose prescription and planning followed GEC-ESTRO guidelines, aiming for HR-CTV D90 ≥85 Gy EQD2 (α/β = 10) while respecting OAR constraints (e.g., bladder D2cc <90 Gy EQD2, rectum/sigmoid D2cc <75 Gy EQD2, α/β = 3).
Data Collection and Variables
Collected data include:
Demographics: age Tumour characteristics: histology, FIGO stage, initial MRI findings, nodal status Treatment parameters: EBRT technique, fields, dose, chemotherapy regimen, brachytherapy technique, applicator type, imaging modality, fractionation scheme, dosimetric parameters (HR-CTV, IR-CTV, OAR doses), total treatment time Outcomes: local, pelvic nodal, para-aortic nodal, distant relapse (dates and locations), vital status, last follow-up Toxicities: maximum grade acute and late toxicities, date of onset, management strategies
Statistical Analysis:
Survival endpoints (local control, PFS, OS, nodal and distant control) will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons will be performed with log-rank tests. Prognostic factor analysis will use univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Predictive modelling with machine learning algorithms (LASSO regression, random forests) will be explored for relapse and survival prediction. All analyses will be performed using R software (v4.4.2 or later).
Ethics and Regulatory Compliance:
The study is conducted under the MR004 framework for retrospective research without informed consent, in compliance with GDPR. The AP-HP Data Protection Officer has been notified, and the Sorbonne Université Ethics Committee opinion has been sought. Pseudonymisation is performed locally at each centre, and no directly identifying data will be transferred to the coordinating centre.
Potential Impact:
If single-implant HDR brachytherapy is shown to provide equivalent local control and toxicity outcomes compared with traditional multi-implant schedules, it could:
- Streamline treatment delivery, freeing up operating rooms and staff.
- Reduce anaesthesia-related morbidity and patient discomfort.
- Shorten treatment times, potentially improving tumour control.
- Optimise cost-effectiveness and scalability of brachytherapy programmes in both high-resource and resource-constrained settings.
The UNICURE-HD study will therefore provide robust, multicentre evidence to inform clinical practice guidelines and health policy regarding brachytherapy delivery for cervical cancer.
- Conditions
- LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCERS
- Being tested
- data collection
- Keywords
- Brachytherapy, gynaecologic, oncology, single-insertion, dosimetry
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
data collectionOther
Collection of relevant medical data (clinical data, imaging, treatment, follow-up, toxicities), performed locally by investigators or authorized members of the medical team.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Local control, overall survival
Local control (LC) was defined as the absence of persistent tumor or relapse in the cervix, uterus, or paracervical region. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the start of treatment to death from any cause.
Measured: January 1, 2014 - June 15, 2024
Secondary outcomes (2)
Failure-free survival
Measured: January 1, 2014 - June 15, 2024
overall survival
Measured: January 1, 2014 - June 15, 2024
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2025
- Study startDec 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionJun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCERSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 363 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07213427
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP251146
- Acronym
- UNICURE-HD
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 16 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients. Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- UNICURE-HD - Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Image-guided High-dose-rate Uterovaginal Brachytherapy With Single Implantation: a French Multicentre Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07213427
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UNICURE-HD / APHP251146
- Conditions
- LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCERS
- Keywords
- Brachytherapy, gynaecologic, oncology, single-insertion, dosimetry
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 363 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background and Rationale:
Locally advanced cervical cancer remains a major public health concern worldwide and in France. Standard-of-care management involves concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy, which is critical for local tumour control and survival. Conventional high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy protocols often require multiple implantations under anaesthesia, entailing increased logistical demands, operating room use, and patient discomfort.
The UNICURE-HD study investigates a simplified brachytherapy approach - a single intraoperative implantation delivering all planned fractions - combined with image guidance (MRI and/or CT) and 3D dosimetry, in order to assess whether it can maintain oncological outcomes while reducing treatment complexity and resource consumption.
Objectives:
Primary objective: To evaluate local control at 3 and 5 years after completion of chemoradiotherapy and image-guided HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy with single implantation.
Secondary objectives: To assess pelvic nodal control, para-aortic nodal control, distant control, progression-free survival, overall survival, and acute/late severe toxicities (CTCAE v5.0 ≥ grade 3). Prognostic factors will be analysed, and exploratory predictive models will be developed.
Study Design:
This is a retrospective, observational, multicentre study involving six French cancer centres (Pitié-Salpêtrière, Saint-Louis, Tenon, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Centre Oscar Lambret, CHU de La Réunion). Eligible patients are women ≥18 years, diagnosed with FIGO 2018 stage IB3-IV cervical cancer, treated between January 2014 and June 2024 with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by image-guided HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy using a single implantation.
