Implant DentistryNCT07294820
The Use of a Fully Digital Workflow in Immediate Implants With Immediate Restoration
An observational study of Implant Dentistry, run by Proed, Torino, Italy at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Study hypothesis The hypothesis is that a full-digital workflow for immediate implant placement with immediate restoration is able to provide at least the same outcomes as standard analog implant placement in the same clinical scenario (immediate placement with immediate loading), in terms of implant success and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Implant Dentistry
- What is being tested?
- oral implant
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 27 Jan 2026to Jun 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 24 adults systemically healthy patient requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5
Who may be able to join
- adult systemically healthy patient requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5
Who cannot join
- patients not fulfilling inclusion criteria
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Studio Dottor Cardaropoli
Turin, Piedmont, 10129
Daniele Franco Cardaropoli, DDS, +39011323683, danielecardaropoli@gmail.com
About this study
Study hypothesis The hypothesis is that a full-digital workflow for immediate implant placement with immediate restoration is able to provide at least the same outcomes as standard analog implant placement in the same clinical scenario (immediate placement with immediate loading), in terms of implant success and survival and marginal bone level stability. A VAS scale evaluation will be created to measure patients' aesthetic and overall satisfaction, as well the duration of the procedure will be measured.
Type of study Clinical
Read more
Study design Prospective, single-arm using BLC implants with full digital workflow. Patients treated within "Clinical and radiological evaluation of a novel implant design (Straumann BLX) in the esthetic zone: a prospective case series study" (IIS 43/17), published as "Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Demaria A. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a fully tapered implant with immediate placement in the aesthetic zone: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637" will be used for comparison.
Study power N total: 24 Anticipated drop-out rate %: 15 Adequate power analysis and justification A power calculation before the study revealed that a sample size of 20 was necessary to detect a difference of 0.5 mm in the vertical position of the implant between planning and execution of 0.5 mm assuming a maximal standard deviation of 0.7 mm using a paired t test with 80% power and .05 level of significance.
Study intervention - test arm Study Device BLC Implant
Test treatment name Fully digital immediate placement/immediate restoration
Test Treatment description An immediate BLC implant inserted in post-extraction sites in the upper maxilla, from 15 to 25, with immediate restoration.
Primary outcome parameter Pink Esthetic Score (PES from 0 to 14), at 1 year Marginal Bone Level expressed in mm, at 1 year
Secondary outcome parameter PROMS - Patients' satisfaction using VAS scale, at day of surgery and at 1 year Duration of the procedure, at day of surgery Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BoP) at 1 year
Materials and Methods Population and indication 24 adult systemically healthy patients requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5
Treatments In the case study phase, a 3D cone-beam radiograph and an intraoral scan are acquired. A computer guided surgical stent is produced from the virtual planning. By sharing the virtual planning, the laboratory designs and produces a temporary crown. On the day of surgery the tooth is extracted, the implant is inserted and the temporary is delivered. The final ceramic crown is delivered 3 months later. Follow-up will end 1 year after implant placement.
Read the detailed description
Summary Immediate implant placement is a procedure that can have enormous benefits from using a fully digital workflow. The pre-surgical planning phase can be performed by combining cone-beam images with intraoral scanning. This matching allows you to pre-visualize the extraction of the tooth, making a careful assessment of the bone volume available in the post-extraction socket, and to plan the implant insertion according to the indications reported in the literature. A computer guided surgical stent can be printed "in office" from the plan. At the same time, the planning is exported to the cloud so that it can be viewed by the laboratory that will carry out the provisional crown. On the day of the surgery, with a minimally invasive procedure, after the extraction of the tooth and the insertion of the implant, the implanted temporary crown will be immediately delivered to the patient.
Background and rationale Immediate implant insertion is a treatment protocol that allows the insertion of an osseointegrated implant at the same time as tooth extraction. This procedure has high success rates, above 98%, but at the same time a high risk of biological and aesthetic complications. If possible, the delivery of an immediate temporary crown can improve the aesthetic result in terms of maintaining the original soft tissue profile. Planning the intervention becomes a fundamental point in the diagnostic-therapeutic path. It is essential to have three-dimensional radiographic information in order to evaluate the buccal bone plate, and the post-extractions socket. But it is also very important to have detailed information about the position and quality of the soft tissues. This information can be made available by cone-beam radiographic examination and intraoral digital scanning. The digital planning of the implant surgery can be shared with the laboratory which will design the temporary crown and produce it. On the day of surgery, thanks to the computer guided surgical stent, the implant can be inserted in the three-dimensional position as chosen and at the end of the session the temporary crown with its temporary abutment will be delivered. The fully digital workflow can create a minimally invasive, fast and precise treatment protocol, capable of pre-visualizing unfavorable anatomical conditions.
