AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerNCT07250204

A Study on Combined Low-pass Whole-genome and Methylome Testing of Bloody Nipple Discharge Specimens for Benign-Malignant Differentiation.

An observational study of Breast Cancer and Nipple Discharge, run by Hubei Cancer Hospital at 1 site in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective, single-center diagnostic study testing whether a new, minimally invasive analysis of nipple fluid can distinguish benign from malignant causes of pathologic nipple discharge. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer, Nipple Discharge
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
21 Dec 2025to Aug 2027
How long will I take part?
1 Month
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Prospective, single-center consecutive series at Hubei Cancer Hospital. Adults presenting with spontaneous, unilateral, single-duct bloody/serosanguinous nipple discharge and scheduled for diagnostic surgery/biopsy will undergo preoperative nipple-discharge collection for low-coverage whole-genome sequencing and methylome profiling. Postoperative pathology serves as the gold standard to classify benign vs malignant lesions. Enrollment is not restricted by gender identity; individuals with relevant breast anatomy who meet criteria may be included. Excludes physiologic discharge, infection, prior treated breast cancer, pregnancy/lactation, recent duct manipulation, and unsafe sampling conditions. Target sample size ≈30; no healthy volunteers.

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Spontaneous, unilateral, single-duct pathologic nipple discharge, predominantly bloody or serosanguinous, raising clinical suspicion of intraductal disease.
  • Planned diagnostic breast surgery/biopsy after specialist assessment (e.g., duct excision/microdochectomy, lumpectomy); patients who had ductoscopy but are still scheduled for surgery remain eligible.
  • Study sampling (nipple discharge and one peripheral blood tube) feasible before surgery/invasive diagnostics without delaying standard care.
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent and allow access to surgical pathology and relevant clinical data.

Who cannot join

  • Physiologic or non-pathologic discharge (typically bilateral, multiduct, expressible only with manipulation; milky/clear/green) or galactorrhea due to endocrine/drug causes.
  • Active breast infection/inflammatory disease (e.g., abscess) as the source of discharge.
  • Prior diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer (surgery/radiation/systemic therapy).
  • Recent invasive ductal manipulation likely to confound analysis (e.g., ductoscopy, duct cannulation/irrigation), per investigator judgment.
  • Pregnant or lactating patients.
  • Significant hematologic disease/coagulopathy precluding safe sampling.
  • Inability to complete preoperative study sampling, refusal/withdrawal of consent, or poor compliance.
  • Any condition judged by investigators to compromise sample quality, data interpretation, or participant safety.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Xinhong Wu Principal Investigator contact

+8618602726300

wuxinhong_9@sina.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Wu Xinhong

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430079

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

This is a prospective, single-center diagnostic study testing whether a new, minimally invasive analysis of nipple fluid can distinguish benign from malignant causes of pathologic nipple discharge. Many patients with bloody or blood-tinged nipple discharge undergo surgery to make a diagnosis, yet most are ultimately found to have benign disease. The investigators aim to develop a laboratory test that analyzes DNA in nipple fluid to help avoid unnecessary operations while still identifying cancers.

Approximately 30 adults with spontaneous, single-duct, unilateral bloody or serosanguinous nipple discharge who are already scheduled for standard diagnostic surgery will be enrolled at Hubei Cancer Hospital. Before surgery, the investigators will collect a small sample of nipple fluid (or gently obtain nipple aspirate fluid using a soft suction cup if needed) and one tube of blood. The investigators will analyze the fluid's DNA using two approaches: low-pass whole-genome analysis to look for copy number changes and fragmentation patterns, and genome-wide DNA methylation profiling. Surgical pathology will serve as the reference standard. Using these data, the investigators will build and validate a model to classify lesions as benign or malignant.

The primary outcome is diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity). Secondary outcomes include positive and negative predictive values, model calibration, subgroup performance (e.g., ductal carcinoma in situ vs invasive cancer), and an estimate of potential clinical impact (for example, how many benign cases might safely avoid surgery at a high-sensitivity threshold). Study test results will not affect current clinical care; all participants will receive usual evaluation and surgery. Risks are minimal and may include brief nipple discomfort or skin irritation from gentle suction and routine blood-draw risks (bruising, lightheadedness). There is no direct benefit to participants, but the findings may support a future noninvasive test to guide care and reduce unnecessary surgery. Data will be de-identified and stored securely. Expected enrollment is from September 2025 to May 2026.

