Malnutrition (Calorie)GMDFANCT07225153
Goat Milk-Derived Formula vs. Undiluted Goat Milk in Infants Unable to Exclusively Breastfeed: Growth and Biomarker Analysis
A study testing GMDFA and Undiluted Goat Milk in people with Malnutrition (Calorie) and Infant Nutrition Disorder, run by Aga Khan University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternatives (GMDFA) are safe and effective for infants who are unable to be exclusively breastfed. It will also study growth patterns, biological markers, and gut microbiome differences among infants receiving GMDFA, undiluted goat milk, or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 10 weeks
- Conditions the study is for
- Malnutrition (Calorie), Infant Nutrition Disorder, Growth Flatering
- What is being tested?
- GMDFA and Undiluted Goat Milk
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 30 Aug 2025to 18 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 10 weeks
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- • Infants aged = 08 -10 weeks with WAZ better than -1.8. (NIPS \& ICF, 2019) Age Sex WAZ Weight in Kilograms 2 Month Boys WAZ>-1.8 4-5 kg 2 Month Girls WAZ>-1.8 4-5 kg Table 3: WAZ scores
- Living in Matiari District.
- Who has access to goat milk in their households.
- The Breastfeeding group: Women who exclusively breastfeeding and not giving and sort of formula or animal derived milk.
- Intervention Group: Women who do not breastfeed at all or give goat milk to their infants (2-3 feeds per day).
- No birth deformities
Who cannot join
- • Infant birth weight < WAZ -1.8 i.e. weight-for-age based on established growth standards, such as the World Health Organization (WHO).
- Birth deformities or disorders, such as genetic disorders, aerodigestive problems, or congenital anomalies.
- Plan to migrate during the next six months.
- We will exclude the women who exclusive breast feed and continue breast feeding for first 4 months.
- If the child is enrolled or included in any other interventional trial.
- Who does not have access to goat milk in their households.
- Are medically disqualified: Any potential participant who is deemed medically unfit for enrollment, due to the presence of severe or unstable health conditions that could compromise safety or interfere with the study outcomes, will be excluded from participation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
MATIARI Research & Training Centre
Matiāri, Sindh, 45330
Dr. Fayyaz Umrani, MSPH, +923337009960, fayaz.umrani@aku.edu
Dr. Sheraz Ahmed, +923343131087, sheraz.ahmed@aku.edu
About this study
Official title: Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternatives vs. Undiluted Goat Milk in Babies Unable to Exclusively Breastfeed: Analysis of Growth Metrics and Biological Markers
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternatives (GMDFA) are safe and effective for infants who are unable to be exclusively breastfed. It will also study growth patterns, biological markers, and gut microbiome differences among infants receiving GMDFA, undiluted goat milk, or breast milk.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Do infants receiving GMDFA show similar growth patterns to those who are breastfed?
- Are biological markers of gut health and nutrition (such as calprotectin, lipocalin-2, CRP, and claudin) comparable between the groups?
- How do feeding types (GMDFA, goat milk, or breast milk) influence the infant gut microbiome composition, metabolic pathways, and lipid profiles?
- Is GMDFA a safe and nutritionally adequate feeding option for infants unable to be exclusively breastfed?
We will compare GMDFA, undiluted goat milk, and breast milk (reference group) to evaluate infant growth, gut health, and metabolic outcomes.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to one of three feeding groups: GMDFA, undiluted goat milk, or breastfed
Attend regular follow-up visits for growth measurements and sample collection (blood, stool, and breast milk where applicable)
Have feeding practices monitored and recorded through caregiver interviews and feeding logs
Additional Analyses:
Microbiome analysis: to identify gut bacterial diversity and composition across feeding groups Metagenomic analysis: to explore functional genes and metabolic pathways related to nutrition and gut health Lipidomic analysis: to assess differences in lipid and fatty acid profiles in breast milk, goat milk, and infant samples
Read the detailed description
This community-based randomized controlled trial will evaluate the safety, nutritional adequacy, and biological effects of a Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) among infants aged 8-10 weeks in Matiari, Pakistan, who are unable to exclusively breastfeed. The study includes three groups: (1) an intervention group receiving GMDFA prepared according to a standardized recipe developed for the study, (2) a control group receiving undiluted goat milk according to local feeding practices, and (3) an active comparator group of exclusively breastfed infants serving as a reference.
