AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative Pain Managementbifes kneeNCT07242339

Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block Versus Adductor Canal Plus Biceps Femoris Short Head Block in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy

A study testing Adductor Canal Block (ACB) Only and biceps femoris short head block + Adductor Canal Block (ACB) in people with Postoperative Pain Management, run by Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective, randomized, controlled, and multicenter clinical study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of two regional anesthesia techniques commonly used in knee arthroscopy: adductor canal block (ACB) and combined adductor canal block plus biceps femoris short head (ACB+BiFeS) block. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pain Management
What is being tested?
Adductor Canal Block (ACB) Only and biceps femoris short head block + Adductor Canal Block (ACB)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
20 Nov 2025to 3 Apr 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • ASA physical status I-III
  • Scheduled for elective knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis
  • Current use of anticoagulant therapy
  • Known allergy or contraindication to local anesthetics used in the study
  • History of diabetes mellitus with neuropathy or other neuropathic disorders
  • Contraindications to regional anesthesia techniques
  • Refusal to participate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Health Science University İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education and Training Hospital

    Istanbul, küçükçekmece, 34303

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block Versus Adductor Canal Plus Biceps Femoris Short Head Block in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

This prospective, randomized, controlled, and multicenter clinical study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of two regional anesthesia techniques commonly used in knee arthroscopy: adductor canal block (ACB) and combined adductor canal block plus biceps femoris short head (ACB+BiFeS) block. The study will evaluate postoperative pain control, opioid consumption, adverse effects, hospital stay, and patient satisfaction. Findings will help determine the most effective and safe method for postoperative analgesia in knee arthroscopy patients.

Read the detailed description

Knee arthroscopy is one of the most common orthopedic procedures and is frequently associated with significant postoperative pain. Effective multimodal analgesia is therefore essential to reduce opioid consumption, improve early mobilization, and enhance overall patient recovery. Among the regional anesthesia techniques, the adductor canal block (ACB) is well established as an effective motor-sparing block that provides analgesia to the medial and anterior aspects of the knee. However, patients often continue to experience posterolateral knee pain, which is not consistently relieved by ACB alone.

Recent anatomical and cadaveric studies have described the biceps femoris short head (BiFeS) block as a promising technique for targeting the posterolateral knee compartment. The BiFeS block involves deposition of local anesthetic between the short head of the biceps femoris muscle and the lateral femoral cortex at the supracondylar level. Preliminary findings suggest that this block may provide effective analgesia for the posterolateral knee without causing significant motor impairment.

This prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial is designed to evaluate whether the addition of the BiFeS block to standard ACB improves postoperative analgesia compared with ACB alone in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia. The study will investigate pain scores at rest and during movement, total opioid consumption, side effects, rescue analgesic requirements, and quality of recovery. The dermatomal distribution of the blocks will be optionally assessed using cold testing.

By directly comparing ACB and combined ACB+BiFeS block under standardized perioperative conditions, this study seeks to generate high-quality evidence on the clinical utility of BiFeS as an adjunct technique. The results are expected to guide anesthesiologists in selecting optimal regional analgesia strategies for knee arthroscopy, with the potential to improve patient satisfaction, reduce opioid-related complications, and shorten hospitalization.

Being tested
Adductor Canal Block (ACB) Only, biceps femoris short head block + Adductor Canal Block (ACB)
Keywords
regional anesthesia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Adductor Canal Block (ACB) OnlyProcedure or surgery

    Ultrasound-guided injection of 10 mL 0.25% bupivacaine into the adductor canal targeting the femoral artery region, providing motor-sparing analgesia to the medial/anterior knee.

  • biceps femoris short head block + Adductor Canal Block (ACB)Procedure or surgery

    Combination of adductor canal block (10 mL 0.25% bupivacaine) and biceps femoris short head block with 25 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, deposited at the interfascial plane between BiFeS muscle and lateral femoral cortex to extend analgesia to the posterolateral knee.

Study groups in NCT07242339
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adductor Canal Block (ACB)Active comparatorParticipants will undergo ultrasound-guided adductor canal block at the end of surgery under spinal anesthesia.
Receives: Procedure: Adductor Canal Block (ACB) Only
Adductor Canal Block + Biceps Femoris Short Head Block (ACB+BiFeS)Active comparatorParticipants will undergo both adductor canal block and biceps femoris short head block at the end of surgery under spinal anesthesia.
Receives: Procedure: biceps femoris short head block + Adductor Canal Block (ACB)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total Opioid Consumption (Tramadol, mg)

    The total dose of tramadol administered via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device within the first 24 hours postoperatively will be recorded in milligrams.

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Postoperative Pain with Movement and at rest (NRS)

    Pain intensity during knee movement will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10).

    Measured: At 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

  2. Rescue Analgesia Requirement

    The number of patients requiring rescue analgesia (IV dexketoprofen 50 mg) will be recorded.

    Measured: Within the first 24 hours postoperatively

  3. Incidence of Nausea and Vomiting

    Presence of nausea/vomiting and the requirement for antiemetic medications will be documented.

    Measured: Within the first 24 hours postoperatively

  4. Quality of Recovery (QOR-15 score)

    Patient recovery quality will be assessed using the validated Quality of Recovery 15-item questionnaire (QOR-15). The scale includes 15 items, each scored from 0 to 10, producing a total score ranging from 0 to 150.

    Minimum score: 0 (poor recovery)

    Maximum score: 150 (excellent recovery)

    Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better postoperative recovery.

    Measured: At 24 hours after surgery

  5. Dermatomal Spread of Block

    Sensory block distribution will be assessed using a cold test to map dermatomal coverage.

    Measured: 2nd hour postoperatively

  6. Motor Blockade Incidence

    Patients will be evaluated for presence or absence of motor weakness attributable to the block.

    Measured: Within the first 24 hours postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Nov 2025
  2. Study start20 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completion3 Apr 2026
  4. Study completion3 Apr 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either an adductor canal block (ACB) or a combined adductor canal plus biceps femoris short head (ACB+BiFeS) block. Both interventions will be performed under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07242339
Sponsor's protocol ID
Bifes knee
Acronym
bifes knee
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
17 Nov 2025
Last updated
7 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Adductor Canal Block (ACB) Only and biceps femoris short head block + Adductor Canal Block (ACB) in people with Postoperative Pain Management, run by Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total Opioid Consumption (Tramadol, mg) (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in