Bladder CancerNCT07225205
Home Intravenous Fluid Infusion After Undergoing Radical Cystectomy
A study testing Intravenous fluids and ERAS in people with Bladder Cancer and Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC), run by Johns Hopkins University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Radical cystectomy is the standard of care for muscle invasive bladder cancer, however despite advances, it is still associated with high morbidity. Many complications may be driven by dehydration and it is unclear if a home intravenous fluid (IVF) infusion program post-operatively, which is an accepted standard… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder Cancer, Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC), Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Urothelial Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Intravenous fluids and ERAS
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2025to 1 Feb 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients greater than 18 years of age and older
- Confirmed urothelial carcinoma on pathology, including muscle invasive, non-muscle invasive, and variant histology
- Patient electing to undergo radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy after counseling with a urologic oncologist.
Who cannot join
- Patients undergoing radical cystectomy for benign indications (e.g. chronic bladder pain, fistulas, severe lower urinary tract symptoms)
- Patients undergoing radical cystectomy for a non-bladder primary malignancy (e.g. rectal, colon, uterine cancers).
- Patients with extensive locally advanced disease necessitating a pelvic exenteration
- Contraindication to receiving home IVF therapy (i.e. pre-existing cardiac, renal, hepatic dysfunction)
- Unwilling or unable to participate in 30 and 90 day follow-up phone calls.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Tyler Garman, MD, 410-955-6100, tgarman1@jhu.edu
Max R Kates, MD, 410-614-0009, Mkates@jhmi.edu
- Recruiting
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Tyler S Garman, MD, 813-955-6100, tgarman1@jh.edu
Max R Kates, MD, 4105028130, Mkates@jhmi.edu
About this study
Official title: Home Intravenous Fluid Infusion After Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Radical cystectomy is the standard of care for muscle invasive bladder cancer, however despite advances, it is still associated with high morbidity. Many complications may be driven by dehydration and it is unclear if a home intravenous fluid (IVF) infusion program post-operatively, which is an accepted standard practice, is beneficial. This study is a single institution randomized controlled trial where patients who choose to undergo radical cystectomy for bladder cancer will be randomized to an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol with a home IVF program, consisting of 1 liter (L) of crystalloid fluid three times per week for four weeks, or ERAS protocol alone. The primary outcome will be 90-day hospital re-admissions, with secondary outcomes including 30 and 90 day complications.
Read the detailed description
The standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is to undergo a radical cystectomy (RC), bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion, but this surgery is associated with substantial perioperative morbidity frequently exceeding 60% 90-day complication rates. ERAS protocols have been widely adopted to improve perioperative outcomes in RC. These multimodal pathways reduce length of stay, expedite bowel recovery, and decrease overall complication rates, but have not consistently reduced readmission rates. The most common causes of readmission include dehydration, urinary tract infection, and ileus, with dehydration being a particularly modifiable risk factor.
The ERAS pathway employed at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) utilizes IVF infusion programs to promote hydration in the post-operative period. This is based on both substantial clinical experience that suggest the driver of many hospital re-admissions may be dehydration and a prospective study that found a substantial decrease in 90-day readmission rates with the addition of a home IVF program to the ERAS protocol. However, there is still a paucity of high quality evidence on the addition of a home IVF program to ERAS protocols and this addition is not without its risks, particularly related to the necessity of indwelling venous catheters. Additionally, ERAS protocols for RC were originally developed and validated in the context of open surgical approaches, which are associated with higher intraoperative blood loss and fluid shifts. However, the adoption of robot-assisted RC has led to significantly lower estimated blood loss and reduced transfusion requirements compared to open RC. These improvements in surgical technique may reduce the need for aggressive perioperative fluid replacements. Taken together, this evidence underscores the need for randomized trial evidence to evaluate home IVF programs in RC ERAS protocols.
The study will be a single-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either receive home IVF or standard peri-operative education related to hydration. This randomization will be stratified based on the urinary diversion the patient receives, which will either be an ileal conduit or a neobladder, and the patient's sex. Patients will be consented pre-operatively by a physician on the research team. The surgeon and surgical team will be blinded to the group assignment before and during the surgery.
