AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)Phase 2FT14NCT07232953

Safety and Efficacy of FT14 Conditioning for Allogeneic HSCT in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A Phase 2 study testing Fludarabine + Treosulfan in people with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT), run by Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia at 13 sites in Italy.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, phase II, open-label, non-randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Fludarabine plus Treosulfan 14 g/m² (FT14) conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) aged 40-65 years… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 65 years
What is being tested?
Fludarabine + Treosulfan
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
82 participants
Where
13 sitesItaly
Study dates
10 Nov 2022to Jun 2027
Phase
Phase 2

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients >40 <65 years of age
  • Diagnosis of AML in first complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete recovery (CRi)/multiflow leukemia free state (MLFS)
  • Eligible for allo-SCT from HLA-identical matched related or unrelated donor as defined by molecular high-resolution typing (4 digits) at the following four HLA gene loci (HLA-A, B, C, and DRB1)
  • Adequate hepatic function (bilirubin ≤2 UNL; ALT/AST ≤2,5 UNL)
  • Adequate renal function (creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min)
  • ECOG Performance Status < 2
  • Willing and able to comply with all of the requirements and visits in the protocol.
  • Written and signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • AML patients with t(15;17); t(8;21); inv(16)
  • Subject has known active CNS involvement with AML.
  • Grade >2 NCI-CTCAE (v. 5) adverse events at the time of enrollment
  • Serious organ dysfunction: left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, FEV1, FVC, DLCO (diffusion capacity) <40% of predicted, LFT > 5 times the upper limit of normal, or creatinine clearance < 40 ml/min.
  • The evidence of HBV or HCV active infection (HBV DNA, HCV RNA positive test).
  • Patients with HIV infection
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Current uncontrolled infections
  • Patients with other life-threatening concurrent diseases
  • Subjects with known hypersensitivity to any of the component medications
  • Participation in another clinical trial within 1 month before the start of this trial
  • Participant, both female and male, in childbearing age who do not agree to maintain an active contraceptive practice
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients during screening

Trial locations and contacts

13 sites in 1 country.

13 sites in 1 country

Italy13 sites
  • Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona

    Ancona, The Marches, 60126

  • Ospedale C e G Mazzoni

    Ascoli Piceno, The Marches, 63100

  • ASST degli Spedali Civili di Brescia

    Brescia, Lombardy, 25123

  • Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle

    Cuneo, Piedmont, 12100

  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi

    Florence, Tuscany, 50134

  • Ospedale dell'Angelo

    Mestre, Veneto, 30174

  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca&#39; Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico,

    Milan, Lombardy, 20122

  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

    Milan, Lombardy, 20132

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena

    Modena, Emilia-Romagna, 41124

  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale Antonio Cardarelli

    Naples, Campania, 80131

  • Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "Bianco Melacrino Morelli"

    Reggio Calabria, Calabria, 89124

  • Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale

    Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33100

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

    Verona, Veneto, 37126

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Prospective Phase II Study on Safety and Efficacy of Fludarabine Plus Treosulfan (14g) (FT14) Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (Allo-SCT) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients (≥40 <65years) (FT14-Trial)

This is a prospective, multicenter, phase II, open-label, non-randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Fludarabine plus Treosulfan 14 g/m² (FT14) conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) aged 40-65 years who are in complete remission.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multicenter, phase II, open-label, non-randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antileukemic activity of the FT14 conditioning regimen (Fludarabine plus Treosulfan 14 g/m²/day for three consecutive days) in adult patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Eligible patients are 40 to 65 years old, in complete remission (CR), and candidates for allogeneic transplantation according to institutional criteria.

Treosulfan-based conditioning represents an effective alternative to conventional myeloablative regimens, with reduced organ toxicity and favorable immunosuppressive properties. Increasing the treosulfan dose to 14 g/m²/day aims to enhance antileukemic potency while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Fludarabine provides additional immunosuppression and cytotoxic synergism, facilitating engraftment and disease control.

Enrolled patients will receive the FT14 conditioning regimen followed by allo-HSCT from either a matched related donor (MRD) or a matched unrelated donor (MUD). Haploidentical donors are not included in this study. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and supportive care will follow each center's standard procedures.

The primary endpoint is the 1-year leukemia-free survival (LFS). Secondary endpoints include time to engraftment, cumulative incidence of graft failure, transplant-related mortality (TRM) and non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence, acute and chronic GVHD incidence and severity, overall survival (OS), and graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). Safety will be assessed through regimen-related toxicities, early and late post-transplant complications, and hematologic recovery kinetics.