The intervention will last for 8 weeks. Primary and secondary outcomes will assess changes in lipidomic profiles, micronutrient status, gut inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, lipocalin-2, calprotectin, Claudin), and gut microbiome composition and diversity (Bifidobacterium, Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Clostridium, Lactobacillus). Anthropometric measurements including weight, length, and head circumference will be recorded at baseline and follow-up to evaluate infant growth outcomes.
The study aims to determine whether GMDFA provides a safe and nutritionally appropriate alternative to formula milk for infants who cannot be exclusively breastfed, with comparable biological and growth outcomes to breastfed infants. Findings from this study will inform the potential use of goat milk-based alternatives in low-resource settings where malnutrition and suboptimal breastfeeding rates are prevalent.
- Conditions
- Malnutrition (Calorie), Infant Nutrition Disorder, Growth Flatering, Gut Microbiome, Lipidomics
- Being tested
- GMDFA, Undiluted Goat Milk
- Keywords
- Infant nutrition, goat milk, Infant feeding practices, Breastfeeding, Breastfeeding Alternatives, Alternate feeding practices, Growth outcomes, Infant growth metrics, Gut microbiome, Gut inflammation biomarkers, Calprotectin, Lipocalin-2, Claudin-2, C-reactive protein (CRP), Randomized controlled trial, Rural Pakistan, Infant health, Malnutrition prevention, Lipidomics, Breast milk
- Medical subject headings
- Malnutrition, Infant Nutrition Disorders, Breast Feeding
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GMDFADietary supplement
GMDFA (GOat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative) is a goat milk-based formulation designed as an affordable alternative to commercial infant formula. It is prepared by diluting goat's milk to a standardized protein and micronutrient concentration according to study protocol. Infants in this arm will receive GMDFA from enrollment (08-10 weeks) until 16-18 weeks of age under close monitoring for growth and safety outcomes.
Undiluted Goat MilkOther
Infants will receive undiluted goat milk as per current local feeding practices for 8 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) | Experimental | Infants in this arm will receive Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) as their primary source of feeding for 08 weeks. Growth, safety, and biological markers will be assessed through anthropometric measurements and laboratory analyses, including microbiome, metagenomic, and lipidomic profiling. Receives: Dietary Supplement: GMDFA |
| Undiluted Goat Milk (Current Practice) | Active comparator | Infants in this arm will receive undiluted goat milk according to local feeding practices, representing the current alternative to breastfeeding in the community. Growth and biological markers will be compared with the GMDFA and breastfed groups to evaluate safety and nutritional adequacy. Receives: Other: Undiluted Goat Milk |
| Breastfed Group (Reference Comparator) | No intervention | Infants in this arm will be exclusively breastfed following WHO guidelines. No feeding intervention will be introduced. This group serves as the gold standard for comparison of growth metrics, microbiome composition, and metabolic biomarkers with the GMDFA and undiluted goat milk groups. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in lipidomic markers among infants receiving Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) compared to undiluted goat milk and breastfeeding groups.
To evaluate whether infants aged 8-10 weeks in Matiari who are unable to exclusively breastfeed and receive GMDFA show favorable changes in lipidomic profiles compared to those fed undiluted goat milk, and similar metabolic marker status compared to exclusively breastfed infants after 8 weeks of intervention.
Measured: Baseline (enrollment) to 8 weeks after intervention
Change in gut microbiome composition and diversity among infants receiving GMDFA compared to undiluted goat milk and breastfeeding groups.
