AzTrials
AzTrials

Echocardiography, TransthoracicAI INSIGHTNCT07229300

AI ECHO INSIGHT RCT for Automated Echo Reporting

A study testing AI-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation, Sonographer-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation and Cardiologist-Only Echocardiogram Interpretation in people with Echocardiography, Transthoracic and Echocardiographic Software, run by Kaiser Permanente at 1 site in United States.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this blinded randomized controlled trial is to assess whether AI-assisted TTE interpretation can improve cardiologist efficiency and reduce interpretation variability while preserving accuracy compared to current methods in adult patients whose historical echocardiogram images were performed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
AI-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation, Sonographer-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation and Cardiologist-Only Echocardiogram Interpretation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,200 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Nov 2025to 20 Aug 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Comprehensive transthoracic echocardiogram study performed a KPNC Medical Center.

Who cannot join

  • Known Congenital heart disease study
  • Known Ventricular assist device
  • Limited transthoracic echocardiogram study
  • Transesophageal echocardiogram study
  • Stress echocardiogram study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research

    Pleasanton, California, 94588

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Artificial Intelligence Echocardiogram Interpretation for Systematic Integration and Guided Healthcare Transformation (The AI ECHO INSIGHT Study)

The goal of this blinded randomized controlled trial is to assess whether AI-assisted TTE interpretation can improve cardiologist efficiency and reduce interpretation variability while preserving accuracy compared to current methods in adult patients whose historical echocardiogram images were performed.

The main questions it aims to answer is to:

  1. Assess overall transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) interpretation accuracy of an AI-assisted workflow compared to standard cardiologist-only and sonographer-assisted workflows to hypothesize if AI-assisted workflow for echocardiography interpretation is non-inferior in accuracy compared to standard workflows.
  2. Evaluate cardiologist interpretation time using an AI-assisted workflow compared to standard cardiologist-only and sonographer-assisted workflows to determine if an AI-assisted workflow will result in a decrease in interpretation time compared to the cardiologist-only workflow.
  3. To compare interpretation consistency and reliability compared to historical reports as well as consensus reports of all finalized cardiologist reports.
Being tested
AI-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation, Sonographer-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation, Cardiologist-Only Echocardiogram Interpretation
Keywords
Echocardiography Interpretation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AI-Assisted Echocardiogram InterpretationOther

    Echocardiogram studies are pre-interpreted by the AI software and finalized by a blinded cardiologist.

  • Sonographer-Assisted Echocardiogram InterpretationOther

    (Standard of Care 1): Echocardiogram studies are pre-interpreted by a sonographer and finalized by a blinded cardiologist.

  • Cardiologist-Only Echocardiogram InterpretationOther

    (Standard of Care 2): Echocardiogram studies are interpreted solely by two cardiologists (one provides a preliminary interpretation another provides a blinded final interpretation).

Study groups in NCT07229300
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AI-Assisted InterpretationActive comparatorIn AI-prelim arm, AI provides the preliminary interpretation which is finalized by a blinded cardiologist.
Receives: Other: AI-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation
Sonographer-Assisted InterpretationActive comparatorIn Sonographer-prelim arm, sonographer provides the preliminary interpretation which is finalized by a blinded cardiologist.
Receives: Other: Sonographer-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation
Cardiologist-Only InterpretationActive comparatorIn cardiologist-prelim arm, cardiology provides the preliminary interpretation which is finalized by a blinded separate cardiologist.
Receives: Other: Cardiologist-Only Echocardiogram Interpretation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of AI-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation Compared to Standard Workflows.

    The accuracy rate is defined as the proportion of transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) studies for which the final cardiologist interpretation is not significantly different from the preliminary interpretation. We will assess the accuracy rate in the AI-assisted arm for non-inferiority versus the pooled accuracy rate across both the sonographer-assisted and cardiologist-only arms.

    The investigators will measure the proportion of TTE studies for which the final cardiologist report is substantially different from the preliminary report (e.g., the rate of substantial change). We define a TTE report to be substantially different from another TTE interpretation if any of its key elements are substantially different (LVEF, right ventriuclar function, chamber size, valvular regurgitation severity, valvular stenosis severity, and right ventricular systolic pressure).

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Secondary Measures of Accuracy (Superiority Analyses)

    Accuracy rates will also be analyzed for superiority rather than non-inferiority. The proportion of TTE studies for which the final cardiologist interpretation is not significantly different from the preliminary interpretation will be compared individually between the AI-assisted arm and each comparator arm (sonographer-assisted and cardiologist-only).

