Pain, ProceduralCSB-PAINNCT07233694
IM İnjection-PAIN-Cold Spray and Stress Ball
A study testing cold spray gruop and stress ball gruop in people with Pain, Procedural and Acute Pain, run by Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Brief Summary: Intramuscular (IM) injection is a widely used method for drug administration, with over 12 billion applications globally each year. Despite its therapeutic advantages, IM injection often causes pain, which can negatively impact patient comfort and lead to injection fear, non-compliance, and avoidance of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Procedural, Acute Pain, Injection Site
- What is being tested?
- cold spray gruop and stress ball gruop
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 25 Nov 2025to 10 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 18-65 years
- Receiving intramuscular injection
- Voluntarily agreed to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Skin disease at the injection site
- Allergy to cold spray
- Cognitive impairment preventing cooperation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University
Erzincan, 24100
Handan AYDIN KAHRAMAN, PHD, +90 507 746 9889, haydin@erzincan.edu.tr
About this study
Official title: The Effects of Cold Spray and Stress Ball Methods on Perceived Pain, Comfort, and Satisfaction During Intramuscular Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Brief Summary:
Intramuscular (IM) injection is a widely used method for drug administration, with over 12 billion applications globally each year. Despite its therapeutic advantages, IM injection often causes pain, which can negatively impact patient comfort and lead to injection fear, non-compliance, and avoidance of healthcare services. Effective pain management during IM injection is an ethical and professional responsibility for nurses. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effectiveness of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods against standard practice in reducing IM injection-related pain. The study will be conducted in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey between March and June 2025, involving 66 patients prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: cold spray, stress ball, or control. Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within the first minute after injection.
Read the detailed description
Study Description
Brief Summary:
Intramuscular (IM) injection is a widely used method for drug administration, with over 12 billion applications globally each year. Despite its therapeutic advantages, IM injection often causes pain, which can negatively impact patient comfort and lead to injection fear, non-compliance, and avoidance of healthcare services. Effective pain management during IM injection is an ethical and professional responsibility for nurses. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effectiveness of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods against standard practice in reducing IM injection-related pain. The study will be conducted in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey between March and June 2025, involving 66 patients prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: cold spray, stress ball, or control. Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within the first minute after injection.
Detailed Description:
Intramuscular (IM) injection is a fundamental method for delivering drugs directly into muscle tissue for systemic circulation. It is one of the most common invasive procedures in clinical practice globally, with over 12 billion applications annually. While offering faster absorption and higher bioavailability compared to oral and other parenteral routes for various pharmacological agents like vaccines, analgesics, sedatives, and antibiotics, IM injection can cause pain during administration, affecting patient comfort. This pain is a frequently reported side effect and can lead to injection phobia, non-adherence to treatment, and avoidance of health services. Consequently, managing pain during IM injections is a crucial ethical and professional responsibility for nurses.
Various non-pharmacological methods have been developed in nursing practice to reduce IM injection pain, and their efficacy has been extensively evaluated. These interventions include ShotBlocker, manual pressure, acupuncture, air-lock, distraction, and cold application. Cold application is a commonly preferred method for acute pain management due to its non-pharmacological effect and ease of clinical application. Cold sprays, in particular, offer significant advantages in clinical practice due to their minimal preparation, rapid effect, and low cost. These medical agents, derived from liquefied gases, rapidly evaporate from the skin surface, reducing local temperature and providing temporary superficial anesthesia. Their analgesic effects are achieved by inhibiting the activation of ion channels involved in pain transmission or by reducing the sensitivity of pain receptors. Limited studies have investigated cold spray use for IM injection pain control in adults. Comparative studies with ShotBlocker have reported that cold spray significantly reduces pain, but no significant difference was found between the two methods.
Distraction methods are effective nursing approaches that aim to reduce pain perception by shifting cognitive focus away from painful stimuli. The stress ball squeezing method, used within this strategy, has been applied in various invasive procedures and found effective in pain control. However, only one study has specifically evaluated its effect on IM injection pain. This study, conducted during Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination, reported no statistically significant effect of stress ball squeezing on pain levels.