To determine whether infants aged 8-10 weeks in Matiari who are unable to exclusively breastfeed and receive Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) exhibit distinct shifts in gut microbiome composition (Bifidobacterium, Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Lactobacillus) and changes in alpha- and beta-diversity over 8 weeks, compared to those fed undiluted goat milk, and a microbiome profile similar to age-matched breastfed infants and healthy reference profiles from the same population.
Measured: Baseline (enrollment) to 8 weeks after intervention
Secondary outcomes (3)
Infant growth measured by weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
Change in infant weight-for-age z-score from enrollment to 16-18 weeks of age, comparing GMDFA, breastfeeding, and undiluted goat milk groups.
Measured: From baseline (enrollment) to 16-18 weeks of age
Change in serum micronutrient levels among infants receiving GMDFA compared to undiluted goat milk and breastfeeding groups.
To determine whether infants aged 8-10 weeks in Matiari who are unable to exclusively breastfeed and receive Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) exhibit higher serum concentrations of essential micronutrients (vitamin A, vitamin B12, vitamin D, calcium, iron, and zinc) compared to those fed undiluted goat milk, and comparable micronutrient status to exclusively breastfed infants after 8 weeks of intervention.
Measured: Baseline (enrollment) to 8 weeks after intervention
Change in gut inflammatory biomarkers among infants receiving GMDFA compared to undiluted goat milk and breastfeeding groups.
To assess whether infants aged 8-10 weeks in Matiari who are unable to exclusively breastfeed and receive Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) show favorable changes in gut inflammatory markers (CRP, Lipocalin-2, Claudin, and Calprotectin) compared to those fed undiluted goat milk, and similar gut inflammatory marker status to exclusively breastfed infants after 8 weeks of intervention.
Measured: Baseline (enrollment) to 8 weeks after intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2025
- Study start30 Aug 2025
- Primary completion30 Dec 2025
- Study completion18 Mar 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (27)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Malnutrition (Calorie)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a three-arm, parallel-group, community-based randomized controlled trial designed to compare the effects of Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA), undiluted goat milk, and exclusive breastfeeding on infant growth, gut microbiome, and metabolic health. Infants will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups and followed concurrently for a 8-week intervention period. Each group will receive its assigned feeding regimen in parallel, with no crossover between groups.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aga Khan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health, University of Colorado, Boulder, Baker Heart Research Institute
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Junaid Iqbal, Aga Khan University
- Investigators
- Dr. junaid Iqbal, PhD, Principal investigator, Aga Khan UniversitySyed Asad Ali, MPH, Study director, Aga Khan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07225153
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-11220-34303
- Other IDs
- D43TW007585, 2025
- Acronym
- GMDFA
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
George AD, Paul S, Wang T, Huynh K, Giles C, Mellett N, Duong T, Nguyen A, Geddes D, Mansell T, Saffery R, Vuillermin P, Ponsonby AL, Burgner D, Burugupalli S, Meikle PJ; Barwon Infant Study Investigator Team. Defining the lipid profiles of human milk, infant formula, and animal milk: implications for infant feeding. Front Nutr. 2023 Aug 30;10:1227340. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1227340. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 37712002Vandenplas Y, Zolnowska M, Berni Canani R, Ludman S, Tengelyi Z, Moreno-Alvarez A, Goh AEN, Gosoniu ML, Kirwan BA, Tadi M, Heine RG, Cinnamon Study Investigator Group. Effects of an Extensively Hydrolyzed Formula Supplemented with Two Human Milk Oligosaccharides on Growth, Tolerability, Safety and Infection Risk in Infants with Cow's Milk Protein Allergy: A Randomized, Multi-Center Trial. Nutrients. 2022 Jan 26;14(3):530. doi: 10.3390/nu14030530.
PubMed 35276889Akter S, Nishu NA. Malnutrition among under-5 children and its determinants in the southwestern coastal region of Bangladesh: A community-based study. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):e090174. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090174.
