Prone PositionPRODONARNCT07251777
Prone vs Supine Position in Potential Organ Donors: Multicenter Clinical Trial
A study testing Prone position in people with Prone Position and Donors, run by Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría at 1 site in Argentina.
Trial summary
Background and justification: In Argentina, 9,650 people are on the organ transplant waiting list, including 290 who require a lung transplant. In 2022, 21 unilateral lungs, 18 bilateral lungs, and one cardiopulmonary block were implanted, representing only 1.9% of all transplants. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Prone Position, Donors, Lung Procurement
- What is being tested?
- Prone position
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 254 participants
- Where
- 1 siteArgentina
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2023to 1 May 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who died under neurological criteria
- 18 to 70 years of age
- Meet multi-organ donor criteria
- That they have no opposition to the donation.
Who cannot join
- Patients who have expressly stated that they do not donate organs
- Patients who, for some reason, cannot establish a prone position
- Deceased with contraindication for organ donation.
- Elimination criteria
- Time between diagnosis of ME and prone greater than 12 hours
- Loss of more than 20% of data on main variables.
- Require changing a patient from the prone to the supine position for any reason
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Argentina1 site
Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría
Monte Grande, Buenos Aires, 1842
About this study
Official title: Prone vs Supine Position in Potential Organ Donors: PRODONAR Multicenter Clinical Trial
Background and justification: In Argentina, 9,650 people are on the organ transplant waiting list, including 290 who require a lung transplant. In 2022, 21 unilateral lungs, 18 bilateral lungs, and one cardiopulmonary block were implanted, representing only 1.9% of all transplants. Maintaining organ viability in potential donors (PD) is challenging because brain death triggers adrenergic activation, hemodynamic instability, and atelectasis due to mechanical ventilation and loss of respiratory muscle activity. These factors impair gas exchange and reduce the number of lungs suitable for transplantation.
Ventilatory management in PDs aims to preserve lung function, minimize risks of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and maintain adequate gas exchange while preventing alveolar collapse and overdistension. Strategies derived from Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) include recruitment maneuvers, which may cause complications. In contrast, prone positioning improves ventilation-perfusion matching and increases functional lung parenchyma.
Read more
This study proposes prone positioning as a preventive ventilatory strategy to optimize lung preservation in organ donors.
Objectives: (1) Determine whether early prone positioning after BD certification increases the proportion of lungs meeting suitability criteria for transplantation. (2) Evaluate its effect on the availability of other transplantable organs and on hemodynamic stability.
Methods: The PRODON-AR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial conducted in 10 intensive care units (ICUs) across Argentina. Recruitment began on June 1, 2023, and will continue until 250 PDs are enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned to standard care (supine) or prone positioning following BD certification. Eligible donors will be those with confirmed BD, meeting multi-organ donation criteria, and without documented opposition to donation. Exclusion criteria include contraindications to prone positioning. Donors will be excluded from analysis if the interval between BD certification and proning exceeds 12 hours, if more than 20% of data for key variables are missing, or if clinical conditions require returning to the supine position.
The primary outcome is the number of lungs suitable for transplantation. Secondary outcomes include the number of organs transplanted, vasopressor requirements, and variables related to gas exchange and respiratory mechanics.
Read the detailed description
This protocol follows the SPIRIT guidelines (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials).
Introduction: Organ transplantation replaces a failing organ with one from a donor. Ablation enables organ removal for therapeutic use in recipients with terminal organ failure. In Argentina, as of February 2023, 9,650 people were on the national waiting list, including 290 requiring lung transplantation. In 2022, 767 real donors generated 2,090 organs, of which only 40 lungs were transplanted, representing 1.9% of all transplants.
The lung remains one of the most challenging organs for procurement due to strict selection criteria and rapid functional deterioration after brain death (BD). Countries such as Spain, which lead global donation rates, have broadened donor criteria ("expanded criteria donors"), demonstrating that the use of marginal lungs does not increase recipient mortality.