Despite numerous studies on IM injection-related pain, it remains a prevalent clinical issue. Cold spray and stress ball squeezing offer practical options for pain reduction. However, studies evaluating their direct effects on IM injection pain are limited, and no direct comparative studies exist. Addressing this gap is crucial for evidence-based nursing care and improving patient experience.
This study aims to develop effective and applicable strategies to enhance care quality by comparatively evaluating cold spray, stress ball, and standard practice for reducing IM injection-related pain. Specifically, it aims to compare the effects of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods on injection pain during IM injection and to examine their effectiveness in reducing pain compared to standard practice.
The research hypotheses are:
H1. The application of cold spray to the injection site during IM injection reduces the intensity of pain caused by the injection.
H2. Squeezing a stress ball during IM injection reduces the intensity of pain caused by the injection.
H3. Cold spray application is more effective than stress ball squeezing in reducing injection pain.
Study Design and Participants:
This study is a three-arm parallel-group, single-blind, randomized controlled experimental design, conducted in accordance with the CONSORT 2010 guidelines. The research will be conducted from March to June 2025 in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey. The sample will consist of 66 patients who present to the emergency department and have been prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. The sample size was calculated using G Power 3.1.9.7, based on variance values from a relevant article, with a 95% confidence interval, 0.05 error rate, 80% power, and an effect size of d=0.63, determining 22 participants per group.
Randomization and Allocation Concealment:
Participants will be randomly assigned to the cold spray, stress ball, or control group using a random number table generated via
https://www.random.org. Numbers from 1 to 66 will be written on separate slips of paper, placed in opaque envelopes, and sealed. Each eligible participant who consents to the study will select an envelope, and the number drawn will determine their group assignment.
Data Collection Instruments:
Data will be collected using a Patient Identification Form and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Patient Identification Form will gather sociodemographic and clinical information such as age, gender, marital status, education level, body mass index, and chronic health conditions. The VAS is a valid and reliable 10-centimeter linear scale used to assess pain intensity, ranging from "no pain at all" (0) to "unbearable pain" (10). It is widely used in clinical studies due to its ease of application and effectiveness in evaluating pain reduction methods.
Intervention Materials:
Cold Spray: Galena® brand, aerosol form, containing butane, propane, and isobutane, which rapidly evaporates to reduce skin temperature and provide temporary superficial anesthesia.
Stress Ball: Approximately 10 cm in diameter, medium firmness, made of high-quality silicone, designed to change shape when squeezed and return to its original form.
Data Collection Process:
Before data collection, eligible patients will be informed about the study's purpose and content, and written and verbal consent will be obtained. All participants will complete the "Patient Identification Form" before the intervention. All IM injections will be administered by the same researcher following a standardized protocol to minimize variability. The injection side (right or left ventrogluteal region) will be randomly determined for each participant. Pain assessment will be performed within the first minute after injection by an independent nurse blinded to the patient's group, using the VAS.
Standard Intramuscular Injection Protocol:
Drug: Diclofenac sodium (3 mL)
Needle size: 21 Gauge
Syringe volume: 5 mL
Injection site: Left or right ventrogluteal region
Skin cleansing: The injection site will be cleaned with an alcohol swab in a 5 cm diameter, using circular movements from inside to outside, and 5 seconds will be waited for the area to dry before needle insertion.
Air-lock: 0.2-0.3 mL
Insertion angle: 90∘
Aspiration: Yes (5 sec)
Drug injection duration: 30 sec (1 mL / 10 sec)
Waiting time before needle removal: 10 sec
Post-injection application: Light pressure will be applied to the area for 15-20 seconds.
Pain measurement: Pain level will be assessed with VAS within the first 1 minute after injection and recorded.
Intervention Groups:
Cold Spray Group: Before the injection, cold spray will be applied for 5 seconds from a distance of 15 cm to an approximately 10cm 2 area at the planned injection site. The IM injection will then be performed within 15 seconds, following the standard protocol.
Stress Ball Group: Participants will be instructed on how to use the stress ball. After the injection site is randomly determined, a medium-firm stress ball will be given to the participant's non-injection hand, and they will be asked to rhythmically squeeze and release it throughout the procedure. The injection will be performed according to the standard protocol.
