Coronary Artery DiseaseCALAMBRENCT07260474
Comparison of the Amplatzer Amulet Versus LAmbre Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure
A study testing Patients implanted with Amplatzer Amulet™ and Patients implanted with LAmbre™ in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Fundación EPIC at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Clinical investigation with CE-marked medical devices, multicenter, prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high embolic risk and with at least one high bleeding risk criterion according to the Munich consensus document will be randomized to left atrial appendage… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Patients implanted with Amplatzer Amulet™ and Patients implanted with LAmbre™
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 5 May 2024to 31 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- (MUST MEET ALL INCLUSION CRITERIA)
- Patient with aged ≥18 years AND;
- Patient have non-valvular atrial (NVAF) with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, and presented at least one high-bleeding-risk criterion according to the Munich consensus document AND;
- Patient are required to undergo preprocedural TEE / CCTA to confirm the absence of LAA thrombus and to ensure that LAA anatomy is suitable for closure with either device.
- Patient who has been informed of the characteristics of the study and has provided written informed consent..
Who cannot join
- (MUST NOT MEET ANY EXCLUSION CRITERIA)
- Patient life expectancy <1 year (terminal illness).
- Patient with requirement for oral anticoagulation therapy for any indication other than non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
- Patient with prior surgical ligation or obliteration of the left atrial appendage.
- Patient with history of allergic reaction or intolerance to any material used in the study devices or to any of the antithrombotic agents required post-procedure.
- Patient with active systemic infection.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patient with concurrent participation in another investigational study that may affect study results.
- Patient with inability or unwillingness to comply with the study protocol or follow-up requirements.
- Patient pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Fuencarral-El Pardo, 28046
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Amplatzer Amulet Versus LAmbre Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure: the CALAMBRE Randomized Clinical Trial
Clinical investigation with CE-marked medical devices, multicenter, prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high embolic risk and with at least one high bleeding risk criterion according to the Munich consensus document will be randomized to left atrial appendage closure with either the Amplatzer Amulet™ or the LAmbre™ device. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of both devices regarding successful implantation, effective appendage closure, and clinical outcomes at follow-up.
Read the detailed description
Clinical investigation with CE-marked medical devices, multicenter, prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high embolic risk and with at least one high bleeding risk criterion according to the Munich consensus document will be randomized to left atrial appendage closure with either the Amplatzer Amulet™ or the LAmbre™ device. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of both devices regarding successful implantation, effective appendage closure, and clinical outcomes at follow-up.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Patients implanted with Amplatzer Amulet™, Patients implanted with LAmbre™
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patients implanted with Amplatzer Amulet™Device
Left atrial appendage closure with the Amplatzer Amulet™ device. The procedure will be performed according to standard practice using the manufacturer's instructions for use.
Patients implanted with LAmbre™Device
Left atrial appendage closure with the LAmbre™ device. The procedure will be performed according to standard practice using the manufacturer's instructions for use.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Amplatzer Amulet™left atrial appendage occluder | Other | Not described Receives: Device: Patients implanted with Amplatzer Amulet™ |
| LAmbre™left atrial appendage occluder | Other | Not described Receives: Device: Patients implanted with LAmbre™ |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
EFFICACY: Device success
Percentage Device success defined as: Successful deployment and stable implantation of the assigned device within the left atrial appendage during the index procedure and no crossover to the alternative device and effective closure of the appendage with a residual leak ≤5 mm as assessed by TEE(Transesophageal Echocardiography) or CCTA (Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography) at 90 days.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
SAFETY: Clinical success
Percentage of Device success plus absence of all-cause mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, or procedure-related complications at 90 days.
Measured: 3 months
SAFETY: Procedure-related complications
Percentage of Composite of death, stroke, systemic or pulmonary embolism, air embolism, any bleeding, pericardial effusion, vascular access complication, device-related complication, or AKI (Acute Kidney Injury) within 7 days (or later if related to the procedure).