Methods:
Data will be extracted from medical records (electronic or paper), pseudonymised locally, and entered into a secure AP-HP-hosted database compliant with GDPR and the MR004 framework. Variables collected include demographics, tumour characteristics, EBRT details, brachytherapy technique (endocavitary vs hybrid/interstitial), dosimetric parameters (EQD2 for HR-CTV, IR-CTV, OARs), and outcomes. Imaging protocols, applicator types, and treatment times will also be recorded.
Statistical analysis will use descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival estimation, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression. Predictive models (LASSO, random forests) will be explored. Analyses will be conducted in R software.
Sample Size:
Approximately 400 patients are expected, representing all eligible cases treated over the 10-year period in the participating centres.
Ethics and Regulatory Compliance:
The study follows GDPR and French data protection regulations (MR004). Ethics opinion has been requested from the Sorbonne Université Ethics Committee. Each centre will retain the correspondence table linking identifiers to pseudonyms locally; no directly identifying data will be shared.
Potential Impact:
If the single-implantation HDR brachytherapy strategy achieves equivalent tumour control and toxicity profiles compared to multi-implant protocols, it could streamline cervical cancer management, reduce anaesthetic risk, improve patient comfort, and optimise resource use in high-volume oncology departments. This could have significant implications for accessibility and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer care, particularly in settings with limited resources.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale Cervical cancer remains a major global health concern, ranking among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in women in low- and middle-income countries, but also persisting as a significant public health problem in high-income countries such as France. The prognosis of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) has markedly improved over the past two decades thanks to the standardisation of concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy, in accordance with international guidelines (e.g., GEC-ESTRO, ABS, ESGO).
Brachytherapy is an essential component of curative treatment, enabling the delivery of high doses to the tumour volume while sparing surrounding organs at risk (OARs) through the steep dose fall-off inherent to the inverse square law. Multiple large-scale studies have demonstrated that omission or suboptimal delivery of brachytherapy significantly compromises local control and survival. However, conventional high-dose-rate (HDR) image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer often requires multiple applicator implantations (usually 2-3) under general or spinal anaesthesia, spread over separate hospitalisations or days.
This traditional multi-implantation schedule, although effective, poses several challenges:
- Logistical complexity: multiple operating room slots, anaesthetic procedures, and inpatient stays are required, which increases healthcare system burden.
- Patient comfort and safety: repeated invasive procedures are associated with increased pain, anxiety, risk of anaesthesia-related complications, and overall reduced quality of life.
- Resource constraints**: in high-volume oncology departments or in resource-limited settings, multiple implantations can delay treatment or limit access for other patients.
- Overall treatment time: prolongation of the total treatment time beyond 50 days is associated with a \~1% decrease in local control per day of delay, underlining the importance of optimising schedules.
To address these challenges, some teams have adopted a *single-implantation* strategy, whereby all HDR brachytherapy fractions are delivered from a single applicator placement, either over consecutive days (with in-patient applicator maintenance) or on the same day with multiple fractions. This approach is less common but potentially offers major advantages in terms of logistics, patient comfort, and cost-efficiency, provided that it maintains oncological efficacy and safety.
Study rationale The UNICURE-HD study aims to comprehensively evaluate the outcomes of image-guided HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy delivered with a single implantation in patients with LACC treated in French reference centres. This large, multicentre retrospective analysis will address a gap in the literature, as most published data on single-implant strategies come from small single-centre series with heterogeneous protocols and limited follow-up.
Given that France benefits from a strong brachytherapy infrastructure and experienced multidisciplinary teams, but also faces increasing demands on operating theatres and inpatient beds, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of single-implant HDR brachytherapy could have significant organisational and economic impact without compromising patient outcomes.
Objectives
Primary objective:
To determine the 3 and 5-year local control rate following chemoradiotherapy and single-implantation image-guided HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy in women with LACC.
Secondary objectives:
- To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
- To assess pelvic nodal control, para-aortic nodal control, and distant metastasis control rates.
- To document the incidence and patterns of severe (grade ≥3, CTCAE v5.0) acute and late toxicities affecting urinary, rectal, gastrointestinal, and vaginal functions.
- To identify clinical, radiological, and dosimetric prognostic factors for local control, PFS, and OS.
- To develop exploratory predictive models for relapse and survival using advanced statistical and machine learning methods.
Study Design:
This is a retrospective, observational, national multicentre study involving six French centres with expertise in gynaecological brachytherapy:
- Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris (Coordinating centre)
- Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris
- Tenon Hospital, Paris
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy
- Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
- CHU de La Réunion
Population:
Inclusion criteria encompass adult women (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed LACC (FIGO 2018 IB3-IV), treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by image-guided HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy using a single implantation, between January 1, 2014, and June 15, 2024.
