MedulloblastomaPhase 3NCT07291102
Comparison of Neurocognitive Outcome in Two Standard Regimen for Treatment of Low-risk Medulloblastoma
A Phase 3 study testing Bridging Chemotherapy, Induction Cycles A1-A3 and Induction Cycles A4-5 in people with Medulloblastoma, run by Nationwide Children's Hospital at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a trial to compare neurocognitive outcomes in the intent-to-treat population 2.5 years after diagnosis between patients with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic, SHH-activated, TP53-wt, non-MYC amplified MF randomized to the interventional arms A ("Head Start 4") or B (HIT-SKK). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 5 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Medulloblastoma
- What is being tested?
- Bridging Chemotherapy, Induction Cycles A1-A3 and Induction Cycles A4-5
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2027to Oct 2038
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 5 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age at diagnosis < 5 years
- Patients with institutional suspicion or diagnosis of SHH-activated MB
- Patient and family in social circumstances that will allow neuropsychological follow-up
- Ability of parents/legal representatives to understand the patient information and to personally sign and date the informed consent to participate in screening procedures
- Patient and the parents/legal representative are able and willing to participate in the entire study (if patient is eligible)
- Patient has received bridging chemotherapy as described in this protocol
Show all 18Show fewer
- Patients with centrally reviewed SHH-activated MB, TP53-wt, according to WHO classification 2021
- Absence of metastatic disease on central radiology review
- Exclusion of TP53-mutation by DNA sequencing of the TP53-gene from tumor tissue by central review. Results from local institution will be accepted if raw data of this analysis is forwarded to the national central review institution
- Confirmation of SHH activation by DNA methylation-based classification on central review. Results from local institution will be accepted if raw data of this analysis is forwarded to the national central review institution
- No amplification of MYC (amplification of MYCN allowed). Array-based technologies (850k array, molecular inversion probe assay (MIP)), array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) or next generation sequencing (NGS) DNA sequencing coverage MYC locus will be used. If these alternative assays give any indication of possible amplification, FISH will be performed on central review.
- No other medical contraindications to chemotherapy:
- No uncontrolled invasive fungal infection or other severe systemic infection requiring system/parental therapy
- No other severe organ dysfunctions, which cannot be clinically controlled
- No concomitant use with yellow fever vaccine and with live virus and bacterial vaccines
- No demyelinating form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome
- Retrospective assessment of pre-operative health-related QoL (HR-QoL) measured by Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory
- Provided written informed consent by parent(s)/parent representative(s) for randomization
Who cannot join
- Patients previously treated for any other brain tumor or any type of malignant disease
- Patients, in whom compliance with toxicity management guidelines and study procedures cannot be assured
- History of hypersensitivity to an investigational medicinal product or to any drug with similar chemical structure or to any excipient present in the pharmaceutical form of an investigational medicinal product.
- Patients/parents who do not wish to abstain from treatment with live vaccines during study participation
- Patients with a language barrier too extensive to complete neuropsychological tests based on the investigator's judgement
- Patients with severe premorbid developmental delay (based on the investigator's judgement), which will not allow WPPSI-IV assessment after 2.5 years
Show all 31Show fewer
- Patients cannot undergo MRI
- Inclusion Criteria for Bridging chemotherapy (carboplatin/etopiside) in interventional arms:
- Patients with SHH-activated MB, TP53-wt demonstrated by IHC for Gab1 or p75-NGFR, Yap1, beta-catenin, and TP53 (lack of strong and widespread nuclear p53 positivity) on central review according to WHO classification 2021.
- No clinical evidence of extra-CNS metastases
- Negative CSF cytology
- No prior therapy for MB other than surgery
- No other medical contraindications to chemotherapy:
- No uncontrolled invasive fungal infection or other severe systemic infection requiring system/parental therapy
- No other severe organ dysfunctions, which cannot be clinically controlled
- No concomitant use with yellow fever vaccine and with live virus and bacterial vaccines
- No demyelinating form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome
- Assessment of hearing function completed
- No evidence of cancer predisposition syndromes other than Gorlin syndrome or ELP1, GPR161 germline alterations.