Measured: 7 days
EFFICACY: Residual leak
Percentage of residual leak >5 mm as assessed by TEE or CCTA (core lab evaluation).
Measured: 3 months
EFFICACY: Residual leak
Percentage of residual leak >5 mm as assessed by TEE or CCTA (core lab evaluation).
Measured: 12 months
SAFETY:Device-related thrombus (DRT)
Percentage of Homogeneous mass (TEE) or hypoattenuated thickening (CCTA) on the atrial surface of the device, adjudicated by independent imaging experts.
Measured: 3 months
SAFETY: MACE
Percentage of Composite of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolism, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and bleeding (classified by BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium)).
Measured: 3 months
SAFETY: MACE
Percentage of Composite of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolism, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and bleeding (classified by BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium)).
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Dec 2025
- Study start5 May 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación EPIC
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07260474
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EPIC48-CALAMBRE
- Acronym
- CALAMBRE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Landmesser U, Skurk C, Tzikas A, Falk V, Reddy VY, Windecker S. Left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: current status and perspectives. Eur Heart J. 2024 Aug 21;45(32):2914-2932. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae398.
PubMed 39027946Lakkireddy D, Ellis CR, Thaler D, Swarup V, Gambhir A, Hermiller J, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Worthley S, Nair D, Schmidt B, Horton R, Gupta N, Anderson JA, Zhao H, Alkhouli M, Windecker S. 5-Year Results From the AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Mar 25;85(11):1141-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.10.101. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
PubMed 39570242Alkhouli M, Freeman JV, Ellis CR, Shah AP, Gada H, Coylewright M, Lo M, Makkar A, Agarwal H, Lakkireddy D. First Experience With Amulet in the United States: Early Insights From EMERGE LAA Postapproval Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan 19:S1936-8798(23)01553-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.11.027. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 38310499Bangash AB, Li Y, Huang W, Zhong J, Zheng H, Zhang D, Zeng A, Wang R, Zhao W, Wang M, Zhao Y, Yu L, Liu Q, Jiang R, Jiang C, Zhang J. Left atrial appendage occlusion using the LAmbre device in atrial fibrillation patients with a history of ischemic stroke: 1-Year outcomes from a multicenter study in China. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1478-1483. doi: 10.1111/pace.14866. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
PubMed 37943004Samaras A, Papazoglou AS, Balomenakis C, Bekiaridou A, Moysidis DV, Patsiou V, Orfanidis A, Giannakoulas G, Kassimis G, Fragakis N, Saw J, Landmesser U, Alkhouli MA, Tzikas A. Residual leaks following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and outcomes: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2024 Jan 14;45(3):214-229. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad828.
PubMed 38088437
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Amplatzer Amulet Versus LAmbre Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure: the CALAMBRE Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07260474
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CALAMBRE / EPIC48-CALAMBRE
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación EPICUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Clinical investigation with CE-marked medical devices, multicenter, prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high embolic risk and with at least one high bleeding risk criterion according to the Munich consensus document will be randomized to left atrial appendage closure with either the Amplatzer Amulet™ or the LAmbre™ device. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of both devices regarding successful implantation, effective appendage closure, and clinical outcomes at follow-up.
Detailed description
Clinical investigation with CE-marked medical devices, multicenter, prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high embolic risk and with at least one high bleeding risk criterion according to the Munich consensus document will be randomized to left atrial appendage closure with either the Amplatzer Amulet™ or the LAmbre™ device. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of both devices regarding successful implantation, effective appendage closure, and clinical outcomes at follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Amplatzer Amulet™left atrial appendage occluder | Other | Device: Patients implanted with Amplatzer Amulet™ |
| LAmbre™left atrial appendage occluder | Other | Device: Patients implanted with LAmbre™ |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- (MUST MEET ALL INCLUSION CRITERIA)
- Patient with aged ≥18 years AND;
- Patient have non-valvular atrial (NVAF) with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, and presented at least one high-bleeding-risk criterion according to the Munich consensus document AND;
- Patient are required to undergo preprocedural TEE / CCTA to confirm the absence of LAA thrombus and to ensure that LAA anatomy is suitable for closure with either device.
