AzTrials
AzTrials

Myeloid MalignancyCHORDSNCT07263074

Considering alloHCT: Opportunities for Patient Reflection During Decision-Making Via Digital Stories

A study testing CHORDS in people with Myeloid Malignancy, run by University of Rochester at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a two-arm pilot randomized trial that assesses the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a digital story and values clarification intervention (Considering alloHCT: Opportunities for Patient Reflection During Decision-Making via Digital Stories [CHORDS]) compared to usual care among patients with myeloid… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Myeloid Malignancy
What is being tested?
CHORDS
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Jan 2026to 30 Jun 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >21 years old
  • Diagnosis of myeloid cancer (e.g. AML, MDS, myelofibrosis, CML, or MDS/MPN)
  • Being considered for alloHCT
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Able to speak English. The reason for this is because the digital stories have been created in the English language and their multimedia form cannot easily be translated.
  • Exclusion criteria 1) Patients with psychiatric or cognitive conditions which the hematologist believes prohibits informed consent or compliance with study procedures
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Caregivers
  • Age >18 years old
  • Selected by the patient when asked if there is a "family member, partner, friend or caregiver with whom you discuss or who can be helpful in health-related matters."
  • Caregiver may be paid/professional or informal caregiver
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Able to speak English
  • 1) Hematologists of the patients who agree to enroll on the study who are part of WCI.

Who cannot join

  • 1) None
  • Hematologists
  • 1) None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Rochester

    Rochester, New York, 14642

    Rachel Rodenbach, 585-275-5830, rachel_rodenbach@urmc.rochester.edu

    Rachel Rodenbach

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of a Digital Story Intervention to Facilitate Decision-Making in Patients With Myeloid Cancers Considering Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

This is a two-arm pilot randomized trial that assesses the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a digital story and values clarification intervention (Considering alloHCT: Opportunities for Patient Reflection During Decision-Making via Digital Stories [CHORDS]) compared to usual care among patients with myeloid cancers considering allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT).

Read the detailed description

Our proposed intervention is Considering alloHCT: Opportunities for Patient Reflection During Decision-Making via Digital Stories (CHORDS), which includes: 1) real-life digital stories of individuals with similar experiences who previously underwent consultation for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and their caregivers and 2) explicit values clarification exercises designed to help patients reflect on their emotions and clarify what matters to them, including a) an interactive workbook, and b) best-worst scaling. Together, they help patients reflect on their values and prioritize their own needs and goals, enhance emotional awareness, and gain experiential knowledge from peers to better understand the real-life implications of treatment risks and benefits.

Being tested
CHORDS

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CHORDSOther

    The CHORDS intervention consists of 1) digital stories created by individuals who previously underwent consultation for alloHCT and 2) explicit values clarification exercises designed to help patients reflect on their emotions and clarify what matters to them, including a) an interactive workbook, and b) best-worst scaling (BWS).

Study groups in NCT07263074
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention (CHORDS)ExperimentalThe CHORDS intervention consists of 1) digital stories created by individuals who previously underwent consultation for alloHCT and 2) explicit values clarification exercises designed to help patients reflect on their emotions and clarify what matters to them, including a) an interactive workbook, and b) best-worst scaling (BWS).
Receives: Other: CHORDS
Usual CareNo interventionPatients randomized to the usual care arm will receive standard of care. Patients (and their caregivers when available) randomized to usual care will not participate in CHORDS. Patients and caregivers will complete baseline (T1) and post-alloHCT office visit (T3, T4, T5) assessments.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Retained (Feasibility - Retention Rate)

    Feasibility will be assessed based on the percentage of enrolled participants who complete both the intervention and post-intervention secondary outcome assessments. The number of participants who complete all study procedures will be divided by the total number enrolled to calculate the retention rate. Higher percentages indicate greater feasibility.

    Measured: From enrollment (Day -30 to Day 0) to 2 weeks post-alloHCT office visit (Day 9-19)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Mean Change in Decisional Engagement Scale Score

    Engagement in decision making will be assessed using the Decisional Engagement Scale, a self-reported measure evaluating patient involvement and perceived shared decision making. A single score will be derived according to scale instructions. Higher scores indicate greater engagement in decision making. There are 10 items in the scale, with each items score ranging from 0 to 10 (range 0-100 for the entire scale).

    Measured: Baseline (Day -30 to Day 0) to 2 weeks post-alloHCT office visit (Day 9-19)

  2. Mean Change in Decisional Conflict Scale Score

    Decisional conflict will be assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale, a validated self-report instrument that measures personal uncertainty in making health-related decisions. The total score is derived by averaging item responses according to the scoring manual (range 0-100). Higher scores indicate greater decisional conflict (worse outcome), while lower scores indicate less conflict (improvement).

    Measured: Baseline (Day -30 to Day 0) to 2 weeks post-alloHCT office visit (Day 9-19)

  3. Mean Change in Distress Thermometer Score

    Psychological distress will be measured using the NCCN Distress Thermometer, a single-item visual analog scale ranging from 0 ("no distress") to 10 ("extreme distress"). Higher scores indicate greater distress.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -30 to Day 0) to 2 weeks post-alloHCT office visit (Day 9-19)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Dec 2025
  2. Study start15 Jan 2026
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Assess the feasibility of CHORDS among patients with myeloid cancers referred for alloHCT.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07263074
Sponsor's protocol ID
UOCPC25049
Acronym
CHORDS
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
17 Nov 2025
Last updated
6 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CHORDS in people with Myeloid Malignancy, run by University of Rochester at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rachel Rodenbach, MD, MS (585-275-5830, rachel_rodenbach@urmc.rochester.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Retained (Feasibility - Retention Rate) (time frame: From enrollment (Day -30 to Day 0) to 2 weeks post-alloHCT office visit (Day 9-19)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in