BurnoutBalint GroupNCT07278219
Balint Approach Group Intervention
A study testing Balint Approach Group Intervention in people with Burnout and Communication Skills, run by Yuksek Ihtisas University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of a Balint-based group intervention on burnout and communication skills among nurses. Burnout is a common outcome of prolonged exposure to workplace stressors and can weaken nurses' empathy, emotional regulation, and therapeutic communication abilities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Burnout, Communication Skills, Psychosocial Well-being
- What is being tested?
- Balint Approach Group Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 20 Dec 2024to 5 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- having worked as a nurse in the same clinical setting for at least one year
- providing informed consent to participate
Who cannot join
- presence of a communication impairment that could hinder participation (e.g., hearing or speech disorder)
- Discontinuation Criteria:
- Voluntary withdrawal from the study
- Failure to attend at least two sessions
- Incomplete or missing data on the study instruments
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Faculty of Health Sciences
Bilecik
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Balint Approach Group Intervention on Burnout and Communication Skills in Nurses
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of a Balint-based group intervention on burnout and communication skills among nurses. Burnout is a common outcome of prolonged exposure to workplace stressors and can weaken nurses' empathy, emotional regulation, and therapeutic communication abilities. Balint groups are reflective, structured sessions that focus on understanding the emotional and relational aspects of challenging patient-nurse interactions. These groups provide a safe environment for nurses to explore their thoughts and feelings, enhance self-awareness, and improve interpersonal effectiveness.
The study used a two-arm parallel-group randomized controlled design with pre-test and post-test measurements and follow-up assessments at one and three months. A total of 50 nurses were screened, and 30 who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 15) or control (n = 15) group. Inclusion criteria included at least one year of experience in the same clinical setting and the provision of informed consent. Nurses with communication impairments that could interfere with participation were excluded.
Read more
The intervention consisted of six weekly online Balint-based group sessions lasting 45-50 minutes. Sessions followed the structure recommended by the International Balint Federation, including case presentation, exploration, group discussion, feedback, and closing phases. The first session included additional time to review study procedures and establish group rules and confidentiality. The control group continued routine work without receiving any additional psychosocial support.
The primary outcome was burnout, measured with the Maslach Burnout Inventory. The secondary outcome was communication skills, assessed with the Communication Skills Scale for Health Professionals. Both outcomes were measured at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at one- and three-month follow-ups.
Data were collected electronically, and all participants provided informed consent online. Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant institutional ethics committee. This study contributes to the growing evidence supporting the use of Balint-based reflective group interventions to enhance nurses' psychosocial well-being and professional communication competencies.
Read the detailed description
Nurses experience burnout as a response to prolonged exposure to stressors. Burnout significantly reduces nurses' capacity for therapeutic communication by weakening their empathy and active listening skills. Balint therapy is a reflective approach focused on the patient-nurse relationship. In Balint groups, nurses discover how to better manage challenging patient-nurse relationships and strive to improve their interpersonal relationships. Balint groups are particularly helpful in recognizing feelings and thoughts related to patients who are perceived as "difficult." Balint-based interventions are conducive to providing social support by creating a relatively safe atmosphere while respecting nurses' experiences. Furthermore, considering nurses' working conditions, Balint-based interventions are considered an easy-to-implement, time-efficient, and evidence-based approach.
The present study aims to measure the effect of Balint-based group intervention on burnout and communication skills among nurses. The research hypotheses are as follows: H0-1: There is no significant difference in burnout levels between the intervention and control groups. H0-2: There is no significant difference in communication skills between the intervention and control groups.
This study was conducted using a two-armed parallel group randomized controlled design with pre-test and post-test measurements, and follow-up assessments were performed at one and three months. Participants included nurses recruited using a purposive sampling method. The inclusion criteria were: (i) having worked as a nurse in the same clinical setting for at least one year and (ii) providing informed consent to participate. The exclusion criterion was the presence of a communication impairment that could hinder participation (e.g., hearing or speech disorder). The criteria for discontinuation from the study included: (i) voluntary withdrawal, (ii) missing at least two sessions, and (iii) incomplete or missing data on the study instruments. A total of 50 nurses were contacted by the research team and underwent eligibility screening. A total of 30 nurses who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study, taking into account a potential dropout rate. The study was completed with a total of 30 nurses, 15 in the intervention group and 15 in the control group. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group at a 1:1 ratio using simple randomization.
The primary outcome of the study is burnout, measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Higher scores indicate higher levels of burnout. The secondary outcome is communication skills, measured using the Communication Skills Scale for Health Professionals, with higher scores indicating better communication skills. Both outcomes were assessed at baseline, after the intervention, and at one- and three-month follow-ups.
