Kidney CancerPuraBondNCT07284953
A Novel Haemostatic Agent for Robotic Partial Nephrectomy
A study testing PuraBond in people with Kidney Cancer and Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Kidney cancer is one of only a few cancers with an increasing incidence over the past two decades. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for over 85% of all kidney tumours, which makes up 2-3% of all adult malignancies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- PuraBond
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Mar 2026to Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients, aged 18 years or above
- Patient has a clinical indication for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy procedure
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
- Intraoperative criteria: Subject requiring the use of PuraBond for persisting mild and moderate bleeding(s) when haemostasis by ligation or standard means are insufficient or impractical.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or Lactating women
- Unable to give informed consent
- Patient undergoing redo surgery
- Fibrin glue and/or topical haemostatic agent used before or concomitantly to the use of PuraBond
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational treatment PuraBond
- Known coagulopathy
Show all 9Show fewer
- Clinical indication not satisfying inclusion criteria
- Patient has clinical evidence of disease or condition expected to compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments during the study duration
- Patients currently participating in, or planning to enroll in another clinical study that may impact participation or outcomes of this clinical study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
About this study
Official title: A Pilot, Single Arm Post-Market Clinical Study to Demonstrate the Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of PuraBond™ Absorbable Haemostatic Material for the Management of Bleeding and Tissue Healing in Robotic Partial Nephrectomy
Kidney cancer is one of only a few cancers with an increasing incidence over the past two decades. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for over 85% of all kidney tumours, which makes up 2-3% of all adult malignancies. Approximately, 70% of RCCs are incidentally discovered on axial imaging of the abdomen with >50% of RCCs being low-stage (T1-T2 N0M0). Despite advancements in drug discovery for advanced RCC, mortality rates have not changed over the past two decades, however for patients with the low-stage disease, surgical extirpation offers excellent 5-year survival rates of 95%.
Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) provides effective curative therapy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma with the benefit of kidney preservation and excellent cancer-specific survival. However, the most frequent complications during NSS, after tumour resection are bleeding, urinary fistula formation, and ischemic renal damage. More precisely, the urological complication was defined as significant haemorrhage >500 mL necessitating intervention or transfusion, urine leakage (drainage of greater than 50 mL daily for more than one week with fluid biochemistry compatible with urine) and acute renal failure (resulting in any dialysis, ureteral obstruction or kidney loss).
In the field of partial nephrectomy procedures, it is therefore crucial achieving adequate haemostasis intraoperatively during post tumour excision while the artery is clamped and after being unclamped.
Read the detailed description
Kidney cancer is one of only a few cancers with an increasing incidence over the past two decades. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for over 85% of all kidney tumours, which makes up 2-3% of all adult malignancies. Approximately, 70% of RCCs are incidentally discovered on axial imaging of the abdomen with >50% of RCCs being low-stage (T1-T2 N0M0). Despite advancements in drug discovery for advanced RCC, mortality rates have not changed over the past two decades, however for patients with the low-stage disease, surgical extirpation offers excellent 5-year survival rates of 95%.
Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) provides effective curative therapy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma with the benefit of kidney preservation and excellent cancer-specific survival. However, the most frequent complications during NSS, after tumour resection are bleeding, urinary fistula formation, and ischemic renal damage. More precisely, the urological complication was defined as significant haemorrhage >500 mL necessitating intervention or transfusion, urine leakage (drainage of greater than 50 mL daily for more than one week with fluid biochemistry compatible with urine) and acute renal failure (resulting in any dialysis, ureteral obstruction or kidney loss).
In the field of partial nephrectomy procedures, it is therefore crucial achieving adequate haemostasis intraoperatively during post tumour excision while the artery is clamped and after being unclamped.
Haemostatic agent can be used after Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) or after the sutureless technique with bipolar cauterization of the surgical bed for the haemostatic control in the treatment of small cortical masses. It can be always used for tumours ≤1.5 cm and can be a valid option also for tumours between 1.6 and 2.5 cm, aside from their spatial extension.
As such, there is a need for the exploration of the use of novel haemostatic agents, such as self-assembling peptide (SAP)-based haemostat, to manage bleeding during partial nephrectomy.
The SAPs are oligopeptides (8 - 16 amino acids) composed of alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids. These peptide chains can rapidly form nanofibers and create 3D microenvironments at a physiological pH and osmolarity. As peptides are nontoxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable, the SAPs can be used without an apparent immunological response, are also easy handling and are easy to inject due to their water solubility. Due to all these properties, SAPs are suitable for clinical use. One of the most widely studied SAPs is RADA16. It contains the amino acids alanine, lysine, and glutamate in repeated sequences of 4 X [Arg-Ala-Asp-Ala] (RADA16). RADA16 has proven utility as an effective topical haemostatic agent in a variety of surgical and pathological scenarios.
