AzTrials
AzTrials

Implant DentistryNCT07294820

The Use of a Fully Digital Workflow in Immediate Implants With Immediate Restoration

An observational study of Implant Dentistry, run by Proed, Torino, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study hypothesis The hypothesis is that a full-digital workflow for immediate implant placement with immediate restoration is able to provide at least the same outcomes as standard analog implant placement in the same clinical scenario (immediate placement with immediate loading), in terms of implant success and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Implant Dentistry
What is being tested?
oral implant
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
27 Jan 2026to Jun 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 24 adults systemically healthy patient requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5

Who may be able to join

  • adult systemically healthy patient requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5

Who cannot join

  • patients not fulfilling inclusion criteria

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Daniele Franco Cardaropoli, dds contact

+393386688933

danielecardaropoli@gmail.com

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Studio Dottor Cardaropoli

    Turin, Piedmont, 10129

    Daniele Franco Cardaropoli, DDS, +39011323683, danielecardaropoli@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Study hypothesis The hypothesis is that a full-digital workflow for immediate implant placement with immediate restoration is able to provide at least the same outcomes as standard analog implant placement in the same clinical scenario (immediate placement with immediate loading), in terms of implant success and survival and marginal bone level stability. A VAS scale evaluation will be created to measure patients' aesthetic and overall satisfaction, as well the duration of the procedure will be measured.

Type of study Clinical

Read more

Study design Prospective, single-arm using BLC implants with full digital workflow. Patients treated within "Clinical and radiological evaluation of a novel implant design (Straumann BLX) in the esthetic zone: a prospective case series study" (IIS 43/17), published as "Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Demaria A. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a fully tapered implant with immediate placement in the aesthetic zone: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637" will be used for comparison.

Study power N total: 24 Anticipated drop-out rate %: 15 Adequate power analysis and justification A power calculation before the study revealed that a sample size of 20 was necessary to detect a difference of 0.5 mm in the vertical position of the implant between planning and execution of 0.5 mm assuming a maximal standard deviation of 0.7 mm using a paired t test with 80% power and .05 level of significance.

Study intervention - test arm Study Device BLC Implant

Test treatment name Fully digital immediate placement/immediate restoration

Test Treatment description An immediate BLC implant inserted in post-extraction sites in the upper maxilla, from 15 to 25, with immediate restoration.

Primary outcome parameter Pink Esthetic Score (PES from 0 to 14), at 1 year Marginal Bone Level expressed in mm, at 1 year

Secondary outcome parameter PROMS - Patients' satisfaction using VAS scale, at day of surgery and at 1 year Duration of the procedure, at day of surgery Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BoP) at 1 year

Materials and Methods Population and indication 24 adult systemically healthy patients requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5

Treatments In the case study phase, a 3D cone-beam radiograph and an intraoral scan are acquired. A computer guided surgical stent is produced from the virtual planning. By sharing the virtual planning, the laboratory designs and produces a temporary crown. On the day of surgery the tooth is extracted, the implant is inserted and the temporary is delivered. The final ceramic crown is delivered 3 months later. Follow-up will end 1 year after implant placement.

Read the detailed description

Summary Immediate implant placement is a procedure that can have enormous benefits from using a fully digital workflow. The pre-surgical planning phase can be performed by combining cone-beam images with intraoral scanning. This matching allows you to pre-visualize the extraction of the tooth, making a careful assessment of the bone volume available in the post-extraction socket, and to plan the implant insertion according to the indications reported in the literature. A computer guided surgical stent can be printed "in office" from the plan. At the same time, the planning is exported to the cloud so that it can be viewed by the laboratory that will carry out the provisional crown. On the day of the surgery, with a minimally invasive procedure, after the extraction of the tooth and the insertion of the implant, the implanted temporary crown will be immediately delivered to the patient.