This study conducted from December 2024 to April 2025. Participating nurses received an online information form and a voluntary consent form. After reviewing the information, participants provided electronic consent. Only those who consented were included in the online intervention sessions.
Intervention group sessions were held once a week, each lasting 45-50 minutes, without disrupting nurses' rest periods or shift schedules. The intervention group was organized as a closed group. Session days were scheduled according to nurses' weekly work schedule. The groups were facilitated by two academically qualified researchers specializing in psychiatric nursing, each trained in psychotherapy techniques, including psychodrama and cognitive behavioral therapy. Sessions were conducted online in a quiet environment, with the screen layout designed to allow participants to see one another clearly. Nurses participated in Balint-based group counseling for six weeks. Post-tests were administered immediately after the final session (Session 6). The first follow-up assessment was conducted one month after the intervention, and the second follow-up assessment took place three months post-intervention.
The intervention in this study consisted of nurse-led group counseling based on the Balint approach. The primary objectives of a Balint group are to deepen understanding of the nurse-patient relationship, enhance nurses' awareness of their own emotions, thoughts, and behaviors within that relationship, and provide a supportive environment for participants. In this study, weekly sessions followed a structured format adapted from the recommendations of the International Balint Federation. The first session included an additional 30 minutes to explain the study's purpose and procedures, establish a confidentiality agreement, and clarify group rules and expectations (e.g., maintaining confidentiality, being respectful and non-judgmental, ensuring all members have an opportunity to speak, and attending sessions punctually). This preparation ensured that participants were fully prepared to engage in the intervention.
Phase 1 (Case Presentation): In each session, a different group member (the case presenter) shared a case involving a patient interaction that elicited intense or challenging emotions (e.g., distress, helplessness, frustration, anger). The case presenter elaborated on their feelings, thoughts, and behaviors regarding the situation, providing details about when, where, and how it occurred.
Phase 2 (Exploration): Group members asked questions to better understand the dynamics of the nurse-patient relationship in the case, while avoiding direct advice or criticism. The case presenter clarified ambiguous points and had the opportunity to explore their own experiences more deeply.
Phase 3 (Group Discussion): The group leader asked the case presenter to temporarily withdraw and remain silent during the discussion. Group members then discussed various aspects of the nurse-patient relationship, sharing their own feelings and perspectives. The group leader encouraged members to explore their emotions in depth and guided the discussion toward the dynamics of the nurse-patient relationship. By preventing criticism directed at the case presenter, the leader ensured a safe environment and effectively managed session time.
Phase 4 (Feedback): After the discussion, the case presenter rejoined the group to share new perspectives and emotional insights gained from the discussion. Group members then provided general evaluations of the process and highlighted their learning points.
Phase 5 (Closing): The group leader summarized the prominent themes that emerged during the session, offered a brief evaluation, and concluded the session in a structured manner.
Control group: Nurses in the control group continued their routine work schedules and did not receive any additional training or psychosocial support during the study period. Data collection instruments were administered to the control group concurrently with the intervention group. Because the nurses in the control group were employed at different hospitals and were unfamiliar with one another, the risk of information sharing between groups was minimized. After the study was completed, the control group was informed about the intervention; however, no additional counseling services were provided due to scheduling constraints related to their working hours.
Data were collected at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at one- and three-month follow-ups. Sociodemographic characteristics of the groups were compared using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and independent samples t-tests for continuous variables. A two-way mixed-design ANOVA was performed to examine between-group, within-time, and group × time interactions; the Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparisons. Paired sample t-tests were also used to compare pre-test and post-test scores in the intervention group. Effect sizes were reported using Cohen's d for within-group comparisons and partial eta-squared (η²) for the mixed ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Bilecik Seyh Edebali University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (19.09.2024 - 280361). Prior to participation, nurses were provided with detailed information about the purpose of the study, the procedures to be performed, and the voluntary nature of participation. Informed consent was obtained electronically from all participants via an online consent form. Participants were assured of confidentiality, the right to withdraw from the study at any time, and that their personal information would not be shared.
