Colo-rectal CancerDA-CRCNCT07269028
Personalised and Gamification-based Decision Aid (DA): a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study About Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening
A study testing Gamified Mobile App in people with Colo-rectal Cancer, run by University of Pavia at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately 903,000 deaths annually. While population-based screening programmes have demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing early detection and reducing mortality, participation rates remain suboptimal. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 51 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Colo-rectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Gamified Mobile App
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 248 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 15 May 2023to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 51 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Stable residence within one of the municipalities served by Brescia LHA;
- Ownership of a smartphone (Android or iOS);
- Proficiency in the Italian language;
- Provision of informed consent within the PREVenGO app.
Who cannot join
- Failure to provide informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Agenzia per la Tutela della Salute (ATS) di Brescia
Brescia, Brescia, 25123
About this study
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately 903,000 deaths annually. While population-based screening programmes have demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing early detection and reducing mortality, participation rates remain suboptimal. Adherence is influenced by cognitive, psychological, and socioeconomic barriers.
This study aimed to assess the impact of a digital decision aid (DA), incorporating personalisation and gamification elements, on informed decision-making and adherence to CRC screening.
Read more
DA-CRC is a two-arm randomised controlled pilot trial. Individuals born in 1973-1974 living in the area served by the local health authority of Brescia (Northern Italy) who were invited for the first time to participate in the CRC screening programme, were eligible. An invitation letter, including instructions to download the PREVenGO app, was mailed to potential participants.
Upon download, participants were randomised to either the intervention or control arm. The intervention app included questionnaires on family history, knowledge of primary and secondary prevention, and locus of control (LoC), as well as gamification and reward features. The control app provided static educational content only. Notifications prompted users to complete follow-up assessments at 3 months (T1) and 6 months (T2), receive prevention information, and attend screening.
- Conditions
- Colo-rectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Gamified Mobile App
- Keywords
- Colo-rectal cancer, Prevention, eHealth, Gamification
- Medical subject headings
- Colonic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gamified Mobile AppOther
The intervention app included questionnaires on family history, knowledge of primary and secondary prevention, and locus of control (LoC), as well as gamification and reward features.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Gamified Mobile App |
| Control | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Awareness
Informed choice, using the three-dimensional model by Marteau, including:
Knowledge (minimum score 7/13); Attitude (score >24); Behavioural intention (actual participation).
Measured: From enrollment to 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Uptake of CRC screening
ATS Brescia provided pseudonymised data on actual FOBT participation.
Measured: From enrollment to 31st December 2024
Knowledge of primary prevention and healthy behaviours,
Assessment through 13 multiple-choice questions. Participants were classified based on correct responses as:
Low knowledge (0-5 correct answers); Moderate knowledge (6-8); High knowledge (9-13);
Measured: From enrollment to 6 months
Decisional conflict, user satisfaction, and app acceptability
Evaluation through items related to the decision-making process and perceived usefulness of the decision aid
Measured: From enrollment to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2025
- Study start15 May 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024
- Study completion31 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colo-rectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized Clinical Trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 248 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pavia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agenzia di Tutela della Salute (ATS) di Brescia
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Cristina Montomoli, University of Pavia
- Investigators
- Cristina Montomoli, Principal investigator, University of Pavia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07269028
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Protocol Number: NP5686
- Acronym
- DA-CRC
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 25 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 8 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Hersch J, Barratt A, Jansen J, Irwig L, McGeechan K, Jacklyn G, Thornton H, Dhillon H, Houssami N, McCaffery K. Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1642-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60123-4. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
PubMed 25701273Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R. Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. Health Educ Monogr. 1978 Spring;6(2):160-70. doi: 10.1177/109019817800600107.
PubMed 689890Duan Y, Shang B, Liang W, Du G, Yang M, Rhodes RE. Effects of eHealth-Based Multiple Health Behavior Change Interventions on Physical Activity, Healthy Diet, and Weight in People With Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 22;23(2):e23786. doi: 10.2196/23786.