PubMed 39809564Moreno-Avila IDM, Martinez-Linares JM, Garcia-Pintor S, Rubia-Ortega SM, Ortiz-Paneque J, El Messaoudi-Ouardani S, Cortes-Martin J. Perceptions on the Reasons Influencing the Choice and Abandonment of Exclusive Breastfeeding in Muslim and Christian Women: A Phenomenological Study. Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Sep;27(3):e70195. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70195.
PubMed 40695358Reinhardt K, Fanzo J. Addressing Chronic Malnutrition through Multi-Sectoral, Sustainable Approaches: A Review of the Causes and Consequences. Front Nutr. 2014 Aug 15;1:13. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2014.00013. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25988116Omer S, Zakar R, Zakar MZ, Fischer F. The influence of social and cultural practices on maternal mortality: a qualitative study from South Punjab, Pakistan. Reprod Health. 2021 May 18;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01151-6.
PubMed 34006307Pietrzak-Fiecko R, Kamelska-Sadowska AM. The Comparison of Nutritional Value of Human Milk with Other Mammals' Milk. Nutrients. 2020 May 14;12(5):1404. doi: 10.3390/nu12051404.
PubMed 32422857Organization, W. H. (2005). Guiding principles for feeding non-breastfed children 6-24 months of age, World Health Organization.
Organization, W. H. (2003). Complementary feeding: report of the global consultation, and summary of guiding principles for complementary feeding of the breastfed child, World Health Organization.
Noh JW, Kim YM, Akram N, Yoo KB, Cheon J, Lee LJ, Kwon YD, Stekelenburg J. Factors Affecting Breastfeeding Practices in Sindh Province, Pakistan: A Secondary Analysis of Cross-Sectional Survey Data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 14;16(10):1689. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101689.
PubMed 31091768Nayik GA, Jagdale YD, Gaikwad SA, Devkatte AN, Dar AH, Dezmirean DS, Bobis O, Ranjha MMAN, Ansari MJ, Hemeg HA, Alotaibi SS. Recent Insights Into Processing Approaches and Potential Health Benefits of Goat Milk and Its Products: A Review. Front Nutr. 2021 Dec 6;8:789117. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.789117. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34938763Militao, E. M., Salvador, E. M., Silva, J. P., Uthman, O. A., Vinberg, S., & Macassa, G. (2022). Coping strategies for household food insecurity, and perceived health in an urban community in southern Mozambique: a qualitative study. Sustainability, 14(14), 8710.
Kinsella HM, Hostnik LD, Toribio RE. Energy endocrine physiology, pathophysiology, and nutrition of the foal. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2022 Oct 26;260(S3):S83-S93. doi: 10.2460/javma.22.08.0348.
PubMed 36288202Kandhro F, Kazi TG, Afridi HI, Baig JA, Lashari AA, Lashari A. Determination of toxic elemental levels in whey milk of different cattle and human using an innovative digestion method: risk assessment for children < 6.0 months to 5 years. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(14):41923-41936. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-25059-1. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
PubMed 36640239Kabir F, Iqbal J, Jamil Z, Iqbal NT, Mallawaarachchi I, Aziz F, Kalam A, Muneer S, Hotwani A, Ahmed S, Umrani F, Syed S, Sadiq K, Ma JZ, Moore SR, Ali A. Impact of enteropathogens on faltering growth in a resource-limited setting. Front Nutr. 2023 Jan 10;9:1081833. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1081833. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 36704796
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternatives vs. Undiluted Goat Milk in Babies Unable to Exclusively Breastfeed: Analysis of Growth Metrics and Biological Markers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07225153
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GMDFA / 2025-11220-34303
- Conditions
- Malnutrition (Calorie), Infant Nutrition Disorder, Growth Flatering, Gut Microbiome, Lipidomics
- Keywords
- Infant nutrition, goat milk, Infant feeding practices, Breastfeeding, Breastfeeding Alternatives, Alternate feeding practices, Growth outcomes, Infant growth metrics
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Aga Khan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health, University of Colorado, Boulder, Baker Heart Research Institute
- Study start
- 30 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternatives (GMDFA) are safe and effective for infants who are unable to be exclusively breastfed. It will also study growth patterns, biological markers, and gut microbiome differences among infants receiving GMDFA, undiluted goat milk, or breast milk.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Do infants receiving GMDFA show similar growth patterns to those who are breastfed?
