HealthyNCT07259746
Study of Student Flourishing
A study testing Digital toolkit and Mental Health America Resources in people with Healthy, run by Flourish Science, Inc. at 11 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to learn how a science-based mobile app, called Flourish, affects student well-being. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does receiving access to the Flourish app increase well-being (e.g., positive affect, loneliness, belonging) among students? 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Digital toolkit and Mental Health America Resources
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,500 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 22 Sep 2025to May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Currently a student at one of the participating institutions
- Age 18 or older
- Able to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 3 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
11 sites in 3 countries
United States9 sites, 9 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, California, 94720
Juliana Schroeder, PhD, 510-664-9692, jschroeder@haas.berkeley.edu
- Not yet recruiting
University of Colorado Denver
Denver, Colorado, 80204
Annika Mosier, PhD, 650-898-6664, ANNIKA.MOSIER@ucdenver.edu
- Recruiting
University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822
Elizabeth Weitz, MA, 650-898-6664, eaweitz@hawaii.edu
- Recruiting
Foothill College
Los Altos Hills, California, 94022
Eta Lin, PhD, 650-949-7669, lineta@fhda.edu
- Recruiting
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706
Stav Atir, PhD, 608-263-3648, stav.atir@wisc.edu
- Recruiting
Kansas State University
Manhattan, Kansas, 66506
Natalie Solomon, PhD, 785-532-6850, ndb@ksu.edu
- Recruiting
Chapman University
Orange, California, 92866
John Hunter, PhD, 714-516-6148, johnhunter@chapman.edu
- Not yet recruiting
Brown University
Providence, Rhode Island, 02912
Jamie Trost, PhD, 401-863-2195, jamie_trost@brown.edu
- Not yet recruiting
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Delancey Wu, PhD, 650-898-6664, dcwu@uw.edu
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Victoria
Victoria, British Columbia, V8P 5C2
Nigel Lou, PhD, +1 250-721-7553, nigellou@uvic.ca
New Zealand1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
University of Canterbury
Christchurch, Canterbury, 8140
Kong Meng Liew, PhD, +64 3 369 3208, kongmeng.liew@canterbury.ac.nz
About this study
Official title: A Multi-Institutional Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Trial of Student Well-Being Using the Flourish App
The goal of this study is to learn how a science-based mobile app, called Flourish, affects student well-being.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Does receiving access to the Flourish app increase well-being (e.g., positive affect, loneliness, belonging) among students?
- Does using the Flourish app in combination with a human buddy/friend lead to better outcomes than using the app alone?
Researchers will compare three different groups to see if and how the Flourish app works to improve student well-being:
- Waitlist Control Group: Students continue with existing school resources.
- Flourish App Group: Students use the Flourish app (a digital toolkit and AI chatbot) twice per week.
- Flourish App + Buddy Group: Students use the Flourish app twice per week with someone else as a "Flourish Buddy".
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to one of the three groups listed above. Use the app or continue with regular resources for 6 weeks. Complete four short online surveys about their well-being (at the beginning, during the 6 weeks, and at the end).
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Digital toolkit, Mental Health America Resources
- Keywords
- well-being, digital, positive psychology, students
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Digital toolkitBehavioural
Also called Flourish app
A mobile application providing a science-based digital toolkit and AI chatbot.
Mental Health America ResourcesBehavioural
Access to national mental health resources from Mental Health America, which can be found here: https://mhanational.org/resources/.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Flourish app condition | Experimental | Participants in this condition will gain access to the Flourish app and be instructed to use it at least twice a week for 6 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Digital toolkit |
| Flourish app with buddies condition | Experimental | Participants in this condition will gain access to the Flourish app and be instructed to use it at least twice a week for 6 weeks. In addition, they will be instructed to invite a buddy (e.g., friend, family member) to join them on the app. Receives: Behavioral: Digital toolkit |
| MHA Resources | Active comparator | Participants in this condition will continue to use existing school resources and will be provided with information directing them to external Mental Health America (MHA) resources. Participants in this arm do not receive access to the Flourish app. Receives: Behavioral: Mental Health America Resources |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Subcomponents of Affect Scale
The Subcomponents of Affect Scale (SAS) is an 18-item measure of affect, divided into nine positive and nine negative adjectives. Positive subscales include calm, well-being, and vigor, while negative subscales include depression, anxiety, and anger. Participants rate each adjective from 0 (not at all accurate) to 4 (extremely accurate) based on their feelings over the past two weeks. Total scores for positive and negative affect are summed from their subscales.