Control Group: Participants in this group will receive only the standard IM injection protocol without any additional interventions.
Ethical Considerations:
Ethical approval was obtained from Gümüşhane University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee (2024, E-95674917-108.99-291198) and written application permission from Van Provincial Health Directorate before data collection. Informed written and verbal consent will be obtained from all participants after explaining the study's purpose and content. Principles of informed consent, respect for participant autonomy, and confidentiality of personal information will be maintained during data collection. All participants will be informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time.
- Conditions
- Pain, Procedural, Acute Pain, Injection Site
- Being tested
- cold spray gruop, stress ball gruop
- Keywords
- muscle intramuscular injection, Nursing, Nursing practice, Pain, stress ball, cold spray
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Procedural, Acute Pain, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cold spray gruopProcedure or surgery
Arm Description: Before skin cleansing; cooling spray will be applied to a 10 cm2 area in the injection area from a distance of 15 cm for 5 seconds and diclofenac sodium injection will be applied within 15 seconds (Çetin and Avşar, 2022; Cevheroğlu and Büyükyılmaz, 2023). • IM injection protocol will be followed.
stress ball gruopProcedure or surgery
The patients in the group will first be told how to use the ball. After the VG area to be injected is determined, a stress ball will be given to the patient's hand opposite the injection area and they will be asked to squeeze and loosen the ball. They will be told to repeat this until the procedure is completed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | No additional intervention will be applied to the participants in this group; only the standard IM injection protocol will be followed. |
| Cold Spray Group | Experimental | Prior to the injection, cold spray was applied to an approximately 10 cm² area at the planned injection site from a distance of 15 cm for a duration of 5 seconds. Following this procedure, the intramuscular (IM) injection was administered within 15 seconds, and the entire process was completed in accordance with the standard protocol Receives: Procedure: cold spray gruop |
| Stress Ball Group | Experimental | Participants in this group were informed in advance about how to use the stress ball. After the ventrogluteal (VG) injection site was randomly selected, a medium-firm stress ball was placed in the hand on the non-injection side. Participants were instructed to rhythmically squeeze and release the ball throughout the procedure. The injection was then administered according to the predetermined standard protocol Receives: Procedure: stress ball gruop |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessment of Pain Intensity Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Following a Cold Spray Intervention
Pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a 100-millimeter horizontal line where 0 mm represents 'no pain' and 100 mm represents 'the worst imaginable pain'. A lower score on the VAS indicates a better outcome (less pain).
Measured: Immediately after intramuscular injection (0-5 minutes)
Assessment of Pain Intensity Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) During a Stress Ball Intervention
Squeezing a stress ball during intramuscular (IM) injection reduces the intensity of injection-related pain. Pain will be measured using the VAS.
Measured: During intramuscular injection
Secondary outcomes (1)
Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores Between the Cold Spray and Stress Ball Intervention Groups
The mean pain scores, as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), will be compared between the group receiving the cold spray intervention and the group using the stress ball. The VAS is a 100-millimeter horizontal line where 0 mm represents 'no pain' and 100 mm represents 'the worst imaginable pain'. A lower score indicates a better outcome.
Measured: Immediately after intramuscular injection (0-5 minutes)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Nov 2025
- Study start25 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain, ProceduralStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The research was planned as a single-blind, randomized controlled experimental study.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, handan aydın kahraman, Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi
- Investigators
- Handan AYDIN KAHRAMAN, PHD, Principal investigator, Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07233694
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Handan 1
- Acronym
- CSB-PAIN
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 18 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to privacy concerns and institutional data protection policies. The data collected in this study are intended solely for the purposes of this specific research.
Publications
Ayinde O, Hayward RS, Ross JDC. The effect of intramuscular injection technique on injection associated pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250883. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33939726Basak T, Demirtas A, Yorubulut SM. Virtual reality and distraction cards to reduce pain during intramuscular benzathine penicillin injection procedure in adults: A randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2021 May;77(5):2511-2518. doi: 10.1111/jan.14782. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
PubMed 33608955Cmc S, Lord H, Vargese SS, Kurian N, Cherian SA, Mathew E, Fernandez R. Effectiveness of physical stimulation for reducing injection pain in adults receiving intramuscular injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Feb 1;21(2):373-400. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00590.