- Conditions
- Burnout, Communication Skills, Psychosocial Well-being
- Being tested
- Balint Approach Group Intervention
- Keywords
- burnout, Communication skills, nursing
- Medical subject headings
- Burnout, Psychological
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Balint Approach Group InterventionBehavioural
Also called Balint-Based Group Intervention
A Balint-based group intervention consisting of six weekly online sessions lasting 45-50 minutes. Sessions followed the structure recommended by the International Balint Federation, including case presentation, exploration, group discussion, feedback, and closing phases. The intervention was delivered by two psychiatric nursing academics trained in psychotherapy techniques. The group was conducted as a closed group, and sessions were scheduled according to participants' shift patterns
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm Title: Balint-Based Group Intervention | Experimental | Participants in this arm received a Balint-based group intervention consisting of six weekly online sessions, each lasting 45-50 minutes. Sessions followed the structure recommended by the International Balint Federation, including case presentation, exploration, group discussion, feedback, and closing phases. The intervention was delivered by two psychiatric nursing academics trained in psychotherapy techniques. The group was conducted as a closed group, and sessions were scheduled according to nurses' shift patterns Receives: Behavioral: Balint Approach Group Intervention |
| Arm Title → Control Group (No Intervention) | No intervention | Participants in this arm continued their routine work schedules and did not receive any additional training, counseling, or psychosocial intervention during the study period. Data collection was performed at the same time points as the intervention group (baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up, and 3-month follow-up). After the study was completed, the control group was informed about the intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory Total Score)
Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), a 22-item self-report scale measuring emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. In this study, the personal accomplishment subscale will be reverse-coded so that higher total scores indicate higher levels of burnout. Scores range from 0 to 88. MBI is widely used to assess occupational burnout among healthcare professionals.
Measured: Baseline, immediately after the intervention (6 weeks), 1-month follow-up, and 3-month follow-up.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Communication Skills (Communication Skills Scale for Health Professionals)
Communication skills will be assessed using the Communication Skills Scale for Health Professionals (CSSHP), an 18-item self-report instrument evaluating communication attitudes and behaviors across four subscales. Items are scored on a 1-6 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better communication skills. Total scores range from 18 to 108.
Measured: Baseline, immediately after the intervention (6 weeks), 1-month follow-up, and 3-month follow-up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2025
- Study start20 Dec 2024
- Primary completion5 Apr 2025
- Study completion5 Apr 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BurnoutStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study used a two-arm parallel assignment model in which participants were randomly allocated to either the intervention group or the control group in a 1:1 ratio. Both groups were followed concurrently, and outcome assessments were conducted at identical time points (baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up, and 3-month follow-up). No crossover between groups occurred
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yuksek Ihtisas University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Reyhan Dogan, Yuksek Ihtisas University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07278219
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E-10333602-050.04-280361
- Acronym
- Balint Group
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 11 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Huang L, Harsh J, Cui H, Wu J, Thai J, Zhang X, Cheng L, Wu W. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Balint Groups to Prevent Burnout Among Residents in China. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 11;10:957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00957. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 32116808
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Balint Approach Group Intervention on Burnout and Communication Skills in Nurses
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07278219
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Balint Group / E-10333602-050.04-280361
- Conditions
- Burnout, Communication Skills, Psychosocial Well-being
- Keywords
- burnout, Communication skills, nursing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yuksek Ihtisas UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of a Balint-based group intervention on burnout and communication skills among nurses. Burnout is a common outcome of prolonged exposure to workplace stressors and can weaken nurses' empathy, emotional regulation, and therapeutic communication abilities. Balint groups are reflective, structured sessions that focus on understanding the emotional and relational aspects of challenging patient-nurse interactions. These groups provide a safe environment for nurses to explore their thoughts and feelings, enhance self-awareness, and improve interpersonal effectiveness.
The study used a two-arm parallel-group randomized controlled design with pre-test and post-test measurements and follow-up assessments at one and three months. A total of 50 nurses were screened, and 30 who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 15) or control (n = 15) group. Inclusion criteria included at least one year of experience in the same clinical setting and the provision of informed consent. Nurses with communication impairments that could interfere with participation were excluded.
The intervention consisted of six weekly online Balint-based group sessions lasting 45-50 minutes. Sessions followed the structure recommended by the International Balint Federation, including case presentation, exploration, group discussion, feedback, and closing phases. The first session included additional time to review study procedures and establish group rules and confidentiality. The control group continued routine work without receiving any additional psychosocial support.
The primary outcome was burnout, measured with the Maslach Burnout Inventory. The secondary outcome was communication skills, assessed with the Communication Skills Scale for Health Professionals. Both outcomes were measured at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at one- and three-month follow-ups.
Data were collected electronically, and all participants provided informed consent online. Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant institutional ethics committee. This study contributes to the growing evidence supporting the use of Balint-based reflective group interventions to enhance nurses' psychosocial well-being and professional communication competencies.