- Are biological markers of gut health and nutrition (such as calprotectin, lipocalin-2, CRP, and claudin) comparable between the groups?
- How do feeding types (GMDFA, goat milk, or breast milk) influence the infant gut microbiome composition, metabolic pathways, and lipid profiles?
- Is GMDFA a safe and nutritionally adequate feeding option for infants unable to be exclusively breastfed?
We will compare GMDFA, undiluted goat milk, and breast milk (reference group) to evaluate infant growth, gut health, and metabolic outcomes.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to one of three feeding groups: GMDFA, undiluted goat milk, or breastfed
Attend regular follow-up visits for growth measurements and sample collection (blood, stool, and breast milk where applicable)
Have feeding practices monitored and recorded through caregiver interviews and feeding logs
Additional Analyses:
Microbiome analysis: to identify gut bacterial diversity and composition across feeding groups Metagenomic analysis: to explore functional genes and metabolic pathways related to nutrition and gut health Lipidomic analysis: to assess differences in lipid and fatty acid profiles in breast milk, goat milk, and infant samples
Detailed description
This community-based randomized controlled trial will evaluate the safety, nutritional adequacy, and biological effects of a Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) among infants aged 8-10 weeks in Matiari, Pakistan, who are unable to exclusively breastfeed. The study includes three groups: (1) an intervention group receiving GMDFA prepared according to a standardized recipe developed for the study, (2) a control group receiving undiluted goat milk according to local feeding practices, and (3) an active comparator group of exclusively breastfed infants serving as a reference.
The intervention will last for 8 weeks. Primary and secondary outcomes will assess changes in lipidomic profiles, micronutrient status, gut inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, lipocalin-2, calprotectin, Claudin), and gut microbiome composition and diversity (Bifidobacterium, Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Clostridium, Lactobacillus). Anthropometric measurements including weight, length, and head circumference will be recorded at baseline and follow-up to evaluate infant growth outcomes.
The study aims to determine whether GMDFA provides a safe and nutritionally appropriate alternative to formula milk for infants who cannot be exclusively breastfed, with comparable biological and growth outcomes to breastfed infants. Findings from this study will inform the potential use of goat milk-based alternatives in low-resource settings where malnutrition and suboptimal breastfeeding rates are prevalent.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This is a three-arm, parallel-group, community-based randomized controlled trial designed to compare the effects of Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA), undiluted goat milk, and exclusive breastfeeding on infant growth, gut microbiome, and metabolic health. Infants will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups and followed concurrently for a 8-week intervention period. Each group will receive its assigned feeding regimen in parallel, with no crossover between groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: GMDFAInfants in this arm will receive Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) as their primary source of feeding for 08 weeks. Growth, safety, and biological markers will be assessed through anthropometric measurements and laboratory analyses, including microbiome, metagenomic, and lipidomic profiling. |
| Undiluted Goat Milk (Current Practice) | Active comparator | Other: Undiluted Goat MilkInfants in this arm will receive undiluted goat milk according to local feeding practices, representing the current alternative to breastfeeding in the community. Growth and biological markers will be compared with the GMDFA and breastfed groups to evaluate safety and nutritional adequacy. |