PubMed 36758552
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Cold Spray and Stress Ball Methods on Perceived Pain, Comfort, and Satisfaction During Intramuscular Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07233694
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CSB-PAIN / Handan 1
- Conditions
- Pain, Procedural, Acute Pain, Injection Site
- Keywords
- muscle intramuscular injection, Nursing, Nursing practice, Pain, stress ball, cold spray
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Erzincan Binali Yildirim UniversitesiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Brief Summary:
Intramuscular (IM) injection is a widely used method for drug administration, with over 12 billion applications globally each year. Despite its therapeutic advantages, IM injection often causes pain, which can negatively impact patient comfort and lead to injection fear, non-compliance, and avoidance of healthcare services. Effective pain management during IM injection is an ethical and professional responsibility for nurses. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effectiveness of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods against standard practice in reducing IM injection-related pain. The study will be conducted in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey between March and June 2025, involving 66 patients prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: cold spray, stress ball, or control. Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within the first minute after injection.
Detailed description
Study Description
Brief Summary:
Intramuscular (IM) injection is a widely used method for drug administration, with over 12 billion applications globally each year. Despite its therapeutic advantages, IM injection often causes pain, which can negatively impact patient comfort and lead to injection fear, non-compliance, and avoidance of healthcare services. Effective pain management during IM injection is an ethical and professional responsibility for nurses. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effectiveness of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods against standard practice in reducing IM injection-related pain. The study will be conducted in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey between March and June 2025, involving 66 patients prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: cold spray, stress ball, or control. Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within the first minute after injection.
Detailed Description:
Intramuscular (IM) injection is a fundamental method for delivering drugs directly into muscle tissue for systemic circulation. It is one of the most common invasive procedures in clinical practice globally, with over 12 billion applications annually. While offering faster absorption and higher bioavailability compared to oral and other parenteral routes for various pharmacological agents like vaccines, analgesics, sedatives, and antibiotics, IM injection can cause pain during administration, affecting patient comfort. This pain is a frequently reported side effect and can lead to injection phobia, non-adherence to treatment, and avoidance of health services. Consequently, managing pain during IM injections is a crucial ethical and professional responsibility for nurses.
Various non-pharmacological methods have been developed in nursing practice to reduce IM injection pain, and their efficacy has been extensively evaluated. These interventions include ShotBlocker, manual pressure, acupuncture, air-lock, distraction, and cold application. Cold application is a commonly preferred method for acute pain management due to its non-pharmacological effect and ease of clinical application. Cold sprays, in particular, offer significant advantages in clinical practice due to their minimal preparation, rapid effect, and low cost. These medical agents, derived from liquefied gases, rapidly evaporate from the skin surface, reducing local temperature and providing temporary superficial anesthesia. Their analgesic effects are achieved by inhibiting the activation of ion channels involved in pain transmission or by reducing the sensitivity of pain receptors. Limited studies have investigated cold spray use for IM injection pain control in adults. Comparative studies with ShotBlocker have reported that cold spray significantly reduces pain, but no significant difference was found between the two methods.
Distraction methods are effective nursing approaches that aim to reduce pain perception by shifting cognitive focus away from painful stimuli. The stress ball squeezing method, used within this strategy, has been applied in various invasive procedures and found effective in pain control. However, only one study has specifically evaluated its effect on IM injection pain. This study, conducted during Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination, reported no statistically significant effect of stress ball squeezing on pain levels.
Despite numerous studies on IM injection-related pain, it remains a prevalent clinical issue. Cold spray and stress ball squeezing offer practical options for pain reduction. However, studies evaluating their direct effects on IM injection pain are limited, and no direct comparative studies exist. Addressing this gap is crucial for evidence-based nursing care and improving patient experience.
This study aims to develop effective and applicable strategies to enhance care quality by comparatively evaluating cold spray, stress ball, and standard practice for reducing IM injection-related pain. Specifically, it aims to compare the effects of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods on injection pain during IM injection and to examine their effectiveness in reducing pain compared to standard practice.
The research hypotheses are:
H1. The application of cold spray to the injection site during IM injection reduces the intensity of pain caused by the injection.