PuraStat and PuraBond (same product manufactured by 3-D Matrix Europe SAS, Caluire-et-Cuire, France) are CE-marked medical devices delivered by pre-filled syringes as viscous aqueous solutions of synthetic 2.5% RADA16. When RADA16 comes in to contact with blood or other physiological fluids, it forms a hydrogel. The hydrogel formation acts as a mechanical barrier and blocks the flow of the blood from the wound and thereby, demonstrates excellent topical haemostatic control. Initial preclinical studies investigating this peptide have shown other benefits in addition to its haemostatic properties, including improved wound healing.
Since 2014, PuraStat/PuraBond haemostatic efficacy has been significant successfully assessed in clinical studies, including in GI endoscopy, ENT, cardiovascular and general surgery (liver surgery) to support its use in humans demonstrated >90% of achieved haemostasis within 2min. There is a recent Australian case series published in Oct 2023 evaluating 29 patients undergoing nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, concluding it is a safe haemostatic agent.
However, there are no current studies published regarding self-assembling peptide haemostatic agents in partial nephrectomy. This study aims to generate clinical evidence investigating the feasibility and safety of PuraBond in achieving haemostasis in partial nephrectomy.
- Conditions
- Kidney Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- PuraBond
- Keywords
- Robotic Partial Nephrectomy, PuraBond
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PuraBondDevice
Consecutive patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy procedure (primary resection) and treated with PuraBond
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PuraBond | Experimental | Collect medical information on patients who were treated with PuraBond during robotic partial nephrectomy, according to each participating institution's procedures and standards of care.
Evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of PuraBond in achieving haemostasis and post operative healing at the resection site compared to standard of care agent for robotic partial nephrectomy procedures Receives: Device: PuraBond |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intraoperative efficacy rate in stopping remaining mild and moderate bleeding after declamping within 2 minutes
Measured: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure
Secondary outcomes (5)
Time to Haemostasis after PuraBond application
Measured: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure
The amount of PuraBond needed to achieve haemostasis
Measured: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure
Ease of use of PuraBond (difficult or easy)
Measured: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure
Rate of revision for bleeding
Measured: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure
Radiomics score of tissue healing at 6 months post op CT scan
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2025
- Study startMar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2027 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Study no longer going ahead
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Kidney CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Patients will be randomised to PuraBond or standard care of Floseal to stop the bleeding after renorrhaphy suture when undergoing a robotic partial nephrectomy procedure (primary resection).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07284953
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024SUR137
- Acronym
- PuraBond
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot, Single Arm Post-Market Clinical Study to Demonstrate the Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of PuraBond™ Absorbable Haemostatic Material for the Management of Bleeding and Tissue Healing in Robotic Partial Nephrectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07284953
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PuraBond / 2024SUR137
- Conditions
- Kidney Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Robotic Partial Nephrectomy, PuraBond
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Study no longer going ahead
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS TrustOther government
- Study start
- Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Kidney cancer is one of only a few cancers with an increasing incidence over the past two decades. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for over 85% of all kidney tumours, which makes up 2-3% of all adult malignancies. Approximately, 70% of RCCs are incidentally discovered on axial imaging of the abdomen with >50% of RCCs being low-stage (T1-T2 N0M0). Despite advancements in drug discovery for advanced RCC, mortality rates have not changed over the past two decades, however for patients with the low-stage disease, surgical extirpation offers excellent 5-year survival rates of 95%.
Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) provides effective curative therapy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma with the benefit of kidney preservation and excellent cancer-specific survival. However, the most frequent complications during NSS, after tumour resection are bleeding, urinary fistula formation, and ischemic renal damage. More precisely, the urological complication was defined as significant haemorrhage >500 mL necessitating intervention or transfusion, urine leakage (drainage of greater than 50 mL daily for more than one week with fluid biochemistry compatible with urine) and acute renal failure (resulting in any dialysis, ureteral obstruction or kidney loss).
In the field of partial nephrectomy procedures, it is therefore crucial achieving adequate haemostasis intraoperatively during post tumour excision while the artery is clamped and after being unclamped.
Detailed description
Kidney cancer is one of only a few cancers with an increasing incidence over the past two decades. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for over 85% of all kidney tumours, which makes up 2-3% of all adult malignancies. Approximately, 70% of RCCs are incidentally discovered on axial imaging of the abdomen with >50% of RCCs being low-stage (T1-T2 N0M0). Despite advancements in drug discovery for advanced RCC, mortality rates have not changed over the past two decades, however for patients with the low-stage disease, surgical extirpation offers excellent 5-year survival rates of 95%.
Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) provides effective curative therapy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma with the benefit of kidney preservation and excellent cancer-specific survival. However, the most frequent complications during NSS, after tumour resection are bleeding, urinary fistula formation, and ischemic renal damage. More precisely, the urological complication was defined as significant haemorrhage >500 mL necessitating intervention or transfusion, urine leakage (drainage of greater than 50 mL daily for more than one week with fluid biochemistry compatible with urine) and acute renal failure (resulting in any dialysis, ureteral obstruction or kidney loss).
