CancerIRISNCT07280715
Investigating Real-Time Immunotherapy Symptoms Study
A study testing Digital remote monitoring intervention in people with Cancer and Melanoma (Skin Cancer), run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using information from wearable devices and self-reported symptoms to remotely monitor patients during immunotherapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is the digital remote patient monitoring tool feasible and acceptable to patients? Do the alerts and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer, Melanoma (Skin Cancer), Immunotherapy
- What is being tested?
- Digital remote monitoring intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Jun 2026to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy at UPMC Hillman Cancer Center for melanoma;
- age 18 years or older;
- ability to read and write in English;
- owns and uses a smartphone capable of running study applications
Who cannot join
- under 18 years old; and
- unable to read and write in English
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Krina C Durica contact
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
Carissa A Low, 412-623-5973, lowca@upmc.edu
Carissa A Low
About this study
Official title: Digital Remote Patient Monitoring and Triage During Cancer Immunotherapy
The goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using information from wearable devices and self-reported symptoms to remotely monitor patients during immunotherapy. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is the digital remote patient monitoring tool feasible and acceptable to patients?
- Do the alerts and guidance improve symptom management, quality of life, and engagement with the care team during treatment?
Read more
Participants will:
- Complete a demographic questionnaire at the beginning of the study and quality-of-life and health questionnaires at the beginning, midpoint, and end of study.
- As feasible: At the beginning and end of the study, complete an in-person physical function assessment measuring balance (Short Physical Performance Battery).
If participant is randomly assigned to the intervention group, they will also:
- Complete weekly symptom ratings via digital remote patient monitoring tool
- Wear a Fitbit activity tracker as feasible for 90 days.
- At the end of the study, complete a semi-structured interview to provide feedback on the study.
Read the detailed description
Participants (n = 40) will be recruited from UPMC Hillman clinics.
If eligible patients consent to participate, they will complete online baseline, midpoint, and end of study questionnaires. Participant's medical records will be reviewed to extract demographic information and clinical covariates, including information about their cancer, its treatment, biological variables such as sex and age, clinical variables such as comorbidities, surgeries and hospitalizations, medications, and other markers of health care utilization (e.g., emergency department visits). Once extracted, these values will be linked only to their study ID number.
As feasible, participants will complete the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) at the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center or the research team's office at baseline and at the end of the study. During these visits, this in-person assessment will be administered by trained study team members. Participants that enroll in the study remotely will be invited to complete the in-person SPPB as feasible. The SPPB will be conducted within one month of the enrollment date and within one month of the end of study date.
Following informed consent and completing baseline questionnaires, participants will then be randomized into the digital remote monitoring group or usual care (1:1).
For participants in the intervention condition (digital remote monitoring group):
At the initial study visit, participants in the digital remote monitoring group will be oriented to the ecological momentary assessment procedures to assess patient reported symptoms.
Participants in the digital remote monitoring group will receive a weekly text message containing a secure link to a brief (approximately 5 minute) online symptom survey administered via Qualtrics. Each participant is assigned a unique, non-identifying study ID, which is embedded in their survey link to ensure responses are associated with the correct participant. A secure Qualtrics-based contact log, accessible only to authorized study personnel, will maintain phone numbers and study IDs for survey distribution. No survey data is stored on the participant's device, and no personally identifiable information is collected within the survey. All data is linked only to the study ID. Data usage requirements are not significantly different from what most smartphone users would require if they use their device to access the Internet for web searching.
Symptoms will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). The PRO-CTCAE includes 22 symptoms commonly associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as fatigue, diarrhea, abdominal pain, constipation, rash, itchy skin, dry skin, muscle aches, joint pain, arm or leg swelling, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, cough, headache, dry mouth, blurry vision, dizziness, pain or burning with urination, eye irritation (e.g., itching, watering, stinging, foreign body sensation), and nasal congestion. Participants are asked to report on symptoms experienced over the past 7 days. Responses are rated on a 0-4 scale.
If a participant reports a rating of 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), or 4 (very severe) for any symptom, an automated alert will appear at the end of the survey. This alert will inform participants that their responses may be concerning and that they should consider contacting their clinical care team. The alert will also include a summary of the self-reported severity, frequency, and/or interference for the relevant symptom(s), along with links to symptom management resources on the National Cancer Institute website if applicable.
In addition to the PRO-CTCAE questions in the weekly survey, participants in the digital remote monitoring group will also be asked to rate their overall quality of life for that day from 0 (worst possible) to 10 (best possible), indicate how they managed symptoms in the past week, rate their confidence in managing their symptoms from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (very confident), report if they hesitated to contact their care team about symptoms from the past week (and, if so, why), report if they were worried about their health in the past week, report any cancer treatment they've received since the last survey, and indicate if they have communicated with their cancer care team since their last survey.