H2. Squeezing a stress ball during IM injection reduces the intensity of pain caused by the injection.
H3. Cold spray application is more effective than stress ball squeezing in reducing injection pain.
Study Design and Participants:
This study is a three-arm parallel-group, single-blind, randomized controlled experimental design, conducted in accordance with the CONSORT 2010 guidelines. The research will be conducted from March to June 2025 in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey. The sample will consist of 66 patients who present to the emergency department and have been prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. The sample size was calculated using G Power 3.1.9.7, based on variance values from a relevant article, with a 95% confidence interval, 0.05 error rate, 80% power, and an effect size of d=0.63, determining 22 participants per group.
Randomization and Allocation Concealment:
Participants will be randomly assigned to the cold spray, stress ball, or control group using a random number table generated via
https://www.random.org. Numbers from 1 to 66 will be written on separate slips of paper, placed in opaque envelopes, and sealed. Each eligible participant who consents to the study will select an envelope, and the number drawn will determine their group assignment.
Data Collection Instruments:
Data will be collected using a Patient Identification Form and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Patient Identification Form will gather sociodemographic and clinical information such as age, gender, marital status, education level, body mass index, and chronic health conditions. The VAS is a valid and reliable 10-centimeter linear scale used to assess pain intensity, ranging from "no pain at all" (0) to "unbearable pain" (10). It is widely used in clinical studies due to its ease of application and effectiveness in evaluating pain reduction methods.
Intervention Materials:
Cold Spray: Galena® brand, aerosol form, containing butane, propane, and isobutane, which rapidly evaporates to reduce skin temperature and provide temporary superficial anesthesia.
Stress Ball: Approximately 10 cm in diameter, medium firmness, made of high-quality silicone, designed to change shape when squeezed and return to its original form.
Data Collection Process:
Before data collection, eligible patients will be informed about the study's purpose and content, and written and verbal consent will be obtained. All participants will complete the "Patient Identification Form" before the intervention. All IM injections will be administered by the same researcher following a standardized protocol to minimize variability. The injection side (right or left ventrogluteal region) will be randomly determined for each participant. Pain assessment will be performed within the first minute after injection by an independent nurse blinded to the patient's group, using the VAS.
Standard Intramuscular Injection Protocol:
Drug: Diclofenac sodium (3 mL)
Needle size: 21 Gauge
Syringe volume: 5 mL
Injection site: Left or right ventrogluteal region
Skin cleansing: The injection site will be cleaned with an alcohol swab in a 5 cm diameter, using circular movements from inside to outside, and 5 seconds will be waited for the area to dry before needle insertion.
Air-lock: 0.2-0.3 mL
Insertion angle: 90∘
Aspiration: Yes (5 sec)
Drug injection duration: 30 sec (1 mL / 10 sec)
Waiting time before needle removal: 10 sec
Post-injection application: Light pressure will be applied to the area for 15-20 seconds.
Pain measurement: Pain level will be assessed with VAS within the first 1 minute after injection and recorded.
Intervention Groups:
Cold Spray Group: Before the injection, cold spray will be applied for 5 seconds from a distance of 15 cm to an approximately 10cm 2 area at the planned injection site. The IM injection will then be performed within 15 seconds, following the standard protocol.
Stress Ball Group: Participants will be instructed on how to use the stress ball. After the injection site is randomly determined, a medium-firm stress ball will be given to the participant's non-injection hand, and they will be asked to rhythmically squeeze and release it throughout the procedure. The injection will be performed according to the standard protocol.
Control Group: Participants in this group will receive only the standard IM injection protocol without any additional interventions.