The study is designed to provide prospective clinical evidence on the performance, tolerability, and efficacy of the FT14 regimen in adults with AML undergoing allo-HSCT, with the aim of defining its potential role as a conditioning option for this patient population.

Being tested
Fludarabine + Treosulfan
Keywords
AML, Fludarabine, Treosulfan, Allo-HSCT
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fludarabine + TreosulfanDrug

    Also called Treosulfan, Fludarabine

    Fludarabine (30 mg/m²/d × 5 days) IV infusion days -6 to -2 and Treosulfan (14 g/m²/d × 3 days) IV infusion days -4 to -2

Study groups in NCT07232953
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fludarabine + Treosulfan conditioning regimen in AML patientsExperimentalFludarabine (30 mg/m²/d × 5 days) IV infusion days -6 to -2 and Treosulfan (14 g/m²/d × 3 days) IV infusion days -4 to -2.
Receives: Drug: Fludarabine + Treosulfan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The 1-year leukemia -free survival (LFS) after allo-SCT

    Proportion of patients alive and free from leukemia at 1 year after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to 1-year post allo-HSCT

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Cumulative incidence of graft failure at day +30

    Cumulative incidence of primary graft failure within 30 days after allo-HSCT, considering death without graft failure as a competing risk.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to day +30

  2. Cumulative incidence of graft failure at day +100

    Cumulative incidence of primary or secondary graft failure within 100 days after allo-HSCT, with competing-risk methodology.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to day +100

  3. Transplant-related mortality (TRM) at day +100

    Proportion of patients who die without evidence of disease relapse within 100 days after allo-HSCT (non-relapse mortality), estimated using cumulative incidence.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to day +100

  4. TRM at 1 year

    Cumulative incidence of TRM within 1 years after allo-HSCT.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to 1 year

  5. TRM at 2 years

    Cumulative incidence of TRM within 2 years after allo-HSCT.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to 2 years

  6. Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at day +100

    Proportion of patients developing grade II-IV acute GVHD by day +100, estimated using cumulative incidence with relapse and death as competing events.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to day +100

  7. Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year

    Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD diagnosed within 1 year after allo-HSCT, based on NIH criteria, using competing-risk methodology.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to 1 year

  8. Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 2 years

    Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD diagnosed within 2 years after allo-HSCT, based on NIH criteria.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to 2 years

  9. Relapse incidence at 1 year

    Cumulative incidence of leukemia relapse within 1 year after allo-HSCT, analyzed using competing-risk models.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to 1 year

  10. Relapse incidence at 2 year

    Cumulative incidence of leukemia relapse within 2 year after allo-HSCT, analyzed using competing-risk models.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to 2 year

  11. Overall survival at 1 year

    Proportion of patients alive at 1 year after allo-HSCT, estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to 1 year

  12. Overall survival at 2 years

    Proportion of patients alive at 2 years after allo-HSCT, estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to 2 years

  13. Graft-versus-Host Disease-Free, Relapse-Free Survival (GRFS) at 1 year

    Proportion of patients alive without grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic therapy, relapse, or death at 1 year after allo-HSCT.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to 1 year

  14. GRFS at 2 years

    Proportion of patients alive without severe acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic therapy, relapse, or death within 2 years after allo-HSCT.

    Measured: From allo-HSCT to 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2025
  2. Study start10 Nov 2022
  3. Primary completionJun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
This is a multicenter, non-randomized, open-label, single-arm phase II study in which all enrolled patients receive the same conditioning regimen with Fludarabine plus Treosulfan (FT14) before allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
82 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07232953
Sponsor's protocol ID
FT14-Trial
Acronym
FT14
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
14 Nov 2025
Last updated
18 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: At this time, individual participant data will not be shared outside the study team.

Publications

  • Shimoni A, Labopin M, Savani B, Hamladji RM, Beelen D, Mufti G, Socie G, Delage J, Blaise D, Chevallier P, Forcade E, Deconinck E, Mohty M, Nagler A. Intravenous Busulfan Compared with Treosulfan-Based Conditioning for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Study on Behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Apr;24(4):751-757. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.12.776. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

    PubMed 29247780
  • Ruutu T, Volin L, Beelen DW, Trenschel R, Finke J, Schnitzler M, Holowiecki J, Giebel S, Markiewicz M, Uharek L, Blau IW, Kienast J, Stelljes M, Larsson K, Zander AR, Gramatzki M, Repp R, Einsele H, Stuhler G, Baumgart J, Mylius HA, Pichlmeier U, Freund M, Casper J. Reduced-toxicity conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes: final results of an international prospective phase II trial. Haematologica. 2011 Sep;96(9):1344-50. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.043810. Epub 2011 Jun 9.

