AzTrials
AzTrials

Detention Under the Mental Health ActACDINCT07284368

Advance Choice Document Implementation

An observational study of Detention Under the Mental Health Act, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Advance Choice Documents (ACDs) are statements of preferences for mental health care and treatment made when service users have capacity to do so. This is done with their care team and others as desired, e.g. carers/supporters or advocates. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Detention Under the Mental Health Act
What is being tested?
Advance Choice Document Implementation
How many people
374 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
29 Sep 2025to 31 Mar 2027
How long will I take part?
18 Months
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: People with severe mental Illnesses

Who may be able to join

  • WP1: Focus Groups Service users-Young people Aged ≥ 16 Experienced detention under the MHA while in the care of CAMHS Currently under the care of community mental health services (CAMHS / EI / CMHT)
  • Older adults
  • Experienced detention under the MHA while under services for Older Adults
  • Currently under the care of older adult community mental health services
  • Carers / Informal supporters Aged ≥ 16 years A relative or friend of a service user who is eligible for the study
  • Professionals Professional potentially involved in supporting the completion of ACDs (i.e., community mental health team (CMHT) staff, advocates, peer workers) SLaM professionals potentially involved in referring to ACDs (i.e., inpatient and emergency department liaison mental health staff, home treatment, place of safety and street triage staff) Approved mental health professionals (AMHPs) and Section 12 (MHA) approved doctors involved in detention.
Show all 27Show fewer
  • Ambulance, prison mental health and Emergency Department staff General Practitioners, including mental health leads, or other primary care professionals who care for people with SMI discharged from secondary services
  • WP 2: Prospective study of ACD completion and use Service users All service users: accepted referral to an ACD facilitator for ACD creation Young people
  • Aged ≥ 16
  • Experienced detention under the MHA while in the care of CAMHS
  • Currently under the care of community mental health services (CAMHS / EI / CMHT/)
  • Accepted referral to an ACD facilitator for ACD creation; including participants who decline to complete and ACD after referral to an ACD facilitator.
  • Older adults
  • Experienced detention under the MHA while under services for Older Adults
  • Currently under the care of older adult community mental health services
  • accepted referral to an ACD facilitator for ACD creation
  • General Adult:
  • Aged ≥ 18 years
  • Previously detained under the MHA
  • Under the care of community mental health services (CMHT or EI)
  • Forensic
  • Aged ≥ 18 years
  • Experience detention under the MHA into forensic services
  • Currently under the care of forensic mental health services
  • Carers: relative or friend of someone referred to an ACD facilitator
  • Professionals: SLaM staff involved in the care of a participant with an ACD whose ACD is expected to have been consulted because they were: involved in a transfer of care, placed in zoning, referred for a MHA assessment or to a home treatment team, attended an Emergency Department or Place of Safety, admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit or imprisoned.
  • The interviews conducted with service users and staff after the expected use event will also include questions about satisfaction with and perceived value of the process of completing, distributing, accessing, honouring, and reviewing an ACD.

Who cannot join

  • Service users Aged under 16 years Lacking capacity to provide consent and/or is unwilling to do so Currently detained under the MHA in psychiatric hospital Currently under the care of eating disorder services
  • Carers/informal supporters Aged under 16 years Is not a relative or friend of a service user who is eligible for the study
  • Professionals Is not a mental health professional or Section 12 (MHA) approved doctor Is not a professional involved in supporting the completion of ACDs Is not a General Practitioner or mental health lead caring for people with SMI discharged from secondary services.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United Kingdom1 site
  • South London and Maudsley/Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience-King's College London

    London, SE5 8AZ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Advance Choice Documents (ACDs) are statements of preferences for mental health care and treatment made when service users have capacity to do so. This is done with their care team and others as desired, e.g. carers/supporters or advocates. In addition to improving therapeutic relationships, ACDs have been shown to reduce compulsory psychiatric admissions by 25%.

South London and Maudsley is currently implementing ACDs into routine practice across its services and the Advance Choice Document Implementation (ACDI) project, run by researchers at King's College London, is supporting the development of related resources and the evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation. Advisory groups will also guide the study approach throughout.

Read more

The project comprises four work packages. Work Package 1 involves focus groups with stakeholders (service users, carers, staff) to inform implementation for Older Adults and CAMHS services. This is to understand the barriers and facilitators for ACD implementation in these services; and learn what adaptations are needed to the ACD resources and procedures for use in these services

Work Package 2 is a prospective study of ACD completion and use throughout all directorates. This will comprise interviews with service users after ACD creation and after an event where the ACD is expected to have been used; interviews with their care-team during expected use events; and interviews/focus groups with staff facilitating the creation of ACDs to understand the integration of their role in SLaM.

