AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)NCT07271550

NAFF Arabic Validation Study

An observational study of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Diabetic Foot Disease, run by Faculty of Medicine, Sousse at 1 site in Tunisia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to evaluate a new Arabic version of the NAFF questionnaire, which measures foot care behaviors in adults with type 2 diabetes. Participants are adults with type 2 diabetes who will complete the questionnaire online. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 26 to 65 years
How many people
255 participants
Where
1 siteTunisia
Study dates
1 Jun 2021to 30 Nov 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 26 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with type 2 diabetes.

Who may be able to join

  • Adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Age 26-65 years
  • Ability to read and understand Arabic
  • Receiving regular follow-up care at the endocrinology outpatient clinic

Who cannot join

  • Cognitive impairments affecting comprehension or self-care activities
  • Physical disabilities hindering self-care activities
  • Presence of active foot ulcers at time of enrollment
  • Bilateral lower-limb amputations

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Tunisia1 site
  • Farhat Hached University Hospital, Endocrinology Department

    Sousse, Sousse Governorate, 4000

Other trials in Tunisia

About this study

Official title: Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare (NAFF) Questionnaire Among Arabic-speaking Adults With Diabetes in Tunisia

This study aims to evaluate a new Arabic version of the NAFF questionnaire, which measures foot care behaviors in adults with type 2 diabetes. Participants are adults with type 2 diabetes who will complete the questionnaire online. The study will assess how reliable and valid the Arabic version is, helping healthcare providers identify risky foot care behaviors and improve patient education.

Read the detailed description

This study is a cross-sectional validation of the NAFF questionnaire translated into Arabic. Adult patients with type 2 diabetes will be recruited from endocrinology outpatient clinic in Sousse. Participants will complete the Arabic NAFF online. Primary outcomes include assessment of reliability (internal consistency, test-retest) and validity (construct and criterion validity). Secondary outcomes include the relationship between foot care behaviors and demographic or clinical factors. All participants will provide informed consent electronically. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Sousse. Data will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Arabic NAFF..

Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Behavior

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Translation and adaptation

    Translation, cultural adaptation, and assessment of content validity through expert panel evaluation using a 4-point relevance scale. Content validity index calculated by dividing items rated 3-4 by total items (n=29). Values ≥0.80 considered acceptable.

    Measured: 01/06/ 2021-31/07/ 2021 (2 months)

  2. Descriptive data

    Participants were asked to complete the NAFF-A questionnaire in the waiting room before clinical consultation. Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records in collaboration with attending physicians, including gender, age, educational level, residence, diabetes duration, HbA1c levels, and history of ulceration or amputation.

    Measured: 01/08/2021 to 28/11/2021 (4 months)

  3. Test-Retest Reliability of NAFF-A (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient)

    Assessment of temporal stability of the NAFF-A using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between test and retest administrations. Values ≥0.70 indicate good reliability, with higher values indicating better temporal stability.

    Measured: Test-retest interval of 10-14 days between initial assessment and follow-up assessment.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Internal consistency

    Assessment of internal consistency reliability of the Arabic version of the Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Acceptable range is 0.70-0.95, with higher values indicating better internal consistency.

    Measured: At the end of data collection

  2. Criterion Validity - Correlation with Educational Level

    Spearman's correlation coefficient between NAFF-A total scores and participant educational level (primary, secondary, university). Positive correlation expected based on literature showing higher education associated with better self-care behaviors.

    Measured: At the end of data collection

  3. Criterion Validity - Correlation with HbA1c Levels

    Spearman's correlation coefficient between NAFF-A total scores and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Negative correlation expected as better foot care behaviors should be associated with better glycemic control.

    Measured: At the end of data collection

  4. Criterion Validity - Correlation with Ulceration Risk Stratification

    Spearman's correlation coefficient between NAFF-A total scores and ulceration risk grades (0-3 scale based on IWGDF guidelines). Negative correlation expected as better foot care behaviors should be associated with lower ulceration risk.

    Measured: At the end of data collection

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Dec 2025
  2. Study start1 Jun 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2021
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
255 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07271550
Sponsor's protocol ID
NAFF-A
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
29 Aug 2025
Last updated
9 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared publicly due to ethical constraints and participant privacy protections as per the Ethics Committee approval (CEFMS 81/2021) and Tunisian data protection regulations. Aggregate data and statistical results are available through the published manuscript. Researchers interested in collaboration may contact the principal investigator to discuss potential data sharing arrangements that comply with ethical and regulatory requirements.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Diabetic Foot Disease, run by Faculty of Medicine, Sousse at 1 site in Tunisia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Tunisia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Translation and adaptation (time frame: 01/06/ 2021-31/07/ 2021 (2 months)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in