Facial PainNCT07250984
Treatment of Atypical Resistant Facial Pain
An observational study of Facial Pain, run by Alenka Spindler-Vesel at 1 site in Slovenia.
Trial summary
Facial pain in the trigeminal nerve region, which is not a migraine headache is often very persistent and difficult to treat. Research findings suggest that, similar to the mechanisms of migraine headache, the increased concentration of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays an important role in the mechanisms… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Facial Pain
- What is being tested?
- intravenous administration of ACMP
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSlovenia
- Study dates
- 3 Nov 2025to 3 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Pain Therapy Clinic of University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Who may be able to join
- facial pain
Who cannot join
- psychiatric disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Slovenia1 site
Pain Therapy Clinic of University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Ljubljana, 1000
About this study
Official title: The Impact of Intravenous Administration of ACMP (Eptinezumab) on the Treatment of Atypical Resistant Facial Pain
Facial pain in the trigeminal nerve region, which is not a migraine headache is often very persistent and difficult to treat. Research findings suggest that, similar to the mechanisms of migraine headache, the increased concentration of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays an important role in the mechanisms of facial pain.
Therefore, the hypothesis is that intravenous administration of ACMP will similarly disrupt central sensitization in facial pain as it does in migraine headaches.
Read the detailed description
Facial pain in the trigeminal nerve region, which is not a migraine headache (e.g., cluster headaches, trigeminal neuralgia, burning mouth syndrome), is often very persistent and difficult to treat. Despite the use of all available treatment methods is often unsuccessful. Research findings suggest that, similar to the mechanisms of migraine headache, the increased concentration of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays an important role in the mechanisms of facial pain. Trigeminal neuralgia has already been treated with intravenous administration of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (ACMP), such as eptinezumab.
In facial pain, as in chronic migraine, both peripheral and central nervous system sensitization can occur. Central sensitization is a poorly understood biological phenomenon, although some mechanisms are known. According to current knowledge and clinical experience, CGRP likely plays a central role in central sensitization that occurs in facial pain. It is known that in chronic migraine, the concentration of CGRP in the blood is elevated.
The peripheral mechanism of sensitization is not entirely clear, but it is likely that the peripheral part of the autonomic nervous system, specifically the parasympathetic system, plays an important role. The trigeminovascular reflex, a consequence of the autonomic segmental reflex, causes peripheral sensitization. Neurogenic inflammation also occurs. Neurogenic inflammation in the meninges further sensitizes the trigeminal nerve fibers.
CGRP is important for regulating physiological processes in the human body. It is also important for the sensitization of the peripheral nervous system, which can lead to central sensitization and create a vicious cycle. Central sensitization is a source of pro-inflammatory factors that promote neurogenic inflammation.
The level of CGRP in the body depends on its production and removal from the blood. ACMP effectively inactivate CGRP, thus reducing the number of migraine episodes and their intensity. Therefore, we hypothesize that intravenous administration of ACMP will similarly disrupt central sensitization in facial pain as it does in migraine headaches. Pharmacokinetic studies with eptinezumab have shown that intravenous administration of eptinezumab leads to an immediate peak concentration of ACMP, while subcutaneous administration reaches this effect only after several days. Since the biological availability of ACMP is significantly higher in the first few days, this may lead to the most effective reduction in CGRP influx and a probable clinical reduction in facial pain.
There are some attempts in the literature to treat cluster headaches with ACMP, but there is no data available for other syndromes.
The study will take place at the Chronic Pain Treatment Department of the Clinical Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care at the University Medical Centre (UKC) Ljubljana and will be designed as a multidisciplinary study (neurology and anesthesiology). 10 patients with facial pain in the trigeminal nerve region who do not have a migraine headache (e.g., cluster headaches, trigeminal neuralgia, burning mouth syndrome) and who have not responded to conventional treatment approaches will be included. Each participant will be individually assessed and invited to participate in the study, followed by an explanatory conversation. After obtaining written consent, an intravenous line will be established, and standard monitoring (non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximeter, oximetry) will be applied. A venous blood sample will be taken, followed by a 30-minute infusion of eptinezumab. A venous blood sample and the eptinezumab dose will be repeated after three months. CGRP levels, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and specific biomarkers will be monitored, before the and after three months of drug administration .
- Conditions
- Facial Pain
- Being tested
- intravenous administration of ACMP
- Keywords
- facial pain, CGRP, intravenous ACMP
- Medical subject headings
- Facial Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
intravenous administration of ACMPDrug
30-minute infusion of 100 mg of eptinezumab, repeated after three months
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
MIDAS score
The MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment) questionnaire measures how much migraines affect your everyday life and activities: work, household activities, school responsibilities, and leisure activities over the past 3 months.
The total score is obtained by summing the answers to the key questions (1-5).
- Low scores (0-10): Grade I and II- mild, ittle or no disability. Migraines has no or slight imapct on activities, but overall functioning is mostly preserved. Basic treatment and lifestyle adjustments are usually sufficient.
- Moderate scores (11-20): Grade III - moderate disability. Migraines significantly interfere with work and daily life; treatment adjustment may be needed.Consideration of preventive migraine therapy is advised.
- High scores (21+):
Grade IV - severe disability. Migraines greatly reduce the ability to perform daily activities; specialist evaluation Migraines significantly impair quality of life; evaluation and prevention are recommended.