| Breastfed Group (Reference Comparator) | No intervention | –Infants in this arm will be exclusively breastfed following WHO guidelines. No feeding intervention will be introduced. This group serves as the gold standard for comparison of growth metrics, microbiome composition, and metabolic biomarkers with the GMDFA and undiluted goat milk groups. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 10 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- • Infants aged = 08 -10 weeks with WAZ better than -1.8. (NIPS \& ICF, 2019) Age Sex WAZ Weight in Kilograms 2 Month Boys WAZ>-1.8 4-5 kg 2 Month Girls WAZ>-1.8 4-5 kg Table 3: WAZ scores
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- • Infant birth weight < WAZ -1.8 i.e. weight-for-age based on established growth standards, such as the World Health Organization (WHO).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GMDFAGMDFA (GOat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative) is a goat milk-based formulation designed as an affordable alternative to commercial infant formula. It is prepared by diluting goat's milk to a standardized protein and micronutrient concentration according to study protocol. Infants in this arm will receive GMDFA from enrollment (08-10 weeks) until 16-18 weeks of age under close monitoring for growth and safety outcomes. | Dietary supplement | Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) |
| Undiluted Goat MilkInfants will receive undiluted goat milk as per current local feeding practices for 8 weeks. | Other | Undiluted Goat Milk (Current Practice) |
Primary outcome
Change in lipidomic markers among infants receiving Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) compared to undiluted goat milk and breastfeeding groups.
Time frame: Baseline (enrollment) to 8 weeks after intervention
To evaluate whether infants aged 8-10 weeks in Matiari who are unable to exclusively breastfeed and receive GMDFA show favorable changes in lipidomic profiles compared to those fed undiluted goat milk, and similar metabolic marker status compared to exclusively breastfed infants after 8 weeks of intervention.
Change in gut microbiome composition and diversity among infants receiving GMDFA compared to undiluted goat milk and breastfeeding groups.
Time frame: Baseline (enrollment) to 8 weeks after intervention
To determine whether infants aged 8-10 weeks in Matiari who are unable to exclusively breastfeed and receive Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) exhibit distinct shifts in gut microbiome composition (Bifidobacterium, Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Lactobacillus) and changes in alpha- and beta-diversity over 8 weeks, compared to those fed undiluted goat milk, and a microbiome profile similar to age-matched breastfed infants and healthy reference profiles from the same population.
3 secondary outcomes
Infant growth measured by weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
Time frame: From baseline (enrollment) to 16-18 weeks of age
Change in serum micronutrient levels among infants receiving GMDFA compared to undiluted goat milk and breastfeeding groups.
Time frame: Baseline (enrollment) to 8 weeks after intervention
Change in gut inflammatory biomarkers among infants receiving GMDFA compared to undiluted goat milk and breastfeeding groups.
Time frame: Baseline (enrollment) to 8 weeks after intervention
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 37712002George AD, Paul S, Wang T, Huynh K, Giles C, Mellett N, Duong T, Nguyen A, Geddes D, Mansell T, Saffery R, Vuillermin P, Ponsonby AL, Burgner D, Burugupalli S, Meikle PJ; Barwon Infant Study Investigator Team. Defining the lipid profiles of human milk, infant formula, and animal milk: implications for infant feeding. Front Nutr. 2023 Aug 30;10:1227340. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1227340. eCollection 2023.
- Background: PubMed 35276889Vandenplas Y, Zolnowska M, Berni Canani R, Ludman S, Tengelyi Z, Moreno-Alvarez A, Goh AEN, Gosoniu ML, Kirwan BA, Tadi M, Heine RG, Cinnamon Study Investigator Group. Effects of an Extensively Hydrolyzed Formula Supplemented with Two Human Milk Oligosaccharides on Growth, Tolerability, Safety and Infection Risk in Infants with Cow's Milk Protein Allergy: A Randomized, Multi-Center Trial. Nutrients. 2022 Jan 26;14(3):530. doi: 10.3390/nu14030530.