Following BD, sympathetic nervous system activation triggers a massive inflammatory response leading to endothelial and alveolar damage. Potential donors (PDs) under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) experience additional inflammatory stress. Neuromuscular paralysis and a lack of respiratory effort promote atelectasis, particularly in dependent lung regions, thereby compromising ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching. The apnea test and FiO₂ 100% exposure can worsen atelectasis through nitrogen washout. In addition, an absent cough reflex predisposes to secretion retention and infection, reducing lung viability and secondarily impairing the function of other organs through systemic hypoxia and inflammation.
Rationale: Ventilatory management in PDs aims to preserve lung function, reduce IMV-induced injury, and maintain optimal gas exchange while preventing alveolar collapse and overdistension. Lung-protective ventilation (tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight and adequate positive end-expiratory pressure, PEEP) remains standard; however, the proportion of suitable lungs for procurement remains low.
Recruitment maneuvers, formerly used in ARDS, are now avoided due to their association with increased mortality (ART trial, 2018). In turn, prone positioning (PP) has proven several clinical benefits in ARDS, enhancing oxygenation and reducing ventilator-induced lung injury. PP promotes more homogeneous ventilation, recruits dorsal lung areas, enhances oxygenation, and improves right ventricular function without significant hemodynamic compromise. Studies such as PROSEVA demonstrated reduced cardiac arrests and better extrapulmonary organ function in PP patients.
In PDs, PP could similarly improve oxygenation and hemodynamics, facilitating donor management and increasing organ suitability. The PRODON-AR study will test whether PP after BD certification increases the proportion of lungs suitable for transplantation compared with standard supine positioning (SP).
Primary objective: Evaluate whether early PP after BD certification increases the number of lungs meeting suitability criteria for transplantation. Secondary objective: Assess the effect of PP on hemodynamic stability and on the availability of other transplantable organs.
Methods
Design: The PRODON-AR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted across 11 intensive care units (ICUs) in Argentina. Recruitment began on June 1, 2023, and will continue until 250 PDs are enrolled. Participants will be randomized to PP (intervention) or SP (control). Randomization will be electronic and unblinded.
Inclusion criteria: confirmed BD according to national protocol, eligibility for multi-organ donation, and no documented opposition to donation.
Exclusion criteria: contraindications to PP (e.g., spinal instability, major abdominal wounds). PDs will be excluded from analysis if the interval between BD certification and PP exceeds 12 h, more than 20% of key variable data are missing, or if medical conditions require return to SP.
Procedure: After BD certification, ventilation will be set in VC-CMV mode with tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight, PEEP 8-12 cmH₂O, respiratory rate to maintain PaCO₂ 35-45 mmHg, FiO₂ for SpO₂ 94-98%, and inspiratory time 0.8-1.0 s.
Baseline evaluation (in SP) includes:
- Chest X-ray or CT for infiltrates,
- Respiratory mechanics (peak, plateau, total PEEP, ΔP, compliance, resistance),
- Optional lung ultrasound for aeration scoring,
- Arterial blood gas (PaO₂/FiO₂, base excess, bicarbonate, SpO₂),
- Vasopressor requirement (μg/kg/min),
- Intra-abdominal pressure (mmHg) and urine output (mL/h).
After baseline, PDs will be randomized to PP or SP. Those assigned to PP will be turned following institutional protocols. Reassessment will occur 8-12 h after randomization and again before organ procurement. Complications will be recorded. In the PP group, the donor remains prone until preparation for surgery, with head and limb repositioning every 3 h. For procurement, all donors are returned to SP before transfer to the operating room.
Outcomes Primary: number of lungs suitable for transplantation. Secondary: number of organs transplanted, PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, respiratory mechanics, vasopressor requirement, and hemodynamic variables.
Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics (mean, median, SD, IQR) will summarize continuous variables. Categorical variables will be expressed as frequencies and percentages.
Inferential analysis:
Primary outcome: logistic regression assessing the association between PP and lung suitability, adjusted for age, sex, time from BD to PP, and comorbidities (odds ratio with 95% CI).
Secondary outcomes: group comparisons via t-test/ANOVA or Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis as appropriate. P<0.05 will indicate significance. Subgroup analysis will explore the effect of PP timing and presence of atelectasis. Analyses will use JASP (version 2021).
Sample Size: Based on a 6% baseline lung suitability rate (per INCUCAI data), 10% expected improvement, α=0.05, power=80%, and 10% anticipated loss, a total of 250 PDs (125/group) will be required using Student's t-test for proportions.
