Health AdultsSIJCORENCT07244679
Sacroiliac Manipulation and Core Stability in Healthy Adults
A study testing Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation (HVLA) in people with Health Adults and Core Stabilization, run by Bahçeşehir University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a common cause of lumbopelvic instability, often linked to altered load transfer between the spine and lower limbs. Although various therapeutic interventions are used to restore joint alignment and improve neuromuscular control, the immediate effects of chiropractic manipulation… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Health Adults, Core Stabilization
- What is being tested?
- Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation (HVLA)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 30 Mar 2022to 1 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy adults aged between 18 and 40 years
- No history of low back or pelvic pain within the last 6 months
- No previous spinal or sacroiliac joint surgery
- No current neurological or musculoskeletal disorders
- Able to maintain standing and sitting positions without discomfort
- Voluntary participation with informed consent
Who cannot join
- History of chronic low back pain or sacroiliac dysfunction
- Previous fractures, dislocations, or surgery in the lumbopelvic region
- Neurological, vestibular, or systemic disorders affecting balance or movement
- Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
- Use of pain medication, muscle relaxants, or anti-inflammatory drugs within the last 48 hours
- Contraindications to manual therapy (osteoporosis, malignancy, inflammatory joint disease, acute disc herniation, cauda equina syndrome)
- Refusal or inability to participate in the study protocol
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ataşehir Florence Nightingale Hospital
Istanbul
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation on Core Stabilization in Healthy Individuals
Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a common cause of lumbopelvic instability, often linked to altered load transfer between the spine and lower limbs. Although various therapeutic interventions are used to restore joint alignment and improve neuromuscular control, the immediate effects of chiropractic manipulation on core stabilization in asymptomatic individuals remain unclear. This randomized controlled study aimed to examine the acute impact of bilateral sacroiliac joint high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation on trunk stability in healthy adults. Sixty participants aged 18-40 years were randomly assigned to either a manipulation group or a control group. Core stabilization performance and postural control were evaluated using standardized tests including the Centaur Trunk Training (CTT) biofeedback system, plank, sit-ups endurance, and flexibility assessments. The findings demonstrated significant short-term improvements in trunk stability and flexibility following manipulation, suggesting that sacroiliac joint adjustments may positively influence neuromuscular activation and motor control in healthy individuals.
Read the detailed description
SIJ is recognized as a key anatomical structure responsible for transmitting mechanical loads between the spine and the lower extremities. Even minor restrictions in SIJ mobility have the potential to alter lumbopelvic alignment, modify core muscle activation patterns, and influence postural stability. Although these alterations may occur in symptomatic and asymptomatic populations alike, the precise neuromuscular mechanisms through which SIJ mobility affects trunk control remain an area of ongoing scientific inquiry.
Manual therapy techniques-particularly HVLA manipulation-are frequently employed to restore joint mobility, regulate proprioceptive input, and optimize neuromuscular coordination within the lumbopelvic region. HVLA manipulation has been proposed to facilitate rapid mechanical and neurophysiological responses, including improved segmental motion, enhanced afferent feedback, and short-term modifications in motor unit recruitment. Despite these proposed mechanisms, empirical evidence concerning the acute effects of SIJ-directed HVLA manipulation in healthy adults is limited.
Core stabilization constitutes another critical component of lumbopelvic rehabilitation. This approach emphasizes the activation, endurance, and coordinated function of deep trunk musculature-particularly the transversus abdominis, multifidus, and associated stabilizer groups-which collectively contribute to spinal alignment and postural equilibrium. Core stabilization strategies are widely supported in theory; however, their interaction with manual therapy techniques, especially in terms of immediate biomechanical and neuromuscular responses, has not been thoroughly examined in healthy individuals.
This randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate the immediate effects of bilateral SIJ HVLA manipulation on trunk stability and postural control in healthy adults. The study was conducted at Ataşehir Florence Nightingale Hospital and included participants aged 18-40 years who met predefined eligibility criteria. After completing baseline assessments, participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups:(1) the SIJ Manipulation Group, which received bilateral HVLA manipulation at the posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS) in a side-lying position, and (2) the Control Group (No Treatment), which completed the same assessment procedures without receiving any therapeutic intervention.
A comprehensive set of outcome measures was selected to evaluate multiple dimensions of lumbopelvic function. Pelvic alignment patterns were examined using the Derifield-Thompson leg check, while lumbar spine mobility was assessed with the Modified Schober Test. Core endurance and trunk muscle performance were measured using standardized sit-up and plank tests. The most detailed assessment was performed with the CTT biofeedback system, an objective device capable of analyzing postural control across 22 angular positions ranging from 0° to ±180°, thereby providing multidimensional insight into trunk stability.
The HVLA manipulation procedure involved a brief, controlled thrust delivered bilaterally to the SIJ region following established clinical guidelines. All post-intervention assessments were performed immediately after the procedure according to the predefined protocol. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Decision No: 24.03.2022/14), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment.
