AzTrials
AzTrials

StudentNCT07274839

Interactive Ren'Py Learning in Physiotherapy Education

A study testing Digital Instructional Material and Conventional Instructional Material in people with Student, run by Ahmet Koçyiğit at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Advances in health professions education increasingly emphasize the use of digital technologies to enhance student engagement and support diverse learning needs. In physiotherapy training, particularly in technically complex subjects like electrotherapy, conventional instruction may fall short in fostering active… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Student
What is being tested?
Digital Instructional Material and Conventional Instructional Material
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
7 Oct 2024to 27 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Voluntary participation
  • Cumulative GPA above 1.80
  • Access to a device compatible with at least one of the following operating systems or platforms: Linux x86_64/Arm, Windows 7 or later, or Mac OS X 10.10 or later

Who cannot join

  • History of course failure due to absenteeism

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Facultu of Health Sciences

    Zonguldak, Kozlu, 67000

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Digitalization Through the Use of Ren'Py-Based Interactive Learning Experiences in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Education: A Randomised, Controlled, Single-Blind Study

Advances in health professions education increasingly emphasize the use of digital technologies to enhance student engagement and support diverse learning needs. In physiotherapy training, particularly in technically complex subjects like electrotherapy, conventional instruction may fall short in fostering active learning and knowledge retention. Game-based platforms such as Ren'Py offer an opportunity to integrate interactive, scenario-based learning into the curriculum. This study aimed to assess the impact of Ren'Py-based digital materials on learning outcomes by comparing conventional, digital, and hybrid teaching models in an undergraduate electrotherapy course.

Conditions
Student
Being tested
Digital Instructional Material, Conventional Instructional Material

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Digital Instructional MaterialOther

    A lesson package containing a story in an interactive visual novel format created using Ren'Py. This package was designed by the researchers to include the theoretical and practical contents of the medium frequency currents unit, again using the content of the CK4Stim project.

  • Conventional Instructional MaterialOther

    The course content was standardized using materials from the "CK4Stim-Clinical Key for Electrical Stimulation in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation" project (CK4Stim, Access Date: October 2024). The CK4Stim project, supported by the European Union and involving multiple projects partners, aims to develop a common language for the use of electrical stimulation in physiotherapy and rehabilitation education in accordance with European standards.

Study groups in NCT07274839
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional EducationActive comparatorThe course content was standardized using materials from the "CK4Stim-Clinical Key for Electrical Stimulation in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation" project (CK4Stim, Access Date: October 2024). The CK4Stim project, supported by the European Union and involving multiple projects partners, aims to develop a common language for the use of electrical stimulation in physiotherapy and rehabilitation education in accordance with European standards.
Receives: Other: Conventional Instructional Material
Digital EducationExperimentalA lesson package containing a story in an interactive visual novel format created using Ren'Py. This package was designed by the researchers to include the theoretical and practical contents of the medium frequency currents unit, again using the content of the CK4Stım project.
Receives: Other: Digital Instructional Material
Conventional and Digital EducationOtherA group that received both educational models for comparison.
Receives: Other: Digital Instructional Material; Other: Conventional Instructional Material

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Theoretical Knowledge Examination Score

    A researcher-developed 20-item multiple-choice theoretical exam assessing students' knowledge of electrotherapy principles.

    Full Scale Name: Theoretical Knowledge Examination (20-item multiple-choice test) Score Range: 0 to 100 points Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better theoretical knowledge.

    Measured: Measured at 1-week follow-up after completion of the educational intervention.

  2. Practical Skills Examination Score

    A 16-item practical performance assessment evaluated by an independent three-member exam jury. Each item was rated as "Sufficient", "Partial", or "Insufficient", and final scores were calculated as the arithmetic mean of the three jury evaluations, scaled to a 0-100 range.

    Full Scale Name: Practical Skills Performance Assessment (16-item jury-rated evaluation) Score Range: 0 to 100 points Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better practical performance.

    Measured: Measured at 1-week follow-up after completion of the educational intervention.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Cognitive Load Rating Score

    Subjective cognitive load was assessed using the nine-point Cognitive Load Rating Scale developed by Paas and Van Merriënboer (1993). Participants rated the level of mental effort experienced during the learning activity on a nine-point Likert-type scale.

    Full Scale Name: Paas \& Van Merriënboer Cognitive Load Rating Scale (9-point Likert scale) Score Range: 1 (Very Low) to 9 (Very High) Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived cognitive load.

    Measured: Measured at 1-week follow-up after completion of the educational intervention.

  2. Instructional Materials Motivation Scale Score

    Motivation toward the instructional materials was assessed using the 33-item Instructional Materials Motivation Scale (IMMS) developed by Keller. Participants rated each item on a five-point Likert scale evaluating attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction related to the instructional materials.

    Full Scale Name: Instructional Materials Motivation Scale (IMMS), 33-item Likert scale Score Range: 33 (minimum) to 165 (maximum) Interpretation: Higher scores indicate higher motivation toward the instructional materials.

    Measured: Measured at 1-week follow-up after completion of the educational intervention.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Dec 2025
  2. Study start7 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion13 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion27 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups-Conventional Education Group (CEG), Digital Education Group (DEG), or Conventional and Digital Education Group (CaDEG)-using a random sequence generated via random.org
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07274839
Sponsor's protocol ID
03.07.2024/468499
Other IDs
https://osf.io/38ntm
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
19 Nov 2025
Last updated
10 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Anonymized data and software repositories will be shared on OSF.

Publications

  • Kocyigit A, Cavlak U. Digitalization through the use of Ren'Py-Based interactive learning experiences in physiotherapy and rehabilitation education: a randomised, controlled, single-blind study. BMC Med Educ. 2025 Dec 22;26(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-08474-z.

    PubMed 41430217

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Digital Instructional Material and Conventional Instructional Material in people with Student, run by Ahmet Koçyiğit at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Theoretical Knowledge Examination Score (time frame: Measured at 1-week follow-up after completion of the educational intervention.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07274839, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in