In the field of partial nephrectomy procedures, it is therefore crucial achieving adequate haemostasis intraoperatively during post tumour excision while the artery is clamped and after being unclamped.
Haemostatic agent can be used after Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) or after the sutureless technique with bipolar cauterization of the surgical bed for the haemostatic control in the treatment of small cortical masses. It can be always used for tumours ≤1.5 cm and can be a valid option also for tumours between 1.6 and 2.5 cm, aside from their spatial extension.
As such, there is a need for the exploration of the use of novel haemostatic agents, such as self-assembling peptide (SAP)-based haemostat, to manage bleeding during partial nephrectomy.
The SAPs are oligopeptides (8 - 16 amino acids) composed of alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids. These peptide chains can rapidly form nanofibers and create 3D microenvironments at a physiological pH and osmolarity. As peptides are nontoxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable, the SAPs can be used without an apparent immunological response, are also easy handling and are easy to inject due to their water solubility. Due to all these properties, SAPs are suitable for clinical use. One of the most widely studied SAPs is RADA16. It contains the amino acids alanine, lysine, and glutamate in repeated sequences of 4 X [Arg-Ala-Asp-Ala] (RADA16). RADA16 has proven utility as an effective topical haemostatic agent in a variety of surgical and pathological scenarios.
PuraStat and PuraBond (same product manufactured by 3-D Matrix Europe SAS, Caluire-et-Cuire, France) are CE-marked medical devices delivered by pre-filled syringes as viscous aqueous solutions of synthetic 2.5% RADA16. When RADA16 comes in to contact with blood or other physiological fluids, it forms a hydrogel. The hydrogel formation acts as a mechanical barrier and blocks the flow of the blood from the wound and thereby, demonstrates excellent topical haemostatic control. Initial preclinical studies investigating this peptide have shown other benefits in addition to its haemostatic properties, including improved wound healing.
Since 2014, PuraStat/PuraBond haemostatic efficacy has been significant successfully assessed in clinical studies, including in GI endoscopy, ENT, cardiovascular and general surgery (liver surgery) to support its use in humans demonstrated >90% of achieved haemostasis within 2min. There is a recent Australian case series published in Oct 2023 evaluating 29 patients undergoing nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, concluding it is a safe haemostatic agent.
However, there are no current studies published regarding self-assembling peptide haemostatic agents in partial nephrectomy. This study aims to generate clinical evidence investigating the feasibility and safety of PuraBond in achieving haemostasis in partial nephrectomy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Patients will be randomised to PuraBond or standard care of Floseal to stop the bleeding after renorrhaphy suture when undergoing a robotic partial nephrectomy procedure (primary resection).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PuraBond | Experimental | Device: PuraBondCollect medical information on patients who were treated with PuraBond during robotic partial nephrectomy, according to each participating institution's procedures and standards of care. Evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of PuraBond in achieving haemostasis and post operative healing at the resection site compared to standard of care agent for robotic partial nephrectomy procedures |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female patients, aged 18 years or above
- Patient has a clinical indication for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy procedure
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
- Intraoperative criteria: Subject requiring the use of PuraBond for persisting mild and moderate bleeding(s) when haemostasis by ligation or standard means are insufficient or impractical.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Pregnant or Lactating women
- Unable to give informed consent
- Patient undergoing redo surgery
- Fibrin glue and/or topical haemostatic agent used before or concomitantly to the use of PuraBond
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational treatment PuraBond
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PuraBondConsecutive patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy procedure (primary resection) and treated with PuraBond | Device | PuraBond |
Primary outcome
Intraoperative efficacy rate in stopping remaining mild and moderate bleeding after declamping within 2 minutes
Time frame: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure
5 secondary outcomes
Time to Haemostasis after PuraBond application
Time frame: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure
The amount of PuraBond needed to achieve haemostasis
Time frame: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure
Ease of use of PuraBond (difficult or easy)
Time frame: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure
Rate of revision for bleeding
Time frame: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure
Radiomics score of tissue healing at 6 months post op CT scan
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Kidney Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Casdatifan and Cabozantinib Versus Placebo and Cabozantinib in Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Hereditary Leiomyomatosis Renal Cell Cancer - Study of the Genetic Cause and the Predisposition to Renal Cancer
Renal Tumor Histology, Cutaneous Leiomyoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Pazopanib Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Metastatic Kidney Cancer Who Have No Evidence of Disease After Surgery
Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Stage IV Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v7
Enrolling by invitation
Use of Tracking Devices to Locate Abnormalities During Invasive Procedures
Adenocarcinoma, Prostate Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Neoadjuvant Belzutifan Plus Pembrolizumab in High-Risk, Locally Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Locally Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PuraBond in people with Kidney Cancer and Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intraoperative efficacy rate in stopping remaining mild and moderate bleeding after declamping within 2 minutes (time frame: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2026.