Measured: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Implicit Theories of Emotion
Implicit theories of emotion were assessed using the Implicit Theories of Emotion Scale, adapted from Dweck's Implicit Theories of Intelligence framework. The scale includes four items assessing beliefs about whether emotions are malleable (incremental) or fixed (entity). Participants rate each item on a 6-point scale from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 6 ("Strongly agree"). The two entity items are reverse-scored, and all items are averaged to create a single score ranging from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating stronger endorsement of an incremental (malleable) theory of emotion.
Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks post-baseline
Loneliness
The UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale is a brief measure assessing subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation. Participants rate each item on a 3-point scale, from 1 (hardly ever) to 3 (often), with higher scores indicating greater loneliness.
Measured: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Perceived Cohesion
The Perceived Cohesion Scale measures a sense of belonging and morale within a community using a Likert scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). For our purposes, we use a single-item version: "I see myself as part of the campus community."
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Closeness to University
Closeness to one's university was assessed using a modified single-item Inclusion of Other in the Self measure. Participants were shown seven pairs of increasingly overlapping circles and asked, "Which picture best describes your relationship with your university?" Responses range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater perceived closeness to the university.
Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks post-baseline
Perceived Social Support (PSSS-3)
Perceived social support was assessed using a 3-item short form based on the ACO (PSSS-A6) and adapted from the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Participants rate each item on a 7-point scale from 1 ("Very Strongly Disagree") to 7 ("Very Strongly Agree"). Total scores are summed, yielding a range from 3 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater perceived social support.
Measured: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Mindfulness (Mindful Attention Awareness Scale)
Mindfulness was assessed using a 5-item short form of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), modified to assess experiences over the past two weeks. Participants rate each item on a 7-point scale from 0 ("Not at all") to 6 ("Very much"). Items are averaged to create a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores reflecting lower mindfulness. For interpretability in analyses, this score is reverse-scored so that higher values indicate greater mindfulness.
Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks post-baseline
Resilience
The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) is a 6-item measure of stress recovery, rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate a stronger ability to "bounce back" after setbacks.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Flourishing Scale
The Flourishing Scale is an 8-item measure of psychological well-being. Respondents rate items from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 7 ("Strongly agree"), yielding a total score range from 8 to 56. Higher scores indicate greater well-being and flourishing.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Retention / Enrollment Intention
Retention intention was assessed using 2 items evaluating students' likelihood of continuing their enrollment. Participants respond to "How likely are you to stay enrolled next quarter/semester?" on a 5-point scale from 1 ("Very unlikely") to 5 ("Very likely"). A second item asks, "How often have you considered leaving your college/university in the past semester?" rated from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Very often"). Higher scores on the first item indicate greater intention to persist, while higher scores on the second item indicate greater consideration of leaving.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Secondary outcomes (12)
Depression (PHQ-2)
The PHQ-2 is an 2-item measure assessing depression severity over the past two weeks. Each item scores from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"), with total scores from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate greater depression severity.
Measured: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Anxiety (GAD-2)
The GAD-2 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2) is a 2-item measure assessing anxiety severity. Each item is rated from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"), with total scores ranging from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety severity.
Measured: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Perceived Stress (PSS-4)
The PSS-4 (Perceived Stress Scale-4) is a 4-item measure of perceived stress, rated from 0 ("never") to 4 ("very often"). Scores range from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating greater stress.
Measured: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Academic Self Efficacy
The 5-item Academic Self-Efficacy scale measures students' confidence in their ability to succeed academically. Participants rate their agreement with statements such as "I generally manage to solve difficult academic problems if I try hard enough" on a 5-point scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater self-belief in tackling academic challenges and achieving study-related goals.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Satisfaction With Life
Life satisfaction was assessed using a single-item measure asking, "All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole?" Participants respond on an 11-point scale from 0 ("Completely dissatisfied") to 10 ("Completely satisfied"). Higher scores indicate greater overall life satisfaction.
Measured: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
School Perceptions
School perceptions are measured using two single-item measures from the Healthy Minds Survey. The first item rates satisfaction with the overall school experience from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied). The second item rates agreement with the statement, "At my school, students' mental and emotional well-being is a priority," on a scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 6 (strongly disagree).
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Multi-Dimensional Measure of Trust
The Multi-Dimensional Measure of Trust (MDMT) assesses perceived trustworthiness of the Flourish chatbot, Sunnie, through a set of 10 attributes (Form A), rated from 0 (Not at all) to 5 (Very), with a 'Does Not Fit' option. Only participants in the intervention conditions (Flourish app; Flourish app + buddies conditions) complete this measure.