This trial was designed to explore the theoretical mechanisms through which SIJ manipulation may influence trunk stability, neuromuscular activation, and early postural adjustments in asymptomatic individuals. The findings and statistical outcomes of the study will be reported separately in the Results section of this clinical trial record. The present protocol description is intended solely to outline the scientific rationale, methodological framework, and procedural details of the study, without including any data-driven conclusions.
- Conditions
- Health Adults, Core Stabilization
- Being tested
- Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation (HVLA)
- Keywords
- Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation, Core Stabilization, Chriopractic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation (HVLA)Other
Also called Experimental Group
HVLA manipulation applied bilaterally at the sacroiliac joint (PSIS) to improve lumbopelvic stability.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SIJ Manipulation Group | Experimental | Bilateral HVLA SIJ manipulation applied at PSIS Receives: Other: Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation (HVLA) |
| Control Group (No Treatment) | No intervention | Participants received no manipulation; only baseline and post-test evaluations were performed. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Trunk Stability Index CTT biofeedback system
Measurement of trunk stability using the CTT biofeedback system, which evaluates angular deviation and postural control across 22 tilt positions (0° to ±180°). Lower deviation values indicate greater stability.
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after intervention (within 1 week)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Static Core Endurance (Plank Test Duration)
Duration (in seconds) that participants can maintain a standard plank position to assess static trunk endurance. Higher values indicate greater core stability and muscular endurance.
Measured: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (within 1 week)
Sit-ups Endurance Test
Number of sit-ups completed in 60 seconds to evaluate abdominal and hip flexor endurance. Increased repetitions indicate improved muscular performance.
Measured: Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
Modified Schober Test (Lumbar Flexibility)
Measurement of lumbar spine flexibility in centimeters. The difference between baseline and post-test scores reflects improvement in spinal mobility.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (1 week)
Finger-to-Floor Distance (Trunk Flexibility)
Distance (cm) between fingertips and floor during maximal forward flexion. Shorter distance indicates improved flexibility and spinal mobility.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (1 week)
Derifield-Thompson Leg Check Test (Pelvic Alignment)
Manual assessment used to detect leg length discrepancy associated with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Improvement is noted as reduction in asymmetry between pre- and post-intervention.
Measured: Baseline and immediately post-intervention
Lumbar and Hip Range of Motion (Goniometric Assessment)
Active and passive range of motion (degrees) of the lumbar spine and hip joints, measured using a goniometer. Parameters include lumbar flexion, extension, and hip flexion. Greater values indicate increased joint mobility.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (1 week)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Nov 2025
- Study start30 Mar 2022
- Primary completion1 May 2022
- Study completion1 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Health AdultsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- a randomized, controlled, single-blind, prospective study
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bahçeşehir University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Esra BECENI, Bahçeşehir University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07244679
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BAU-FTR-SIJCORE-2022
- Acronym
- SIJCORE
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 24 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: This study was completed as an academic clinical trial involving healthy volunteers. Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly because the dataset contains identifiable information collected under institutional ethics approval and informed consent restricted to internal analysis. Only aggregate (group-level) results will be available upon publication.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation on Core Stabilization in Healthy Individuals
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07244679
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SIJCORE / BAU-FTR-SIJCORE-2022
- Conditions
- Health Adults, Core Stabilization
- Keywords
- Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation, Core Stabilization, Chriopractic
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bahçeşehir UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a common cause of lumbopelvic instability, often linked to altered load transfer between the spine and lower limbs. Although various therapeutic interventions are used to restore joint alignment and improve neuromuscular control, the immediate effects of chiropractic manipulation on core stabilization in asymptomatic individuals remain unclear. This randomized controlled study aimed to examine the acute impact of bilateral sacroiliac joint high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation on trunk stability in healthy adults. Sixty participants aged 18-40 years were randomly assigned to either a manipulation group or a control group. Core stabilization performance and postural control were evaluated using standardized tests including the Centaur Trunk Training (CTT) biofeedback system, plank, sit-ups endurance, and flexibility assessments. The findings demonstrated significant short-term improvements in trunk stability and flexibility following manipulation, suggesting that sacroiliac joint adjustments may positively influence neuromuscular activation and motor control in healthy individuals.
Detailed description
SIJ is recognized as a key anatomical structure responsible for transmitting mechanical loads between the spine and the lower extremities. Even minor restrictions in SIJ mobility have the potential to alter lumbopelvic alignment, modify core muscle activation patterns, and influence postural stability. Although these alterations may occur in symptomatic and asymptomatic populations alike, the precise neuromuscular mechanisms through which SIJ mobility affects trunk control remain an area of ongoing scientific inquiry.
