AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain, ProceduralCSB-PAINNCT07233694

IM İnjection-PAIN-Cold Spray and Stress Ball

A study testing cold spray gruop and stress ball gruop in people with Pain, Procedural and Acute Pain, run by Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Brief Summary: Intramuscular (IM) injection is a widely used method for drug administration, with over 12 billion applications globally each year. Despite its therapeutic advantages, IM injection often causes pain, which can negatively impact patient comfort and lead to injection fear, non-compliance, and avoidance of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Procedural, Acute Pain, Injection Site
What is being tested?
cold spray gruop and stress ball gruop
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
25 Nov 2025to 10 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 18-65 years
  • Receiving intramuscular injection
  • Voluntarily agreed to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • Skin disease at the injection site
  • Allergy to cold spray
  • Cognitive impairment preventing cooperation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Handan AYDIN KAHRAMAN, PHD contact

+905077469889

haydin@erzincan.edu.tr

Handan AYDIN KAHRAMAN, PHD contact

+90 507 746 9889

haydin@erzincan.edu.tr

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University

    Erzincan, 24100

    Handan AYDIN KAHRAMAN, PHD, +90 507 746 9889, haydin@erzincan.edu.tr

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effects of Cold Spray and Stress Ball Methods on Perceived Pain, Comfort, and Satisfaction During Intramuscular Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Brief Summary:

Intramuscular (IM) injection is a widely used method for drug administration, with over 12 billion applications globally each year. Despite its therapeutic advantages, IM injection often causes pain, which can negatively impact patient comfort and lead to injection fear, non-compliance, and avoidance of healthcare services. Effective pain management during IM injection is an ethical and professional responsibility for nurses. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effectiveness of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods against standard practice in reducing IM injection-related pain. The study will be conducted in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey between March and June 2025, involving 66 patients prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: cold spray, stress ball, or control. Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within the first minute after injection.

Read the detailed description

Study Description

Brief Summary:

Intramuscular (IM) injection is a widely used method for drug administration, with over 12 billion applications globally each year. Despite its therapeutic advantages, IM injection often causes pain, which can negatively impact patient comfort and lead to injection fear, non-compliance, and avoidance of healthcare services. Effective pain management during IM injection is an ethical and professional responsibility for nurses. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effectiveness of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods against standard practice in reducing IM injection-related pain. The study will be conducted in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey between March and June 2025, involving 66 patients prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: cold spray, stress ball, or control. Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within the first minute after injection.

Detailed Description:

Intramuscular (IM) injection is a fundamental method for delivering drugs directly into muscle tissue for systemic circulation. It is one of the most common invasive procedures in clinical practice globally, with over 12 billion applications annually. While offering faster absorption and higher bioavailability compared to oral and other parenteral routes for various pharmacological agents like vaccines, analgesics, sedatives, and antibiotics, IM injection can cause pain during administration, affecting patient comfort. This pain is a frequently reported side effect and can lead to injection phobia, non-adherence to treatment, and avoidance of health services. Consequently, managing pain during IM injections is a crucial ethical and professional responsibility for nurses.

Various non-pharmacological methods have been developed in nursing practice to reduce IM injection pain, and their efficacy has been extensively evaluated. These interventions include ShotBlocker, manual pressure, acupuncture, air-lock, distraction, and cold application. Cold application is a commonly preferred method for acute pain management due to its non-pharmacological effect and ease of clinical application. Cold sprays, in particular, offer significant advantages in clinical practice due to their minimal preparation, rapid effect, and low cost. These medical agents, derived from liquefied gases, rapidly evaporate from the skin surface, reducing local temperature and providing temporary superficial anesthesia. Their analgesic effects are achieved by inhibiting the activation of ion channels involved in pain transmission or by reducing the sensitivity of pain receptors. Limited studies have investigated cold spray use for IM injection pain control in adults. Comparative studies with ShotBlocker have reported that cold spray significantly reduces pain, but no significant difference was found between the two methods.

Distraction methods are effective nursing approaches that aim to reduce pain perception by shifting cognitive focus away from painful stimuli. The stress ball squeezing method, used within this strategy, has been applied in various invasive procedures and found effective in pain control. However, only one study has specifically evaluated its effect on IM injection pain. This study, conducted during Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination, reported no statistically significant effect of stress ball squeezing on pain levels.

