AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney CancerPuraBondNCT07284953

A Novel Haemostatic Agent for Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

A study testing PuraBond in people with Kidney Cancer and Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Kidney cancer is one of only a few cancers with an increasing incidence over the past two decades. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for over 85% of all kidney tumours, which makes up 2-3% of all adult malignancies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma
What is being tested?
PuraBond
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Mar 2026to Mar 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female patients, aged 18 years or above
  • Patient has a clinical indication for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy procedure
  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
  • Intraoperative criteria: Subject requiring the use of PuraBond for persisting mild and moderate bleeding(s) when haemostasis by ligation or standard means are insufficient or impractical.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or Lactating women
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Patient undergoing redo surgery
  • Fibrin glue and/or topical haemostatic agent used before or concomitantly to the use of PuraBond
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational treatment PuraBond
  • Known coagulopathy
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Clinical indication not satisfying inclusion criteria
  • Patient has clinical evidence of disease or condition expected to compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments during the study duration
  • Patients currently participating in, or planning to enroll in another clinical study that may impact participation or outcomes of this clinical study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust

    Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Pilot, Single Arm Post-Market Clinical Study to Demonstrate the Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of PuraBond™ Absorbable Haemostatic Material for the Management of Bleeding and Tissue Healing in Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

Kidney cancer is one of only a few cancers with an increasing incidence over the past two decades. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for over 85% of all kidney tumours, which makes up 2-3% of all adult malignancies. Approximately, 70% of RCCs are incidentally discovered on axial imaging of the abdomen with >50% of RCCs being low-stage (T1-T2 N0M0). Despite advancements in drug discovery for advanced RCC, mortality rates have not changed over the past two decades, however for patients with the low-stage disease, surgical extirpation offers excellent 5-year survival rates of 95%.

Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) provides effective curative therapy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma with the benefit of kidney preservation and excellent cancer-specific survival. However, the most frequent complications during NSS, after tumour resection are bleeding, urinary fistula formation, and ischemic renal damage. More precisely, the urological complication was defined as significant haemorrhage >500 mL necessitating intervention or transfusion, urine leakage (drainage of greater than 50 mL daily for more than one week with fluid biochemistry compatible with urine) and acute renal failure (resulting in any dialysis, ureteral obstruction or kidney loss).

In the field of partial nephrectomy procedures, it is therefore crucial achieving adequate haemostasis intraoperatively during post tumour excision while the artery is clamped and after being unclamped.

Read the detailed description

Kidney cancer is one of only a few cancers with an increasing incidence over the past two decades. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for over 85% of all kidney tumours, which makes up 2-3% of all adult malignancies. Approximately, 70% of RCCs are incidentally discovered on axial imaging of the abdomen with >50% of RCCs being low-stage (T1-T2 N0M0). Despite advancements in drug discovery for advanced RCC, mortality rates have not changed over the past two decades, however for patients with the low-stage disease, surgical extirpation offers excellent 5-year survival rates of 95%.

Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) provides effective curative therapy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma with the benefit of kidney preservation and excellent cancer-specific survival. However, the most frequent complications during NSS, after tumour resection are bleeding, urinary fistula formation, and ischemic renal damage. More precisely, the urological complication was defined as significant haemorrhage >500 mL necessitating intervention or transfusion, urine leakage (drainage of greater than 50 mL daily for more than one week with fluid biochemistry compatible with urine) and acute renal failure (resulting in any dialysis, ureteral obstruction or kidney loss).

In the field of partial nephrectomy procedures, it is therefore crucial achieving adequate haemostasis intraoperatively during post tumour excision while the artery is clamped and after being unclamped.

Haemostatic agent can be used after Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) or after the sutureless technique with bipolar cauterization of the surgical bed for the haemostatic control in the treatment of small cortical masses. It can be always used for tumours ≤1.5 cm and can be a valid option also for tumours between 1.6 and 2.5 cm, aside from their spatial extension.

As such, there is a need for the exploration of the use of novel haemostatic agents, such as self-assembling peptide (SAP)-based haemostat, to manage bleeding during partial nephrectomy.

The SAPs are oligopeptides (8 - 16 amino acids) composed of alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids. These peptide chains can rapidly form nanofibers and create 3D microenvironments at a physiological pH and osmolarity. As peptides are nontoxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable, the SAPs can be used without an apparent immunological response, are also easy handling and are easy to inject due to their water solubility. Due to all these properties, SAPs are suitable for clinical use. One of the most widely studied SAPs is RADA16. It contains the amino acids alanine, lysine, and glutamate in repeated sequences of 4 X [Arg-Ala-Asp-Ala] (RADA16). RADA16 has proven utility as an effective topical haemostatic agent in a variety of surgical and pathological scenarios.

PuraStat and PuraBond (same product manufactured by 3-D Matrix Europe SAS, Caluire-et-Cuire, France) are CE-marked medical devices delivered by pre-filled syringes as viscous aqueous solutions of synthetic 2.5% RADA16. When RADA16 comes in to contact with blood or other physiological fluids, it forms a hydrogel. The hydrogel formation acts as a mechanical barrier and blocks the flow of the blood from the wound and thereby, demonstrates excellent topical haemostatic control. Initial preclinical studies investigating this peptide have shown other benefits in addition to its haemostatic properties, including improved wound healing.

Since 2014, PuraStat/PuraBond haemostatic efficacy has been significant successfully assessed in clinical studies, including in GI endoscopy, ENT, cardiovascular and general surgery (liver surgery) to support its use in humans demonstrated >90% of achieved haemostasis within 2min. There is a recent Australian case series published in Oct 2023 evaluating 29 patients undergoing nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, concluding it is a safe haemostatic agent.

However, there are no current studies published regarding self-assembling peptide haemostatic agents in partial nephrectomy. This study aims to generate clinical evidence investigating the feasibility and safety of PuraBond in achieving haemostasis in partial nephrectomy.

Being tested
PuraBond
Keywords
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy, PuraBond
Medical subject headings
Kidney Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Renal Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PuraBondDevice

    Consecutive patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy procedure (primary resection) and treated with PuraBond

Study groups in NCT07284953
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PuraBondExperimentalCollect medical information on patients who were treated with PuraBond during robotic partial nephrectomy, according to each participating institution's procedures and standards of care. Evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of PuraBond in achieving haemostasis and post operative healing at the resection site compared to standard of care agent for robotic partial nephrectomy procedures
Receives: Device: PuraBond

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intraoperative efficacy rate in stopping remaining mild and moderate bleeding after declamping within 2 minutes

    Measured: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Time to Haemostasis after PuraBond application

    Measured: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure

  2. The amount of PuraBond needed to achieve haemostasis

    Measured: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure

  3. Ease of use of PuraBond (difficult or easy)

    Measured: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure

  4. Rate of revision for bleeding

    Measured: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure

  5. Radiomics score of tissue healing at 6 months post op CT scan

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2025
  2. Study startMar 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2027 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Study no longer going ahead

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Patients will be randomised to PuraBond or standard care of Floseal to stop the bleeding after renorrhaphy suture when undergoing a robotic partial nephrectomy procedure (primary resection).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07284953
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024SUR137
Acronym
PuraBond
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
14 Nov 2025
Last updated
13 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PuraBond in people with Kidney Cancer and Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intraoperative efficacy rate in stopping remaining mild and moderate bleeding after declamping within 2 minutes (time frame: During robotic partial nephrectomy procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in