PubMed 33616534Sequi-Dominguez I, Alvarez-Bueno C, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Fernandez-Rodriguez R, Del Saz Lara A, Cavero-Redondo I. Effectiveness of Mobile Health Interventions Promoting Physical Activity and Lifestyle Interventions to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk Among Individuals With Metabolic Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 31;22(8):e17790. doi: 10.2196/17790.
PubMed 32865503Mohamad Marzuki MF, Yaacob NA, Bin Yaacob NM, Abu Hassan MR, Ahmad SB. Usable Mobile App for Community Education on Colorectal Cancer: Development Process and Usability Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Apr 16;6(2):e12103. doi: 10.2196/12103.
PubMed 30990454Hammedi, W., Leclerq, T. & Van Riel, A. C. R. The use of gamification mechanics to increase employee and user engagement in participative healthcare services: A study of two cases. J. Serv. Manag. 28, 640-661 (2017).
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Prentice-Hall, Inc
Roberto A, Colombo C, Candiani G, Satolli R, Giordano L, Jaramillo L, Castagno R, Mantellini P, Falini P, Carnesciali E, Valenza M, Costa L, Campari C, Caroli S, Faggiano RC, Orione L, Belmessieri B, Marchio V, Deandrea S, Silvestri A, Luciano D, Paci E, Mosconi P. A dynamic web-based decision aid to improve informed choice in organised breast cancer screening. A pragmatic randomised trial in Italy. Br J Cancer. 2020 Sep;123(5):714-721. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0935-2. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
PubMed 32546834Gabel P, Larsen MB, Edwards A, Kirkegaard P, Andersen B. Effectiveness of a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening on components of informed choice according to educational attainment: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0241703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241703. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33170877Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
PubMed 28402085Elwyn G, Frosch D, Rollnick S. Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions. Implement Sci. 2009 Nov 18;4:75. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-75.
PubMed 19922647O'Connor AM, Legare F, Stacey D. Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):736-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.736.
PubMed 14512487Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PubMed 33538338Celebrin M, Filosa A, Anelli M, Brucchi F, La Torraca Vittori P, Incremona A, Rogledi M, Summer A, Vizzardi M, Ghidini P, Bregoli M, Hoxha E, Marazza G, Gorini A, Montomoli C. A Personalised and Gamified Digital Decision Aid for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Study. Cancer Med. 2026 Jun;15(6):e71991. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71991.
PubMed 42216438
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Personalised and Gamification-based Decision Aid (DA): a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study About Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07269028
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DA-CRC / Protocol Number: NP5686
- Conditions
- Colo-rectal Cancer
- Keywords
- Colo-rectal cancer, Prevention, eHealth, Gamification
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 248 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PaviaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agenzia di Tutela della Salute (ATS) di Brescia
- Study start
- 15 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately 903,000 deaths annually. While population-based screening programmes have demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing early detection and reducing mortality, participation rates remain suboptimal. Adherence is influenced by cognitive, psychological, and socioeconomic barriers.
This study aimed to assess the impact of a digital decision aid (DA), incorporating personalisation and gamification elements, on informed decision-making and adherence to CRC screening.
DA-CRC is a two-arm randomised controlled pilot trial. Individuals born in 1973-1974 living in the area served by the local health authority of Brescia (Northern Italy) who were invited for the first time to participate in the CRC screening programme, were eligible. An invitation letter, including instructions to download the PREVenGO app, was mailed to potential participants.
Upon download, participants were randomised to either the intervention or control arm. The intervention app included questionnaires on family history, knowledge of primary and secondary prevention, and locus of control (LoC), as well as gamification and reward features. The control app provided static educational content only. Notifications prompted users to complete follow-up assessments at 3 months (T1) and 6 months (T2), receive prevention information, and attend screening.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized Clinical Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Other: Gamified Mobile App |
| Control | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 51 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Stable residence within one of the municipalities served by Brescia LHA;
- Ownership of a smartphone (Android or iOS);
- Proficiency in the Italian language;
- Provision of informed consent within the PREVenGO app.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Failure to provide informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gamified Mobile AppThe intervention app included questionnaires on family history, knowledge of primary and secondary prevention, and locus of control (LoC), as well as gamification and reward features. | Other | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Awareness
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months
Informed choice, using the three-dimensional model by Marteau, including: Knowledge (minimum score 7/13); Attitude (score >24); Behavioural intention (actual participation).
