Unaccompanied MigrationNCT07278934
Testing the Impact of Family-Based Intervention to Improve Developmental and Health Outcomes for Female Adolescents
A study testing ANZANSI Family Program in people with Unaccompanied Migration, run by New York University at 1 site in Ghana.
Trial summary
This study seeks to address the urgent need for theoretically and empirically informed interventions that would address the increasing numbers of unaccompanied minors migrating from rural to urban centers in developing countries for better economic opportunities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 11 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Unaccompanied Migration
- What is being tested?
- ANZANSI Family Program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,920 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGhana
- Study dates
- 7 Apr 2026to 15 Aug 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 11 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adolescent girls' inclusion criteria are:
- Enrolled in school and living within a family (defined broadly -not necessarily biological parents)
- Ages 11 to 14
- Skipping school in the past academic term (with at least 10% of unexcused absences).
- Capable of giving assent
- The caregiver inclusion criteria
Show all 9Show fewer
- Age 18 or older
- Self-identified as primary caregiver of the adolescent girl
- Capable of providing informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Participants that do not meet the criteria or exhibit a lack of understanding of the study procedures and hence not able to provide informed consent will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Ghana1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Ghana
Tamale
Adolphina Addo-Lartey, +233 26 145 8709, AAddo-Lartey@ug.edu.gh
About this study
This study seeks to address the urgent need for theoretically and empirically informed interventions that would address the increasing numbers of unaccompanied minors migrating from rural to urban centers in developing countries for better economic opportunities. This process often results in hazardous child labor defined as work that is mentally, physically, socially or morally dangerous and harmful; interfering with schooling and health and mental health functioning, and leading to several other disproportionate risks. Unaccompanied migrant child laborers' vulnerability is further intensified by the lack of parental protection and community belonging in the host urban center. The International Labor Organization (ILO) estimates that 9.6% of children (ages 5 to 17) across the globe are child laborers and draws attention to migrant child laborers as an underreported and highly vulnerable group, a significant portion of which are female with no education. Poverty has been identified as the main driver of child labor, with family context also being a critical contributing factor. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has the highest rates of child labor (24%), with Ghana -the focus of this study- registering one of the highest child labor prevalence at 22%, including unaccompanied child migrant laborers. In Ghana, unaccompanied adolescent girls migrate from the Northern region to urban centers in the south to work in the informal economy. Load carrying is the most common type of labor for this population and exposes migrant girls to multiple developmental and health risks. Building on the recently concluded R21 study (with 97 adolescent girls aged 11 to 14 years and their caregivers) that showed high feasibility and acceptability, and promising preliminary impact of the ANZANSI (resilience in Dagbani -local language) combination intervention in the same region, we propose to test its effectiveness in a larger two-arm cluster randomized clinical trial among 960 adolescent girls (age 11 to 14 years) at risk of school dropout nested within 32 public junior high schools in the Northern region of Ghana and their caregivers. The schools will be randomly assigned to one of two study conditions: 1) ANZANSI (FEE+MFG) and 2) bolstered usual care. The intervention will be delivered for 12 months, with assessments conducted at baseline and at 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-ups post-intervention initiation.
- Conditions
- Unaccompanied Migration
- Being tested
- ANZANSI Family Program
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ANZANSI Family ProgramBehavioural
Family Economic Empowerment: 1) Financial literacy training: Four 1-2 hour workshop sessions focused on financial literacy will be delivered. 2) CDA. Each participant receives a CDA, a matched savings account. Participants' family members, relatives, or friends are allowed and encouraged to contribute towards the CDA. The account is then matched with money from the project. The match cap is an equivalent of US$10 per month; 3) The family income-generating activity (IGA): Participants are trained on IGAs and expected to use part of their matched savings to start an IGA.
Multiple Family Groups. The manualized 16-session intervention is organized around 4Rs (Rules, Responsibility, Relationships, and Respectful Communication) and 2Ss (Stress and Social Support). Children and caregivers complete activities together or split to reconvene later for discussing as a larger group. Each group involves 7 to 10 families, with at least two generations of a family present in each session.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bolstered care | No intervention | Female adolescents in the bolstered care will receive services/education as usual in their respective schools. The usual care will be bolstered by providing school supplies (e.g., textbooks, notebooks) |
| ANZANSI Family Program | Experimental | In addition to bolstered care, participants in this arm will receive the ANZANSI intervention comprised of family economic empowerment (FEE) intervention and multiple family group (MFG) intervention. FEE includes: 1) Financial Literacy Training; 2) Child Development Account (CDA); and 3) Family income-generating/microenterprise promotion component Receives: Behavioral: ANZANSI Family Program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
overall health
Change in health will be measured using the 5-item physical health subscale of the KIDSCREEN-52 Health Questionnaire for Children and Young People. The items are rated on a 1 to 5 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better physical health. The theoretical range is from 5 to 25.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Nutrition
Change in nutrition is measured using the 29-item Diet Quality Questionnaire-Ghana, mapping onto 29 food groups. Each item is rated yes/no. DQQ data collection uses the closed-ended, sentinel foods list-based method and captures food and drink consumption from the previous day and night.
