AzTrials
AzTrials

Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis (ISR)NCT07277218

Drug-coated Balloons Versus Drug-eluting Stents for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

An observational study of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis (ISR), run by Chunshui He at 10 sites in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains an important cause of recurrent symptoms and repeat revascularization after lower-extremity endovascular treatment. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) avoid an additional permanent metallic layer, whereas drug-eluting stents provide mechanical scaffolding with local… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Drug-Coated Balloon-First Strategy and Eluvia Drug-Eluting Stent-First Strategy
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
600 participants
Where
10 sitesChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2027to 31 Dec 2030
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults with symptomatic Rutherford category 2-5 femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis undergoing clinically indicated endovascular treatment at participating tertiary vascular centers in China. Potentially eligible patients will be screened consecutively. Treatment is selected by the treating physician as part of routine clinical care and is not assigned by the research protocol. The primary comparative cohort includes patients for whom both DCB-first and Eluvia-first strategies remain clinically feasible after lesion preparation.

Who may be able to join

  • Age >18 years. Willing and able to provide written informed consent. Rutherford Clinical Category 2-5. Angiographically confirmed ≥50% stenosis or occlusion within a previously implanted superficial femoral or proximal popliteal artery stent more than 30 days after implantation.
  • The target lesion is within the previously stented segment or extends no more than 3 cm proximally or distally beyond the prior stent.
  • Total target lesion length ≤30 cm. At least one patent below-the-knee runoff vessel. Willing and able to complete follow-up through 24 months. After lesion preparation, both the DCB-first and Eluvia-first strategies remain clinically feasible.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy or lactation. Rutherford Clinical Category 0 or 6. Target lesion stenosis <50%. Target lesion length >30 cm. Severe calcification precluding endovascular treatment. Acute limb ischemia or acute thrombosis of the target limb. Untreated hemodynamically significant aorto-iliac inflow disease. Cerebrovascular accident within 60 days before the index procedure. Contraindication to required antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent. Life expectancy <2 years or another factor making completion of follow-up unlikely.
  • Persistent post-preparation anatomy that mandates one treatment strategy and therefore eliminates clinical equipoise.

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

chunshui he, MD contact

+86 18981885601

chunshui_he@163.com

10 sites in 1 country

China10 sites
  • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 646000

    junjie chen, 13281985830, chenjunjie1@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn

  • Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 646000

    junjie chen, 13281985830, chenjunjie1@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn

  • Hangzhou First People's Hospital

    Hangzhou, Hangzhou, 646000

    junjie chen, 13281985830, chenjunjie1@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn

  • Qingdao Haici Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University

    Qingdao, Shandong, 646000

    junjie chen, 13281985830, chenjunjie1@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn

  • Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 646000

    junjie chen, 13281985830, chenjunjie1@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn

  • Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 646000

    junjie chen, 13281985830, chenjunjie1@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn

  • Huashan Hospital, Fudan University

    Shanghai, Sichuan, 646000

    junjie chen, 13281985830, chenjunjie1@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn

  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

    Suzhou, Jiangsu, 646000

    junjie chen, 13281985830, chenjunjie1@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn

  • Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

    Wuhan, Hubei, 646000

    junjie chen, +86 13281985830, chenjunjie1@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn

  • Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital of Xiamen University

    Xiamen, Fujian, 646000

    junjie chen, 13281985830, chenjunjie1@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Title: Drug-coated Balloons Versus Drug-eluting Stents for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study (The Defier Study)

Femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains an important cause of recurrent symptoms and repeat revascularization after lower-extremity endovascular treatment. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) avoid an additional permanent metallic layer, whereas drug-eluting stents provide mechanical scaffolding with local antiproliferative drug delivery. Direct prospective comparative-effectiveness evidence in symptomatic femoropopliteal ISR remains limited.

DEFIER is a prospective, multicenter observational comparative-effectiveness cohort study enrolling up to 600 adults with symptomatic Rutherford category 2-5 femoropopliteal ISR. Treatment is selected by the treating physician as part of routine clinical care and is not assigned by the research protocol. After guidewire crossing and lesion preparation, patients for whom both strategies remain clinically feasible enter the primary comparative cohort. The DCB-first strategy uses IN.PACT Admiral or AcoArt Orchid 0.035, with protocol-defined focal bare-metal bailout stenting permitted when clinically required. The Eluvia-first strategy uses the Eluvia drug-eluting vascular stent.

Participants will be followed for 24 months. The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of first clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) through 24 months. Comparative analyses will use a prespecified target-trial framework and propensity-score overlap weighting, with death and major target-limb amputation treated as competing events.

Being tested
Drug-Coated Balloon-First Strategy, Eluvia Drug-Eluting Stent-First Strategy
Keywords
in-stent restenosis ; femoropopliteal artery; drug-coated balloon ; drug-eluting stent; peripheral arterial disease
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Arterial Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Drug-Coated Balloon-First StrategyDevice

    Physician-selected routine-care treatment with either IN.PACT Admiral or AcoArt Orchid 0.035 after lesion preparation. Device size and length are selected according to vessel anatomy and locally approved instructions for use. Protocol-defined focal bare-metal bailout stenting is permitted when clinically required for a suboptimal DCB result.

  • Eluvia Drug-Eluting Stent-First StrategyDevice

    Physician-selected routine-care treatment with the Eluvia Drug-Eluting Vascular Stent System after lesion preparation. Stent diameter and length are selected according to vessel anatomy and locally approved instructions for use.

Study groups in NCT07277218
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DCB-First Strategy CohortParticipants whose treating physician selects a drug-coated balloon-first strategy as part of routine clinical care after lesion preparation and confirmation that both treatment strategies remain clinically feasible. The prespecified DCB platforms are IN.PACT Admiral and AcoArt Orchid 0.035. Protocol-defined focal bare-metal bailout stenting is permitted when clinically necessary. Treatment is not assigned by the research protocol.
Receives: Device: Drug-Coated Balloon-First Strategy
Eluvia-First Strategy CohortParticipants whose treating physician selects an Eluvia-first strategy as part of routine clinical care after lesion preparation and confirmation that both treatment strategies remain clinically feasible. The strategy uses the Eluvia Drug-Eluting Vascular Stent System. Treatment is not assigned by the research protocol.
Receives: Device: Eluvia Drug-Eluting Stent-First Strategy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)

    Clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) is defined as repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization of the target lesion, defined as the treated segment plus 5 mm proximally and distally, for ≥50% restenosis or occlusion accompanied by recurrent or worsening limb symptoms, Rutherford-category deterioration, ABI/TBI decline consistent with hemodynamic worsening, including an ABI decline ≥0.15 from the post-procedure reference when applicable, or failure or worsening of tissue loss in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Events will be independently adjudicated.

    Measured: 24 months post-procedure

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. First Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization Through 12 Months

    Number and percentage of participants experiencing first clinically driven target lesion revascularization within 12 months after time zero, using the same prespecified clinical and anatomical definition and independent adjudication procedures as the 24-month primary outcome.

    Measured: From post-preparation time zero through 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Dec 2025
  2. Study start1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07277218
Sponsor's protocol ID
CZY FY XGWK2
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
30 Nov 2025
Last updated
2 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis (ISR), run by Chunshui He at 10 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact chunshui he, MD (+86 18981885601, chunshui_he@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) (time frame: 24 months post-procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in