Rheumatic DiseasesNCT07278609
The RheumSafer Study: Improving Medication Appropriateness in People With Rheumatic Conditions
An observational study of Rheumatic Diseases and Inflammatory Arthritis, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The goal of this prospective observational quality improvement study is to determine if a physician tool, MedSafer, combined with educational brochures for patients, can help to reduce the use of 'potentially inappropriate medications' (PIMs) in adults aged 60 and over with rheumatic conditions and polypharmacy… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatic Diseases, Inflammatory Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erthematosus (SLE)
- What is being tested?
- MedSafer deprescribing opportunity reports, EMPOWER brochures
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 29 Oct 2025to 30 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants will be recruited from patients attending usual follow-up care for chronic rheumatic diseases at the McGill University Health Centre
Who may be able to join
- Aged ≥60
- Followed by a rheumatologist at MUHC for an inflammatory arthritis (such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis), a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (such as systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory myositis, systemic sclerosis, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, Sjogren syndrome, systemic vasculitis), or another chronic musculoskeletal or rheumatic condition (such as crystal arthritis and osteoarthritis)
- Currently taking ≥5 regular medications and ≥1 PIM
- Anticipated ongoing clinical follow-up in rheumatology at an interval of every 3-9 months
Who cannot join
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Acute life-threatening illness or life expectancy <12 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Jeannette Bere, BSc, LPN contact
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H3G1A4
Arielle Mendel, MD MSc, 514-934-1934, arielle.mendel@mcgill.ca
Jeannette Bere, BSc, jeannette.bere@rimuhc.ca
About this study
The goal of this prospective observational quality improvement study is to determine if a physician tool, MedSafer, combined with educational brochures for patients, can help to reduce the use of 'potentially inappropriate medications' (PIMs) in adults aged 60 and over with rheumatic conditions and polypharmacy (taking 5 or more regular medications).
Researchers will follow participants during usual rheumatic disease care. They will compare the rate of PIM deprescribing (stopping medications or reducing the dose) before and after the introduction of the following interventions:
Read more
- MedSafer reports provided to treating physicians
- EMPOWER consumer brochures provided to participants
Participants will complete 4 study visits over 18-20 months during which researchers will collect information on medication changes, serious adverse events (emergency visits or hospitalizations), and quality of life.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of provider-facing MedSafer reports, combined with patient-facing educational brochures, for deprescribing PIMs in adults aged ≥60 with rheumatic diseases who have polypharmacy (taking 5 or more regular medications).
HYPOTHESIS MedSafer reports combined with consumer-facing brochures could safely increase PIM deprescription above usual care, improving medication appropriateness.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Prospective before-and-after quality improvement quasi-experimental study within the outpatient rheumatology clinic at the Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Canada. All participants will be followed during 'control' and 'intervention' periods, and all participants will receive the intervention, acting as their own control.
DESCRIPTION OF INTERVENTION
- Physician-oriented individualized deprescribing opportunity reports are created for each patient within MedSafer by cross referencing a patients' medical conditions and medications (https://www.medsafer.org/public). Deprescribing opportunities are categorized as "high risk" for adverse drug events if the drug is continued, "intermediate risk" (harms must be weighted against the benefits) and "low risk" for harm (but with little to no added value to continue). Specific tapering instructions, including for sedative hypnotic medications, are provided to complement deprescribing reports. Deprescribing decisions remain at the treating physicians' discretion, and no physician will be obligated to act on a deprescribing suggestion.
- Patient-oriented educational material, available to the public for routine use (https://www.deprescribingnetwork.ca/patient-handouts).
- All participants receive a deprescribing fact sheet in either French or English.
- Participants taking specific PIMs will also receive consumer-facing bilingual 'EMPOWER' educational brochures (French or English).
STUDY PROCEDURES
Pre-screening and recruitment The study will recruit approximately 100 participants during routine clinical visits. A research team member will pre-screen participants for eligibility by previewing clinic lists using the electronic medical record and reviewing medications lists contained within prior clinical notes.
During regular routine clinical visits, a member of the research team will approach consecutive eligible individuals and invite them to participate in the study. See Eligibility section for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants will be aware that the study will evaluate medication use and changes over time, but will be unaware of the specific details of the intervention or which medications will be studied.