Despite numerous studies on IM injection-related pain, it remains a prevalent clinical issue. Cold spray and stress ball squeezing offer practical options for pain reduction. However, studies evaluating their direct effects on IM injection pain are limited, and no direct comparative studies exist. Addressing this gap is crucial for evidence-based nursing care and improving patient experience.

This study aims to develop effective and applicable strategies to enhance care quality by comparatively evaluating cold spray, stress ball, and standard practice for reducing IM injection-related pain. Specifically, it aims to compare the effects of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods on injection pain during IM injection and to examine their effectiveness in reducing pain compared to standard practice.

The research hypotheses are:

H1. The application of cold spray to the injection site during IM injection reduces the intensity of pain caused by the injection.

H2. Squeezing a stress ball during IM injection reduces the intensity of pain caused by the injection.

H3. Cold spray application is more effective than stress ball squeezing in reducing injection pain.

Study Design and Participants:

This study is a three-arm parallel-group, single-blind, randomized controlled experimental design, conducted in accordance with the CONSORT 2010 guidelines. The research will be conducted from March to June 2025 in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey. The sample will consist of 66 patients who present to the emergency department and have been prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. The sample size was calculated using G Power 3.1.9.7, based on variance values from a relevant article, with a 95% confidence interval, 0.05 error rate, 80% power, and an effect size of d=0.63, determining 22 participants per group.

Randomization and Allocation Concealment:

Participants will be randomly assigned to the cold spray, stress ball, or control group using a random number table generated via

https://www.random.org. Numbers from 1 to 66 will be written on separate slips of paper, placed in opaque envelopes, and sealed. Each eligible participant who consents to the study will select an envelope, and the number drawn will determine their group assignment.

Data Collection Instruments:

Data will be collected using a Patient Identification Form and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Patient Identification Form will gather sociodemographic and clinical information such as age, gender, marital status, education level, body mass index, and chronic health conditions. The VAS is a valid and reliable 10-centimeter linear scale used to assess pain intensity, ranging from "no pain at all" (0) to "unbearable pain" (10). It is widely used in clinical studies due to its ease of application and effectiveness in evaluating pain reduction methods.

Intervention Materials:

Cold Spray: Galena® brand, aerosol form, containing butane, propane, and isobutane, which rapidly evaporates to reduce skin temperature and provide temporary superficial anesthesia.

Stress Ball: Approximately 10 cm in diameter, medium firmness, made of high-quality silicone, designed to change shape when squeezed and return to its original form.

Data Collection Process:

Before data collection, eligible patients will be informed about the study's purpose and content, and written and verbal consent will be obtained. All participants will complete the "Patient Identification Form" before the intervention. All IM injections will be administered by the same researcher following a standardized protocol to minimize variability. The injection side (right or left ventrogluteal region) will be randomly determined for each participant. Pain assessment will be performed within the first minute after injection by an independent nurse blinded to the patient's group, using the VAS.

Standard Intramuscular Injection Protocol:

Drug: Diclofenac sodium (3 mL)

Needle size: 21 Gauge

Syringe volume: 5 mL

Injection site: Left or right ventrogluteal region

Skin cleansing: The injection site will be cleaned with an alcohol swab in a 5 cm diameter, using circular movements from inside to outside, and 5 seconds will be waited for the area to dry before needle insertion.

Air-lock: 0.2-0.3 mL

Insertion angle: 90∘

Aspiration: Yes (5 sec)

Drug injection duration: 30 sec (1 mL / 10 sec)

Waiting time before needle removal: 10 sec

Post-injection application: Light pressure will be applied to the area for 15-20 seconds.

Pain measurement: Pain level will be assessed with VAS within the first 1 minute after injection and recorded.

Intervention Groups:

Cold Spray Group: Before the injection, cold spray will be applied for 5 seconds from a distance of 15 cm to an approximately 10cm 2 area at the planned injection site. The IM injection will then be performed within 15 seconds, following the standard protocol.

Stress Ball Group: Participants will be instructed on how to use the stress ball. After the injection site is randomly determined, a medium-firm stress ball will be given to the participant's non-injection hand, and they will be asked to rhythmically squeeze and release it throughout the procedure. The injection will be performed according to the standard protocol.

Control Group: Participants in this group will receive only the standard IM injection protocol without any additional interventions.