3 secondary outcomes
Uptake of CRC screening
Time frame: From enrollment to 31st December 2024
Knowledge of primary prevention and healthy behaviours,
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months
Decisional conflict, user satisfaction, and app acceptability
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Dec 2025.
- Background: PubMed 25701273Hersch J, Barratt A, Jansen J, Irwig L, McGeechan K, Jacklyn G, Thornton H, Dhillon H, Houssami N, McCaffery K. Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1642-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60123-4. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 689890Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R. Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. Health Educ Monogr. 1978 Spring;6(2):160-70. doi: 10.1177/109019817800600107.
- Background: PubMed 33616534Duan Y, Shang B, Liang W, Du G, Yang M, Rhodes RE. Effects of eHealth-Based Multiple Health Behavior Change Interventions on Physical Activity, Healthy Diet, and Weight in People With Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 22;23(2):e23786. doi: 10.2196/23786.
- Background: PubMed 32865503Sequi-Dominguez I, Alvarez-Bueno C, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Fernandez-Rodriguez R, Del Saz Lara A, Cavero-Redondo I. Effectiveness of Mobile Health Interventions Promoting Physical Activity and Lifestyle Interventions to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk Among Individuals With Metabolic Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 31;22(8):e17790. doi: 10.2196/17790.
- Background: PubMed 30990454Mohamad Marzuki MF, Yaacob NA, Bin Yaacob NM, Abu Hassan MR, Ahmad SB. Usable Mobile App for Community Education on Colorectal Cancer: Development Process and Usability Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Apr 16;6(2):e12103. doi: 10.2196/12103.
- BackgroundHammedi, W., Leclerq, T. & Van Riel, A. C. R. The use of gamification mechanics to increase employee and user engagement in participative healthcare services: A study of two cases. J. Serv. Manag. 28, 640-661 (2017).
- BackgroundRotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Prentice-Hall, Inc
- Background: PubMed 32546834Roberto A, Colombo C, Candiani G, Satolli R, Giordano L, Jaramillo L, Castagno R, Mantellini P, Falini P, Carnesciali E, Valenza M, Costa L, Campari C, Caroli S, Faggiano RC, Orione L, Belmessieri B, Marchio V, Deandrea S, Silvestri A, Luciano D, Paci E, Mosconi P. A dynamic web-based decision aid to improve informed choice in organised breast cancer screening. A pragmatic randomised trial in Italy. Br J Cancer. 2020 Sep;123(5):714-721. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0935-2. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 33170877Gabel P, Larsen MB, Edwards A, Kirkegaard P, Andersen B. Effectiveness of a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening on components of informed choice according to educational attainment: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0241703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241703. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 28402085Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
- Background: PubMed 19922647Elwyn G, Frosch D, Rollnick S. Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions. Implement Sci. 2009 Nov 18;4:75. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-75.
- Background: PubMed 14512487O'Connor AM, Legare F, Stacey D. Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):736-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.736.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Colo-rectal Cancer
Recruiting
MRD Monitoring in Colorectal Cancer Using ctDNA
Colorectal Neoplasms, Colorectal Cancer (Diagnosis)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Master Protocol for the Study of Rilogrotug for the Treatment of Weight Loss and Anorexia in Patients With Cancer Cachexia and mCRC or mNSCLC
Cachexia; Cancer, Cachexia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study to Test the Safety and Tolerability of PF-07220060 in Participants With Advance Solid Tumors
Liposarcoma, Prostate Cancer
Recruiting
Rectus Sheath Catheters Following Midline Laparotomy
Acute Abdomen, Ileus
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Long-Term Extension Study for Participants Previously Enrolled in an Exelixis-Sponsored Study
Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cristina Montomoli principal investigator
University of Pavia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Gamified Mobile App in people with Colo-rectal Cancer, run by University of Pavia at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Awareness (time frame: From enrollment to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07269028, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2025.