Work Package 3 is a retrospective study examining the impact of ACD creation on health service use and routinely collected outcomes. Work Package 4 is a prospective study of ACD use and its relationship to ACD content. Work Packages 3 and 4 will use de-identified data collected via South London an Maudsley's Clinical Records Interactive search System (CRIS).

For more information on ACDI, the people involved, and related publications, please visit: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/acdi

Being tested
Advance Choice Document Implementation
Keywords
Advance Statements, Advance Choice Documents, Psychiatric Advance Directives, Mental Health Act, Involuntary hospitalisation, Coercion, Detention rates

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Advance Choice Document ImplementationOther

    Creation and application of Advance Choice Documents

Study groups in NCT07284368
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ACD holdersservice users with a history of detention under the Mental Health Act that create Advance Choice Documents
Receives: Other: Advance Choice Document Implementation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of admissions under the Mental Health Act sections 2, 3, 135 and and associated bed days

    Mental Health Act sections Section 2, 3, 135 and 136 are a means to detain someone in a psychiatric facility, in England and Wales.

    Evaluation will be done over different follow-up periods and include participants admitted under all Sections of the Mental Health Act and associated bed-days, compared to number of participants admitted voluntarily (non-Mental Health Act) and associated bed-days.

    Measured: 18 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Number of Home Treatment Team events

    The number of Home Treatment Team events and days spent under the care of Home Treatment Teams will be assessed for participants with advance choice documents and those without advance choice documents

    Measured: 18 months

  2. Number of events of acute mental health and emergency service use

    The number of events use of acute mental health and emergency services will be evaluated for participants with advance choice documents compared to those without advance choice documents

    Measured: 18

  3. Rates of restraint

    The number of events where restraint is used will be evaluated for participants advance choice documents compared to participants without advance choice documents, across each follow-up period. As these events are not recorded in structured fields, free-text entries will be searched to identify all events containing the words: Restrained' and/or 'restraint'

    Measured: 18

  4. Number of days spent in seclusion

    The number of days spent in seclusion will be evaluated for participants with advance choice documents compared to those without advance choice documents. As these events are not recorded in structured fields, free-text entries will be searched to identify all events containing the words 'Seclusion' and 'supervised confinement'

    Measured: 18 months

  5. Number of events of involuntary medication

    The number of events where involuntary medication is used will be evaluated for participants advance choice documents compared to those without advance choice documents

    Measured: 18 months

  6. Number of safety events recorded (violence, self-harm, consequences of self-neglect and other serious untoward incidents)

    The number of safety events recorded will be evaluated for participants with advance choice documents compared to those without advance choice documents

    Measured: 18 months

  7. Number of events of contact with police related to use of mental health services

    The number of events of contact with police related to use of mental health services will be evaluated for participants with advance choice documents compared to those without advance choice documents

    Measured: 18 months

  8. Number of events of General health service use

    General health service use will be measured through data linkage with Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). These data will be obtained at a national level for all service users. Physical health service use outcomes will include: inpatient admissions and associated bed days (this will include Healthcare Resource Group codes, associated primary and secondary diagnostic codes, admission category, and treatment specialty code), Emergency Department (ED) attendances (this will include Healthcare Resource Group codes, diagnosis classifications, investigations codes, treatment codes, arrival mode, and attendance disposal codes), and outpatient appointments (this will include appointment information such as first appointment. We will extract routinely collected outcomes such as the Health of the Nations Outcomes Scales (HoNOS)

    Measured: 18 months

  9. Number of community mental health team events

    Number of community mental health team events will be evaluated for participants with advance choice documents compared to those without advance choice documents.

    Measured: 18 months

  10. Number of psychiatric liaison team events (in emergency departments)

    The number of psychiatric liaison team events will be evaluated for participants with advance choice documents and those without. The number of events will be requested for all follow-up periods within 18 months. (ie participants will have varying follow-up periods)

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2025
  2. Study start29 Sep 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
374 participants (estimated)
Target duration
18 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07284368
Sponsor's protocol ID
R&D2025/062
Other IDs
2946
Acronym
ACDI
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
13 Nov 2025
Last updated
16 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual Participant Data will not be publicly available due to risk of reidentification.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in