AzTrials
AzTrials

High Bleeding Risk PatientsNCT07238764

OCT-based DAPT Cessation in HBR Patients

A study testing Optical Coherence Tomography-based early DAPT discontinuation in people with High Bleeding Risk Patients and DAPT(Dual Antiplatelet Therapy), run by Federal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of Health at 1 site in Russia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study investigates whether patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and a high risk of bleeding can safely stop dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) earlier than usual after receiving a special type of stent called a polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Optical Coherence Tomography-based early DAPT discontinuation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteRussia
Study dates
12 Jun 2022to 9 May 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)
  • Coronary artery disease (CAD) suitable for drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation
  • High-bleeding risk as defined by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) or a Precise-DAPT score ≥ 25

Who cannot join

  • Acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
  • Active bleeding at the time of randomization
  • Known renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] ≤ 20 ml/min)
  • Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 30%)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Russia1 site
  • Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

    Saint Petersburg, 197341

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study of Early DAPT Discontinuation Based on Optical Coherence Tomography in High-Bleeding Risk Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Following Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stent Implantation

This study investigates whether patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and a high risk of bleeding can safely stop dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) earlier than usual after receiving a special type of stent called a polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent. DAPT, which combines aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor, is typically prescribed for six months after stent placement to prevent blood clots. However, in patients at high risk of bleeding, stopping DAPT early may be beneficial if the artery has healed properly.

The study uses optical coherence tomography (OCT), a high-resolution imaging tool, to assess how well the artery has healed after stent placement. If OCT shows that at least 80% of the stent is covered by new tissue after one month, patients in the short DAPT group stop taking DAPT and switch to a single antiplatelet drug for up to six months. In the standard DAPT group, patients continue taking both drugs for the full six months.

Read more

The goal of the study is to determine whether early DAPT discontinuation guided by OCT is as safe as the standard six-month treatment. The study focuses on two main outcomes: (1) how well the artery heals, measured by the percentage of stent coverage seen on OCT, and (2) the occurrence of major complications such as heart attack, stroke, or severe bleeding over 12 months.

This research is important because patients with diabetes often face delayed healing and a higher risk of blood clots, making it challenging to balance the risks of clotting and bleeding. The polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent used in this study is designed to promote faster healing and reduce inflammation, potentially allowing for safer early DAPT discontinuation. Additionally, OCT provides precise information about arterial healing, helping doctors make personalized decisions about when to stop DAPT.

By comparing the safety and effectiveness of short DAPT versus standard DAPT, this study aims to improve treatment strategies for high-risk patients, reducing the risk of both bleeding and clot-related complications. If successful, this approach could lead to more tailored and safer antiplatelet therapy for patients with diabetes and high bleeding risk.

Read the detailed description

This study investigates the safety and feasibility of early DAPT discontinuation guided by OCT findings in high-bleeding-risk patients with DM who undergo PCI with a polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent. The research focuses on balancing the risks of bleeding and stent thrombosis, two critical complications associated with prolonged DAPT use, particularly in diabetic patients who are predisposed to delayed arterial healing and heightened thrombogenicity.

Study Design This is an investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective, randomized pilot trial designed to compare two DAPT strategies: short DAPT (OCT-guided discontinuation after 1 month) and standard DAPT (6 months). Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the two groups, and all participants underwent PCI with the implantation of a polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent (Cre-8, Alvimedica, Turkey). The study adheres to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and International Conference on Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice guidelines and was approved by the local ethics committee.

Patient Population The study included patients aged 18 years or older with known diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2), coronary artery disease (CAD) suitable for drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, and a high-bleeding risk as defined by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) or a Precise-DAPT score ≥ 25. Key exclusion criteria included acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or active bleeding at the time of randomization, severe renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] ≤ 20 ml/min), and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 30%). A total of 40 patients were enrolled and randomized into the two study arms.

Interventions All participants received a loading dose of 300 mg of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and 600 mg of clopidogrel before PCI. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia with anticoagulation using unfractionated heparin (UFH) at a dose of 100 IU per kg. Full revascularization and adequate post-dilation were mandatory in both groups. In the short DAPT group, stent implantation was guided by OCT to ensure optimal stent strut apposition.

Within one month after PCI, patients in the short DAPT group underwent another OCT assessment to evaluate arterial healing. Early DAPT discontinuation was based on favorable OCT findings, defined as ≥80% neointimal strut coverage. OCT was performed using a commercially available system (Optis, Abbott, USA) and catheters (DragonFly Optis, Abbott, USA) according to a standardized protocol. Cross-sectional OCT images were analyzed at 2 mm intervals along the entire stented segment. For each analyzed segment, the total number of struts and uncovered struts (with no visible intimal coverage) were counted. Neointimal strut coverage was estimated as the total number of covered struts divided by the total number of analyzed struts.

If favorable OCT findings were observed, DAPT was discontinued, and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with 75 mg of clopidogrel daily was prescribed for up to six months. In cases where OCT findings did not meet the predefined criteria, patients were switched to the standard DAPT regimen. In the standard DAPT group, patients continued dual antiplatelet therapy for the recommended duration of six months. After six months, all patients were transitioned to ASA only. Patients requiring oral anticoagulation were additionally prescribed non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) as per their clinical indications, alongside either DAPT or SAPT.