Ethics: The trial addresses the critical shortage of transplantable lungs in Argentina. Evidence for PP benefits in critical care is robust, yet data in PDs after BD remain scarce. The study involves deceased individuals with certified BD under national law (Laws 17.132, 25.326, 26.629, 27.447, and Decree 1089/2012), posing no risk to living persons. In turn, this study was officially reviewed and approved by the Ministry of Health of Argentina, managed by the research ethics committee (REC) of INCUCAI (INSTITUTO NACIONAL CENTRAL ÚNICO COORDINADOR DE ABLACIÓN E IMPLANTE), under the reference number EX-2024-43540732-APN-INCUCAI#MS.
All data will be anonymized per data protection regulations. Inclusion of deceased donors does not require informed consent (Law 27.447, Chapter VIII; CIOMS Guideline 10 exception). The study does not interfere with organ procurement and relies on standard clinical measurements already documented in SINTRA (National Information System for Procurement and Transplantation).
Biological samples are limited to routine blood and urine analyses and discarded immediately after testing. No genetic studies or material storage are planned. Each site is led by an experienced transplant professional. The principal investigator has extensive experience in donor management and research coordination.
Confidentiality: All participant data will remain confidential. Only anonymized and authorized information will be used for analysis and publication.
Results Publication Policy: Findings will be submitted to high-impact journals and shared with the Argentine Societies of Medicine, Intensive Care, and Transplantation. Ethical and legal publication standards, including conflict-of-interest disclosure, will be strictly followed.
Conflict of Interest: The investigators declare no conflicts of interest.
- Conditions
- Prone Position, Donors, Lung Procurement, Tissue Donors, Lung Transplantation
- Being tested
- Prone position
- Keywords
- Prone position, Donors, Lung procurement, Tissue donors, Mechanical Ventilation, Brain Death, Lung Transplantation
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Death
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prone positionProcedure or surgery
The only intervention that differs between the groups will be that the potential donors assigned to the experimental group will be kept in a prone position until they enter the operating room for ablation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prone position | Experimental | Potential donors assigned to the experimental group will be placed in a prone position. This position will be maintained until one hour prior to entering the operating room for organ ablation. Receives: Procedure: Prone position |
| Supine position | No intervention | Potential donors assigned to the control group (supine position) will continue in that position with the usual treatment. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Potential lung donor
Before the potential donor enters the operating room for organ ablation, it will be determined whether the individual is eligible to be a lung donor based on the criteria established by the Spanish Transplant Society
Measured: The assessment will be conducted within 1 hour before the potential donor enters the operating room for organ ablation.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Organs ablated and implanted
The organs ablated from each subject will be recorded, as well as which of them were actually implanted in a recipient.
Measured: Data will be collected from the INCUCAI website up to 2 days post-ablation, following the procedure
Vasopressor requirement
The requirement for vasopressor drugs will be recorded, including the specific drug(s) used and the dose administered, expressed in mcg/kg/min.
Measured: The vasopressor requirement will be evaluated at three time points: 1. Immediately after the diagnosis of brain death (BD) 2. At 12 hours after the diagnosis of BD 3. Prior to entering the operating room for organ ablation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Nov 2025
- Study start1 Jun 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024
- Study completion1 May 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prone PositionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The PRODON-AR study is a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter, randomized, parallel group, unblinded trial with electronic-based randomization
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 254 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Hospital Cuenca Alta Néstor Kirchner Cañuelas, Hospital Escuela General José Francisco de San Martín (Corrientes), Hospital Ángel Cruz Padilla (Tucuman), Hospital Central de Mendoza, Hospital Simplemente Evita de Gonzalez Catan, HIGA Abraham Piñeyro, Hospital San Martín (Entre Ríos), Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos San Roque, Hospital Regional Dr. Enrique Vera Barros (La Rioja), Instituto Nacional Central Único Coordinador de Ablación e Implante
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pablo Centeno, Dr., Principal investigator, Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07251777
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1168576558
- Acronym
- PRODONAR
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 26 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hrobjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleza-Jeric K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
PubMed 23303884Maciel CB, Greer DM. ICU Management of the Potential Organ Donor: State of the Art. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Sep;16(9):86. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0682-1.