The outcome of this study will be compared with the results obtained from the recently completed clinical trial with similar design (Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Demaria A. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a fully tapered implant with immediate placement in the aesthetic zone: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637.). In this study fully tapered implants with comparable design (BLX) have been placed in post-extraction sockets, from premolar to premolar in the maxilla, and immediately loaded. Marginal bone level (MBL) and probing depth (PD) have been evaluated up to a 12-month follow-up period. All implants osseointegrated achieving a success rate of 100%. Difference in MBL between time of placement and one year was 0.20 ± 0.04 mm, while PD at one year was 2.82±0.51. Data here reported support the use of a fully tapered implant for immediate placement and immediate loading, for single-tooth replacements in the aesthetic area.
Study hypothesis The hypothesis is that a full-digital workflow for immediate implant placement with immediate restoration is able to provide at least the same outcomes as standard analog implant placement in the same clinical scenario (immediate placement with immediate loading), in terms of implant success and survival and marginal bone level stability. A VAS scale evaluation will be created to measure patients' aesthetic and overall satisfaction, as well the duration of the procedure will be measured.
Type of study Clinical
Study design Prospective, single-arm using BLC implants with full digital workflow. Patients treated within "Clinical and radiological evaluation of a novel implant design (Straumann BLX) in the esthetic zone: a prospective case series study" (IIS 43/17), published as "Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Demaria A. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a fully tapered implant with immediate placement in the aesthetic zone: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637" will be used for comparison.
Study power N total: 24 Anticipated drop-out rate %: 15 Adequate power analysis and justification A power calculation before the study revealed that a sample size of 20 was necessary to detect a difference of 0.5 mm in the vertical position of the implant between planning and execution of 0.5 mm assuming a maximal standard deviation of 0.7 mm using a paired t test with 80% power and .05 level of significance.
Study intervention - test arm Study Device BLC Implant
Test treatment name Fully digital immediate placement/immediate restoration
Test Treatment description An immediate BLC implant inserted in post-extraction sites in the upper maxilla, from 15 to 25, with immediate restoration.
Primary outcome parameter Pink Esthetic Score (PES from 0 to 14), at 1 year Marginal Bone Level expressed in mm, at 1 year
Secondary outcome parameter PROMS - Patients' satisfaction using VAS scale, at day of surgery and at 1 year Duration of the procedure, at day of surgery Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BoP) at 1 year
Materials and Methods Population and indication 24 adult systemically healthy patients requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5
Treatments In the case study phase, a 3D cone-beam radiograph and an intraoral scan are acquired. A computer guided surgical stent is produced from the virtual planning. By sharing the virtual planning, the laboratory designs and produces a temporary crown. On the day of surgery the tooth is extracted, the implant is inserted and the temporary is delivered. The final ceramic crown is delivered 3 months later. Follow-up will end 1 year after implant placement.
Statistical methods paired t-test
- Conditions
- Implant Dentistry
- Being tested
- oral implant
- Keywords
- oral implant placement, computer guided surgery, Immediata implant placement
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
oral implantDevice
fully guided implant placement with a computer guided surgical stant
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pink Esthetic Score
Measured: 1 year
Marginal Bone Level
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2025
- Study start27 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionJun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Implant DentistryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Proed, Torino, Italy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniele Cardaropoli, Proed, Torino, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07294820
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12.2025.IIPP.STR.IIS07/24
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, De Maria A. Clinical and Radiologic Evaluation of a Fully Tapered Implant with Immediate Placement in the Esthetic Zone: A Prospective Case Series Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637. doi: 10.11607/prd.5682.