Patients assigned to the home IVF arm will undergo the investigator's current ERAS pathway, which involves establishing vascular access that can be used for 4 weeks at home. Many patients have existing vascular access via a port which the participant receives for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If the patient does not have existing access, the JHH Vascular Access Team (VAT) is engaged during the post-operative hospitalization to place a midline catheter, which is a type of peripheral vascular access that is adequate for 4 week durations and is less invasive than central catheters. Once the patient has vascular access, the home care coordinator and social worker are engaged to organize home nursing for wound care, ostomy teaching, and home IVF. At home, the patient receives a 1L bolus of either lactated ringers or normal saline three times a week for four weeks with the patient's home nurse.
Patients assigned to not receive home IVF will receive everything in the investigator's current ERAS protocol except the home intravenous fluid program. Patients without preexisting vascular access will not receive a midline catheter post-operatively, however the participant will still receive home care for skilled nursing who will provide wound care, ostomy teaching, and education about perioperative fluid management.
No other standard pre-, peri- or post-operative urologic surgery procedures will be affected. Routine care includes an initial clinic consultation, physical examination, and informed consent prior to proceeding with surgery. Informed consent for participation in the study may also be obtained in the preoperative area during the day of surgery. Eligibility will be confirmed at the time of consent. Post- operatively, patients will be given the option of returning to the Johns Hopkins clinic or local follow-up for further ostomy teaching and wound check approximately 7-14 days after surgery. Discussions about the surgical specimen's pathology and initiation of potential adjuvant therapy will not be impacted. All patients will receive phone calls at 30 and 90 days post operatively to assess for complications, emergency department visits, and hospital re-admissions using a standardized template.
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer, Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC), Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Urothelial Carcinoma, Cystectomy
- Being tested
- Intravenous fluids, ERAS
- Keywords
- Cystectomy, Bladder Cancer, Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC), Fluids, IVF, ERAS
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intravenous fluidsOther
At home, the patient receives a 1L bolus of either lactated ringers or normal saline three times a week for four weeks with the patient's home nurse.
ERASOther
Patients assigned to not receive home IVF will receive everything in the investigator's current ERAS protocol except the home intravenous fluid program. Patients without preexisting vascular access will not receive a midline catheter post-operatively, however the participant will still receive home care for skilled nursing who will provide wound care, ostomy teaching, and education about perioperative fluid management.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Home IVF + ERAS | Experimental | Patients assigned to the home IVF arm will undergo the investigator's current ERAS pathway, which involves establishing vascular access that can be used for 4 weeks at home. Many patients have existing vascular access via a port which the participant receives for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If the patient does not have existing access, the JHH Vascular Access Team (VAT) is engaged during the post-operative hospitalization to place a midline catheter, which is a type of peripheral vascular access that is adequate for 4 week durations and is less invasive than central catheters. Once the patient has vascular access, the home care coordinator and social worker are engaged to organize home nursing for wound care, ostomy teaching, and home IVF. At home, the patient receives a 1L bolus of either lactated ringers or normal saline three times a week for four weeks with the participant's home nurse. Receives: Other: Intravenous fluids; Other: ERAS |
| ERAS Alone | No intervention | Patients assigned to not receive home IVF will receive everything in the investigator's current ERAS protocol except the home intravenous fluid program. Patients without preexisting vascular access will not receive a midline catheter post-operatively, however the participant will still receive home care for skilled nursing who will provide wound care, ostomy teaching, and education about perioperative fluid management. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of participants with 90-day Hospital Readmission
The primary outcome will be 90-day hospital readmissions that are unplanned, including admissions for observation
Measured: From date of surgery up to 90-days postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (3)
Percentage of participants with 30-day hospital readmissions
The percentage of patients with unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days post-discharge after surgery
Measured: From date of surgery up to 30-days post-operatively
Percentage of participants with 90-day emergency department presentations
The percentage of patients with presentations to the emergency department within 90 days after surgery
Measured: From date of surgery up to 90 days after surgery
Percentage of participants with All-cause Complications
All-cause complications including complications related to the surgery like bleeding, infection, Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), failure to thrive, and complications related to midline or port venous access including infection and thrombosis.