- Provided written informed consent by parent(s)/parent representative(s) by bridging chemotherapy
- Patient should be enrolled within 28 days after diagnosis. Bridging chemotherapy can start as early as criteria for enrollment are met, and must start no later than 33 days after diagnosis
- One or more of the inclusion criteria for bridging chemotherapy are lacking
- Other histology than SHH MB
- -Patients are excluded from the interventional study if any of the following criteria are met:
- One or more of the inclusion criteria for randomization are lacking
- Patients with metastatic disease
- TP53-mutated SHH MB
- MYC amplified MB
- Pre-existing condition incompatible with scheduled therapy (e.g. Fanconi anemia)
- Patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus, e.g. due to perinatal intracranial haemorrhage, adueductal stenosis, or meningitis
- Contraindication for any components of the randomized therapies, including HDCT and intraventricular chemotherapy. Note: postperative hydrocephalus is not a contraindication for i.ventr. MTX.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites
Children's of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Girish Dhall, MD, (205) 638-9100, gdhall@uabmc.edu
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205
Maryam Fouladi, MD, 6147225758, Maryam.Fouladi@nationwidechildrens.org
About this study
This is a trial to compare neurocognitive outcomes in the intent-to-treat population 2.5 years after diagnosis between patients with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic, SHH-activated, TP53-wt, non-MYC amplified MF randomized to the interventional arms A ("Head Start 4") or B (HIT-SKK).
Read the detailed description
In this study, two highly effective irradiation-sparing treatment regimens are being compared in patients with low-risk early childhood MB:
- Arm A: The "Head Start" 4 regimen developed by the North American Head Start Consortium. This approach uses intensive Induction chemotherapy and Consolidation with HDCT and has led to equally favorable results in this subgroup -- 3y PFS was 96% for infants and young children with M0, SHH MB; 5y EFS was 93% for M0, DMB on the predecessor "Head Start" 3 study.
- Arm B: The HIT-SKK regimen developed within the GPOH. This regimen combines systemic chemotherapy with intraventricular MTX, leading to 93% 5-year PFS in low-risk patients.
Both treatment regimens use high-dose i.v. MTX, but only the HIT-SKK regimen also uses intraventricular administration of MTX directly into the CSF in addition to i.v. MTX. Given the long-term neurocognitive deficits of MTX have been described in childhood leukemia, and the pathogenesis of MTX-induced CNS-damage has been described, this has raised some concerns. Similarly, highly intensive, HDCT containing "Head Start" chemotherapy carries specific risks for the neurocognitive outcomes. Encouragingly, five years after HIT-SKK treatment including intraventricular MTX, young children with MB have a mean fluid intelligence score of 93.8 points. The full-scale IQ after "Head Start" chemotherapy is 95.4 and likewise within normal range. On the other hand, highly intensive, HDCT/AuHCR containing "Head Start" chemotherapy carries specific risks for the neurocognitive outcomes. However, neurocognitive outcomes after the HIT-SKK and "Head Start" chemotherapy regimens are difficult to compare from existing data, because of small sample sizes and inhomogeneous assessment tools used in prior studies. Therefore, a confirmatory study utilizing the same measures administered at the same time points is required to identify clinically relevant differences. In addition, survival, occurrence of second malignancies, neurological and endocrine deficits, hearing loss, and psychosocial comorbidities are also of high relevance in survivors of MB and may differ after both regimens. Since these also severely limit the survivors' potential for activity and participation in everyday life and affect their parents and siblings as well, this information will also be recorded.
- Conditions
- Medulloblastoma
- Being tested
- Bridging Chemotherapy, Induction Cycles A1-A3, Induction Cycles A4-5, Consolidation Cycle A6, HIT-SKK Chemotherapy Cycles B1-3
- Medical subject headings
- Medulloblastoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bridging ChemotherapyDrug
One bridging chemotherapy cycle consists of five days of therapy using Carboplatin and etoposide
Induction Cycles A1-A3Drug
Cisplatin, vincristin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, high-dose methotrexate
Induction Cycles A4-5Drug
Cisplatin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, high-dose methotrexate
Consolidation Cycle A6Drug
Carboplatin, thiotepa, etoposide
HIT-SKK Chemotherapy Cycles B1-3Drug
Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, high-dose methotrexate, carboplatin, etoposide, i.ventri. methotrexate
Modified HIT-SKK Cycle B4-5Drug
Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, carboplatin, etoposide
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: "Head Start" 4 | Experimental | Arm A consists of 3 to 5 Induction chemotherapy cycles and one high-dose chemotherapy cycle evaluated in the "Head Start" 4 study. Receives: Drug: Bridging Chemotherapy; Drug: Induction Cycles A1-A3; Drug: Induction Cycles A4-5; Drug: Consolidation Cycle A6 |
| Arm B: HIT-SKK | Experimental | Arm B consists of 3 to 5 cycles of chemotherapy evaluated in the HIT-SKK'92 (Rutkowski et al. 2005) and HIT-2000 (NCT00303810) clinical studies. Receives: Drug: Bridging Chemotherapy; Drug: HIT-SKK Chemotherapy Cycles B1-3; Drug: Modified HIT-SKK Cycle B4-5 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neurocognitive Outcomes using WPPSIIV
To compare neurocognitive outcomes 2.5 years after diagnosis between patients randomized to the interventional arms A ("Head Start" 4) and B (HIT-SKK). Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (IQ) as measured by the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSIIV) administered to those between the ages of 2 years and 6 months to 7 years and 7 months old at 2.5 years after diagnosis (+/- 6 months).