Manual therapy techniques-particularly HVLA manipulation-are frequently employed to restore joint mobility, regulate proprioceptive input, and optimize neuromuscular coordination within the lumbopelvic region. HVLA manipulation has been proposed to facilitate rapid mechanical and neurophysiological responses, including improved segmental motion, enhanced afferent feedback, and short-term modifications in motor unit recruitment. Despite these proposed mechanisms, empirical evidence concerning the acute effects of SIJ-directed HVLA manipulation in healthy adults is limited.
Core stabilization constitutes another critical component of lumbopelvic rehabilitation. This approach emphasizes the activation, endurance, and coordinated function of deep trunk musculature-particularly the transversus abdominis, multifidus, and associated stabilizer groups-which collectively contribute to spinal alignment and postural equilibrium. Core stabilization strategies are widely supported in theory; however, their interaction with manual therapy techniques, especially in terms of immediate biomechanical and neuromuscular responses, has not been thoroughly examined in healthy individuals.
This randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate the immediate effects of bilateral SIJ HVLA manipulation on trunk stability and postural control in healthy adults. The study was conducted at Ataşehir Florence Nightingale Hospital and included participants aged 18-40 years who met predefined eligibility criteria. After completing baseline assessments, participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups:(1) the SIJ Manipulation Group, which received bilateral HVLA manipulation at the posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS) in a side-lying position, and (2) the Control Group (No Treatment), which completed the same assessment procedures without receiving any therapeutic intervention.
A comprehensive set of outcome measures was selected to evaluate multiple dimensions of lumbopelvic function. Pelvic alignment patterns were examined using the Derifield-Thompson leg check, while lumbar spine mobility was assessed with the Modified Schober Test. Core endurance and trunk muscle performance were measured using standardized sit-up and plank tests. The most detailed assessment was performed with the CTT biofeedback system, an objective device capable of analyzing postural control across 22 angular positions ranging from 0° to ±180°, thereby providing multidimensional insight into trunk stability.
The HVLA manipulation procedure involved a brief, controlled thrust delivered bilaterally to the SIJ region following established clinical guidelines. All post-intervention assessments were performed immediately after the procedure according to the predefined protocol. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Decision No: 24.03.2022/14), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment.
This trial was designed to explore the theoretical mechanisms through which SIJ manipulation may influence trunk stability, neuromuscular activation, and early postural adjustments in asymptomatic individuals. The findings and statistical outcomes of the study will be reported separately in the Results section of this clinical trial record. The present protocol description is intended solely to outline the scientific rationale, methodological framework, and procedural details of the study, without including any data-driven conclusions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- a randomized, controlled, single-blind, prospective study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SIJ Manipulation Group | Experimental | Other: Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation (HVLA)Bilateral HVLA SIJ manipulation applied at PSIS |
| Control Group (No Treatment) | No intervention | –Participants received no manipulation; only baseline and post-test evaluations were performed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Healthy adults aged between 18 and 40 years
- No history of low back or pelvic pain within the last 6 months
- No previous spinal or sacroiliac joint surgery
- No current neurological or musculoskeletal disorders
- Able to maintain standing and sitting positions without discomfort
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- History of chronic low back pain or sacroiliac dysfunction
- Previous fractures, dislocations, or surgery in the lumbopelvic region
- Neurological, vestibular, or systemic disorders affecting balance or movement
- Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
- Use of pain medication, muscle relaxants, or anti-inflammatory drugs within the last 48 hours
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation (HVLA)Also: Experimental GroupHVLA manipulation applied bilaterally at the sacroiliac joint (PSIS) to improve lumbopelvic stability. | Other | SIJ Manipulation Group |
Primary outcome
Trunk Stability Index CTT biofeedback system
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after intervention (within 1 week)
Measurement of trunk stability using the CTT biofeedback system, which evaluates angular deviation and postural control across 22 tilt positions (0° to ±180°). Lower deviation values indicate greater stability.
6 secondary outcomes
Static Core Endurance (Plank Test Duration)
Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (within 1 week)
Sit-ups Endurance Test
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week post-intervention
Modified Schober Test (Lumbar Flexibility)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (1 week)
Finger-to-Floor Distance (Trunk Flexibility)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (1 week)
Derifield-Thompson Leg Check Test (Pelvic Alignment)
Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention
Lumbar and Hip Range of Motion (Goniometric Assessment)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (1 week)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Nov 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. This study was completed as an academic clinical trial involving healthy volunteers. Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly because the dataset contains identifiable information collected under institutional ethics approval and informed consent restricted to internal analysis. Only aggregate (group-level) results will be available upon publication.
Related trials for Health Adults
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Not yet recruiting
REM Enhancement Sleep Technology for Well-being, Emotion, and Life Lift
Healthy Adult Participants
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation (HVLA) in people with Health Adults and Core Stabilization, run by Bahçeşehir University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Trunk Stability Index CTT biofeedback system (time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after intervention (within 1 week)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2025.