PubMed 27498101Del Rio F, Escudero D, De La Calle B, Vidal FG, Paredes MV, Nunez JR. [Evaluation and maintenance of the lung donor]. Med Intensiva. 2009 Jan-Feb;33(1):40-9. doi: 10.1016/s0210-5691(09)70304-3. Spanish.
PubMed 19232208Meyfroidt G, Gunst J, Martin-Loeches I, Smith M, Robba C, Taccone FS, Citerio G. Management of the brain-dead donor in the ICU: general and specific therapy to improve transplantable organ quality. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Mar;45(3):343-353. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05551-y. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
PubMed 30741327Bansal R, Esan A, Hess D, Angel LF, Levine SM, George T, Raoof S. Mechanical ventilatory support in potential lung donor patients. Chest. 2014 Jul;146(1):220-227. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2745.
PubMed 25010965Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators; Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura EA, Laranjeira LN, Paisani DM, Damiani LP, Guimaraes HP, Romano ER, Regenga MM, Taniguchi LNT, Teixeira C, Pinheiro de Oliveira R, Machado FR, Diaz-Quijano FA, Filho MSA, Maia IS, Caser EB, Filho WO, Borges MC, Martins PA, Matsui M, Ospina-Tascon GA, Giancursi TS, Giraldo-Ramirez ND, Vieira SRR, Assef MDGPL, Hasan MS, Szczeklik W, Rios F, Amato MBP, Berwanger O, Ribeiro de Carvalho CR. Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1335-1345. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14171.
PubMed 28973363Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.
PubMed 23688302Vieillard-Baron A, Charron C, Caille V, Belliard G, Page B, Jardin F. Prone positioning unloads the right ventricle in severe ARDS. Chest. 2007 Nov;132(5):1440-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1013. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
PubMed 17925425Matejovic M, Rokyta R Jr, Radermacher P, Krouzecky A, Sramek V, Novak I. Effect of prone position on hepato-splanchnic hemodynamics in acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Dec;28(12):1750-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1524-y. Epub 2002 Oct 26.
PubMed 12447518
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prone vs Supine Position in Potential Organ Donors: PRODONAR Multicenter Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07251777
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRODONAR / 1168576558
- Conditions
- Prone Position, Donors, Lung Procurement, Tissue Donors, Lung Transplantation
- Keywords
- Prone position, Donors, Lung procurement, Tissue donors, Mechanical Ventilation, Brain Death, Lung Transplantation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 254 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban EcheverríaOther government
- Collaborators
- Hospital Cuenca Alta Néstor Kirchner Cañuelas, Hospital Escuela General José Francisco de San Martín (Corrientes), Hospital Ángel Cruz Padilla (Tucuman), Hospital Central de Mendoza, Hospital Simplemente Evita de Gonzalez Catan, HIGA Abraham Piñeyro, Hospital San Martín (Entre Ríos), Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos San Roque, Hospital Regional Dr. Enrique Vera Barros (La Rioja), Instituto Nacional Central Único Coordinador de Ablación e Implante
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background and justification: In Argentina, 9,650 people are on the organ transplant waiting list, including 290 who require a lung transplant. In 2022, 21 unilateral lungs, 18 bilateral lungs, and one cardiopulmonary block were implanted, representing only 1.9% of all transplants. Maintaining organ viability in potential donors (PD) is challenging because brain death triggers adrenergic activation, hemodynamic instability, and atelectasis due to mechanical ventilation and loss of respiratory muscle activity. These factors impair gas exchange and reduce the number of lungs suitable for transplantation.
Ventilatory management in PDs aims to preserve lung function, minimize risks of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and maintain adequate gas exchange while preventing alveolar collapse and overdistension. Strategies derived from Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) include recruitment maneuvers, which may cause complications. In contrast, prone positioning improves ventilation-perfusion matching and increases functional lung parenchyma.
This study proposes prone positioning as a preventive ventilatory strategy to optimize lung preservation in organ donors.
Objectives: (1) Determine whether early prone positioning after BD certification increases the proportion of lungs meeting suitability criteria for transplantation. (2) Evaluate its effect on the availability of other transplantable organs and on hemodynamic stability.