Measured: From surgery up to 90 days post surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Nov 2025
- Study start1 Nov 2025
- Primary completion1 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Feb 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bladder CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Max Kates, MD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07225205
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00516342
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Home Intravenous Fluid Infusion After Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07225205
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00516342
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer, Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC), Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Urothelial Carcinoma, Cystectomy
- Keywords
- Cystectomy, Bladder Cancer, Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC), Fluids, IVF, ERAS
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Radical cystectomy is the standard of care for muscle invasive bladder cancer, however despite advances, it is still associated with high morbidity. Many complications may be driven by dehydration and it is unclear if a home intravenous fluid (IVF) infusion program post-operatively, which is an accepted standard practice, is beneficial. This study is a single institution randomized controlled trial where patients who choose to undergo radical cystectomy for bladder cancer will be randomized to an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol with a home IVF program, consisting of 1 liter (L) of crystalloid fluid three times per week for four weeks, or ERAS protocol alone. The primary outcome will be 90-day hospital re-admissions, with secondary outcomes including 30 and 90 day complications.
Detailed description
The standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is to undergo a radical cystectomy (RC), bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion, but this surgery is associated with substantial perioperative morbidity frequently exceeding 60% 90-day complication rates. ERAS protocols have been widely adopted to improve perioperative outcomes in RC. These multimodal pathways reduce length of stay, expedite bowel recovery, and decrease overall complication rates, but have not consistently reduced readmission rates. The most common causes of readmission include dehydration, urinary tract infection, and ileus, with dehydration being a particularly modifiable risk factor.
The ERAS pathway employed at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) utilizes IVF infusion programs to promote hydration in the post-operative period. This is based on both substantial clinical experience that suggest the driver of many hospital re-admissions may be dehydration and a prospective study that found a substantial decrease in 90-day readmission rates with the addition of a home IVF program to the ERAS protocol. However, there is still a paucity of high quality evidence on the addition of a home IVF program to ERAS protocols and this addition is not without its risks, particularly related to the necessity of indwelling venous catheters. Additionally, ERAS protocols for RC were originally developed and validated in the context of open surgical approaches, which are associated with higher intraoperative blood loss and fluid shifts. However, the adoption of robot-assisted RC has led to significantly lower estimated blood loss and reduced transfusion requirements compared to open RC. These improvements in surgical technique may reduce the need for aggressive perioperative fluid replacements. Taken together, this evidence underscores the need for randomized trial evidence to evaluate home IVF programs in RC ERAS protocols.
The study will be a single-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either receive home IVF or standard peri-operative education related to hydration. This randomization will be stratified based on the urinary diversion the patient receives, which will either be an ileal conduit or a neobladder, and the patient's sex. Patients will be consented pre-operatively by a physician on the research team. The surgeon and surgical team will be blinded to the group assignment before and during the surgery.
Patients assigned to the home IVF arm will undergo the investigator's current ERAS pathway, which involves establishing vascular access that can be used for 4 weeks at home. Many patients have existing vascular access via a port which the participant receives for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If the patient does not have existing access, the JHH Vascular Access Team (VAT) is engaged during the post-operative hospitalization to place a midline catheter, which is a type of peripheral vascular access that is adequate for 4 week durations and is less invasive than central catheters. Once the patient has vascular access, the home care coordinator and social worker are engaged to organize home nursing for wound care, ostomy teaching, and home IVF. At home, the patient receives a 1L bolus of either lactated ringers or normal saline three times a week for four weeks with the patient's home nurse.
Patients assigned to not receive home IVF will receive everything in the investigator's current ERAS protocol except the home intravenous fluid program. Patients without preexisting vascular access will not receive a midline catheter post-operatively, however the participant will still receive home care for skilled nursing who will provide wound care, ostomy teaching, and education about perioperative fluid management.