Non-inclusion criteria include absence of brachytherapy, treatment without concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or missing follow-up data.
Sample size:
An estimated 400 patients are expected, representing all eligible cases during the study period in participating centres.
Treatment Details:
All patients received EBRT to the pelvis (± para-aortic fields if indicated) with a total dose typically ranging from 45-50 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy fractions, delivered using 3D conformal radiotherapy or IMRT/VMAT. Nodal boosts were administered based on disease extent. Concurrent weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m²) or alternative regimens (e.g., carboplatin) were used unless contraindicated.
Brachytherapy was performed using an endocavitary applicator or hybrid/interstitial technique depending on tumour response and anatomy. Imaging for applicator reconstruction included MRI (preferred) and/or CT, with MRI often fused to CT for optimal target delineation. Dose prescription and planning followed GEC-ESTRO guidelines, aiming for HR-CTV D90 ≥85 Gy EQD2 (α/β = 10) while respecting OAR constraints (e.g., bladder D2cc <90 Gy EQD2, rectum/sigmoid D2cc <75 Gy EQD2, α/β = 3).
Data Collection and Variables
Collected data include:
Demographics: age Tumour characteristics: histology, FIGO stage, initial MRI findings, nodal status Treatment parameters: EBRT technique, fields, dose, chemotherapy regimen, brachytherapy technique, applicator type, imaging modality, fractionation scheme, dosimetric parameters (HR-CTV, IR-CTV, OAR doses), total treatment time Outcomes: local, pelvic nodal, para-aortic nodal, distant relapse (dates and locations), vital status, last follow-up Toxicities: maximum grade acute and late toxicities, date of onset, management strategies
Statistical Analysis:
Survival endpoints (local control, PFS, OS, nodal and distant control) will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons will be performed with log-rank tests. Prognostic factor analysis will use univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Predictive modelling with machine learning algorithms (LASSO regression, random forests) will be explored for relapse and survival prediction. All analyses will be performed using R software (v4.4.2 or later).
Ethics and Regulatory Compliance:
The study is conducted under the MR004 framework for retrospective research without informed consent, in compliance with GDPR. The AP-HP Data Protection Officer has been notified, and the Sorbonne Université Ethics Committee opinion has been sought. Pseudonymisation is performed locally at each centre, and no directly identifying data will be transferred to the coordinating centre.
Potential Impact:
If single-implant HDR brachytherapy is shown to provide equivalent local control and toxicity outcomes compared with traditional multi-implant schedules, it could:
- Streamline treatment delivery, freeing up operating rooms and staff.
- Reduce anaesthesia-related morbidity and patient discomfort.
- Shorten treatment times, potentially improving tumour control.
- Optimise cost-effectiveness and scalability of brachytherapy programmes in both high-resource and resource-constrained settings.
The UNICURE-HD study will therefore provide robust, multicentre evidence to inform clinical practice guidelines and health policy regarding brachytherapy delivery for cervical cancer.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO 2018: IB3-IV) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by HDR uterovaginal brachytherapy
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Women aged 18 years or older
- Diagnosis of locally advanced cervical cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or other)
- FIGO stage IB3-IV
- Treatment with chemoradiotherapy followed by uterovaginal brachytherapy with implantation in the operating room
- Informed and not opposed to the collection of her data for research purposes
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Lack of information regarding follow-up
- Patient under legal protection measures -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| data collectionCollection of relevant medical data (clinical data, imaging, treatment, follow-up, toxicities), performed locally by investigators or authorized members of the medical team. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Local control, overall survival
Time frame: January 1, 2014 - June 15, 2024
Local control (LC) was defined as the absence of persistent tumor or relapse in the cervix, uterus, or paracervical region. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the start of treatment to death from any cause.
2 secondary outcomes
Failure-free survival
Time frame: January 1, 2014 - June 15, 2024
overall survival
Time frame: January 1, 2014 - June 15, 2024
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients. Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations.
Related trials for LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCERS
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Induction Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab Before Chemoradiation and Pembrolizumab Maintenance Compared to Standard Chemoradiation With Pembrolizumab Followed by Pembrolizumab Maintenance in High-Risk Cervical Cancer
Locally Advanced Cervical Adenocarcinoma, Locally Advanced Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Intravenously Administered PROMITIL Combined With Radiotherapy in Patients With Cisplatin-Ineligible Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Head & Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Soylent in Reducing Gastrostomy Tube Rates in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy
Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCERS, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Local control, overall survival (time frame: January 1, 2014 - June 15, 2024). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2025.