Participants in the digital remote monitoring group will receive weekly email reports from the study team that show summaries/graphs of recent alerts triggered, symptom ratings, Fitbit data, and symptom management data. Participants may choose to share these data reports with their care team, family members, etc.
Participants in the remote monitoring group will also be asked to wear a Fitbit device as feasible (Fitbit Inspire 3 or similar) for the duration of the study and to install the Fitbit app on their smartphone. The Fitbit is a wristwatch-sized waterproof device that assesses heart and breathing rates, physical activity, and sleep, skin temperature, and oxygen levels and wirelessly transmits data to the server. Participants will be asked to charge the device as needed, approximately every 4-5 days. If participants already own a Fitbit device that collects comparable data to the study provided device, the study team will request access to the participant's Fitbit data for the duration of their study participation. Fitbit data points exceeding prespecified thresholds based on physiological norms (for skin temperature and pulse oxygenation) or each participants' historic average (heart rate and activity) will trigger a recommendation that the participant may want to contact their provider about the potentially concerning data point(s).
At the end of the study, participants will complete an end of study interview.
- Conditions
- Cancer, Melanoma (Skin Cancer), Immunotherapy
- Being tested
- Digital remote monitoring intervention, Usual Care
- Keywords
- quality of life, adverse events
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Digital remote monitoring interventionBehavioural
Responses to the PRO-CTCAE questions range from 0-4. Any grade 2-4 response (reflecting moderate to severe symptoms) will trigger a recommendation that the participant may want to contact their provider about the potentially concerning symptom. Fitbit data points exceeding prespecified thresholds based on physiological norms (for skin temperature and pulse oxygenation) or each participants' historic average (heart rate and activity) will also trigger a recommendation that the participant may want to contact their provider about the potentially concerning data point. Participants will receive weekly data reports that show summaries/graphs of recent alerts triggered, symptom ratings, and Fitbit data.
Usual CareOther
Participants will complete baseline, midpoint, and end of study measures and complete the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). They will not complete surveys, wear a Fitbit, or receive recommendations about when they might want to reach out to a provider about potentially concerning symptoms or Fitbit values. Participants will use the standard information they receive from clinic about how to manage their symptoms and when to contact their care team.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Digital remote monitoring group (intervention) | Experimental | Participants will complete baseline, midpoint, and end of study measures and complete the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) as feasible. Participants will rate symptoms weekly for 90 days using PRO-CTCAE questions to assess symptoms commonly associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Participants will also wear a Fitbit activity tracker (Inspire 3 or similar) as feasible for the duration of the study and install the Fitbit app on their smartphone. The Fitbit is a wristwatch-sized waterproof device that assesses heart and breathing rates, physical activity, and sleep, skin temperature, and oxygen levels and wirelessly transmits data to the server. Data from the wearable devices along with electronic patient-reported outcomes will be used to detect and triage immune-related adverse events. Receives: Behavioral: Digital remote monitoring intervention |
| Usual care | Active comparator | This group will complete baseline, midpoint, and end of study measures and complete the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) as feasible but will not wear an activity tracker or rate weekly symptoms. Receives: Other: Usual Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acceptability via semi-structured interviews
Post-intervention semi-structured interviews will be conducted to gather participant feedback and assess acceptability of the intervention. Participants will be asked to rate the likelihood they would keep using system on their own and to recommend system on a scale from 0 (not at all likely) to 10 (extremely likely). Responses will be averaged.
Measured: At the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
Acceptability via System Usability Scale
System Usability Scale (SUS). For odd items, subtract one from the user response. For even-numbered items, subtract the user responses from 5. This scales all values from 0 to 4 (with four being the most positive response). Add up the converted responses for each user and multiply that total by 2.5. Possible range of scores is 0 to 100 representing a composite measure of the overall usability of the system being studied.
Measured: At the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
Feasibility via accrual rate
accrual rate (number of participants that enroll [consent and provide at least one form of data] out of number of participants approached)
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
Feasibility via engagement with surveys
engagement (how many weeks participants completed symptom surveys)
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
Feasibility via engagement with Fitbit
engagement (how many days within the study the participants had Fitbit data)
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
Feasibility via completion rate
completion rate (number of participants that complete the study)
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Patient-Reported Physical Symptoms
Symptoms will be assessed using the PRO version of the Common Terminology for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE; Dueck et al., 2015). PRO-CTCAE questions will assess 22 symptoms commonly associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as fatigue, diarrhea, abdominal pain, constipation, rash, and itchy skin. For each symptom, participants will be asked about the severity, frequency, and/or the extent to which a symptom interfered with their activities. Participants will be asked to complete one rating per week and will report on symptoms over the past 7 days. Responses range from 0-4, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Measured: Change from baseline to the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2025
- Study start17 Jun 2026
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PittsburghThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized to the digital remote monitoring group or usual care
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Carissa Low, University of Pittsburgh
- Investigators
- Carissa A Low, Principal investigator, University of Pittsburgh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07280715
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY25090094
- Acronym
- IRIS
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Preliminary IPD data from this pilot study will not be shared
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Digital Remote Patient Monitoring and Triage During Cancer Immunotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07280715
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRIS / STUDY25090094
- Conditions
- Cancer, Melanoma (Skin Cancer), Immunotherapy
- Keywords
- quality of life, adverse events
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PittsburghUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using information from wearable devices and self-reported symptoms to remotely monitor patients during immunotherapy. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is the digital remote patient monitoring tool feasible and acceptable to patients?