Informed Consent Informed consent will be sought from participants. At the time of consent, potential participants will be informed that they can withdraw their participation from the study at any time, including during the intervention period.
Study visits:
All participants will participate in the 'control' and 'intervention' periods (each approximately 10 months duration), with 2 in-person study visits (occurring concurrently with routine scheduled clinical visits) and 2 virtual visits conducted with a study team member outside usual care visits.
'Control' period (Visit 1 to Visit 2) Visit 1 (index control visit; in-person) will be the recruitment and enrolment visit. After informed consent, participants will complete a baseline questionnaire collecting self-reported demographics. Rheumatic disease diagnosis and year of diagnosis will be collected from medical records. A research team member will record demographics, medications with doses, and medical history into the MedSafer application, and generate deprescribing opportunity reports. However, the treating physician will not receive the reports. Medication lists will be accessed as usual from clinical records as part of best practice for clinic visits, and deprescribing will be left to 'usual care'.
The 5-level version of the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) will assess baseline quality of life (index score from 0-1, where 1 indicates perfect health).
Visit 2 (in-person or virtual) will take place approximately 4 months (+/- 1 month) following Visit 1. A research team member will review medical records for any medication changes (cessation, initiation, change in dose), and record emergency department visits or hospitalizations (diagnoses, outcomes of the visits). Participants will complete EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. If a routine clinical visit is already taking place during the Visit 2 study window, Visit 2 can also occur in-person at the time of this visit.
Participants may have additional clinical visits during the 'control period', as dictated by their treating physician and their clinical condition, during which no study procedures will take place.
'Intervention' period (Visits 3 and 4) Approximately 2 weeks prior to switching to the intervention period, treating physicians will be introduced to the intervention format and procedures.
Visit 3 (index intervention visit; in-person) will be participants' first returning visit to the rheumatology clinic for usual care during the intervention period. Prior to this visit, a research team member will update current medications within the MedSafer application to generate deprescribing opportunity reports. Treating physicians will then receive personalized deprescribing opportunity reports at the patient visit. Physicians will not be obligated to act on deprescribing opportunities, which require clinical judgement.
Participants will complete the EQ-5D-5L, and receive the intervention bundle.
Visit 4 (virtual/telephone) will be approximately 4 months (+/- 1) following Visit 3. As in Visit 2, a research team member will review medical records and contact participants to ascertain any medication changes (cessation, initiation, change in dose), record emergency department visits, and any hospitalizations, along with details (diagnoses, outcomes of the visits). Participants will complete EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. If a routine clinical visit happens to occur during the Visit 4 study window, this visit can also occur in-person.
Criteria for discontinuing or modifying the intervention There will be no interim analysis. The MedSafer ruleset will remain unchanged throughout the study. In an individual participant, any medication can be re-started or dose escalated at a physicians' discretion on clinical grounds. Re-starting or re-escalation that occurs during the study period will be captured in the study outcomes, along with serious adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs).
Strategies to promote uptake of the interventions At the start of the intervention period, the study team will send an introductory notice to the rheumatologists caring for study participants. This document will contain an overview of how study interventions will integrate with the existing workflow, and the expectations for the treating rheumatologist (to review the MedSafer report at the time of performing a medication review, perform any relevant deprescribing). We will provide sample MedSafer reports to physicians (including residents), so they can familiarize themselves with the report format prior to the intervention commencing.
SAMPLE SIZE An expected 5% of participants will undergo deprescribing during usual care (control period), based on prior studies. A sample size of 90 participants will permit detection of a 15% absolute increase in deprescribing during the intervention period, with 80% power to detect a 2-sided alpha of 0.05, accounting for up to 10% loss to follow-up.
STATISTICAL ANALYSES The primary analysis will be restricted to those who have clinical visits during both control and intervention periods. Researchers will summarize study population characteristics, including baseline demographics, disease characteristics, co-morbidities, number of medications, and PIMs (number and medication class).
Primary outcome: the proportion with ≥1 PIM deprescribed during the control and intervention periods will be compared with the McNemar test for paired proportions.
Secondary outcomes:
The paired Student's t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test will compare the number of regular medications taken at the end of the control and intervention periods.
Event rates for SAEs and ADWEs will be calculated as the number of events during the control or intervention periods divided by the person-time of observation during each period.
