AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac Arrest (CA)CARDISNCT07240714

Effects of a Web-based Support Programme for Cardiac Arrest Survivors

A study testing Digital Support Programme in people with Cardiac Arrest (CA), run by Linkoeping University at 9 sites in Sweden.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a web-based support programme can improve wellbeing in cardiac arrest survivors by helping them manage emotional, cognitive, and physical challenges. The study also explores how the programme is used and experienced in practice. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cardiac Arrest (CA)
What is being tested?
Digital Support Programme
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
9 sitesSweden
Study dates
20 Nov 2025to 31 Aug 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Survival of a cardiac arrest 1 to 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Access to a mobile phone, tablet, or computer with internet connection

Who cannot join

  • Insufficient language or cognitive ability to engage with a digital intervention and complete questionnaires in Swedish
  • Participation in another study involving the collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

9 sites in 1 country

Sweden9 sites
  • Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset

    Gothenburg

  • Östra sjukhuset

    Gothenburg

  • Helsingborgs lasarett

    Helsingborg

  • Länssjukhuset

    Kalmar

  • Universitetssjukhuset

    Linköping

  • Skånes universitetssjukhus

    Lund

  • Lasarettet i Motala

    Motala

  • Vrinnevisjukhuset

    Norrköping

  • Västmanlands sjukhus Västerås

    Västerås

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Effects of a Web-based Support Programme for Cardiac Arrest Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Process Evaluation (The CARDIS Study)

The overall goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a web-based support programme can improve wellbeing in cardiac arrest survivors by helping them manage emotional, cognitive, and physical challenges. The study also explores how the programme is used and experienced in practice.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Read more
  • Can access to a web-based support programme improve overall wellbeing in cardiac arrest survivors?
  • Can it also enhance quality of life, cognitive function, life satisfaction, and sleep, while reducing anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and fatigue? Researchers will compare cardiac arrest survivors who receive a web-based support programme in addition to standard care with those who receive standard care alone, to see if the programme improves wellbeing and other health outcomes. After the study, the control group will also gain access to the programme.

Participants will:

  • Be asked to complete online questionnaires at three time points: at the start of the study, after 3 months, and after 6 months.
  • Be encouraged to use a web-based support programme for 3 months, with unlimited access, at their own pace and according to their individual needs (intervention group only).
Read the detailed description

Cardiac arrest is a serious public health issue, affecting around 13,000 people annually in Sweden. Survivors often face long-term physical, cognitive, and emotional challenges, including anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and post-traumatic stress. These difficulties can significantly impact daily life, and many survivors struggle to return to work or previous routines.

Although guidelines recommend follow-up within 1-3 months after hospital discharge, support is often fragmented and varies across regions. Survivors frequently report limited access to reliable information and emotional support. Research has shown that structured education and rehabilitation are essential for both survivors and their families, yet current care models rarely address these needs in a comprehensive way.

To help fill this gap, a web-based support programme was co-created in 2024-2025 by researchers, healthcare professionals, cardiac arrest survivors, and patient organizations. The programme includes educational modules, patient and family stories, videos, practical exercises, and tools for self-management and personal recovery planning. It also features a moderated chat forum for peer support. A feasibility study showed that the programme was easy to use and perceived as relevant and helpful.

The study begins with a pilot phase (n=10) to test study procedures, followed by a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 120 participants across six Swedish regions. Participants are recruited during routine follow-up visit one month after discharge. All participants receive standard care. Those randomized to the intervention group gain access to the digital support programme for 12 weeks. The control group receives standard care and gains access to the programme after study completion.

Consent and data collection are handled digitally. Participants are asked to complete online surveys at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. These surveys cover wellbeing, quality of life, sleep, fatigue, emotional health, and cognitive function. The study also collects usage data from the programme to understand how participants engage with the content. No physical tests or extra clinic visits are required.

The study aims to generate new knowledge about how digital tools can support recovery after cardiac arrest, improve wellbeing, and reduce healthcare burden by offering accessible, person-centered rehabilitation.

Being tested
Digital Support Programme
Keywords
Cardiac arrest, Digital support programme, Web-based intervention, Mental wellbeing, Quality of life, Fatigue, Cognitive function, Anxiety and depression, Post-traumatic stress, Randomized controlled trial, co-creation
Medical subject headings
Heart Arrest, Fatigue, Anxiety Disorders, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Digital Support ProgrammeBehavioural

    The intervention consists of a web-based support programme designed for individuals recovering from cardiac arrest. Participants in the intervention group receive access to the programme for 12 weeks. The programme includes educational modules, patient and family stories, videos, practical exercises (e.g., breathing techniques, fatigue management), tools for personal recovery planning, and a moderated chat forum for peer support. Participants can access the content at their own pace and according to their individual needs. The programme is delivered entirely online and does not require any physical visits or clinical procedures.

Study groups in NCT07240714
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Web-Based Support Programme for Cardiac Arrest SurvivorsExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Digital Support Programme
Waitlist Control (Standard Care + Delayed Access)No interventionParticipants in this arm receive standard follow-up care according to national guidelines. They do not have access to the digital support programme during the study period. However, they are placed on a waitlist and are offered access to the programme after study completion.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline in Overall Wellbeing at 3 months.