Ethical Considerations:
Ethical approval was obtained from Gümüşhane University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee (2024, E-95674917-108.99-291198) and written application permission from Van Provincial Health Directorate before data collection. Informed written and verbal consent will be obtained from all participants after explaining the study's purpose and content. Principles of informed consent, respect for participant autonomy, and confidentiality of personal information will be maintained during data collection. All participants will be informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- The research was planned as a single-blind, randomized controlled experimental study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | –No additional intervention will be applied to the participants in this group; only the standard IM injection protocol will be followed. |
| Cold Spray Group | Experimental | Procedure: cold spray gruopPrior to the injection, cold spray was applied to an approximately 10 cm² area at the planned injection site from a distance of 15 cm for a duration of 5 seconds. Following this procedure, the intramuscular (IM) injection was administered within 15 seconds, and the entire process was completed in accordance with the standard protocol |
| Stress Ball Group | Experimental | Procedure: stress ball gruopParticipants in this group were informed in advance about how to use the stress ball. After the ventrogluteal (VG) injection site was randomly selected, a medium-firm stress ball was placed in the hand on the non-injection side. Participants were instructed to rhythmically squeeze and release the ball throughout the procedure. The injection was then administered according to the predetermined standard protocol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults aged 18-65 years
- Receiving intramuscular injection
- Voluntarily agreed to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Skin disease at the injection site
- Allergy to cold spray
- Cognitive impairment preventing cooperation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cold spray gruopArm Description: Before skin cleansing; cooling spray will be applied to a 10 cm2 area in the injection area from a distance of 15 cm for 5 seconds and diclofenac sodium injection will be applied within 15 seconds (Çetin and Avşar, 2022; Cevheroğlu and Büyükyılmaz, 2023). • IM injection protocol will be followed. | Procedure or surgery | Cold Spray Group |
| stress ball gruopThe patients in the group will first be told how to use the ball. After the VG area to be injected is determined, a stress ball will be given to the patient's hand opposite the injection area and they will be asked to squeeze and loosen the ball. They will be told to repeat this until the procedure is completed. | Procedure or surgery | Stress Ball Group |
Primary outcome
Assessment of Pain Intensity Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Following a Cold Spray Intervention
Time frame: Immediately after intramuscular injection (0-5 minutes)
Pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a 100-millimeter horizontal line where 0 mm represents 'no pain' and 100 mm represents 'the worst imaginable pain'. A lower score on the VAS indicates a better outcome (less pain).
Assessment of Pain Intensity Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) During a Stress Ball Intervention
Time frame: During intramuscular injection
Squeezing a stress ball during intramuscular (IM) injection reduces the intensity of injection-related pain. Pain will be measured using the VAS.
1 secondary outcome
Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores Between the Cold Spray and Stress Ball Intervention Groups
Time frame: Immediately after intramuscular injection (0-5 minutes)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Nov 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 33939726Ayinde O, Hayward RS, Ross JDC. The effect of intramuscular injection technique on injection associated pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250883. eCollection 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 33608955Basak T, Demirtas A, Yorubulut SM. Virtual reality and distraction cards to reduce pain during intramuscular benzathine penicillin injection procedure in adults: A randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2021 May;77(5):2511-2518. doi: 10.1111/jan.14782. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 36758552Cmc S, Lord H, Vargese SS, Kurian N, Cherian SA, Mathew E, Fernandez R. Effectiveness of physical stimulation for reducing injection pain in adults receiving intramuscular injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Feb 1;21(2):373-400. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00590.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to privacy concerns and institutional data protection policies. The data collected in this study are intended solely for the purposes of this specific research.
Related trials for Pain, Procedural
Not yet recruiting
Testing the Timing and Application of Virtual Reality Distraction During Knee Injections in a VA Pain Clinic
Pain Management, Injection Pain Prevention
Recruiting
Distraction Cards Versus Emotion-Regulation Toy Squeezing During Intramuscular Vaccination in Preschool Children
Procedural Pain, Pain-related Fear
Not yet recruiting
Leg and Foot Massage for Pain in Newborns Receiving Heel Stick
Procedural Pain in Newborns
Enrolling by invitation
VR for Steroid Joint Injections - Feasibility
Acute Pain, Procedural Anxiety
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Pain Control During Hysterosalpingography: A Three-Arm Randomized Trial
Hysterosalpingography-Related Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Handan AYDIN KAHRAMAN, PHD principal investigator
Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing cold spray gruop and stress ball gruop in people with Pain, Procedural and Acute Pain, run by Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Handan AYDIN KAHRAMAN, PHD (+905077469889, haydin@erzincan.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessment of Pain Intensity Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Following a Cold Spray Intervention (time frame: Immediately after intramuscular injection (0-5 minutes)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07233694, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2025.