Methods: The PRODON-AR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial conducted in 10 intensive care units (ICUs) across Argentina. Recruitment began on June 1, 2023, and will continue until 250 PDs are enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned to standard care (supine) or prone positioning following BD certification. Eligible donors will be those with confirmed BD, meeting multi-organ donation criteria, and without documented opposition to donation. Exclusion criteria include contraindications to prone positioning. Donors will be excluded from analysis if the interval between BD certification and proning exceeds 12 hours, if more than 20% of data for key variables are missing, or if clinical conditions require returning to the supine position.
The primary outcome is the number of lungs suitable for transplantation. Secondary outcomes include the number of organs transplanted, vasopressor requirements, and variables related to gas exchange and respiratory mechanics.
Detailed description
This protocol follows the SPIRIT guidelines (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials).
Introduction: Organ transplantation replaces a failing organ with one from a donor. Ablation enables organ removal for therapeutic use in recipients with terminal organ failure. In Argentina, as of February 2023, 9,650 people were on the national waiting list, including 290 requiring lung transplantation. In 2022, 767 real donors generated 2,090 organs, of which only 40 lungs were transplanted, representing 1.9% of all transplants.
The lung remains one of the most challenging organs for procurement due to strict selection criteria and rapid functional deterioration after brain death (BD). Countries such as Spain, which lead global donation rates, have broadened donor criteria ("expanded criteria donors"), demonstrating that the use of marginal lungs does not increase recipient mortality.
Following BD, sympathetic nervous system activation triggers a massive inflammatory response leading to endothelial and alveolar damage. Potential donors (PDs) under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) experience additional inflammatory stress. Neuromuscular paralysis and a lack of respiratory effort promote atelectasis, particularly in dependent lung regions, thereby compromising ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching. The apnea test and FiO₂ 100% exposure can worsen atelectasis through nitrogen washout. In addition, an absent cough reflex predisposes to secretion retention and infection, reducing lung viability and secondarily impairing the function of other organs through systemic hypoxia and inflammation.
Rationale: Ventilatory management in PDs aims to preserve lung function, reduce IMV-induced injury, and maintain optimal gas exchange while preventing alveolar collapse and overdistension. Lung-protective ventilation (tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight and adequate positive end-expiratory pressure, PEEP) remains standard; however, the proportion of suitable lungs for procurement remains low.
Recruitment maneuvers, formerly used in ARDS, are now avoided due to their association with increased mortality (ART trial, 2018). In turn, prone positioning (PP) has proven several clinical benefits in ARDS, enhancing oxygenation and reducing ventilator-induced lung injury. PP promotes more homogeneous ventilation, recruits dorsal lung areas, enhances oxygenation, and improves right ventricular function without significant hemodynamic compromise. Studies such as PROSEVA demonstrated reduced cardiac arrests and better extrapulmonary organ function in PP patients.
In PDs, PP could similarly improve oxygenation and hemodynamics, facilitating donor management and increasing organ suitability. The PRODON-AR study will test whether PP after BD certification increases the proportion of lungs suitable for transplantation compared with standard supine positioning (SP).
Primary objective: Evaluate whether early PP after BD certification increases the number of lungs meeting suitability criteria for transplantation. Secondary objective: Assess the effect of PP on hemodynamic stability and on the availability of other transplantable organs.
Methods
Design: The PRODON-AR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted across 11 intensive care units (ICUs) in Argentina. Recruitment began on June 1, 2023, and will continue until 250 PDs are enrolled. Participants will be randomized to PP (intervention) or SP (control). Randomization will be electronic and unblinded.
Inclusion criteria: confirmed BD according to national protocol, eligibility for multi-organ donation, and no documented opposition to donation.
Exclusion criteria: contraindications to PP (e.g., spinal instability, major abdominal wounds). PDs will be excluded from analysis if the interval between BD certification and PP exceeds 12 h, more than 20% of key variable data are missing, or if medical conditions require return to SP.
Procedure: After BD certification, ventilation will be set in VC-CMV mode with tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight, PEEP 8-12 cmH₂O, respiratory rate to maintain PaCO₂ 35-45 mmHg, FiO₂ for SpO₂ 94-98%, and inspiratory time 0.8-1.0 s.