Background and rationale Immediate implant insertion is a treatment protocol that allows the insertion of an osseointegrated implant at the same time as tooth extraction. This procedure has high success rates, above 98%, but at the same time a high risk of biological and aesthetic complications. If possible, the delivery of an immediate temporary crown can improve the aesthetic result in terms of maintaining the original soft tissue profile. Planning the intervention becomes a fundamental point in the diagnostic-therapeutic path. It is essential to have three-dimensional radiographic information in order to evaluate the buccal bone plate, and the post-extractions socket. But it is also very important to have detailed information about the position and quality of the soft tissues. This information can be made available by cone-beam radiographic examination and intraoral digital scanning. The digital planning of the implant surgery can be shared with the laboratory which will design the temporary crown and produce it. On the day of surgery, thanks to the computer guided surgical stent, the implant can be inserted in the three-dimensional position as chosen and at the end of the session the temporary crown with its temporary abutment will be delivered. The fully digital workflow can create a minimally invasive, fast and precise treatment protocol, capable of pre-visualizing unfavorable anatomical conditions.

The outcome of this study will be compared with the results obtained from the recently completed clinical trial with similar design (Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Demaria A. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a fully tapered implant with immediate placement in the aesthetic zone: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637.). In this study fully tapered implants with comparable design (BLX) have been placed in post-extraction sockets, from premolar to premolar in the maxilla, and immediately loaded. Marginal bone level (MBL) and probing depth (PD) have been evaluated up to a 12-month follow-up period. All implants osseointegrated achieving a success rate of 100%. Difference in MBL between time of placement and one year was 0.20 ± 0.04 mm, while PD at one year was 2.82±0.51. Data here reported support the use of a fully tapered implant for immediate placement and immediate loading, for single-tooth replacements in the aesthetic area.

Study hypothesis The hypothesis is that a full-digital workflow for immediate implant placement with immediate restoration is able to provide at least the same outcomes as standard analog implant placement in the same clinical scenario (immediate placement with immediate loading), in terms of implant success and survival and marginal bone level stability. A VAS scale evaluation will be created to measure patients' aesthetic and overall satisfaction, as well the duration of the procedure will be measured.

Type of study Clinical

Study design Prospective, single-arm using BLC implants with full digital workflow. Patients treated within "Clinical and radiological evaluation of a novel implant design (Straumann BLX) in the esthetic zone: a prospective case series study" (IIS 43/17), published as "Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Demaria A. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a fully tapered implant with immediate placement in the aesthetic zone: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637" will be used for comparison.

Study power N total: 24 Anticipated drop-out rate %: 15 Adequate power analysis and justification A power calculation before the study revealed that a sample size of 20 was necessary to detect a difference of 0.5 mm in the vertical position of the implant between planning and execution of 0.5 mm assuming a maximal standard deviation of 0.7 mm using a paired t test with 80% power and .05 level of significance.

Study intervention - test arm Study Device BLC Implant

Test treatment name Fully digital immediate placement/immediate restoration

Test Treatment description An immediate BLC implant inserted in post-extraction sites in the upper maxilla, from 15 to 25, with immediate restoration.

Primary outcome parameter Pink Esthetic Score (PES from 0 to 14), at 1 year Marginal Bone Level expressed in mm, at 1 year

Secondary outcome parameter PROMS - Patients' satisfaction using VAS scale, at day of surgery and at 1 year Duration of the procedure, at day of surgery Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BoP) at 1 year

Materials and Methods Population and indication 24 adult systemically healthy patients requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5

Treatments In the case study phase, a 3D cone-beam radiograph and an intraoral scan are acquired. A computer guided surgical stent is produced from the virtual planning. By sharing the virtual planning, the laboratory designs and produces a temporary crown. On the day of surgery the tooth is extracted, the implant is inserted and the temporary is delivered. The final ceramic crown is delivered 3 months later. Follow-up will end 1 year after implant placement.

Statistical methods paired t-test

Being tested
oral implant
Keywords
oral implant placement, computer guided surgery, Immediata implant placement

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • oral implantDevice

    fully guided implant placement with a computer guided surgical stant

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pink Esthetic Score

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Marginal Bone Level

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2025
  2. Study start27 Jan 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJun 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
24 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07294820
Sponsor's protocol ID
12.2025.IIPP.STR.IIS07/24
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
7 Dec 2025
Last updated
9 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, De Maria A. Clinical and Radiologic Evaluation of a Fully Tapered Implant with Immediate Placement in the Esthetic Zone: A Prospective Case Series Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637. doi: 10.11607/prd.5682.

    PubMed 36044694

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Implant Dentistry, run by Proed, Torino, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Daniele Franco Cardaropoli, dds (+393386688933, danielecardaropoli@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pink Esthetic Score (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07294820, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in