No other standard pre-, peri- or post-operative urologic surgery procedures will be affected. Routine care includes an initial clinic consultation, physical examination, and informed consent prior to proceeding with surgery. Informed consent for participation in the study may also be obtained in the preoperative area during the day of surgery. Eligibility will be confirmed at the time of consent. Post- operatively, patients will be given the option of returning to the Johns Hopkins clinic or local follow-up for further ostomy teaching and wound check approximately 7-14 days after surgery. Discussions about the surgical specimen's pathology and initiation of potential adjuvant therapy will not be impacted. All patients will receive phone calls at 30 and 90 days post operatively to assess for complications, emergency department visits, and hospital re-admissions using a standardized template.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Home IVF + ERAS | Experimental | Other: Intravenous fluids, Other: ERASPatients assigned to the home IVF arm will undergo the investigator's current ERAS pathway, which involves establishing vascular access that can be used for 4 weeks at home. Many patients have existing vascular access via a port which the participant receives for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If the patient does not have existing access, the JHH Vascular Access Team (VAT) is engaged during the post-operative hospitalization to place a midline catheter, which is a type of peripheral vascular access that is adequate for 4 week durations and is less invasive than central catheters. Once the patient has vascular access, the home care coordinator and social worker are engaged to organize home nursing for wound care, ostomy teaching, and home IVF. At home, the patient receives a 1L bolus of either lactated ringers or normal saline three times a week for four weeks with the participant's home nurse. |
| ERAS Alone | No intervention | –Patients assigned to not receive home IVF will receive everything in the investigator's current ERAS protocol except the home intravenous fluid program. Patients without preexisting vascular access will not receive a midline catheter post-operatively, however the participant will still receive home care for skilled nursing who will provide wound care, ostomy teaching, and education about perioperative fluid management. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patients greater than 18 years of age and older
- Confirmed urothelial carcinoma on pathology, including muscle invasive, non-muscle invasive, and variant histology
- Patient electing to undergo radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy after counseling with a urologic oncologist.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients undergoing radical cystectomy for benign indications (e.g. chronic bladder pain, fistulas, severe lower urinary tract symptoms)
- Patients undergoing radical cystectomy for a non-bladder primary malignancy (e.g. rectal, colon, uterine cancers).
- Patients with extensive locally advanced disease necessitating a pelvic exenteration
- Contraindication to receiving home IVF therapy (i.e. pre-existing cardiac, renal, hepatic dysfunction)
- Unwilling or unable to participate in 30 and 90 day follow-up phone calls.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous fluidsAt home, the patient receives a 1L bolus of either lactated ringers or normal saline three times a week for four weeks with the patient's home nurse. | Other | Home IVF + ERAS |
| ERASPatients assigned to not receive home IVF will receive everything in the investigator's current ERAS protocol except the home intravenous fluid program. Patients without preexisting vascular access will not receive a midline catheter post-operatively, however the participant will still receive home care for skilled nursing who will provide wound care, ostomy teaching, and education about perioperative fluid management. | Other | Home IVF + ERAS |
Primary outcome
Percentage of participants with 90-day Hospital Readmission
Time frame: From date of surgery up to 90-days postoperatively
The primary outcome will be 90-day hospital readmissions that are unplanned, including admissions for observation
3 secondary outcomes
Percentage of participants with 30-day hospital readmissions
Time frame: From date of surgery up to 30-days post-operatively
Percentage of participants with 90-day emergency department presentations
Time frame: From date of surgery up to 90 days after surgery
Percentage of participants with All-cause Complications
Time frame: From surgery up to 90 days post surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Sac-TMT, MK-2870) and Pembrolizumab (MK-3475A) in Participants With Bladder Cancer (MK-2870-055)
Bladder Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of CTX-009 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Unresectable Advanced, Metastatic or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancers (COMPANION-002)
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
Recruiting
Effect of Cyclic Sighing Breathing Exercise on CRBD, Pain, and Sleep Quality in Patients Undergoing TUR
Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Max Kates, MD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intravenous fluids and ERAS in people with Bladder Cancer and Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC), run by Johns Hopkins University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tyler S Garman, MD (410-955-6100, tgarman1@jhu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of participants with 90-day Hospital Readmission (time frame: From date of surgery up to 90-days postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2025.