Ethical Considerations:

Ethical approval was obtained from Gümüşhane University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee (2024, E-95674917-108.99-291198) and written application permission from Van Provincial Health Directorate before data collection. Informed written and verbal consent will be obtained from all participants after explaining the study's purpose and content. Principles of informed consent, respect for participant autonomy, and confidentiality of personal information will be maintained during data collection. All participants will be informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time.

Being tested
cold spray gruop, stress ball gruop
Keywords
muscle intramuscular injection, Nursing, Nursing practice, Pain, stress ball, cold spray
Medical subject headings
Pain, Procedural, Acute Pain, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cold spray gruopProcedure or surgery

    Arm Description: Before skin cleansing; cooling spray will be applied to a 10 cm2 area in the injection area from a distance of 15 cm for 5 seconds and diclofenac sodium injection will be applied within 15 seconds (Çetin and Avşar, 2022; Cevheroğlu and Büyükyılmaz, 2023). • IM injection protocol will be followed.

  • stress ball gruopProcedure or surgery

    The patients in the group will first be told how to use the ball. After the VG area to be injected is determined, a stress ball will be given to the patient's hand opposite the injection area and they will be asked to squeeze and loosen the ball. They will be told to repeat this until the procedure is completed.

Study groups in NCT07233694
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control GroupNo interventionNo additional intervention will be applied to the participants in this group; only the standard IM injection protocol will be followed.
Cold Spray GroupExperimentalPrior to the injection, cold spray was applied to an approximately 10 cm² area at the planned injection site from a distance of 15 cm for a duration of 5 seconds. Following this procedure, the intramuscular (IM) injection was administered within 15 seconds, and the entire process was completed in accordance with the standard protocol
Receives: Procedure: cold spray gruop
Stress Ball GroupExperimentalParticipants in this group were informed in advance about how to use the stress ball. After the ventrogluteal (VG) injection site was randomly selected, a medium-firm stress ball was placed in the hand on the non-injection side. Participants were instructed to rhythmically squeeze and release the ball throughout the procedure. The injection was then administered according to the predetermined standard protocol
Receives: Procedure: stress ball gruop

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of Pain Intensity Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Following a Cold Spray Intervention

    Pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a 100-millimeter horizontal line where 0 mm represents 'no pain' and 100 mm represents 'the worst imaginable pain'. A lower score on the VAS indicates a better outcome (less pain).

    Measured: Immediately after intramuscular injection (0-5 minutes)

  2. Assessment of Pain Intensity Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) During a Stress Ball Intervention

    Squeezing a stress ball during intramuscular (IM) injection reduces the intensity of injection-related pain. Pain will be measured using the VAS.

    Measured: During intramuscular injection

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores Between the Cold Spray and Stress Ball Intervention Groups

    The mean pain scores, as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), will be compared between the group receiving the cold spray intervention and the group using the stress ball. The VAS is a 100-millimeter horizontal line where 0 mm represents 'no pain' and 100 mm represents 'the worst imaginable pain'. A lower score indicates a better outcome.

    Measured: Immediately after intramuscular injection (0-5 minutes)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2025
  2. Study start25 Nov 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The research was planned as a single-blind, randomized controlled experimental study.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
66 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07233694
Sponsor's protocol ID
Handan 1
Acronym
CSB-PAIN
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
14 Jun 2025
Last updated
18 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to privacy concerns and institutional data protection policies. The data collected in this study are intended solely for the purposes of this specific research.

Publications

  • Ayinde O, Hayward RS, Ross JDC. The effect of intramuscular injection technique on injection associated pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250883. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 33939726
  • Basak T, Demirtas A, Yorubulut SM. Virtual reality and distraction cards to reduce pain during intramuscular benzathine penicillin injection procedure in adults: A randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2021 May;77(5):2511-2518. doi: 10.1111/jan.14782. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

    PubMed 33608955
  • Cmc S, Lord H, Vargese SS, Kurian N, Cherian SA, Mathew E, Fernandez R. Effectiveness of physical stimulation for reducing injection pain in adults receiving intramuscular injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Feb 1;21(2):373-400. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00590.

    PubMed 36758552

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing cold spray gruop and stress ball gruop in people with Pain, Procedural and Acute Pain, run by Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Handan AYDIN KAHRAMAN, PHD (+905077469889, haydin@erzincan.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of Pain Intensity Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Following a Cold Spray Intervention (time frame: Immediately after intramuscular injection (0-5 minutes)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07233694, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in