Researchers will convert raw EQ-5D-5L scores into index values using a Canadian value set. Change in index scores and VAS during the control and intervention periods will be categorized as deterioration, no change, or improvement using established minimally important differences. The proportion with unchanged or improved EQ-5D-5L values and VAS will be compared between control and intervention periods using the McNemar test for paired proportions.
Additional analyses:
- A per-protocol analysis will exclude participants who were not exposed to any part of the intervention (e.g. physician did not receive deprescribing reports, participant did not receive deprescribing brochures).
- Stratified analyses of the primary outcomes by sex (female and male), gender-related variables (e.g. education, employment), age (<75 vs >75), rheumatic condition (i.e., inflammatory arthritis vs systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease), baseline number medications (<10 vs ≥10) will be performed if sufficient group sizes exist. Exploratory analyses will also stratify secondary outcomes according to these characteristics.
- Exploratory logistic regression analyses will evaluate factors associated with deprescribing ≥1 PIM, considering age, sex, other demographics, physician, rheumatic condition, number of medications for inclusion, and intervention period in models.
- Medication re-starts or dose re-escalation following deprescribing will be reported descriptively for the control and intervention periods.
METHODS TO HANDLE PROTOCOL NON-ADHERENCE AND MISSING DATA The primary analysis will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle: participants returning for a clinical visit during the intervention period who do not receive the intervention (ie, the physician does not receive or review the electronic decision support, a participant does not receive a relevant educational brochure, if indicated, or the participant is no longer taking a PIM) will be included in the analysis. However, participants who do not return at all for clinical follow-up (ie no virtual or in-person visit) during the intervention period will be excluded from the analysis, as they would not have an opportunity to receive the intervention or have medication data collected. A sensitivity analysis (above) will exclude participants who attended a visit during the intervention period but did not receive the intervention (per-protocol analysis). Every effort will be made to reach participants and/or to ascertain reason for not returning to clinic during the intervention period. In study participants do not return for clinical follow-up during the intervention period but can still be contacted, medications and SAEs will still be collected. No imputation of missing data will be performed.
- Conditions
- Rheumatic Diseases, Inflammatory Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erthematosus (SLE), Vasculitis, Muskuloskeletal Diseases, Systemic Autoimmune Diseases
- Being tested
- MedSafer deprescribing opportunity reports, EMPOWER brochures
- Keywords
- Deprescribing, Potentially inappropriate medications, Rheumatic Diseases, Polypharmacy
- Medical subject headings
- Rheumatic Diseases, Arthritis, Vasculitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MedSafer deprescribing opportunity reports, EMPOWER brochuresBehavioural
- Deprescribing opportunity reports: The MedSafer software generates reports by applying embedded "rules" to medication lists, reflecting best practice recommendations. Deprescribing "opportunities" are classified into high risk (for adverse drug events), intermediate risk (harms must be weighed against benefits), and low risk for harm (but with no added value to continue). Reports include the rationale for deprescribing, tapering instructions, or safer drug alternatives (if relevant), and are provided to clinicians at the point-of-care.
- Patient-oriented educational material:
- Deprescribing fact sheet (all participants)
- Consumer-facing bilingual 'EMPOWER' educational brochures for specific PIMs (e.g., gabapentinoids, proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepines) if applicable
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| All participants | Each participant will serve as their own control and will be followed during control and intervention periods of the study Receives: Behavioral: MedSafer deprescribing opportunity reports, EMPOWER brochures |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PIM deprescribing
The proportion with ≥1 PIM deprescribed (stopped, switched to a safer class, significantly dose-reduced) during the control period compared with the intervention period.
Measured: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits
Secondary outcomes (4)
Total number of regular medications
Change in median total number of regular medications taken during the control and intervention periods
Measured: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits
EQ-5D-5L (quality of life)
Proportion with stable or improved EQ-5D-5L and VAS scores during the control and intervention periods
Measured: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits
Serious adverse events (SAE)
Any unplanned emergency department visit, hospitalization, or death
Measured: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits
Serious adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWE)
Any SAE attributed to deprescribing a PIM, adjudicated by two independent reviewers, blinded to intervention exposure period, using the Leape and Bates Likert scale. In the primary analysis, scores of 5 or 6 (probably or definitely caused by withdrawing a medication) will define ADWEs. A third blinded reviewer will resolve discordant rankings.