PubMed 36044694
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of a Fully Digital Workflow in Immediate Implants With Immediate Restoration
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07294820
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12.2025.IIPP.STR.IIS07/24
- Conditions
- Implant Dentistry
- Keywords
- oral implant placement, computer guided surgery, Immediata implant placement
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Proed, Torino, ItalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study hypothesis The hypothesis is that a full-digital workflow for immediate implant placement with immediate restoration is able to provide at least the same outcomes as standard analog implant placement in the same clinical scenario (immediate placement with immediate loading), in terms of implant success and survival and marginal bone level stability. A VAS scale evaluation will be created to measure patients' aesthetic and overall satisfaction, as well the duration of the procedure will be measured.
Type of study Clinical
Study design Prospective, single-arm using BLC implants with full digital workflow. Patients treated within "Clinical and radiological evaluation of a novel implant design (Straumann BLX) in the esthetic zone: a prospective case series study" (IIS 43/17), published as "Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Demaria A. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a fully tapered implant with immediate placement in the aesthetic zone: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637" will be used for comparison.
Study power N total: 24 Anticipated drop-out rate %: 15 Adequate power analysis and justification A power calculation before the study revealed that a sample size of 20 was necessary to detect a difference of 0.5 mm in the vertical position of the implant between planning and execution of 0.5 mm assuming a maximal standard deviation of 0.7 mm using a paired t test with 80% power and .05 level of significance.
Study intervention - test arm Study Device BLC Implant
Test treatment name Fully digital immediate placement/immediate restoration
Test Treatment description An immediate BLC implant inserted in post-extraction sites in the upper maxilla, from 15 to 25, with immediate restoration.
Primary outcome parameter Pink Esthetic Score (PES from 0 to 14), at 1 year Marginal Bone Level expressed in mm, at 1 year
Secondary outcome parameter PROMS - Patients' satisfaction using VAS scale, at day of surgery and at 1 year Duration of the procedure, at day of surgery Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BoP) at 1 year
Materials and Methods Population and indication 24 adult systemically healthy patients requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5
Treatments In the case study phase, a 3D cone-beam radiograph and an intraoral scan are acquired. A computer guided surgical stent is produced from the virtual planning. By sharing the virtual planning, the laboratory designs and produces a temporary crown. On the day of surgery the tooth is extracted, the implant is inserted and the temporary is delivered. The final ceramic crown is delivered 3 months later. Follow-up will end 1 year after implant placement.
Detailed description
Summary Immediate implant placement is a procedure that can have enormous benefits from using a fully digital workflow. The pre-surgical planning phase can be performed by combining cone-beam images with intraoral scanning. This matching allows you to pre-visualize the extraction of the tooth, making a careful assessment of the bone volume available in the post-extraction socket, and to plan the implant insertion according to the indications reported in the literature. A computer guided surgical stent can be printed "in office" from the plan. At the same time, the planning is exported to the cloud so that it can be viewed by the laboratory that will carry out the provisional crown. On the day of the surgery, with a minimally invasive procedure, after the extraction of the tooth and the insertion of the implant, the implanted temporary crown will be immediately delivered to the patient.
Background and rationale Immediate implant insertion is a treatment protocol that allows the insertion of an osseointegrated implant at the same time as tooth extraction. This procedure has high success rates, above 98%, but at the same time a high risk of biological and aesthetic complications. If possible, the delivery of an immediate temporary crown can improve the aesthetic result in terms of maintaining the original soft tissue profile. Planning the intervention becomes a fundamental point in the diagnostic-therapeutic path. It is essential to have three-dimensional radiographic information in order to evaluate the buccal bone plate, and the post-extractions socket. But it is also very important to have detailed information about the position and quality of the soft tissues. This information can be made available by cone-beam radiographic examination and intraoral digital scanning. The digital planning of the implant surgery can be shared with the laboratory which will design the temporary crown and produce it. On the day of surgery, thanks to the computer guided surgical stent, the implant can be inserted in the three-dimensional position as chosen and at the end of the session the temporary crown with its temporary abutment will be delivered. The fully digital workflow can create a minimally invasive, fast and precise treatment protocol, capable of pre-visualizing unfavorable anatomical conditions.