Baseline evaluation (in SP) includes:
- Chest X-ray or CT for infiltrates,
- Respiratory mechanics (peak, plateau, total PEEP, ΔP, compliance, resistance),
- Optional lung ultrasound for aeration scoring,
- Arterial blood gas (PaO₂/FiO₂, base excess, bicarbonate, SpO₂),
- Vasopressor requirement (μg/kg/min),
- Intra-abdominal pressure (mmHg) and urine output (mL/h).
After baseline, PDs will be randomized to PP or SP. Those assigned to PP will be turned following institutional protocols. Reassessment will occur 8-12 h after randomization and again before organ procurement. Complications will be recorded. In the PP group, the donor remains prone until preparation for surgery, with head and limb repositioning every 3 h. For procurement, all donors are returned to SP before transfer to the operating room.
Outcomes Primary: number of lungs suitable for transplantation. Secondary: number of organs transplanted, PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, respiratory mechanics, vasopressor requirement, and hemodynamic variables.
Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics (mean, median, SD, IQR) will summarize continuous variables. Categorical variables will be expressed as frequencies and percentages.
Inferential analysis:
Primary outcome: logistic regression assessing the association between PP and lung suitability, adjusted for age, sex, time from BD to PP, and comorbidities (odds ratio with 95% CI).
Secondary outcomes: group comparisons via t-test/ANOVA or Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis as appropriate. P<0.05 will indicate significance. Subgroup analysis will explore the effect of PP timing and presence of atelectasis. Analyses will use JASP (version 2021).
Sample Size: Based on a 6% baseline lung suitability rate (per INCUCAI data), 10% expected improvement, α=0.05, power=80%, and 10% anticipated loss, a total of 250 PDs (125/group) will be required using Student's t-test for proportions.
Ethics: The trial addresses the critical shortage of transplantable lungs in Argentina. Evidence for PP benefits in critical care is robust, yet data in PDs after BD remain scarce. The study involves deceased individuals with certified BD under national law (Laws 17.132, 25.326, 26.629, 27.447, and Decree 1089/2012), posing no risk to living persons. In turn, this study was officially reviewed and approved by the Ministry of Health of Argentina, managed by the research ethics committee (REC) of INCUCAI (INSTITUTO NACIONAL CENTRAL ÚNICO COORDINADOR DE ABLACIÓN E IMPLANTE), under the reference number EX-2024-43540732-APN-INCUCAI#MS.
All data will be anonymized per data protection regulations. Inclusion of deceased donors does not require informed consent (Law 27.447, Chapter VIII; CIOMS Guideline 10 exception). The study does not interfere with organ procurement and relies on standard clinical measurements already documented in SINTRA (National Information System for Procurement and Transplantation).
Biological samples are limited to routine blood and urine analyses and discarded immediately after testing. No genetic studies or material storage are planned. Each site is led by an experienced transplant professional. The principal investigator has extensive experience in donor management and research coordination.
Confidentiality: All participant data will remain confidential. Only anonymized and authorized information will be used for analysis and publication.
Results Publication Policy: Findings will be submitted to high-impact journals and shared with the Argentine Societies of Medicine, Intensive Care, and Transplantation. Ethical and legal publication standards, including conflict-of-interest disclosure, will be strictly followed.
Conflict of Interest: The investigators declare no conflicts of interest.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The PRODON-AR study is a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter, randomized, parallel group, unblinded trial with electronic-based randomization
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prone position | Experimental | Procedure: Prone positionPotential donors assigned to the experimental group will be placed in a prone position. This position will be maintained until one hour prior to entering the operating room for organ ablation. |
| Supine position | No intervention | –Potential donors assigned to the control group (supine position) will continue in that position with the usual treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients who died under neurological criteria
- 18 to 70 years of age
- Meet multi-organ donor criteria
- That they have no opposition to the donation.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients who have expressly stated that they do not donate organs
- Patients who, for some reason, cannot establish a prone position
- Deceased with contraindication for organ donation.