- Background: PubMed 39809564Akter S, Nishu NA. Malnutrition among under-5 children and its determinants in the southwestern coastal region of Bangladesh: A community-based study. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):e090174. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090174.
- Background: PubMed 40695358Moreno-Avila IDM, Martinez-Linares JM, Garcia-Pintor S, Rubia-Ortega SM, Ortiz-Paneque J, El Messaoudi-Ouardani S, Cortes-Martin J. Perceptions on the Reasons Influencing the Choice and Abandonment of Exclusive Breastfeeding in Muslim and Christian Women: A Phenomenological Study. Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Sep;27(3):e70195. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70195.
- Background: PubMed 25988116Reinhardt K, Fanzo J. Addressing Chronic Malnutrition through Multi-Sectoral, Sustainable Approaches: A Review of the Causes and Consequences. Front Nutr. 2014 Aug 15;1:13. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2014.00013. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 34006307Omer S, Zakar R, Zakar MZ, Fischer F. The influence of social and cultural practices on maternal mortality: a qualitative study from South Punjab, Pakistan. Reprod Health. 2021 May 18;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01151-6.
- Background: PubMed 32422857Pietrzak-Fiecko R, Kamelska-Sadowska AM. The Comparison of Nutritional Value of Human Milk with Other Mammals' Milk. Nutrients. 2020 May 14;12(5):1404. doi: 10.3390/nu12051404.
- BackgroundOrganization, W. H. (2005). Guiding principles for feeding non-breastfed children 6-24 months of age, World Health Organization.
- BackgroundOrganization, W. H. (2003). Complementary feeding: report of the global consultation, and summary of guiding principles for complementary feeding of the breastfed child, World Health Organization.
- Background: PubMed 31091768Noh JW, Kim YM, Akram N, Yoo KB, Cheon J, Lee LJ, Kwon YD, Stekelenburg J. Factors Affecting Breastfeeding Practices in Sindh Province, Pakistan: A Secondary Analysis of Cross-Sectional Survey Data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 14;16(10):1689. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101689.
- Background: PubMed 34938763Nayik GA, Jagdale YD, Gaikwad SA, Devkatte AN, Dar AH, Dezmirean DS, Bobis O, Ranjha MMAN, Ansari MJ, Hemeg HA, Alotaibi SS. Recent Insights Into Processing Approaches and Potential Health Benefits of Goat Milk and Its Products: A Review. Front Nutr. 2021 Dec 6;8:789117. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.789117. eCollection 2021.
- BackgroundMilitao, E. M., Salvador, E. M., Silva, J. P., Uthman, O. A., Vinberg, S., & Macassa, G. (2022). Coping strategies for household food insecurity, and perceived health in an urban community in southern Mozambique: a qualitative study. Sustainability, 14(14), 8710.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Malnutrition (Calorie)
Recruiting
Optimizing Patient Treatment With EPA-enriched Nutrition, a Randomised Control Trial
Malnutrition (Calorie), Colorectal Cancer
Recruiting
Suitability of a High-energy, Low-protein Formula (Renalive® LP)
CKD, Low Protein Dietary Intake
Recruiting
Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Supportan® Drink
Cancer, Malnutrition (Calorie)
Not yet recruiting
Nutritional Intervention for Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT), Malnutrition (Calorie)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Nutritional Status in Adults With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU), Nutrition Assessment
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Dr. junaid Iqbal, PhD principal investigator
Aga Khan University
Syed Asad Ali, MPH study director
Aga Khan University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing GMDFA and Undiluted Goat Milk in people with Malnutrition (Calorie) and Infant Nutrition Disorder, run by Aga Khan University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nimra Mazhar, M.Phil (+923012354157, nimra.mazhar@scholar.aku.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in lipidomic markers among infants receiving Goat Milk-Derived Formula Alternative (GMDFA) compared to undiluted goat milk and breastfeeding groups. (time frame: Baseline (enrollment) to 8 weeks after intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07225153, which also lists 27 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2026.