- Do the alerts and guidance improve symptom management, quality of life, and engagement with the care team during treatment?
Participants will:
- Complete a demographic questionnaire at the beginning of the study and quality-of-life and health questionnaires at the beginning, midpoint, and end of study.
- As feasible: At the beginning and end of the study, complete an in-person physical function assessment measuring balance (Short Physical Performance Battery).
If participant is randomly assigned to the intervention group, they will also:
- Complete weekly symptom ratings via digital remote patient monitoring tool
- Wear a Fitbit activity tracker as feasible for 90 days.
- At the end of the study, complete a semi-structured interview to provide feedback on the study.
Detailed description
Participants (n = 40) will be recruited from UPMC Hillman clinics.
If eligible patients consent to participate, they will complete online baseline, midpoint, and end of study questionnaires. Participant's medical records will be reviewed to extract demographic information and clinical covariates, including information about their cancer, its treatment, biological variables such as sex and age, clinical variables such as comorbidities, surgeries and hospitalizations, medications, and other markers of health care utilization (e.g., emergency department visits). Once extracted, these values will be linked only to their study ID number.
As feasible, participants will complete the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) at the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center or the research team's office at baseline and at the end of the study. During these visits, this in-person assessment will be administered by trained study team members. Participants that enroll in the study remotely will be invited to complete the in-person SPPB as feasible. The SPPB will be conducted within one month of the enrollment date and within one month of the end of study date.
Following informed consent and completing baseline questionnaires, participants will then be randomized into the digital remote monitoring group or usual care (1:1).
For participants in the intervention condition (digital remote monitoring group):
At the initial study visit, participants in the digital remote monitoring group will be oriented to the ecological momentary assessment procedures to assess patient reported symptoms.
Participants in the digital remote monitoring group will receive a weekly text message containing a secure link to a brief (approximately 5 minute) online symptom survey administered via Qualtrics. Each participant is assigned a unique, non-identifying study ID, which is embedded in their survey link to ensure responses are associated with the correct participant. A secure Qualtrics-based contact log, accessible only to authorized study personnel, will maintain phone numbers and study IDs for survey distribution. No survey data is stored on the participant's device, and no personally identifiable information is collected within the survey. All data is linked only to the study ID. Data usage requirements are not significantly different from what most smartphone users would require if they use their device to access the Internet for web searching.
Symptoms will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). The PRO-CTCAE includes 22 symptoms commonly associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as fatigue, diarrhea, abdominal pain, constipation, rash, itchy skin, dry skin, muscle aches, joint pain, arm or leg swelling, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, cough, headache, dry mouth, blurry vision, dizziness, pain or burning with urination, eye irritation (e.g., itching, watering, stinging, foreign body sensation), and nasal congestion. Participants are asked to report on symptoms experienced over the past 7 days. Responses are rated on a 0-4 scale.
If a participant reports a rating of 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), or 4 (very severe) for any symptom, an automated alert will appear at the end of the survey. This alert will inform participants that their responses may be concerning and that they should consider contacting their clinical care team. The alert will also include a summary of the self-reported severity, frequency, and/or interference for the relevant symptom(s), along with links to symptom management resources on the National Cancer Institute website if applicable.
In addition to the PRO-CTCAE questions in the weekly survey, participants in the digital remote monitoring group will also be asked to rate their overall quality of life for that day from 0 (worst possible) to 10 (best possible), indicate how they managed symptoms in the past week, rate their confidence in managing their symptoms from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (very confident), report if they hesitated to contact their care team about symptoms from the past week (and, if so, why), report if they were worried about their health in the past week, report any cancer treatment they've received since the last survey, and indicate if they have communicated with their cancer care team since their last survey.
Participants in the digital remote monitoring group will receive weekly email reports from the study team that show summaries/graphs of recent alerts triggered, symptom ratings, Fitbit data, and symptom management data. Participants may choose to share these data reports with their care team, family members, etc.