Measured: Change of baseline levels of MIDAS at 3 and 6 months after intervention.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Biomarkers of brain injury and inflammatory response
We will take blood samples for interleukin - 6, 8 and 10 (Il6, IL8, IL10), leptin, Nerve growth factor (NGF), S100 calcium-binding protein A8 (S100A8), Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and CGRP
Measured: Change of baseline levels of proinflamatory cytokines and specific biomarkers at 3 and 6 months after intervention.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Nov 2025
- Study start3 Nov 2025
- Primary completion3 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion3 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Facial PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alenka Spindler-Vesel
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Alenka Spindler-Vesel, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07250984
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0120-331/2024-2711-8
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 22 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Impact of Intravenous Administration of ACMP (Eptinezumab) on the Treatment of Atypical Resistant Facial Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07250984
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0120-331/2024-2711-8
- Conditions
- Facial Pain
- Keywords
- facial pain, CGRP, intravenous ACMP
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Alenka Spindler-VeselUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 3 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Facial pain in the trigeminal nerve region, which is not a migraine headache is often very persistent and difficult to treat. Research findings suggest that, similar to the mechanisms of migraine headache, the increased concentration of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays an important role in the mechanisms of facial pain.
Therefore, the hypothesis is that intravenous administration of ACMP will similarly disrupt central sensitization in facial pain as it does in migraine headaches.
Detailed description
Facial pain in the trigeminal nerve region, which is not a migraine headache (e.g., cluster headaches, trigeminal neuralgia, burning mouth syndrome), is often very persistent and difficult to treat. Despite the use of all available treatment methods is often unsuccessful. Research findings suggest that, similar to the mechanisms of migraine headache, the increased concentration of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays an important role in the mechanisms of facial pain. Trigeminal neuralgia has already been treated with intravenous administration of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (ACMP), such as eptinezumab.
In facial pain, as in chronic migraine, both peripheral and central nervous system sensitization can occur. Central sensitization is a poorly understood biological phenomenon, although some mechanisms are known. According to current knowledge and clinical experience, CGRP likely plays a central role in central sensitization that occurs in facial pain. It is known that in chronic migraine, the concentration of CGRP in the blood is elevated.
The peripheral mechanism of sensitization is not entirely clear, but it is likely that the peripheral part of the autonomic nervous system, specifically the parasympathetic system, plays an important role. The trigeminovascular reflex, a consequence of the autonomic segmental reflex, causes peripheral sensitization. Neurogenic inflammation also occurs. Neurogenic inflammation in the meninges further sensitizes the trigeminal nerve fibers.
CGRP is important for regulating physiological processes in the human body. It is also important for the sensitization of the peripheral nervous system, which can lead to central sensitization and create a vicious cycle. Central sensitization is a source of pro-inflammatory factors that promote neurogenic inflammation.
The level of CGRP in the body depends on its production and removal from the blood. ACMP effectively inactivate CGRP, thus reducing the number of migraine episodes and their intensity. Therefore, we hypothesize that intravenous administration of ACMP will similarly disrupt central sensitization in facial pain as it does in migraine headaches. Pharmacokinetic studies with eptinezumab have shown that intravenous administration of eptinezumab leads to an immediate peak concentration of ACMP, while subcutaneous administration reaches this effect only after several days. Since the biological availability of ACMP is significantly higher in the first few days, this may lead to the most effective reduction in CGRP influx and a probable clinical reduction in facial pain.
There are some attempts in the literature to treat cluster headaches with ACMP, but there is no data available for other syndromes.
The study will take place at the Chronic Pain Treatment Department of the Clinical Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care at the University Medical Centre (UKC) Ljubljana and will be designed as a multidisciplinary study (neurology and anesthesiology). 10 patients with facial pain in the trigeminal nerve region who do not have a migraine headache (e.g., cluster headaches, trigeminal neuralgia, burning mouth syndrome) and who have not responded to conventional treatment approaches will be included. Each participant will be individually assessed and invited to participate in the study, followed by an explanatory conversation. After obtaining written consent, an intravenous line will be established, and standard monitoring (non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximeter, oximetry) will be applied. A venous blood sample will be taken, followed by a 30-minute infusion of eptinezumab. A venous blood sample and the eptinezumab dose will be repeated after three months. CGRP levels, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and specific biomarkers will be monitored, before the and after three months of drug administration .
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Pain Therapy Clinic of University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- facial pain
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- psychiatric disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| intravenous administration of ACMP30-minute infusion of 100 mg of eptinezumab, repeated after three months | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
MIDAS score
Time frame: Change of baseline levels of MIDAS at 3 and 6 months after intervention.
The MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment) questionnaire measures how much migraines affect your everyday life and activities: work, household activities, school responsibilities, and leisure activities over the past 3 months. The total score is obtained by summing the answers to the key questions (1-5). 1. Low scores (0-10): Grade I and II- mild, ittle or no disability. Migraines has no or slight imapct on activities, but overall functioning is mostly preserved. Basic treatment and lifestyle adjustments are usually sufficient. 2. Moderate scores (11-20): Grade III - moderate disability. Migraines significantly interfere with work and daily life; treatment adjustment may be needed.Consideration of preventive migraine therapy is advised. 3. High scores (21+): Grade IV - severe disability. Migraines greatly reduce the ability to perform daily activities; specialist evaluation Migraines significantly impair quality of life; evaluation and prevention are recommended.
1 secondary outcome
Biomarkers of brain injury and inflammatory response
Time frame: Change of baseline levels of proinflamatory cytokines and specific biomarkers at 3 and 6 months after intervention.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Dec 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Facial Pain
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer
Post Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
Recruiting
An Innovative Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment For Chronic Orofacial Pain
Chronic Primary Orofacial Pain (CPOP), Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain (PIFP)
RecruitingPhase 2
Phenotype-based Model for Managing Chronic Post-treatment Pain Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: a Pilot Study
Chronic Postsurgical Pain, Chronic Post Cancer Surgery Pain
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Facial Pain, run by Alenka Spindler-Vesel at 1 site in Slovenia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Slovenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
MIDAS score (time frame: Change of baseline levels of MIDAS at 3 and 6 months after intervention.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2025.