Measured: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2025
- Study start29 Oct 2025
- Primary completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Rheumatic DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Arthritis Society, Canada
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Arielle Mendel, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Investigators
- Arielle Mendel, MD MSc, Principal investigator, RI-MUHC/MUHC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07278609
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2026-11257
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 1 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Participants do not consent for their IPD to be shared with other researchers
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The RheumSafer Study: Improving Medication Appropriateness in People With Rheumatic Conditions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07278609
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2026-11257
- Conditions
- Rheumatic Diseases, Inflammatory Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erthematosus (SLE), Vasculitis, Muskuloskeletal Diseases, Systemic Autoimmune Diseases
- Keywords
- Deprescribing, Potentially inappropriate medications, Rheumatic Diseases, Polypharmacy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Arthritis Society, Canada
- Study start
- 29 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this prospective observational quality improvement study is to determine if a physician tool, MedSafer, combined with educational brochures for patients, can help to reduce the use of 'potentially inappropriate medications' (PIMs) in adults aged 60 and over with rheumatic conditions and polypharmacy (taking 5 or more regular medications).
Researchers will follow participants during usual rheumatic disease care. They will compare the rate of PIM deprescribing (stopping medications or reducing the dose) before and after the introduction of the following interventions:
- MedSafer reports provided to treating physicians
- EMPOWER consumer brochures provided to participants
Participants will complete 4 study visits over 18-20 months during which researchers will collect information on medication changes, serious adverse events (emergency visits or hospitalizations), and quality of life.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of provider-facing MedSafer reports, combined with patient-facing educational brochures, for deprescribing PIMs in adults aged ≥60 with rheumatic diseases who have polypharmacy (taking 5 or more regular medications).
HYPOTHESIS MedSafer reports combined with consumer-facing brochures could safely increase PIM deprescription above usual care, improving medication appropriateness.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Prospective before-and-after quality improvement quasi-experimental study within the outpatient rheumatology clinic at the Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Canada. All participants will be followed during 'control' and 'intervention' periods, and all participants will receive the intervention, acting as their own control.
DESCRIPTION OF INTERVENTION
- Physician-oriented individualized deprescribing opportunity reports are created for each patient within MedSafer by cross referencing a patients' medical conditions and medications (https://www.medsafer.org/public). Deprescribing opportunities are categorized as "high risk" for adverse drug events if the drug is continued, "intermediate risk" (harms must be weighted against the benefits) and "low risk" for harm (but with little to no added value to continue). Specific tapering instructions, including for sedative hypnotic medications, are provided to complement deprescribing reports. Deprescribing decisions remain at the treating physicians' discretion, and no physician will be obligated to act on a deprescribing suggestion.
- Patient-oriented educational material, available to the public for routine use (https://www.deprescribingnetwork.ca/patient-handouts).
- All participants receive a deprescribing fact sheet in either French or English.
- Participants taking specific PIMs will also receive consumer-facing bilingual 'EMPOWER' educational brochures (French or English).
STUDY PROCEDURES
Pre-screening and recruitment The study will recruit approximately 100 participants during routine clinical visits. A research team member will pre-screen participants for eligibility by previewing clinic lists using the electronic medical record and reviewing medications lists contained within prior clinical notes.
During regular routine clinical visits, a member of the research team will approach consecutive eligible individuals and invite them to participate in the study. See Eligibility section for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants will be aware that the study will evaluate medication use and changes over time, but will be unaware of the specific details of the intervention or which medications will be studied.
Informed Consent Informed consent will be sought from participants. At the time of consent, potential participants will be informed that they can withdraw their participation from the study at any time, including during the intervention period.
Study visits:
All participants will participate in the 'control' and 'intervention' periods (each approximately 10 months duration), with 2 in-person study visits (occurring concurrently with routine scheduled clinical visits) and 2 virtual visits conducted with a study team member outside usual care visits.