Measured: 6 weeks post-baseline
Expectations and Experiences of Chatbots
This measure, adapted from the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised (WAI-SR), assesses participants' expectations and experiences with chatbots. Participants rate anticipated and actual interactions across three areas-Goal, Task, and Bond-on a 5-point scale from 1 (seldom) to 5 (always), with higher scores indicating stronger alignment.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Perceived Empathy of Sunnie
Perceived empathy toward the Flourish chatbot, Sunnie, will be assessed using a 7-item measure. Participants rate each item from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 6 ("Strongly agree"). Items are averaged to create a composite score, with higher scores indicating greater perceived empathy. This was only presented to those in the intervention conditions.
Measured: 6 weeks post-baseline
Flourish Buddy Responsiveness
For participants with at least one Flourish Buddy, responsiveness of the selected buddy will be assessed using a 3-item measure assessing how accepted, understood, and cared for participants feel by their buddy. Items are rated from 1 ("Not at all") to 7 ("Very much") and averaged; higher scores indicate greater perceived responsiveness.
Measured: Weeks 4 and 6 post-baseline
Relationship Satisfaction with Flourish Buddy
For participants with at least one Flourish Buddy, relationship satisfaction with the selected buddy will be assessed using RAS-1, a single item rating overall satisfaction with the relationship from 1 ("Not satisfied") to 5 ("Very satisfied"). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Measured: Weeks 4 and 6 post-baseline
Perceived Relationship Improvement
Perceived improvement in the relationship with an existing Flourish Buddy will be assessed using a single item ("To what extent did being Flourish Buddies with this person improve your relationship?"). This item is shown to participants in either Flourish condition who reported having a Flourish Buddy. Participants rate the item from 1 ("Not at all") to 7 ("Very much"). Higher scores indicate greater perceived improvement.
Measured: 6 weeks post-baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Dec 2025
- Study start22 Sep 2025
- Primary completionMay 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Flourish Science, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07259746
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Flourish2025
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 18 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We will share de-identified participant data on OSF from each study timepoint across both conditions, including all data used in our analyses.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-Institutional Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Trial of Student Well-Being Using the Flourish App
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07259746
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Flourish2025
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Keywords
- well-being, digital, positive psychology, students
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Flourish Science, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to learn how a science-based mobile app, called Flourish, affects student well-being.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does receiving access to the Flourish app increase well-being (e.g., positive affect, loneliness, belonging) among students?
- Does using the Flourish app in combination with a human buddy/friend lead to better outcomes than using the app alone?
Researchers will compare three different groups to see if and how the Flourish app works to improve student well-being:
- Waitlist Control Group: Students continue with existing school resources.
- Flourish App Group: Students use the Flourish app (a digital toolkit and AI chatbot) twice per week.
- Flourish App + Buddy Group: Students use the Flourish app twice per week with someone else as a "Flourish Buddy".
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to one of the three groups listed above. Use the app or continue with regular resources for 6 weeks. Complete four short online surveys about their well-being (at the beginning, during the 6 weeks, and at the end).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Flourish app condition | Experimental | Behavioral: Digital toolkitParticipants in this condition will gain access to the Flourish app and be instructed to use it at least twice a week for 6 weeks. |
| Flourish app with buddies condition | Experimental | Behavioral: Digital toolkitParticipants in this condition will gain access to the Flourish app and be instructed to use it at least twice a week for 6 weeks. In addition, they will be instructed to invite a buddy (e.g., friend, family member) to join them on the app. |
| MHA Resources | Active comparator | Behavioral: Mental Health America ResourcesParticipants in this condition will continue to use existing school resources and will be provided with information directing them to external Mental Health America (MHA) resources. Participants in this arm do not receive access to the Flourish app. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Currently a student at one of the participating institutions
- Age 18 or older
- Able to provide informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Digital toolkitAlso: Flourish appA mobile application providing a science-based digital toolkit and AI chatbot. | Behavioural | Flourish app condition, Flourish app with buddies condition |
| Mental Health America ResourcesAccess to national mental health resources from Mental Health America, which can be found here: https://mhanational.org/resources/. | Behavioural | MHA Resources |
Primary outcome
Subcomponents of Affect Scale
Time frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
The Subcomponents of Affect Scale (SAS) is an 18-item measure of affect, divided into nine positive and nine negative adjectives. Positive subscales include calm, well-being, and vigor, while negative subscales include depression, anxiety, and anger. Participants rate each adjective from 0 (not at all accurate) to 4 (extremely accurate) based on their feelings over the past two weeks. Total scores for positive and negative affect are summed from their subscales.