    The Questionnaire on Well-Being is a tool designed to capture subjective well-being. It consists of 18 questions, each rated from 0 to 4, which are added together to give a total score between 0 and 72. Higher scores reflect greater perceived well-being, while scores below 50 have been linked to significant psychological distress.

    Measured: From baseline to 3 months after enrollment.

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Change from Baseline in Quality of Life at 3 and 6 months.

    Change from baseline in Quality of Life (EuroQol Five-Dimension Five-Level questionnaire, EQ-5D-5L).

    Score range: 0 to 1 (index value). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Change from baseline in Quality of Life (EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale). Score range: 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better self-rated health.

    Outcomes will be analyzed both as change from baseline to each time point (3 and 6 months), and as within-subject change between the 3- and 6-months assessments to evaluate sustained or delayed effects of the intervention.

    Measured: From baseline to 3 and 6 months after enrollment.

  2. Change from baseline in Life Satisfaction at 3 and 6 months.

    Change from baseline in Life Satisfaction (Life Satisfaction Questionnaire, LiSat-11) at 3 and 6 months.

    Score range: 11 to 66. Higher scores indicate greater life satisfaction. Outcomes will be analyzed both as change from baseline to each time point (3 and 6 months), and as within-subject change between the 3- and 6-months assessments to evaluate sustained or delayed effects of the intervention.

    Measured: From baseline to 3 and 6 months after enrollment.

  3. Change from baseline in Anxiety at 3 and 6 months.

    Change from baseline in Anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, GAD-7) at 3 and 6 months.

    Score range: 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Outcomes will be analyzed both as change from baseline to each time point (3 and 6 months), and as within-subject change between the 3- and 6-months assessments to evaluate sustained or delayed effects of the intervention.

    Measured: From baseline to 3 and 6 months after enrollment.

  4. Change from baseline in Depression at 3 and 6 months.

    Change from baseline in Depression (Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item scale, PHQ-9) at 3 and 6 months. Score range: 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Outcomes will be analyzed both as change from baseline to each time point (3 and 6 months), and as within-subject change between the 3- and 6-months assessments to evaluate sustained or delayed effects of the intervention.

    Measured: From baseline to 3 and 6 months after enrollment.

  5. Change from baseline in Post-Traumatic Stress at 3 and 6 months.

    Change from baseline in Post-Traumatic Stress (Impact of Event Scale - Revised, IES-R) at 3 and 6 months. Score range: 0 to 88. Higher scores indicate more severe post-traumatic stress symptoms.

    Outcomes will be analyzed both as change from baseline to each time point (3 and 6 months), and as within-subject change between the 3- and 6-months assessments to evaluate sustained or delayed effects of the intervention.

    Measured: From baseline to 3 and 6 months after enrollment.

  6. Change from baseline in Fatigue at 3 and 6 months.

    Change from baseline in Fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, MFIS-21) at 3 and 6 months. Score range: 0 to 84. Higher scores indicate greater impact of fatigue.

    Outcomes will be analyzed both as change from baseline to each time point (3 and 6 months), and as within-subject change between the 3- and 6-months assessments to evaluate sustained or delayed effects of the intervention.

    Measured: From baseline to 3 and 6 months after enrollment.

  7. Change from baseline in Sleep at 3 and 6 months.

    Change from baseline in Sleep (Minimal Insomnia Symptom Scale, MISS) at 3 and 6 months. Score range: 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate more severe insomnia symptoms.

    Outcomes will be analyzed both as change from baseline to each time point (3 and 6 months), and as within-subject change between the 3- and 6-months assessments to evaluate sustained or delayed effects of the intervention.

    Measured: From baseline to 3 and 6 months after enrollment.

  8. Change from baseline in Cognitive Function at 3 and 6 months.

    Change from baseline in Cognitive Function (single-item question on perceived cognitive difficulties) at 3 and 6 months. Score range: 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater perceived cognitive impairment.

    Outcomes will be analyzed both as change from baseline to each time point (3 and 6 months), and as within-subject change between the 3- and 6-months assessments to evaluate sustained or delayed effects of the intervention.

    Measured: From baseline to 3 months after enrollment.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Nov 2025
  2. Study start20 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completion31 May 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07240714
Sponsor's protocol ID
2025-06113-01
Other IDs
2025
Acronym
CARDIS
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
14 Nov 2025
Last updated
10 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be made available to members of the research team after the principal investigator has completed blinded analyses of the primary and secondary outcomes. Data will be stored securely and access will be restricted to authorized collaborators under data use agreements.

Publications

  • Waldemar A, Israelsson J, Heimburg K, Blennow Nordstrom E, Nordberg P, Bremer A, Arestedt K, Thylen I. CARDIS (Cardiac ARrest DIgital Support): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a web-based support intervention for cardiac arrest survivors. Resusc Plus. 2026 Jan 18;28:101235. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101235. eCollection 2026 Mar.

    PubMed 41674709

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Digital Support Programme in people with Cardiac Arrest (CA), run by Linkoeping University at 9 sites in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline in Overall Wellbeing at 3 months. (time frame: From baseline to 3 months after enrollment.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07240714, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in