'Control' period (Visit 1 to Visit 2) Visit 1 (index control visit; in-person) will be the recruitment and enrolment visit. After informed consent, participants will complete a baseline questionnaire collecting self-reported demographics. Rheumatic disease diagnosis and year of diagnosis will be collected from medical records. A research team member will record demographics, medications with doses, and medical history into the MedSafer application, and generate deprescribing opportunity reports. However, the treating physician will not receive the reports. Medication lists will be accessed as usual from clinical records as part of best practice for clinic visits, and deprescribing will be left to 'usual care'.
The 5-level version of the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) will assess baseline quality of life (index score from 0-1, where 1 indicates perfect health).
Visit 2 (in-person or virtual) will take place approximately 4 months (+/- 1 month) following Visit 1. A research team member will review medical records for any medication changes (cessation, initiation, change in dose), and record emergency department visits or hospitalizations (diagnoses, outcomes of the visits). Participants will complete EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. If a routine clinical visit is already taking place during the Visit 2 study window, Visit 2 can also occur in-person at the time of this visit.
Participants may have additional clinical visits during the 'control period', as dictated by their treating physician and their clinical condition, during which no study procedures will take place.
'Intervention' period (Visits 3 and 4) Approximately 2 weeks prior to switching to the intervention period, treating physicians will be introduced to the intervention format and procedures.
Visit 3 (index intervention visit; in-person) will be participants' first returning visit to the rheumatology clinic for usual care during the intervention period. Prior to this visit, a research team member will update current medications within the MedSafer application to generate deprescribing opportunity reports. Treating physicians will then receive personalized deprescribing opportunity reports at the patient visit. Physicians will not be obligated to act on deprescribing opportunities, which require clinical judgement.
Participants will complete the EQ-5D-5L, and receive the intervention bundle.
Visit 4 (virtual/telephone) will be approximately 4 months (+/- 1) following Visit 3. As in Visit 2, a research team member will review medical records and contact participants to ascertain any medication changes (cessation, initiation, change in dose), record emergency department visits, and any hospitalizations, along with details (diagnoses, outcomes of the visits). Participants will complete EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. If a routine clinical visit happens to occur during the Visit 4 study window, this visit can also occur in-person.
Criteria for discontinuing or modifying the intervention There will be no interim analysis. The MedSafer ruleset will remain unchanged throughout the study. In an individual participant, any medication can be re-started or dose escalated at a physicians' discretion on clinical grounds. Re-starting or re-escalation that occurs during the study period will be captured in the study outcomes, along with serious adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs).
Strategies to promote uptake of the interventions At the start of the intervention period, the study team will send an introductory notice to the rheumatologists caring for study participants. This document will contain an overview of how study interventions will integrate with the existing workflow, and the expectations for the treating rheumatologist (to review the MedSafer report at the time of performing a medication review, perform any relevant deprescribing). We will provide sample MedSafer reports to physicians (including residents), so they can familiarize themselves with the report format prior to the intervention commencing.
SAMPLE SIZE An expected 5% of participants will undergo deprescribing during usual care (control period), based on prior studies. A sample size of 90 participants will permit detection of a 15% absolute increase in deprescribing during the intervention period, with 80% power to detect a 2-sided alpha of 0.05, accounting for up to 10% loss to follow-up.
STATISTICAL ANALYSES The primary analysis will be restricted to those who have clinical visits during both control and intervention periods. Researchers will summarize study population characteristics, including baseline demographics, disease characteristics, co-morbidities, number of medications, and PIMs (number and medication class).
Primary outcome: the proportion with ≥1 PIM deprescribed during the control and intervention periods will be compared with the McNemar test for paired proportions.
Secondary outcomes:
The paired Student's t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test will compare the number of regular medications taken at the end of the control and intervention periods.
Event rates for SAEs and ADWEs will be calculated as the number of events during the control or intervention periods divided by the person-time of observation during each period.
Researchers will convert raw EQ-5D-5L scores into index values using a Canadian value set. Change in index scores and VAS during the control and intervention periods will be categorized as deterioration, no change, or improvement using established minimally important differences. The proportion with unchanged or improved EQ-5D-5L values and VAS will be compared between control and intervention periods using the McNemar test for paired proportions.
Additional analyses:
- A per-protocol analysis will exclude participants who were not exposed to any part of the intervention (e.g. physician did not receive deprescribing reports, participant did not receive deprescribing brochures).