Endpoints The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of covered stent struts assessed by OCT at 1 month. This parameter was selected as a key marker of arterial healing, predictor of stent thrombosis risk, and indicator of safe DAPT abbreviation. The primary safety endpoint, defined as net adverse clinical events (NACE), included the incidence of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or major bleeding (BARC types 2, 3, or 5). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of stent thrombosis and other major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Bleeding complications were assessed according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria.

Key Findings At 1 month, OCT analysis of 561 cross-sections in the short DAPT group showed a mean strut coverage of 87.4 ± 5.1%, with only one patient failing to meet the predefined coverage threshold (≥80% neointimal strut coverage) and subsequently transitioning to the standard DAPT regimen. During the 12-month follow-up period, no cardiac deaths, strokes, or stent thrombosis were reported in either group. Non-fatal non-target vessel myocardial infarctions occurred in one patient in each group. Major bleeding events were reported in three patients in the standard DAPT group and one patient in the short DAPT group. The cumulative incidence of NACE was numerically lower in the short DAPT group compared to the standard DAPT group (10% vs. 20%, p = 0.66), although the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Discussion This pilot study demonstrates the potential of OCT-guided early DAPT discontinuation in high-bleeding-risk patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing PCI with a polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent. The favorable healing profile observed at 1 month suggests that this strategy may help balance the risks of bleeding and stent thrombosis. The absence of stent thrombosis and a numerically lower rate of major bleeding events in the short DAPT group align with emerging evidence supporting personalized DAPT strategies.

Recent landmark trials, such as MASTER-DAPT and STOPDAPT-2, have shown that short DAPT regimens in high-bleeding-risk populations are non-inferior to standard DAPT in terms of ischemic outcomes while significantly reducing bleeding events. These findings emphasize the importance of patient-centric decision-making in tailoring DAPT durations. The PROTECT-OCT registry and subsequent studies have highlighted the utility of OCT in assessing endothelial coverage and guiding early DAPT discontinuation. Our findings further support the role of OCT in identifying patients at low risk for stent thrombosis when DAPT is abbreviated.

The polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent used in this study offers unique advantages, including a carbonized surface for improved hemocompatibility and an abluminal coating with long-chain fatty acids targeting inflammation and hyperproliferation. These attributes may enhance arterial healing, particularly in diabetic patients who are predisposed to delayed endothelialization.

Limitations As a single-center trial with a small sample size, the results should be interpreted with caution. While OCT is a promising tool for guiding DAPT strategies, its widespread implementation may be limited by cost and availability. Additionally, the 12-month follow-up period may not fully capture late adverse events, which are particularly relevant in high-risk populations.

Conclusion This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of OCT-guided early DAPT discontinuation in high-bleeding-risk patients with diabetes mellitus after polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent implantation. The favorable healing profile observed at 1 month suggests the potential of this strategy to balance the risks of bleeding and stent thrombosis. However, larger multicenter trials are needed to validate these findings and further explore the role of OCT in tailoring antiplatelet therapy durations in high-risk populations.

Being tested
Optical Coherence Tomography-based early DAPT discontinuation
Keywords
Optical coherence tomography, dual antiplatelet therapy, amphilimus-eluting stent, high-bleeding risk, diabetes mellitus
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Optical Coherence Tomography-based early DAPT discontinuationProcedure or surgery

    Within one month after the index PCI, participants in the short DAPT group underwent coronary angiography with OCT assessment of the implanted stents. If prespecified OCT criteria for adequate arterial healing were met (i.e., ≥80% neointimal strut coverage), DAPT was discontinued immediately, and SAPT with P2Y12 inhibitors was prescribed for up to six months.

Study groups in NCT07238764
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard DAPT (6 months)No interventionStandard DAPT therapy according to clinical guidelines
Short DAPT (1 month)ExperimentalDAPT cessation at 1 month post-PCI based on optical coherence tomography results
Receives: Procedure: Optical Coherence Tomography-based early DAPT discontinuation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The percentage of covered stent struts assessed by OCT at 1 month. The primary safety endpoint, defined as net adverse clinical events (NACE), included the incidence of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or major bleeding.

    Measured: 1 month

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Incidence of stent thrombosis and other MACE. Bleeding complications were assessed according to the BARC criteria.

    Measured: The follow-up period was 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Nov 2025
  2. Study start12 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion9 May 2025
  4. Study completion9 May 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07238764
Sponsor's protocol ID
OCT-DAPT
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
9 May 2025
Last updated
20 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Optical Coherence Tomography-based early DAPT discontinuation in people with High Bleeding Risk Patients and DAPT(Dual Antiplatelet Therapy), run by Federal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of Health at 1 site in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The percentage of covered stent struts assessed by OCT at 1 month. The primary safety endpoint, defined as net adverse clinical events (NACE), included the incidence of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or major bleeding. (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in