Implicit Theories of Emotion
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks post-baseline
Implicit theories of emotion were assessed using the Implicit Theories of Emotion Scale, adapted from Dweck's Implicit Theories of Intelligence framework. The scale includes four items assessing beliefs about whether emotions are malleable (incremental) or fixed (entity). Participants rate each item on a 6-point scale from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 6 ("Strongly agree"). The two entity items are reverse-scored, and all items are averaged to create a single score ranging from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating stronger endorsement of an incremental (malleable) theory of emotion.
Loneliness
Time frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
The UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale is a brief measure assessing subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation. Participants rate each item on a 3-point scale, from 1 (hardly ever) to 3 (often), with higher scores indicating greater loneliness.
Perceived Cohesion
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
The Perceived Cohesion Scale measures a sense of belonging and morale within a community using a Likert scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). For our purposes, we use a single-item version: "I see myself as part of the campus community."
Closeness to University
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks post-baseline
Closeness to one's university was assessed using a modified single-item Inclusion of Other in the Self measure. Participants were shown seven pairs of increasingly overlapping circles and asked, "Which picture best describes your relationship with your university?" Responses range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater perceived closeness to the university.
Perceived Social Support (PSSS-3)
Time frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Perceived social support was assessed using a 3-item short form based on the ACO (PSSS-A6) and adapted from the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Participants rate each item on a 7-point scale from 1 ("Very Strongly Disagree") to 7 ("Very Strongly Agree"). Total scores are summed, yielding a range from 3 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater perceived social support.
Mindfulness (Mindful Attention Awareness Scale)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks post-baseline
Mindfulness was assessed using a 5-item short form of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), modified to assess experiences over the past two weeks. Participants rate each item on a 7-point scale from 0 ("Not at all") to 6 ("Very much"). Items are averaged to create a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores reflecting lower mindfulness. For interpretability in analyses, this score is reverse-scored so that higher values indicate greater mindfulness.
Resilience
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) is a 6-item measure of stress recovery, rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate a stronger ability to "bounce back" after setbacks.
Flourishing Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
The Flourishing Scale is an 8-item measure of psychological well-being. Respondents rate items from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 7 ("Strongly agree"), yielding a total score range from 8 to 56. Higher scores indicate greater well-being and flourishing.
Retention / Enrollment Intention
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Retention intention was assessed using 2 items evaluating students' likelihood of continuing their enrollment. Participants respond to "How likely are you to stay enrolled next quarter/semester?" on a 5-point scale from 1 ("Very unlikely") to 5 ("Very likely"). A second item asks, "How often have you considered leaving your college/university in the past semester?" rated from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Very often"). Higher scores on the first item indicate greater intention to persist, while higher scores on the second item indicate greater consideration of leaving.
12 secondary outcomes
Depression (PHQ-2)
Time frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Anxiety (GAD-2)
Time frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Perceived Stress (PSS-4)
Time frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Academic Self Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Satisfaction With Life
Time frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
School Perceptions
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Multi-Dimensional Measure of Trust
Time frame: 6 weeks post-baseline
Expectations and Experiences of Chatbots
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Perceived Empathy of Sunnie
Time frame: 6 weeks post-baseline
Flourish Buddy Responsiveness
Time frame: Weeks 4 and 6 post-baseline
Relationship Satisfaction with Flourish Buddy
Time frame: Weeks 4 and 6 post-baseline
Perceived Relationship Improvement
Time frame: 6 weeks post-baseline
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Dec 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We will share de-identified participant data on OSF from each study timepoint across both conditions, including all data used in our analyses.
Related trials for Healthy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Subarachnoid Space Using Intrathecal Gadolinium Contrast
Healthy Volunteers
RecruitingObservational study
Survey to Determine Incarcerated Persons' Views on Surrogate Decision Making
Healthy Volunteers
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn How Different Amounts of the Study Medicine Called PF-07985631 Are Tolerated and Act in the Body of Healthy Adults
Healthy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Collection and Distribution of Blood Components From Healthy Donors for In Vitro Research Use
Blood Donors, Apheresis
Recruiting
Metabolic Impact of VLCPUFA-Rich Fish Oil: A Clinical Study on Omega-3 Index Enhancement in Healthy Individuals
Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Fish Oils
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
11 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Digital toolkit and Mental Health America Resources in people with Healthy, run by Flourish Science, Inc. at 11 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in United States, Canada, New Zealand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Julie YA Cachia, PhD (650-898-6664, julie@flouriship.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Subcomponents of Affect Scale (time frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2025.