Measured: 105 months
Secondary outcomes (21)
PFS
Progression-free survival (PFS) compared between randomized groups
Measured: 152 months
rtPFS
Radiotherapy-free/progression-free survival (rtPFS) compared between randomized groups
Measured: 152 months
OS
Overall survival (OS) compared between randomized groups
Measured: 152 months
Second malignancies
Incidence of second malignancies compared between randomized groups
Measured: 152 months
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Acute toxicities compared between randomized groups
Measured: 152 months
Incidence of therapy-related deaths
Incidence of therapy-related deaths compared between randomized groups
Measured: 152 months
Assessment of IQ in patients randomized to Head Start or HIT-SKK
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-V) Full Scale IQ at 5 years after diagnosis (+/- 12 months range allowed), with the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) Full Scale IQ Score used only for children < 6 years old.
Measured: 152 months
Assessment of Development and Adaptive Functioning using ABAS v2 or v3
Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS, versions II or 3) at diagnosis, 2.5- and 5 years after diagnosis will be used to compare patients randomized to Head Start or HIT-SKK.
Measured: 152 months
Quality of Life Assessment using PedsQL Infant or PedsQL 4.0 parent-reported Quality of Life Measure
PedsQL Infant or PedsQL 4.0 parent-report QoL measure depending upon current age at the treatment timepoints. Questionnaires are quantified on a scale of 0-100 where higher scores indicate better outcomes/quality of life.
Measured: 152 months
Correlation between neurocognitive outcomes and QoL
Correlation of neurocognitive outcomes (measured using WISC-V Full Scale IQ at 5 years after diagnosis) and quality of life (measured using PedsQL Infant) 5 years after diagnosis will be achieved using a regression for linear mixed model.
Measured: 152 months
Assessment of impact on hearing using SIOP Boston scale
Ototoxicity will be assessed through hearing evaluation according to SIOP Boston scale (patients with normal Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) will be considered as not having hearing loss).
Measured: 152 months
Number of patients with Leukoencephalopathy
LEP will be assessed 2.5 and 5 years after diagnosis compared between randomized groups using the modified Fazekas scale.
Measured: 152 months
Compare PFS
To compare PFS between randomized groups in patients in CR at end of study therapy
Measured: 152 months
Compare PFS
To compare PFS between subtypes of SHH-MB as defined by classification based on the Heidelberg brain tumor classifier Version 11 (or higher)
Measured: 152 months
Assess rate of patients with cancer predisposition syndromes
To assess the rate of patients with genetically confirmed basal cell nevus syndrome (BCNS, Gorlin-Syndrome, OMIM: 109400), ELP1 and GPR161 cancer predisposition syndromes among eligible enrolled patients
Measured: 152 months
Compare rtPFS
To compare rtPFS between subtypes of SHH-MB as defined by classification based on the Heidelberg brain tumor classifier Version 11 (or higher)
Measured: 152 months
Compare OS
To compare OS between subtypes of SHH-MB as defined by classification based on the Heidelberg brain tumor classifier Version 11 (or higher)
Measured: 152 months
Compare rtPFS
To compare rtPFS between randomized groups in patients in CR at end of study therapy
Measured: 152 months
Compare OS
To compare OS between randomized groups in patients in CR at end of study therapy
Measured: 152 months
Assessment of impact on hearing using Chang scales
Ototoxicity will be assessed through hearing evaluation according to Chang Scale (patients with normal Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) will be considered as not having hearing loss).