Measured: baseline, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month
mental health
Change in mental health will be measured using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8). Each of the 8 items is rated from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). The theoretical range is from 0 to 24, with higher scores representing more severe depression. A total score of 0 to 4 represents no significant depressive symptoms. A total score of 5 to 9 represents mild depressive symptoms; 10 to 14, moderate; 15 to 19, moderately severe; and 20 to 24, severe.
Measured: baseline, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month
Risk-taking
Change in risk-taking will be measured using subsections from the Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS). GSHS measures behavioural risk factors and protective factors. For this study, the measure includes questions about tobacco and alcohol use as well as sexual risk-taking.
Measured: baseline, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month
Secondary outcomes (18)
Self-concept
Change in self-concept will be measured by the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale Short Form. The 20-item short version of the original 100-item TSCS scale assesses adolescents' perception of self-identity and self-satisfaction. The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = always false to 5 = always true. The theoretical range for the TSCS is 20-100, with higher scores representing a more positive self-concept.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Unaccompanied migration
Change in the incidence of unaccompanied migration will be measured by a two-item scale (yes/no) and school records
Measured: 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
self-esteem
Change in self-esteem will be measured using Rosenberg's self-esteem scale (RSES). The scale comprises 10 statements about general feelings of self-worth or self-acceptance rated on a 4-point Likert scale response option (strongly agree to strongly disagree, with 4 = strongly agree, 3 = agree, 2 = disagree, 1 = strongly disagree). The items are scored on a theoretical range of 10-40 and summed, with higher scores representing higher self-esteem.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
life satisfaction
Change in life satisfaction will be measured using the multi-dimensional student life satisfaction scale (MSLSS). The scale includes 40 items assessing life satisfaction on 5 specific aspects while maintaining an overall life satisfaction score. Responses are rated on a 6-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = moderately disagree, 3 = slightly disagree, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = moderately agree, and 6 = strongly agree (theoretical range 40-240). Higher values represent higher satisfaction in student life.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
school attendance
Change in school attendance for the past academic year will be measured using school records.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
grade progress
Grade progress will be measured using a three-response question (0= enrolled in expected grade, 1=grade repetition, 2=dropout)
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
attitudes toward school
Change in attitudes towards school will be measured by School attitude assessment survey. The range is 20 to 100, with higher scores representing a more positive attitude towards school. Attitudes toward school were assessed using the school attitude assessment survey (SAAS; McCoach, 2002). The survey consists of 20 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 2 = a little bit, 3 = pretty well, 4 = well, and 5 = very well). The scale measures aspects of students' lives that predict their academic achievement, including peer attitudes, attitudes toward school, self-motivation, and self-regulation. Higher values representing higher positive attitudes toward school.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
social support
change in social support will be measured using the social support behavior scale. The SS-B measure consists of 45 items designed to tap five modes of support: emotional support, socializing, practical assistance, financial assistance, and advice/guidance. The Likert scale is from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. The theoretical range is 45-225, with higher scores indicating higher social support.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
perceived social support
Change in perceived social support will be measured by the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. The MSPSS is a self-report measure to assess participants' social support. The 12-item scale had statements such as, "there is a special person who is around when I am in need," rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree, with 5=strongly agree, 4=agree, 3=neutral, 2=disagree, 1=strongly disagree. The theoretical range is 12-60, with higher scores indicating greater social support.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
family cohesion
change in family cohesion will be measured by a 7-item measure adapted from Family environment scale and family assessment measure. The items measure the degree of commitment, help and support family members provide for one another. Participants are asked to rate how often each item occurred in their family using a 5-point scale (with 1 = 'never' and 5 = 'always'). Items include 'Do your family members ask each other for help before asking nonfamily members for help?', and 'Do you listen to what other family members have to say, even when you disagree?' Theoretical range is 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating higher levels of family cohesion.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
parenting stress
change in parenting stress will be measured by parental stress scale (PSS) developed by Berry and Jones (1995). The 18 item scale is scored with a 5-point likert scale, 1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Undecided 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly agree (theoretical range 18-80). Items represent positive (e.g. emotional benefits, personal development) and negative (demands on resources, restrictions) themes of parenthood. Lower scores represent lower levels of parenting stress.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Intention to migrate
change in intention to migrate will be measured by one item: How likely do you (the adolescent girl) see yourself migrating? The question uses a likert scale ranging from 1 (very unlikely) to 5 (very likely).