Participants in the remote monitoring group will also be asked to wear a Fitbit device as feasible (Fitbit Inspire 3 or similar) for the duration of the study and to install the Fitbit app on their smartphone. The Fitbit is a wristwatch-sized waterproof device that assesses heart and breathing rates, physical activity, and sleep, skin temperature, and oxygen levels and wirelessly transmits data to the server. Participants will be asked to charge the device as needed, approximately every 4-5 days. If participants already own a Fitbit device that collects comparable data to the study provided device, the study team will request access to the participant's Fitbit data for the duration of their study participation. Fitbit data points exceeding prespecified thresholds based on physiological norms (for skin temperature and pulse oxygenation) or each participants' historic average (heart rate and activity) will trigger a recommendation that the participant may want to contact their provider about the potentially concerning data point(s).
At the end of the study, participants will complete an end of study interview.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized to the digital remote monitoring group or usual care
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Digital remote monitoring group (intervention) | Experimental | Behavioral: Digital remote monitoring interventionParticipants will complete baseline, midpoint, and end of study measures and complete the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) as feasible. Participants will rate symptoms weekly for 90 days using PRO-CTCAE questions to assess symptoms commonly associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Participants will also wear a Fitbit activity tracker (Inspire 3 or similar) as feasible for the duration of the study and install the Fitbit app on their smartphone. The Fitbit is a wristwatch-sized waterproof device that assesses heart and breathing rates, physical activity, and sleep, skin temperature, and oxygen levels and wirelessly transmits data to the server. Data from the wearable devices along with electronic patient-reported outcomes will be used to detect and triage immune-related adverse events. |
| Usual care | Active comparator | Other: Usual CareThis group will complete baseline, midpoint, and end of study measures and complete the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) as feasible but will not wear an activity tracker or rate weekly symptoms. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy at UPMC Hillman Cancer Center for melanoma;
- age 18 years or older;
- ability to read and write in English;
- owns and uses a smartphone capable of running study applications
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- under 18 years old; and
- unable to read and write in English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Digital remote monitoring interventionResponses to the PRO-CTCAE questions range from 0-4. Any grade 2-4 response (reflecting moderate to severe symptoms) will trigger a recommendation that the participant may want to contact their provider about the potentially concerning symptom. Fitbit data points exceeding prespecified thresholds based on physiological norms (for skin temperature and pulse oxygenation) or each participants' historic average (heart rate and activity) will also trigger a recommendation that the participant may want to contact their provider about the potentially concerning data point. Participants will receive weekly data reports that show summaries/graphs of recent alerts triggered, symptom ratings, and Fitbit data. | Behavioural | Digital remote monitoring group (intervention) |
| Usual CareParticipants will complete baseline, midpoint, and end of study measures and complete the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). They will not complete surveys, wear a Fitbit, or receive recommendations about when they might want to reach out to a provider about potentially concerning symptoms or Fitbit values. Participants will use the standard information they receive from clinic about how to manage their symptoms and when to contact their care team. | Other | Usual care |
Primary outcome
Acceptability via semi-structured interviews
Time frame: At the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
Post-intervention semi-structured interviews will be conducted to gather participant feedback and assess acceptability of the intervention. Participants will be asked to rate the likelihood they would keep using system on their own and to recommend system on a scale from 0 (not at all likely) to 10 (extremely likely). Responses will be averaged.
Acceptability via System Usability Scale
Time frame: At the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
System Usability Scale (SUS). For odd items, subtract one from the user response. For even-numbered items, subtract the user responses from 5. This scales all values from 0 to 4 (with four being the most positive response). Add up the converted responses for each user and multiply that total by 2.5. Possible range of scores is 0 to 100 representing a composite measure of the overall usability of the system being studied.
Feasibility via accrual rate
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
accrual rate (number of participants that enroll [consent and provide at least one form of data] out of number of participants approached)
Feasibility via engagement with surveys
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
engagement (how many weeks participants completed symptom surveys)
Feasibility via engagement with Fitbit
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
engagement (how many days within the study the participants had Fitbit data)
Feasibility via completion rate
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
completion rate (number of participants that complete the study)
1 secondary outcome
Patient-Reported Physical Symptoms
Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Preliminary IPD data from this pilot study will not be shared
Related trials for Cancer
Recruiting
MRD-Guided Postoperative Surveillance and Adaptive Treatment for Resectable Lung Cancer
Lung Neoplasms, Neoadjuvant Therapy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Tamoxifen Citrate or Z-Endoxifen Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Recurrent Breast Carcinoma, Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v7
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Phase II Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of SXRN Injection in Patients With Cancer Cachexia
Cachexia-Anorexia Syndrome, Cachexia; Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Adebrelimab ±Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Locally Advanced ESCC
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Immunotherapy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Krina C Durica contact
Carissa A Low principal investigator
University of Pittsburgh
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Digital remote monitoring intervention in people with Cancer and Melanoma (Skin Cancer), run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Carissa A Low (412-623-5973, lowca@upmc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acceptability via semi-structured interviews (time frame: At the end of the intervention (at approximately 90 days)). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2026.