AzTrials
AzTrials

AnesthesiaNCT07232173

Comparative Study Between Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) Versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (SIFIC) in Perioperative Hip Surgery

A study testing Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca compartment Block (SIFIC) in people with Anesthesia and Nerve Block, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The hip joint is the largest and one of the most stable joints in the human body. It bears the majority of the body's weight during both dynamic and static activities, making it highly susceptible to degenerative diseases, particularly in the elderly population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Anesthesia, Nerve Block
What is being tested?
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca compartment Block (SIFIC)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Jan 2023to 1 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 40 years or older
  • non-pathologic hip fractures
  • underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty at Ain Shams University Hospitals
  • physical status I, II and III according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification.

Who cannot join

  • pathological fracture
  • allergy to study drugs.
  • ASA IV (a patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life)
  • bleeding tendencies
  • dementia or any mental disability
  • having sepsis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University

    Cairo, Cairo Governorate

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study Between Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) Versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (SFIC) in Perioperative Hip Surgery

The hip joint is the largest and one of the most stable joints in the human body. It bears the majority of the body's weight during both dynamic and static activities, making it highly susceptible to degenerative diseases, particularly in the elderly population. In advanced cases, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often required-currently ranking as the second most common joint replacement procedure worldwide.

Despite its clinical success, it is estimated that 7-28% of patients experience chronic postoperative pain following THA. This persistent pain significantly impairs quality of life and is receiving growing attention from healthcare professionals. Evidence suggests that unmanaged acute surgical pain is a major risk factor for the development of chronic postoperative pain, underscoring the importance of effective perioperative analgesia. Given the adverse effects associated with opioids, regional anesthesia techniques are increasingly favored for pain management.

Read more

Among these, the fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) has been widely used to reduce postoperative pain intensity, although it carries potential drawbacks such as motor weakness or a need for supplemental opioid use. Recent anatomical studies by Short et al. have identified the anterior capsule of the hip joint as being innervated by the pericapsular nerve group (PNG) including the obturator nerve, accessory obturator nerve, and femoral nerve. The anatomical accessibility of these nerves has enabled the development of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, a motor-sparing regional anesthesia technique that offers targeted analgesia by delivering local anesthetics into the myofascial plane between the psoas muscle and the superior pubic ramus.

While both FICB and PENG blocks are widely used in total hip replacement surgeries, comparative evidence evaluating their efficacy remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare the analgesic effectiveness of FICB and PENG blocks during the preoperative and postoperative phases of total hip arthroplasty.

Being tested
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG), Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca compartment Block (SIFIC)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG)Procedure or surgery

    Participants in the PENG group first received their study medication, administered over a 1-minute interval, 5 minutes prior to the initiation of spinal anesthesia. For the block itself, an in-plane ultrasound-guided approach was utilized. Following the creation of a skin wheal, an echogenic, 10-centimeter, 21-gauge needle was carefully advanced in a lateral-to-medial trajectory. The local anesthetic, 20 mL of .5% ropivacaine, was then accurately injected into the fascial plane located anterior to the psoas tendon and posterior to the pubic ramus.

  • Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca compartment Block (SIFIC)Procedure or surgery

    The SFIC group block began with a skin wheal and employed an in-plane needle insertion. Once the needle successfully pierced the fascia iliaca, a small 2 mL volume of saline was initially injected. This served as a hydraulic confirmation of the correct needle tip placement within the compartment.

Study groups in NCT07232173
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block PENGActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG)
ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block SFICActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca compartment Block (SIFIC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. onset of analgesia

    defined as an NRS of 3 or less at rest and during passive 20° limb elevation.

    Measured: Assessed before the block and every 3 minutes from blocking for 30 minutes afterwards.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. NRS over 24 hours

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2025
  2. Study start1 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07232173
Sponsor's protocol ID
FMASU M D 235/2020
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
14 Nov 2025
Last updated
18 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca compartment Block (SIFIC) in people with Anesthesia and Nerve Block, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

onset of analgesia (time frame: Assessed before the block and every 3 minutes from blocking for 30 minutes afterwards.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in