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
gender norms
change in gender norms will be measured by the 10-item scale adapted from the Gender Norm Attitudes Scale (Waszak et al., 2001), which measures participants' understanding of the appropriateness of behaviors as they relate to being female and male. The items in the scale encompass aspects related to educational performance, future expectations for both genders, family support, encouragement, decision-making, and involvement in intimate relationships and behaviors. The scale items featuredbinary responses (Agree = 1 and Disagree = 0; theoretical range 0-10). Higher scores denote more egalitarian gender norms and beliefs.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
future orientation
change in future orientation will be measured by two items evaluating adolescents' expectations and optimism regarding their educational goals. The first item asks participants, How sure are you that you will achieve your educational plans? with response options ranging from 1 = Not at all sure to 5 = Extremely sure. The second item asks, How hopeful are you that you will achieve your educational plans? with parallel response options ranging from 1 = Not at all hopeful to 5 = Extremely hopeful (theoretical range 2-10). Higher scores indicate a more positive future orientation
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
confidence in saving
change in confidence in saving will be measured by the confidence in saving survey that includes 5 items that assess participant's confidence in saving and saving-related behaviors. The survey uses a 5-point likert scale: 5= extremely confident, 4= very confident, 3= somewhat confident, 2= not very confident, or 1= not confident at all (theoretical range 5-25). Higher scores indicate higher confidence
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
importance of saving
change in importance of saving will be measured by the importance of saving survey that includes 5 items that assess importance of saving for participants. The survey uses a 5-point Likert scale: 5= extremely important, 4= very important, 3= somewhat important, 2= not very important, or 1= not important at all (theoretical range 5-25). Higher scores indicate higher importance of saving for participants.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
saving
change in savings overtime in the intervention group will be measured by monthly bank statements
Measured: 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
child-caregiver relationship
The perceived child-caregiver relationship scale is adapted from the Family Assessment measure and assess relationships on two dimensions: (1) acceptance and warmth - the extent to which the caregiver perceives as involved in their child's life; and (2) psychological autonomy - the extent to which the caregiver employs a non-coercive, democratic discipline and encourages the child to express individuality within the family. Participants are asked to rate the adults they live with, on each of the 17 items (range: 17-85), on a 5-point scale (1 = 'never' and 5 = 'always'). Sample items include: "Can you count on your parents to help her if she has a problem?" and "Do your parents keep challenging you to do the best in whatever you do?" Higher scores indicatw a more positive child-caregiver relationship.
Measured: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2025
- Study start7 Apr 2026
- Primary completion15 Aug 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Aug 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Unaccompanied MigrationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by New York UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,920 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- New York University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Ghana, Washington University School of Medicine
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07278934
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01HD116780
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 5 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The study team will use the NICHD Data and Specimen Hub (DASH) to deposit the data. DASH is a centralized resource that allows researchers to share and access de-identified data from studies fundedby NICHD.
Publications
Sensoy Bahar O, Addo-Lartey A, Ibrahim A, Ssewamala FM, Neilands TB, Tozan Y, Boateng A, Byansi W, Dahlen A, McKay MM. Testing the impact of family-based intervention to improve developmental and health outcomes for female adolescents: study protocol for a cluster-randomized clinical trial in Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2026 Aug 19;26(1):2671. doi: 10.1186/s12889-026-28823-x.
PubMed 42786450
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Testing the Impact of Family-Based Intervention to Improve Developmental and Health Outcomes for Female Adolescents
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07278934
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R01HD116780
- Conditions
- Unaccompanied Migration
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,920 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- New York UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Ghana, Washington University School of Medicine
- Study start
- 7 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study seeks to address the urgent need for theoretically and empirically informed interventions that would address the increasing numbers of unaccompanied minors migrating from rural to urban centers in developing countries for better economic opportunities. This process often results in hazardous child labor defined as work that is mentally, physically, socially or morally dangerous and harmful; interfering with schooling and health and mental health functioning, and leading to several other disproportionate risks. Unaccompanied migrant child laborers' vulnerability is further intensified by the lack of parental protection and community belonging in the host urban center. The International Labor Organization (ILO) estimates that 9.6% of children (ages 5 to 17) across the globe are child laborers and draws attention to migrant child laborers as an underreported and highly vulnerable group, a significant portion of which are female with no education. Poverty has been identified as the main driver of child labor, with family context also being a critical contributing factor. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has the highest rates of child labor (24%), with Ghana -the focus of this study- registering one of the highest child labor prevalence at 22%, including unaccompanied child migrant laborers. In Ghana, unaccompanied adolescent girls migrate from the Northern region to urban centers in the south to work in the informal economy. Load carrying is the most common type of labor for this population and exposes migrant girls to multiple developmental and health risks. Building on the recently concluded R21 study (with 97 adolescent girls aged 11 to 14 years and their caregivers) that showed high feasibility and acceptability, and promising preliminary impact of the ANZANSI (resilience in Dagbani -local language) combination intervention in the same region, we propose to test its effectiveness in a larger two-arm cluster randomized clinical trial among 960 adolescent girls (age 11 to 14 years) at risk of school dropout nested within 32 public junior high schools in the Northern region of Ghana and their caregivers. The schools will be randomly assigned to one of two study conditions: 1) ANZANSI (FEE+MFG) and 2) bolstered usual care. The intervention will be delivered for 12 months, with assessments conducted at baseline and at 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-ups post-intervention initiation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bolstered care | No intervention | –Female adolescents in the bolstered care will receive services/education as usual in their respective schools. The usual care will be bolstered by providing school supplies (e.g., textbooks, notebooks) |
| ANZANSI Family Program | Experimental | Behavioral: ANZANSI Family ProgramIn addition to bolstered care, participants in this arm will receive the ANZANSI intervention comprised of family economic empowerment (FEE) intervention and multiple family group (MFG) intervention. FEE includes: 1) Financial Literacy Training; 2) Child Development Account (CDA); and 3) Family income-generating/microenterprise promotion component |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 11 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Enrolled in school and living within a family (defined broadly -not necessarily biological parents)
- Ages 11 to 14
- Skipping school in the past academic term (with at least 10% of unexcused absences).