Keywords
Nipple Discharge, Bloody nipple discharge, Nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), Pathologic nipple discharge (PND), Breast cancer
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms, Galactorrhea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07250204
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Malignant Cohort - Pathologic Nipple Discharge (DCIS/IDC)Adults (≥18 years) with unilateral, spontaneous, single-duct pathologic nipple discharge who undergo clinically indicated diagnostic surgery. Group assignment is based on postoperative breast pathology confirming malignant disease (e.g., ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive ductal carcinoma). Preoperative nipple discharge is collected for low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (fragmentomics/CNV) and genome-wide DNA methylation profiling. Usual care only; research testing does not alter management. Followed through surgery and receipt of final pathology; no protocol-mandated long-term follow-up.
Benign Cohort - Pathologic Nipple Discharge (Papilloma/Duct Ectasia)Adults (≥18 years) with unilateral, spontaneous, single-duct pathologic nipple discharge who undergo clinically indicated diagnostic surgery. Group assignment is based on postoperative breast pathology confirming benign disease (e.g., intraductal papilloma, duct ectasia, other benign lesions). Preoperative nipple discharge is collected for low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (fragmentomics/CNV) and genome-wide DNA methylation profiling. Usual care only; research testing does not alter management. Followed through surgery and receipt of final pathology; no protocol-mandated long-term follow-up.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. AUC of the combined lcWGS-methylome model for distinguishing malignant vs benign lesions

    Area under the ROC curve (AUC) with 95% CI in the independent validation cohort. Reference standard is postoperative pathology. Model integrates preoperative nipple discharge features (CNV/fragmentomics from low-coverage WGS and genome-wide DNA methylation) with a locked threshold selected on training.

    Measured: From preoperative sampling to receipt of final surgical pathology (per participant); primary analysis at validation lock (≈0-3 months post-enrollment).

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Sensitivity and specificity at a prespecified threshold (target sensitivity ≥95%)

    Sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate), with 95% confidence intervals, estimated in the independent validation cohort at a threshold fixed on the training set to target ≥95% sensitivity. Surgical pathology is the reference standard.

    Measured: Perioperative/Periprocedural: preoperative sampling (Day 0); outcome assessed at final surgical pathology report, up to 30 days postoperatively.

  2. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV)

    PPV and NPV, with 95% confidence intervals, calculated in the independent validation cohort at the prespecified decision threshold, using surgical pathology as the reference standard.

    Measured: preoperative sampling (Day 0); outcome assessed at final surgical pathology, up to 30 days after surgery.

  3. Model calibration (calibration slope, intercept, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test)

    Agreement between predicted probabilities and observed outcomes in the independent validation cohort; report calibration slope and intercept (with 95% confidence intervals) from logistic calibration, and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit p-value (by deciles). Reference standard: final surgical pathology.

    Measured: Perioperative/Periprocedural: preoperative sampling (Day 0); outcome assessed at final surgical pathology report, up to 30 days postoperatively.

  4. Proportion of model-negative results in benign cases at a prespecified decision threshold (independent validation cohort)

    Among participants with benign final surgical pathology, calculate the proportion with a model-negative result when applying a decision threshold prespecified on the training set to achieve >=95% sensitivity for malignancy. Report the percentage and 95% confidence interval. Reference standard: final surgical pathology.

    Measured: Preoperative sampling (Day 0); outcome assessed at the time of the final surgical pathology report, up to 30 days postoperatively.

  5. Subgroup performance by pathology subtype and imaging status

    Area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity (with 95% confidence intervals) in the independent validation cohort, stratified by pathology subtype (DCIS vs IDC) and by presence vs absence of preoperative imaging abnormalities (mammography/ultrasound/MRI). Sensitivity and specificity estimated at a prespecified threshold fixed on the training set to target ≥95% sensitivity. Reference standard: final surgical pathology.

    Measured: Perioperative/Periprocedural: preoperative sampling (Day 0); outcome assessed at final surgical pathology report, up to 30 days postoperatively.

  6. Technical success rate and sample adequacy

    Proportion of nipple discharge samples yielding sequencing libraries that pass prespecified QC thresholds and are analyzable; report percentage and 95% confidence interval. Summarize cfDNA yield (ng) and sequencing depth metrics (aligned reads and mean unique coverage) with medians and interquartile ranges.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0): sample collection; laboratory QC and adequacy assessed up to 14 days post-collection.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Nov 2025
  2. Study start21 Dec 2025
  3. Primary completionJun 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Month
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07250204
Sponsor's protocol ID
LLHBCH2025YN-072
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
19 Sep 2025
Last updated
17 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: We do not plan to share individual participant data (IPD). The informed consent for this study and institutional/regulatory constraints do not permit external sharing of participant-level datasets. Aggregate results will be posted on ClinicalTrials.gov and reported in peer-reviewed publications. The study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and a CSR synopsis will be made available upon publication.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Breast Cancer and Nipple Discharge, run by Hubei Cancer Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Xinhong Wu Principal Investigator (+8618602726300, wuxinhong_9@sina.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

AUC of the combined lcWGS-methylome model for distinguishing malignant vs benign lesions (time frame: From preoperative sampling to receipt of final surgical pathology (per participant); primary analysis at validation lock (≈0-3 months post-enrollment).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in