- Elimination criteria
- Time between diagnosis of ME and prone greater than 12 hours
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prone positionThe only intervention that differs between the groups will be that the potential donors assigned to the experimental group will be kept in a prone position until they enter the operating room for ablation. | Procedure or surgery | Prone position |
Primary outcome
Potential lung donor
Time frame: The assessment will be conducted within 1 hour before the potential donor enters the operating room for organ ablation.
Before the potential donor enters the operating room for organ ablation, it will be determined whether the individual is eligible to be a lung donor based on the criteria established by the Spanish Transplant Society
2 secondary outcomes
Organs ablated and implanted
Time frame: Data will be collected from the INCUCAI website up to 2 days post-ablation, following the procedure
Vasopressor requirement
Time frame: The vasopressor requirement will be evaluated at three time points: 1. Immediately after the diagnosis of brain death (BD) 2. At 12 hours after the diagnosis of BD 3. Prior to entering the operating room for organ ablation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Nov 2025.
- Background: PubMed 23303884Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hrobjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleza-Jeric K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
- Background: PubMed 27498101Maciel CB, Greer DM. ICU Management of the Potential Organ Donor: State of the Art. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Sep;16(9):86. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0682-1.
- Background: PubMed 19232208Del Rio F, Escudero D, De La Calle B, Vidal FG, Paredes MV, Nunez JR. [Evaluation and maintenance of the lung donor]. Med Intensiva. 2009 Jan-Feb;33(1):40-9. doi: 10.1016/s0210-5691(09)70304-3. Spanish.
- Background: PubMed 30741327Meyfroidt G, Gunst J, Martin-Loeches I, Smith M, Robba C, Taccone FS, Citerio G. Management of the brain-dead donor in the ICU: general and specific therapy to improve transplantable organ quality. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Mar;45(3):343-353. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05551-y. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
- Background: PubMed 25010965Bansal R, Esan A, Hess D, Angel LF, Levine SM, George T, Raoof S. Mechanical ventilatory support in potential lung donor patients. Chest. 2014 Jul;146(1):220-227. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2745.
- Background: PubMed 28973363Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators; Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura EA, Laranjeira LN, Paisani DM, Damiani LP, Guimaraes HP, Romano ER, Regenga MM, Taniguchi LNT, Teixeira C, Pinheiro de Oliveira R, Machado FR, Diaz-Quijano FA, Filho MSA, Maia IS, Caser EB, Filho WO, Borges MC, Martins PA, Matsui M, Ospina-Tascon GA, Giancursi TS, Giraldo-Ramirez ND, Vieira SRR, Assef MDGPL, Hasan MS, Szczeklik W, Rios F, Amato MBP, Berwanger O, Ribeiro de Carvalho CR. Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1335-1345. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14171.
- Background: PubMed 23688302Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 17925425Vieillard-Baron A, Charron C, Caille V, Belliard G, Page B, Jardin F. Prone positioning unloads the right ventricle in severe ARDS. Chest. 2007 Nov;132(5):1440-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1013. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
- Background: PubMed 12447518Matejovic M, Rokyta R Jr, Radermacher P, Krouzecky A, Sramek V, Novak I. Effect of prone position on hepato-splanchnic hemodynamics in acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Dec;28(12):1750-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1524-y. Epub 2002 Oct 26.
- Ministerio de Salud de ArgentinaLink provided by the sponsor.
- It is the computer system for the administration, management, supervision and consultation of the procurement and transplantation of organs, tissues and cells at the national level.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prone Position
Not yet recruiting
Regional Lung Ventilation During Prone Position in in Intubated Children
Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of 16-week Dietary Intake of Food Supplements Containing Collagen and MSM on Facial Erythema and Other Skin Parameters
Erythema, Telangiectasis
Active, not recruiting
Prone Positioning During Delayed Cord Clamping
Delayed Cord Clamping
Not yet recruiting
Bedside Assessment of Right Ventricular Output Lying in Prone Or Supine
Right Ventricular Function, Prone Position
Active, not recruiting
Trial to Compare MRI-guided Precision Prone Irradiation (PPI) Versus CT-guided Breast Irradiation
Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pablo Centeno, Dr. principal investigator
Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prone position in people with Prone Position and Donors, run by Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría at 1 site in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Potential lung donor (time frame: The assessment will be conducted within 1 hour before the potential donor enters the operating room for organ ablation.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07251777, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Nov 2025.