- Patient who has been informed of the characteristics of the study and has provided written informed consent..
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- (MUST NOT MEET ANY EXCLUSION CRITERIA)
- Patient life expectancy <1 year (terminal illness).
- Patient with requirement for oral anticoagulation therapy for any indication other than non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
- Patient with prior surgical ligation or obliteration of the left atrial appendage.
- Patient with history of allergic reaction or intolerance to any material used in the study devices or to any of the antithrombotic agents required post-procedure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patients implanted with Amplatzer Amulet™Left atrial appendage closure with the Amplatzer Amulet™ device. The procedure will be performed according to standard practice using the manufacturer's instructions for use. | Device | Amplatzer Amulet™left atrial appendage occluder |
| Patients implanted with LAmbre™Left atrial appendage closure with the LAmbre™ device. The procedure will be performed according to standard practice using the manufacturer's instructions for use. | Device | LAmbre™left atrial appendage occluder |
Primary outcome
EFFICACY: Device success
Time frame: 3 months
Percentage Device success defined as: Successful deployment and stable implantation of the assigned device within the left atrial appendage during the index procedure and no crossover to the alternative device and effective closure of the appendage with a residual leak ≤5 mm as assessed by TEE(Transesophageal Echocardiography) or CCTA (Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography) at 90 days.
7 secondary outcomes
SAFETY: Clinical success
Time frame: 3 months
SAFETY: Procedure-related complications
Time frame: 7 days
EFFICACY: Residual leak
Time frame: 3 months
EFFICACY: Residual leak
Time frame: 12 months
SAFETY:Device-related thrombus (DRT)
Time frame: 3 months
SAFETY: MACE
Time frame: 3 months
SAFETY: MACE
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 39027946Landmesser U, Skurk C, Tzikas A, Falk V, Reddy VY, Windecker S. Left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: current status and perspectives. Eur Heart J. 2024 Aug 21;45(32):2914-2932. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae398.
- Background: PubMed 39570242Lakkireddy D, Ellis CR, Thaler D, Swarup V, Gambhir A, Hermiller J, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Worthley S, Nair D, Schmidt B, Horton R, Gupta N, Anderson JA, Zhao H, Alkhouli M, Windecker S. 5-Year Results From the AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Mar 25;85(11):1141-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.10.101. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
- Background: PubMed 38310499Alkhouli M, Freeman JV, Ellis CR, Shah AP, Gada H, Coylewright M, Lo M, Makkar A, Agarwal H, Lakkireddy D. First Experience With Amulet in the United States: Early Insights From EMERGE LAA Postapproval Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan 19:S1936-8798(23)01553-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.11.027. Online ahead of print.
- Background: PubMed 37943004Bangash AB, Li Y, Huang W, Zhong J, Zheng H, Zhang D, Zeng A, Wang R, Zhao W, Wang M, Zhao Y, Yu L, Liu Q, Jiang R, Jiang C, Zhang J. Left atrial appendage occlusion using the LAmbre device in atrial fibrillation patients with a history of ischemic stroke: 1-Year outcomes from a multicenter study in China. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1478-1483. doi: 10.1111/pace.14866. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 38088437Samaras A, Papazoglou AS, Balomenakis C, Bekiaridou A, Moysidis DV, Patsiou V, Orfanidis A, Giannakoulas G, Kassimis G, Fragakis N, Saw J, Landmesser U, Alkhouli MA, Tzikas A. Residual leaks following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and outcomes: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2024 Jan 14;45(3):214-229. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad828.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Patients implanted with Amplatzer Amulet™ and Patients implanted with LAmbre™ in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Fundación EPIC at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact BORJA Rivero-Santana, MD, PhD (0034696170677, borja.riversa@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
EFFICACY: Device success (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07260474, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026.