Measured: 152 months
Association between neurocognitive and behavioral outcomes
Association of neurocognitive (measured using WISC-V Full Scale IQ at 5 years after diagnosis and WPPSI Full Scale IQ Score used only for children < 6 years old) outcomes and behavioral outcomes (measured using ABAS v2 or v3) 5 years after diagnosis compared between randomized groups
Measured: 152 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Dec 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completionOct 2034 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2038 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MedulloblastomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nationwide Children's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nationwide Children's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Society of Paediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH gGmbH), Children's of Alabama
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Maryam Fouladi, MD, Principal investigator, Nationwide Children's HospitalGirish Dhall, MD, Study chair, Children's Hospital of Alabama
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07291102
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- COGNITO-MB
- Other IDs
- 2024-517133-40-00
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: This study is considered for publication in the scientific literature in a peer re-viewed journal, irrespective of the results. Study results may also be presented at one or more medical congresses and may be used for scientific exchange and teaching purposes. Additionally, this study and its results may be submitted for inclusion in all appropriate health authority study registries, as well as publication on health authority study registry websites, as required by local health authority regulations.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Neurocognitive Outcome in Two Standard Regimen for Treatment of Low-risk Medulloblastoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07291102
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COGNITO-MB
- Conditions
- Medulloblastoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Nationwide Children's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Society of Paediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH gGmbH), Children's of Alabama
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2034 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2038 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a trial to compare neurocognitive outcomes in the intent-to-treat population 2.5 years after diagnosis between patients with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic, SHH-activated, TP53-wt, non-MYC amplified MF randomized to the interventional arms A ("Head Start 4") or B (HIT-SKK).
Detailed description
In this study, two highly effective irradiation-sparing treatment regimens are being compared in patients with low-risk early childhood MB:
- Arm A: The "Head Start" 4 regimen developed by the North American Head Start Consortium. This approach uses intensive Induction chemotherapy and Consolidation with HDCT and has led to equally favorable results in this subgroup -- 3y PFS was 96% for infants and young children with M0, SHH MB; 5y EFS was 93% for M0, DMB on the predecessor "Head Start" 3 study.
- Arm B: The HIT-SKK regimen developed within the GPOH. This regimen combines systemic chemotherapy with intraventricular MTX, leading to 93% 5-year PFS in low-risk patients.
Both treatment regimens use high-dose i.v. MTX, but only the HIT-SKK regimen also uses intraventricular administration of MTX directly into the CSF in addition to i.v. MTX. Given the long-term neurocognitive deficits of MTX have been described in childhood leukemia, and the pathogenesis of MTX-induced CNS-damage has been described, this has raised some concerns. Similarly, highly intensive, HDCT containing "Head Start" chemotherapy carries specific risks for the neurocognitive outcomes. Encouragingly, five years after HIT-SKK treatment including intraventricular MTX, young children with MB have a mean fluid intelligence score of 93.8 points. The full-scale IQ after "Head Start" chemotherapy is 95.4 and likewise within normal range. On the other hand, highly intensive, HDCT/AuHCR containing "Head Start" chemotherapy carries specific risks for the neurocognitive outcomes. However, neurocognitive outcomes after the HIT-SKK and "Head Start" chemotherapy regimens are difficult to compare from existing data, because of small sample sizes and inhomogeneous assessment tools used in prior studies. Therefore, a confirmatory study utilizing the same measures administered at the same time points is required to identify clinically relevant differences. In addition, survival, occurrence of second malignancies, neurological and endocrine deficits, hearing loss, and psychosocial comorbidities are also of high relevance in survivors of MB and may differ after both regimens. Since these also severely limit the survivors' potential for activity and participation in everyday life and affect their parents and siblings as well, this information will also be recorded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: "Head Start" 4 | Experimental | Drug: Bridging Chemotherapy, Drug: Induction Cycles A1-A3, Drug: Induction Cycles A4-5, Drug: Consolidation Cycle A6Arm A consists of 3 to 5 Induction chemotherapy cycles and one high-dose chemotherapy cycle evaluated in the "Head Start" 4 study. |
| Arm B: HIT-SKK | Experimental | Drug: Bridging Chemotherapy, Drug: HIT-SKK Chemotherapy Cycles B1-3, Drug: Modified HIT-SKK Cycle B4-5Arm B consists of 3 to 5 cycles of chemotherapy evaluated in the HIT-SKK'92 (Rutkowski et al. 2005) and HIT-2000 (NCT00303810) clinical studies. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 5 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Age at diagnosis < 5 years
- Patients with institutional suspicion or diagnosis of SHH-activated MB
- Patient and family in social circumstances that will allow neuropsychological follow-up
- Ability of parents/legal representatives to understand the patient information and to personally sign and date the informed consent to participate in screening procedures
- Patient and the parents/legal representative are able and willing to participate in the entire study (if patient is eligible)
Key exclusion criteria (31 listed)
- Patients previously treated for any other brain tumor or any type of malignant disease
- Patients, in whom compliance with toxicity management guidelines and study procedures cannot be assured
- History of hypersensitivity to an investigational medicinal product or to any drug with similar chemical structure or to any excipient present in the pharmaceutical form of an investigational medicinal product.
