AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)NCT07279376

Evaluating an Algorithm-Based Implementation Strategy to Improve HIV Care Outcomes

A study testing predictive emergency room alerts (pERA) in people with HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), run by Hunter College of City University of New York at 1 site in United States.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study tests a strategy for helping Care Management Agencies prioritize patients with HIV (PWH) for outreach and support. Under the new strategy, care managers are given a list of highest-priority patients who have been identified by a computer algorithm as being at high risk of going to the emergency room in the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)
What is being tested?
predictive emergency room alerts (pERA)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,600 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 Nov 2025to Aug 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants must be members of one of the Care Management Agencies that comprise the Community Care Management Partners (CCMP) Health Home
  • Participants must be living with HIV

Who cannot join

  • None, other than those listed above.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • Community Care Management Partners Health Home

    New York, New York, 10016

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Harnessing Data Science to Improve HIV Care Continuum Outcomes: A Hybrid Type 2 Trial Evaluating a Machine-Learning Algorithm-Based Implementation Strategy

This study tests a strategy for helping Care Management Agencies prioritize patients with HIV (PWH) for outreach and support. Under the new strategy, care managers are given a list of highest-priority patients who have been identified by a computer algorithm as being at high risk of going to the emergency room in the next two weeks. This strategy is compared to traditional (standard of care) care management, in which care managers reach out to patients based on a set schedule and their clinical judgement (but not based on a computerized report). We are looking at whether the use of the computer report helps care managers reach the right patients at the right time, preventing them from having to go to the emergency room.

Read the detailed description

Comprehensive Care Management and Care Coordination (CCM/CC) is a medical case management intervention with demonstrated effectiveness in reducing ED visits and hospitalization for PWH, and improving both health outcomes (viral load, CD4 count) and retention in care. However, despite CCM/CC's effectiveness, there are persistent challenges to its implementation. This project is based on the scientific premise that the effectiveness of the CCM/CC intervention can be greatly improved by utilizing a data-driven implementation strategy that optimizes timely provision of CCM/CC services to the patients who need it most. Our community-based collaborator, Comprehensive Care Management Partners (CCMP) Health Home, has developed and validated a machine-learning algorithm that can reliably predict which of its PWH patients are most likely to visit the ED in the next two weeks. In this project, we will apply this algorithm as a targeted implementation strategy for CCM/CC, focusing service provision on the PWH who need it most, when they need it most. Our core hypothesis (supported by preliminary studies data) is that this "just-in-time" strategy for implementing a care management intervention will overcome both provider-level barriers to the provision of CCM/CC services and patient-level barriers to the receipt of HIV treatment and care. We will conduct a Hybrid 2 implementation-effectiveness trial, guided by the RE-AIM implementation science framework and the behavioral economics theory of Scarcity to collect rigorous data on the impact of this algorithm-driven implementation strategy on the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the CCM/CC intervention

Being tested
predictive emergency room alerts (pERA), Standard of care
Keywords
HIV, emergency room, implementation science, machine-learning algorithm
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Emergencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • predictive emergency room alerts (pERA)Other

    pERA is a machine-learning algorithm-driven implementation strategy that identifies patients at higher risk of emergency room visits and alerts the care manager to follow-up with them.

  • Standard of careOther

    Care managers interact with patients according to their standard of care protocols

Study groups in NCT07279376
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Predictive Emergency Room Alerts (perA)Implementation StrategyActive comparatorRefers to patients within Care Management Agencies that have been randomized to use the pERA implementation strategy to delivery CCM/CC during that study period.
Receives: Other: predictive emergency room alerts (pERA)
Standard of Care Implementation StrategyOtherRefers to patients in Care Management Agencies that have been randomized to use their standard of care implementation strategy to deliver CCM/CC during that study period.
Receives: Other: Standard of care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. ER visits

    Number of ER visits made by patients

    Measured: Each 18 month cluster period (36 months total)

  2. Hospitalizations

    Number of days of Hospitalization

    Measured: Each 18 month Cluster Period (36 months total)

  3. Viral Suppression

    Number of timepoints at which patient was virally suppressed

    Measured: Each 18 month cluster period (36 months total)

  4. CD4 Count

    CD4 Level at each data collection timepoint

    Measured: Each 18 month Cluster Period (36 months total)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2025
  2. Study start18 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completionFeb 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07279376
Sponsor's protocol ID
R01MH136903
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
9 Dec 2025
Last updated
27 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: State health department requirements regarding these electronic medical record data prohibit sharing IPD.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing predictive emergency room alerts (pERA) in people with HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), run by Hunter College of City University of New York at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

ER visits (time frame: Each 18 month cluster period (36 months total)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in