Detailed description
Nurses experience burnout as a response to prolonged exposure to stressors. Burnout significantly reduces nurses' capacity for therapeutic communication by weakening their empathy and active listening skills. Balint therapy is a reflective approach focused on the patient-nurse relationship. In Balint groups, nurses discover how to better manage challenging patient-nurse relationships and strive to improve their interpersonal relationships. Balint groups are particularly helpful in recognizing feelings and thoughts related to patients who are perceived as "difficult." Balint-based interventions are conducive to providing social support by creating a relatively safe atmosphere while respecting nurses' experiences. Furthermore, considering nurses' working conditions, Balint-based interventions are considered an easy-to-implement, time-efficient, and evidence-based approach.
The present study aims to measure the effect of Balint-based group intervention on burnout and communication skills among nurses. The research hypotheses are as follows: H0-1: There is no significant difference in burnout levels between the intervention and control groups. H0-2: There is no significant difference in communication skills between the intervention and control groups.
This study was conducted using a two-armed parallel group randomized controlled design with pre-test and post-test measurements, and follow-up assessments were performed at one and three months. Participants included nurses recruited using a purposive sampling method. The inclusion criteria were: (i) having worked as a nurse in the same clinical setting for at least one year and (ii) providing informed consent to participate. The exclusion criterion was the presence of a communication impairment that could hinder participation (e.g., hearing or speech disorder). The criteria for discontinuation from the study included: (i) voluntary withdrawal, (ii) missing at least two sessions, and (iii) incomplete or missing data on the study instruments. A total of 50 nurses were contacted by the research team and underwent eligibility screening. A total of 30 nurses who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study, taking into account a potential dropout rate. The study was completed with a total of 30 nurses, 15 in the intervention group and 15 in the control group. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group at a 1:1 ratio using simple randomization.
The primary outcome of the study is burnout, measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Higher scores indicate higher levels of burnout. The secondary outcome is communication skills, measured using the Communication Skills Scale for Health Professionals, with higher scores indicating better communication skills. Both outcomes were assessed at baseline, after the intervention, and at one- and three-month follow-ups.
This study conducted from December 2024 to April 2025. Participating nurses received an online information form and a voluntary consent form. After reviewing the information, participants provided electronic consent. Only those who consented were included in the online intervention sessions.
Intervention group sessions were held once a week, each lasting 45-50 minutes, without disrupting nurses' rest periods or shift schedules. The intervention group was organized as a closed group. Session days were scheduled according to nurses' weekly work schedule. The groups were facilitated by two academically qualified researchers specializing in psychiatric nursing, each trained in psychotherapy techniques, including psychodrama and cognitive behavioral therapy. Sessions were conducted online in a quiet environment, with the screen layout designed to allow participants to see one another clearly. Nurses participated in Balint-based group counseling for six weeks. Post-tests were administered immediately after the final session (Session 6). The first follow-up assessment was conducted one month after the intervention, and the second follow-up assessment took place three months post-intervention.
The intervention in this study consisted of nurse-led group counseling based on the Balint approach. The primary objectives of a Balint group are to deepen understanding of the nurse-patient relationship, enhance nurses' awareness of their own emotions, thoughts, and behaviors within that relationship, and provide a supportive environment for participants. In this study, weekly sessions followed a structured format adapted from the recommendations of the International Balint Federation. The first session included an additional 30 minutes to explain the study's purpose and procedures, establish a confidentiality agreement, and clarify group rules and expectations (e.g., maintaining confidentiality, being respectful and non-judgmental, ensuring all members have an opportunity to speak, and attending sessions punctually). This preparation ensured that participants were fully prepared to engage in the intervention.
Phase 1 (Case Presentation): In each session, a different group member (the case presenter) shared a case involving a patient interaction that elicited intense or challenging emotions (e.g., distress, helplessness, frustration, anger). The case presenter elaborated on their feelings, thoughts, and behaviors regarding the situation, providing details about when, where, and how it occurred.
Phase 2 (Exploration): Group members asked questions to better understand the dynamics of the nurse-patient relationship in the case, while avoiding direct advice or criticism. The case presenter clarified ambiguous points and had the opportunity to explore their own experiences more deeply.
Phase 3 (Group Discussion): The group leader asked the case presenter to temporarily withdraw and remain silent during the discussion. Group members then discussed various aspects of the nurse-patient relationship, sharing their own feelings and perspectives. The group leader encouraged members to explore their emotions in depth and guided the discussion toward the dynamics of the nurse-patient relationship. By preventing criticism directed at the case presenter, the leader ensured a safe environment and effectively managed session time.
Phase 4 (Feedback): After the discussion, the case presenter rejoined the group to share new perspectives and emotional insights gained from the discussion. Group members then provided general evaluations of the process and highlighted their learning points.
Phase 5 (Closing): The group leader summarized the prominent themes that emerged during the session, offered a brief evaluation, and concluded the session in a structured manner.