- Stratified analyses of the primary outcomes by sex (female and male), gender-related variables (e.g. education, employment), age (<75 vs >75), rheumatic condition (i.e., inflammatory arthritis vs systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease), baseline number medications (<10 vs ≥10) will be performed if sufficient group sizes exist. Exploratory analyses will also stratify secondary outcomes according to these characteristics.
- Exploratory logistic regression analyses will evaluate factors associated with deprescribing ≥1 PIM, considering age, sex, other demographics, physician, rheumatic condition, number of medications for inclusion, and intervention period in models.
- Medication re-starts or dose re-escalation following deprescribing will be reported descriptively for the control and intervention periods.
METHODS TO HANDLE PROTOCOL NON-ADHERENCE AND MISSING DATA The primary analysis will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle: participants returning for a clinical visit during the intervention period who do not receive the intervention (ie, the physician does not receive or review the electronic decision support, a participant does not receive a relevant educational brochure, if indicated, or the participant is no longer taking a PIM) will be included in the analysis. However, participants who do not return at all for clinical follow-up (ie no virtual or in-person visit) during the intervention period will be excluded from the analysis, as they would not have an opportunity to receive the intervention or have medication data collected. A sensitivity analysis (above) will exclude participants who attended a visit during the intervention period but did not receive the intervention (per-protocol analysis). Every effort will be made to reach participants and/or to ascertain reason for not returning to clinic during the intervention period. In study participants do not return for clinical follow-up during the intervention period but can still be contacted, medications and SAEs will still be collected. No imputation of missing data will be performed.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| All participants | – | Behavioral: MedSafer deprescribing opportunity reports, EMPOWER brochuresEach participant will serve as their own control and will be followed during control and intervention periods of the study |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants will be recruited from patients attending usual follow-up care for chronic rheumatic diseases at the McGill University Health Centre
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Aged ≥60
- Followed by a rheumatologist at MUHC for an inflammatory arthritis (such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis), a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (such as systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory myositis, systemic sclerosis, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, Sjogren syndrome, systemic vasculitis), or another chronic musculoskeletal or rheumatic condition (such as crystal arthritis and osteoarthritis)
- Currently taking ≥5 regular medications and ≥1 PIM
- Anticipated ongoing clinical follow-up in rheumatology at an interval of every 3-9 months
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Acute life-threatening illness or life expectancy <12 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MedSafer deprescribing opportunity reports, EMPOWER brochures1. Deprescribing opportunity reports: The MedSafer software generates reports by applying embedded "rules" to medication lists, reflecting best practice recommendations. Deprescribing "opportunities" are classified into high risk (for adverse drug events), intermediate risk (harms must be weighed against benefits), and low risk for harm (but with no added value to continue). Reports include the rationale for deprescribing, tapering instructions, or safer drug alternatives (if relevant), and are provided to clinicians at the point-of-care. 2. Patient-oriented educational material: 1. Deprescribing fact sheet (all participants) 2. Consumer-facing bilingual 'EMPOWER' educational brochures for specific PIMs (e.g., gabapentinoids, proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepines) if applicable | Behavioural | All participants |
Primary outcome
PIM deprescribing
Time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits
The proportion with ≥1 PIM deprescribed (stopped, switched to a safer class, significantly dose-reduced) during the control period compared with the intervention period.
4 secondary outcomes
Total number of regular medications
Time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits
EQ-5D-5L (quality of life)
Time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits
Serious adverse events (SAE)
Time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits
Serious adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWE)
Time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Participants do not consent for their IPD to be shared with other researchers
Related trials for Rheumatic Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Adding Vagal Neuromodulation to Manual Therapy in Women With Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia (FM) OR Fibromyalgia Syndrome, Manuel Therapy
Recruiting
Outpatient Physiotherapy vs. mHealth Exercise and Self-Management for Knee Osteoarthritis (MOKneeTOR)
Knee Osteoarthristis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Music During Walking on Pain and Muscle Activation in People With Chronic Pain Due to Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Radio- KO Radiotherapy for Knee Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jeannette Bere, BSc, LPN contact
Arielle Mendel, MD MSc principal investigator
RI-MUHC/MUHC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rheumatic Diseases and Inflammatory Arthritis, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Arielle Mendel, MD MSc (5149341934 ext. 47284, arielle.mendel@mcgill.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PIM deprescribing (time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2026.