    1. AI-prelim workflow vs. pooled sonographer-prelim and cardiologist-prelim workflow with a superiority test
    2. AI-prelim workflow vs. sonographer-prelim workflow with a superiority test
    3. AI-prelim workflow vs. cardiologist-prelim workflow with a superiority test

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Accuracy Compared with Historical Cardiologist Interpretations

    Accuracy is defined as the proportion of TTE studies for which the final cardiologist report is substantially different from the historical report (e.g., the rate of substantial change). We define a TTE report to be substantially different from another TTE interpretation if any of its key elements are substantially different (LVEF, right ventriuclar function, chamber size, valvular regurgitation severity, valvular stenosis severity, and right ventricular systolic pressure).

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Accuracy Compared with Consensus Cardiologist Interpretations

    Accuracy is defined as the proportion of TTE studies for which the consensus cardiologist report is substantially different from the preliminary report (e.g., the rate of substantial change). We define a TTE report to be substantially different from another TTE interpretation if any of its key elements are substantially different (LVEF, right ventriuclar function, chamber size, valvular regurgitation severity, valvular stenosis severity, and right ventricular systolic pressure).

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Evaluation requiring two-grade change in valve disease severity as substantial change

    Accuracy is defined asthe proportion of TTE studies for which the final cardiologist report is substantially different from the preliminary report (e.g., the rate of substantial change). We define a TTE report to be substantially different from another TTE interpretation if any of its key elements are substantially different (LVEF, right ventricular function, chamber size, valvular regurgitation severity, valvular stenosis severity, and right ventricular systolic pressure).

    1. AI-prelim workflow vs. pooled sonographer-prelim and cardiologist-prelim workflow with a superiority test
    2. AI-prelim workflow vs. sonographer-prelim workflow with a superiority test
    3. AI-prelim workflow vs. cardiologist-prelim workflow with a superiority test

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Cardiologist Overread Time (Efficiency)

    To assess whether AI-assisted interpretation saves time, the investigators will compare the mean time in seconds required for the cardiologist to complete the overreading process across the three arms (i.e., TTE interpretation workflows) in our trial. Specifically, we will perform the following comparisons:

    1. The mean cardiologist overread time in the AI-assisted arm versus the pooled results of the sonographer-assisted and cardiologist-only arms
    2. The mean cardiologist overread time in the AI-assisted arm versus the sonographer-assisted arm
    3. The mean cardiologist overread time in the AI-assisted arm versus the cardiologist-only arm

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Comparison of Existing Standards of Care (Sonographer-Assisted vs Cardiologist-Only)

    The investigators will measure the proportion of TTE studies for which the final cardiologist report is substantially different from the preliminary report (e.g., the rate of substantial change) in sonographer-prelim and cardiologist-prelim arms. We define a TTE report to be substantially different from another TTE interpretation if any of its key elements are substantially different (LVEF, right ventricular function, chamber size, valvular regurgitation severity, valvular stenosis severity, and right ventricular systolic pressure).

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Blinding

    In each of the arms, at the completion of each study for the final cardiologist assessment, the cardiologist will be asked to guess whether the preliminary assessment was AI or human. This will be used to calculate a blinding index comparing the AI-prelim arm vs. a composite of the two standard of care arms, as well as comparing the AI-prelim arm with the sonographer-prelim arm individually and comparing the AI-prelim arm with the cardiologist-prelim arm individually.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Nov 2025
  2. Study start1 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2026
  4. Study completion20 Aug 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
1,200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07229300
Sponsor's protocol ID
2302504
Acronym
AI INSIGHT
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
12 Nov 2025
Last updated
6 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Lee KK, Kumar N, Eusuff S, Vukadinovic M, Ieki H, Moore MJ, Ambrosy AP, Go AS, Jang J, Dinh H, Ku IA, Liu V, Ouyang D, Claggett B, He B. AI echo INSIGHT study: A prospective blinded randomized trial of artificial intelligence echocardiogram interpretation. Contemp Clin Trials. 2026 Aug 9:108431. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108431. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42571809

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AI-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation, Sonographer-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation and Cardiologist-Only Echocardiogram Interpretation in people with Echocardiography, Transthoracic and Echocardiographic Software, run by Kaiser Permanente at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of AI-Assisted Echocardiogram Interpretation Compared to Standard Workflows. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07229300, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in