    PubMed 21659356
  • Casper J, Holowiecki J, Trenschel R, Wandt H, Schaefer-Eckart K, Ruutu T, Volin L, Einsele H, Stuhler G, Uharek L, Blau I, Bornhaeuser M, Zander AR, Larsson K, Markiewicz M, Giebel S, Kruzel T, Mylius HA, Baumgart J, Pichlmeier U, Freund M, Beelen DW. Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in patients with AML following treosulfan/fludarabine conditioning. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Sep;47(9):1171-7. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.242. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

    PubMed 22158386
  • Westerhof GR, Ploemacher RE, Boudewijn A, Blokland I, Dillingh JH, McGown AT, Hadfield JA, Dawson MJ, Down JD. Comparison of different busulfan analogues for depletion of hematopoietic stem cells and promotion of donor-type chimerism in murine bone marrow transplant recipients. Cancer Res. 2000 Oct 1;60(19):5470-8.

    PubMed 11034090
  • Fichtner I, Becker M, Baumgart J. Antileukaemic activity of treosulfan in xenografted human acute lymphoblastic leukaemias (ALL). Eur J Cancer. 2003 Apr;39(6):801-7. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00767-0.

    PubMed 12651206
  • Munkelt D, Koehl U, Kloess S, Zimmermann SY, Kalaaoui RE, Wehner S, Schwabe D, Lehrnbecher T, Schubert R, Kreuter J, Klingebiel T, Esser R. Cytotoxic effects of treosulfan and busulfan against leukemic cells of pediatric patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;62(5):821-30. doi: 10.1007/s00280-007-0669-3. Epub 2008 Feb 2.

    PubMed 18246351
  • Beelen DW, Trenschel R, Stelljes M, Groth C, Masszi T, Remenyi P, Wagner-Drouet EM, Hauptrock B, Dreger P, Luft T, Bethge W, Vogel W, Ciceri F, Peccatori J, Stolzel F, Schetelig J, Junghanss C, Grosse-Thie C, Michallet M, Labussiere-Wallet H, Schaefer-Eckart K, Dressler S, Grigoleit GU, Mielke S, Scheid C, Holtick U, Patriarca F, Medeot M, Rambaldi A, Mico MC, Niederwieser D, Franke GN, Hilgendorf I, Winkelmann NR, Russo D, Socie G, Peffault de Latour R, Holler E, Wolff D, Glass B, Casper J, Wulf G, Menzel H, Basara N, Bieniaszewska M, Stuhler G, Verbeek M, Grass S, Iori AP, Finke J, Benedetti F, Pichlmeier U, Hemmelmann C, Tribanek M, Klein A, Mylius HA, Baumgart J, Dzierzak-Mietla M, Markiewicz M. Treosulfan or busulfan plus fludarabine as conditioning treatment before allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MC-FludT.14/L): a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jan;7(1):e28-e39. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30157-7. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

    PubMed 31606445
  • Romanski M, Wachowiak J, Glowka FK. Treosulfan Pharmacokinetics and its Variability in Pediatric and Adult Patients Undergoing Conditioning Prior to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Current State of the Art, In-Depth Analysis, and Perspectives. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Oct;57(10):1255-1265. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0647-4.

    PubMed 29557088
  • Danylesko I, Shimoni A, Nagler A. Treosulfan-based conditioning before hematopoietic SCT: more than a BU look-alike. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jan;47(1):5-14. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.88. Epub 2011 Apr 11.

    PubMed 21478921
  • Rambaldi A, Grassi A, Masciulli A, Boschini C, Mico MC, Busca A, Bruno B, Cavattoni I, Santarone S, Raimondi R, Montanari M, Milone G, Chiusolo P, Pastore D, Guidi S, Patriarca F, Risitano AM, Saporiti G, Pini M, Terruzzi E, Arcese W, Marotta G, Carella AM, Nagler A, Russo D, Corradini P, Alessandrino EP, Torelli GF, Scime R, Mordini N, Oldani E, Marfisi RM, Bacigalupo A, Bosi A. Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide versus busulfan plus fludarabine as a preparative regimen for allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Nov;16(15):1525-1536. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00200-4. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

    PubMed 26429297
  • Rashidi A, Weisdorf DJ, Bejanyan N. Treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia in adults. Br J Haematol. 2018 Apr;181(1):27-37. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15077. Epub 2018 Jan 9.

    PubMed 29318584

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in