- Patients/parents who do not wish to abstain from treatment with live vaccines during study participation
- Patients with a language barrier too extensive to complete neuropsychological tests based on the investigator's judgement
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bridging ChemotherapyOne bridging chemotherapy cycle consists of five days of therapy using Carboplatin and etoposide | Drug | Arm A: "Head Start" 4, Arm B: HIT-SKK |
| Induction Cycles A1-A3Cisplatin, vincristin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, high-dose methotrexate | Drug | Arm A: "Head Start" 4 |
| Induction Cycles A4-5Cisplatin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, high-dose methotrexate | Drug | Arm A: "Head Start" 4 |
| Consolidation Cycle A6Carboplatin, thiotepa, etoposide | Drug | Arm A: "Head Start" 4 |
| HIT-SKK Chemotherapy Cycles B1-3Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, high-dose methotrexate, carboplatin, etoposide, i.ventri. methotrexate | Drug | Arm B: HIT-SKK |
| Modified HIT-SKK Cycle B4-5Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, carboplatin, etoposide | Drug | Arm B: HIT-SKK |
Primary outcome
Neurocognitive Outcomes using WPPSIIV
Time frame: 105 months
To compare neurocognitive outcomes 2.5 years after diagnosis between patients randomized to the interventional arms A ("Head Start" 4) and B (HIT-SKK). Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (IQ) as measured by the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSIIV) administered to those between the ages of 2 years and 6 months to 7 years and 7 months old at 2.5 years after diagnosis (+/- 6 months).
21 secondary outcomes
PFS
Time frame: 152 months
rtPFS
Time frame: 152 months
OS
Time frame: 152 months
Second malignancies
Time frame: 152 months
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: 152 months
Incidence of therapy-related deaths
Time frame: 152 months
Assessment of IQ in patients randomized to Head Start or HIT-SKK
Time frame: 152 months
Assessment of Development and Adaptive Functioning using ABAS v2 or v3
Time frame: 152 months
Quality of Life Assessment using PedsQL Infant or PedsQL 4.0 parent-reported Quality of Life Measure
Time frame: 152 months
Correlation between neurocognitive outcomes and QoL
Time frame: 152 months
Assessment of impact on hearing using SIOP Boston scale
Time frame: 152 months
Number of patients with Leukoencephalopathy
Time frame: 152 months
Compare PFS
Time frame: 152 months
Compare PFS
Time frame: 152 months
Assess rate of patients with cancer predisposition syndromes
Time frame: 152 months
Compare rtPFS
Time frame: 152 months
Compare OS
Time frame: 152 months
Compare rtPFS
Time frame: 152 months
Compare OS
Time frame: 152 months
Assessment of impact on hearing using Chang scales
Time frame: 152 months
Association between neurocognitive and behavioral outcomes
Time frame: 152 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. This study is considered for publication in the scientific literature in a peer re-viewed journal, irrespective of the results. Study results may also be presented at one or more medical congresses and may be used for scientific exchange and teaching purposes. Additionally, this study and its results may be submitted for inclusion in all appropriate health authority study registries, as well as publication on health authority study registry websites, as required by local health authority regulations.
Related trials for Medulloblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
PLX038 in Primary Central Nervous System Tumors Containing MYC or MYCN Amplifications
Glioma, Medulloblastoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Digoxin Medulloblastoma Study
Medulloblastoma, Medulloblastoma, Non-WNT/Non-SHH
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Pediatric Trial of Indoximod With Chemotherapy and Radiation for Relapsed Brain Tumors or Newly Diagnosed DIPG
Glioblastoma, Medulloblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Chemo-immunotherapy Using Ibrutinib Plus Indoximod for Patients With Pediatric Brain Cancer
Ependymoma, Medulloblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Adoptive T Cell Therapy, DC Vaccines, and Hematopoietic Stem Cells Combined With Immune checkPOINT Blockade in Patients With Medulloblastoma
Recurrent Group 3 Medulloblastoma, Recurrent Group 4 (Non-SHH/Non-WNT) Medulloblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Maryam Fouladi, MD principal investigator
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Girish Dhall, MD study chair
Children's Hospital of Alabama
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Bridging Chemotherapy, Induction Cycles A1-A3 and Induction Cycles A4-5 in people with Medulloblastoma, run by Nationwide Children's Hospital at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 31 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kelsey Troyer, PhD (16147228566, kelsey.troyer@nationwidechildrens.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neurocognitive Outcomes using WPPSIIV (time frame: 105 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.