- Capable of giving assent
- The caregiver inclusion criteria
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants that do not meet the criteria or exhibit a lack of understanding of the study procedures and hence not able to provide informed consent will be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ANZANSI Family ProgramFamily Economic Empowerment: 1) Financial literacy training: Four 1-2 hour workshop sessions focused on financial literacy will be delivered. 2) CDA. Each participant receives a CDA, a matched savings account. Participants' family members, relatives, or friends are allowed and encouraged to contribute towards the CDA. The account is then matched with money from the project. The match cap is an equivalent of US$10 per month; 3) The family income-generating activity (IGA): Participants are trained on IGAs and expected to use part of their matched savings to start an IGA. Multiple Family Groups. The manualized 16-session intervention is organized around 4Rs (Rules, Responsibility, Relationships, and Respectful Communication) and 2Ss (Stress and Social Support). Children and caregivers complete activities together or split to reconvene later for discussing as a larger group. Each group involves 7 to 10 families, with at least two generations of a family present in each session. | Behavioural | ANZANSI Family Program |
Primary outcome
overall health
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Change in health will be measured using the 5-item physical health subscale of the KIDSCREEN-52 Health Questionnaire for Children and Young People. The items are rated on a 1 to 5 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better physical health. The theoretical range is from 5 to 25.
Nutrition
Time frame: baseline, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month
Change in nutrition is measured using the 29-item Diet Quality Questionnaire-Ghana, mapping onto 29 food groups. Each item is rated yes/no. DQQ data collection uses the closed-ended, sentinel foods list-based method and captures food and drink consumption from the previous day and night.
mental health
Time frame: baseline, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month
Change in mental health will be measured using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8). Each of the 8 items is rated from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). The theoretical range is from 0 to 24, with higher scores representing more severe depression. A total score of 0 to 4 represents no significant depressive symptoms. A total score of 5 to 9 represents mild depressive symptoms; 10 to 14, moderate; 15 to 19, moderately severe; and 20 to 24, severe.
Risk-taking
Time frame: baseline, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month
Change in risk-taking will be measured using subsections from the Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS). GSHS measures behavioural risk factors and protective factors. For this study, the measure includes questions about tobacco and alcohol use as well as sexual risk-taking.
18 secondary outcomes
Self-concept
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Unaccompanied migration
Time frame: 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
self-esteem
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
life satisfaction
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
school attendance
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
grade progress
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
attitudes toward school
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
social support
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
perceived social support
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
family cohesion
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
parenting stress
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Intention to migrate
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
gender norms
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
future orientation
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
confidence in saving
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
importance of saving
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
saving
Time frame: 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
child-caregiver relationship
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Oct 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42786450Sensoy Bahar O, Addo-Lartey A, Ibrahim A, Ssewamala FM, Neilands TB, Tozan Y, Boateng A, Byansi W, Dahlen A, McKay MM. Testing the impact of family-based intervention to improve developmental and health outcomes for female adolescents: study protocol for a cluster-randomized clinical trial in Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2026 Aug 19;26(1):2671. doi: 10.1186/s12889-026-28823-x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The study team will use the NICHD Data and Specimen Hub (DASH) to deposit the data. DASH is a centralized resource that allows researchers to share and access de-identified data from studies fundedby NICHD.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ANZANSI Family Program in people with Unaccompanied Migration, run by New York University at 1 site in Ghana.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ghana. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ozge Sensoy Bahar (617 610 6814, osb208@nyu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
overall health (time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07278934, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2026.