The outcome of this study will be compared with the results obtained from the recently completed clinical trial with similar design (Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Demaria A. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a fully tapered implant with immediate placement in the aesthetic zone: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637.). In this study fully tapered implants with comparable design (BLX) have been placed in post-extraction sockets, from premolar to premolar in the maxilla, and immediately loaded. Marginal bone level (MBL) and probing depth (PD) have been evaluated up to a 12-month follow-up period. All implants osseointegrated achieving a success rate of 100%. Difference in MBL between time of placement and one year was 0.20 ± 0.04 mm, while PD at one year was 2.82±0.51. Data here reported support the use of a fully tapered implant for immediate placement and immediate loading, for single-tooth replacements in the aesthetic area.
Study hypothesis The hypothesis is that a full-digital workflow for immediate implant placement with immediate restoration is able to provide at least the same outcomes as standard analog implant placement in the same clinical scenario (immediate placement with immediate loading), in terms of implant success and survival and marginal bone level stability. A VAS scale evaluation will be created to measure patients' aesthetic and overall satisfaction, as well the duration of the procedure will be measured.
Type of study Clinical
Study design Prospective, single-arm using BLC implants with full digital workflow. Patients treated within "Clinical and radiological evaluation of a novel implant design (Straumann BLX) in the esthetic zone: a prospective case series study" (IIS 43/17), published as "Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Demaria A. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a fully tapered implant with immediate placement in the aesthetic zone: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637" will be used for comparison.
Study power N total: 24 Anticipated drop-out rate %: 15 Adequate power analysis and justification A power calculation before the study revealed that a sample size of 20 was necessary to detect a difference of 0.5 mm in the vertical position of the implant between planning and execution of 0.5 mm assuming a maximal standard deviation of 0.7 mm using a paired t test with 80% power and .05 level of significance.
Study intervention - test arm Study Device BLC Implant
Test treatment name Fully digital immediate placement/immediate restoration
Test Treatment description An immediate BLC implant inserted in post-extraction sites in the upper maxilla, from 15 to 25, with immediate restoration.
Primary outcome parameter Pink Esthetic Score (PES from 0 to 14), at 1 year Marginal Bone Level expressed in mm, at 1 year
Secondary outcome parameter PROMS - Patients' satisfaction using VAS scale, at day of surgery and at 1 year Duration of the procedure, at day of surgery Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BoP) at 1 year
Materials and Methods Population and indication 24 adult systemically healthy patients requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5
Treatments In the case study phase, a 3D cone-beam radiograph and an intraoral scan are acquired. A computer guided surgical stent is produced from the virtual planning. By sharing the virtual planning, the laboratory designs and produces a temporary crown. On the day of surgery the tooth is extracted, the implant is inserted and the temporary is delivered. The final ceramic crown is delivered 3 months later. Follow-up will end 1 year after implant placement.
Statistical methods paired t-test
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 24 adults systemically healthy patient requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- adult systemically healthy patient requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients not fulfilling inclusion criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| oral implantfully guided implant placement with a computer guided surgical stant | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Pink Esthetic Score
Time frame: 1 year
Marginal Bone Level
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2026.
- Background: PubMed 36044694Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, De Maria A. Clinical and Radiologic Evaluation of a Fully Tapered Implant with Immediate Placement in the Esthetic Zone: A Prospective Case Series Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637. doi: 10.11607/prd.5682.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Implant Dentistry
Recruiting
Home-Use Dual-Light Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy for Peri-Implant Mucositis in Full-Arch Implant Prostheses
Peri Implant Mucositis, Dental Implant Rehabilitation
Recruiting
Evaluation of Different Grafting Technique of Thin Gingival Phenotype With Delayed Dental Implants
Implant Dentistry, Connective Tissue Graft
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
The General Aim is to Implement Clinical Assessment of Overload by Voluntary Bite Force Registration to Enable Future Simple But Precise Risk Assessment to Provide Individualized Treatment Plans.
Dental Implant, Bruxism
RecruitingObservational study
Assessing Current Clinical Concepts in Dental Practice
Dental Implant
Recruiting
Accuracy of the Calibrated Framework for Intra Oral Full Arch Scan (A Cross-over Study)
Edentulism, Dental Implants
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Implant Dentistry, run by Proed, Torino, Italy at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Daniele Franco Cardaropoli, dds (+393386688933, danielecardaropoli@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pink Esthetic Score (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07294820, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2026.