Control group: Nurses in the control group continued their routine work schedules and did not receive any additional training or psychosocial support during the study period. Data collection instruments were administered to the control group concurrently with the intervention group. Because the nurses in the control group were employed at different hospitals and were unfamiliar with one another, the risk of information sharing between groups was minimized. After the study was completed, the control group was informed about the intervention; however, no additional counseling services were provided due to scheduling constraints related to their working hours.
Data were collected at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at one- and three-month follow-ups. Sociodemographic characteristics of the groups were compared using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and independent samples t-tests for continuous variables. A two-way mixed-design ANOVA was performed to examine between-group, within-time, and group × time interactions; the Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparisons. Paired sample t-tests were also used to compare pre-test and post-test scores in the intervention group. Effect sizes were reported using Cohen's d for within-group comparisons and partial eta-squared (η²) for the mixed ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Bilecik Seyh Edebali University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (19.09.2024 - 280361). Prior to participation, nurses were provided with detailed information about the purpose of the study, the procedures to be performed, and the voluntary nature of participation. Informed consent was obtained electronically from all participants via an online consent form. Participants were assured of confidentiality, the right to withdraw from the study at any time, and that their personal information would not be shared.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study used a two-arm parallel assignment model in which participants were randomly allocated to either the intervention group or the control group in a 1:1 ratio. Both groups were followed concurrently, and outcome assessments were conducted at identical time points (baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up, and 3-month follow-up). No crossover between groups occurred
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm Title: Balint-Based Group Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Balint Approach Group InterventionParticipants in this arm received a Balint-based group intervention consisting of six weekly online sessions, each lasting 45-50 minutes. Sessions followed the structure recommended by the International Balint Federation, including case presentation, exploration, group discussion, feedback, and closing phases. The intervention was delivered by two psychiatric nursing academics trained in psychotherapy techniques. The group was conducted as a closed group, and sessions were scheduled according to nurses' shift patterns |
| Arm Title → Control Group (No Intervention) | No intervention | –Participants in this arm continued their routine work schedules and did not receive any additional training, counseling, or psychosocial intervention during the study period. Data collection was performed at the same time points as the intervention group (baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up, and 3-month follow-up). After the study was completed, the control group was informed about the intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- having worked as a nurse in the same clinical setting for at least one year
- providing informed consent to participate
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- presence of a communication impairment that could hinder participation (e.g., hearing or speech disorder)
- Voluntary withdrawal from the study
- Failure to attend at least two sessions
- Incomplete or missing data on the study instruments
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Balint Approach Group InterventionAlso: Balint-Based Group InterventionA Balint-based group intervention consisting of six weekly online sessions lasting 45-50 minutes. Sessions followed the structure recommended by the International Balint Federation, including case presentation, exploration, group discussion, feedback, and closing phases. The intervention was delivered by two psychiatric nursing academics trained in psychotherapy techniques. The group was conducted as a closed group, and sessions were scheduled according to participants' shift patterns | Behavioural | Arm Title: Balint-Based Group Intervention |
Primary outcome
Burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory Total Score)
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention (6 weeks), 1-month follow-up, and 3-month follow-up.
Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), a 22-item self-report scale measuring emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. In this study, the personal accomplishment subscale will be reverse-coded so that higher total scores indicate higher levels of burnout. Scores range from 0 to 88. MBI is widely used to assess occupational burnout among healthcare professionals.
1 secondary outcome
Communication Skills (Communication Skills Scale for Health Professionals)
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention (6 weeks), 1-month follow-up, and 3-month follow-up.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Dec 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 32116808Huang L, Harsh J, Cui H, Wu J, Thai J, Zhang X, Cheng L, Wu W. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Balint Groups to Prevent Burnout Among Residents in China. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 11;10:957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00957. eCollection 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Burnout
Active, not recruiting
AI Ambient Scribe in Psychiatry
Therapeutic Alliance, Empathy
Enrolling by invitation
PATH to Reducing Burnout Among Peers Who Deliver Overdose Prevention Services (R33 Phase Clinical Trial)
Burnout, Secondary Trauma
Recruiting
Electrotherapy Stimulation Together With Life Coaching for the Support of Burnout Symptoms in Healthcare Workers
Psychiatric Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Relationship of Forward Head Posture With Burnout and Quality of Life
Forward Head Posture
Recruiting
THE EFFECT OF EDUCATION IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION
Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Balint Approach Group Intervention in people with Burnout and Communication Skills, run by Yuksek Ihtisas University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory Total Score) (time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention (6 weeks), 1-month follow-up, and 3-month follow-up.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07278219, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2025.