Trauma (Including Fractures)WALANTNCT07299383
WALANT Versus Local Anesthesia in Central Venous Catheter Insertion
A study testing local anesthesia with walant solution and Local anesthesia with lidocaine in people with Trauma (Including Fractures) and Dialysis Catheter, run by Ataturk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether WALANT is an alternative local anesthesia method that can increase patient comfort and reduce pain during CVC procedure, which is one of the invasive procedures to be performed especially in areas where bleeding control is difficult. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Trauma (Including Fractures), Dialysis Catheter, Malnutrition Severe
- What is being tested?
- local anesthesia with walant solution and Local anesthesia with lidocaine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 11 Jan 2023to 1 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who are over 18 years of age, not pregnant, have a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15, are oriented and cooperative, and have a hemorrhagic shock stage of at most 1 or are not in hemorrhagic shock.
Who cannot join
- Patients who are younger than 18 years of age, pregnant, have <15 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale, are not oriented or cooperative, are in hemorrhagic shock stage >1, have coagulopathy, increased intracranial pressure, bleeding-obstruction-thrombus in the target vessel, skin infection in the relevant area, or have burns.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Atatürk University Research Hospital
Erzurum, Erzurum, 25240
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Local Anesthesia With the Fully Awake Tourniquet-Free Local Anesthesia Technique (WALANT) in Central Venous Catheter Insertion Procedure
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether WALANT is an alternative local anesthesia method that can increase patient comfort and reduce pain during CVC procedure, which is one of the invasive procedures to be performed especially in areas where bleeding control is difficult.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Can we offer an alternative local anesthesia method that can be used to treat patients who require CVC insertion with minimum pain and maximum comfort?
- Can the WALANT technique reduce the risk of complications during CVC insertion?
Participants were:
randomized using a single-blind allocation method based on hospital file numbers: odd numbers received WALANT and even numbers received lidocaine. The WALANT solution was prepared according to the standard protocol and injected into a 3×3 cm target area 20 minutes before catheter insertion. CVCs were placed without ultrasound guidance in jugular, subclavian, or femoral veins by anatomical localization. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before and after the procedure. In the control group, after marking the anatomical location, the vein where the procedure would be performed was identified by using a 10cc syringe, which was then passed through the skin and subcutaneous tissues using negative pressure. As the needle tip was slowly withdrawn, local anesthesia was induced with an average of 2-10ml lidocaine (1.5-2 mg/kg) applied to the designated 3x3cm area. The CVC was then placed according to routine procedures. Patient assessments were recorded using a visual analog scale before and after the procedure.
Read the detailed description
Patients were included in the study if they were older than 18 years, non-pregnant, had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15, were oriented and cooperative, and had a hemorrhagic shock stage of at most 1 or were not in hemorrhagic shock. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years, pregnant, had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <15, were unoriented and cooperative, were in hemorrhagic shock stage >1, had coagulopathy, increased intracranial pressure, target vessel hemorrhage, obstruction, or thrombus, skin infection in the relevant area, or had burns. Sixty-four patients were included in the study between the targeted dates. Patient epidemiological characteristics, the vessel from which CVC was administered, pre- and post-treatment VAS scores, chronic diseases, medications, and any complications were recorded in the prepared case forms.
- Being tested
- local anesthesia with walant solution, Local anesthesia with lidocaine
- Keywords
- walant, cenral venous catheter, local anesthesia, lidocain, epinephrine
- Medical subject headings
- Wounds and Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
local anesthesia with walant solutionProcedure or surgery
Walant solution was prepared using 5 ml lidocaine, 4 ml 0.9% isotonic, 1 ml 8.5% sodium bicarbonate, 1 ml 1/1000 epinephrine and an average of 2-10 ml of WALANT solution was injected into a 3x3 cm area
Local anesthesia with lidocaineProcedure or surgery
ocal anesthesia was induced by applying an average of 2-10ml lidocaine (1.5-2 mg/kg) to the designated 3x3cm area. CVC insertion was then performed according to routine procedures.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Case group | Active comparator | After selecting the area where the CVC would be inserted (femoral vein, subclavian vein, jugular vein), anatomical localization was determined without using any guide such as USG, and the vein where the procedure would be performed was determined by using a 10cc syringe with negative pressure and passing through the skin and subcutaneous tissues. An average of 2-10ml of WALANT solution was injected into the designated 3x3cm area while the needle tip was slowly withdrawn. After waiting 20 minutes, CVC placement was performed. Patient assessments were recorded using a visual analog scale before and at the end of the procedure. Receives: Procedure: local anesthesia with walant solution; Procedure: Local anesthesia with lidocaine |
| Control (Lidocaine group) | Active comparator | For the control group, patients requiring a CVC were selected as single-blind and underwent the procedure in the emergency resuscitation room. After selecting the catheter insertion site after marking the anatomical location, the vein to be treated was identified by using a 10cc syringe and applying negative pressure to the skin and subcutaneous tissues. While the needle was slowly withdrawn, local anesthesia was induced by applying an average of 2-10ml lidocaine (1.5-2 mg/kg) to the designated 3x3cm area. CVC insertion was then performed according to routine procedures. Patient assessments were recorded before and after the procedure using a VAS. Receives: Procedure: Local anesthesia with lidocaine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of the pain felt by patients after central venous catheter placement when local anesthesia is performed with Lidocaine and when it is performed with the Wide Awake Tourniquet-Free Local Anesthesia Technique (WALANT).
To measure pain, participants were asked to describe the pain felt before and after central venous catheter insertion using a VISUAL ANALOG SCALE (VAS). They were asked to give a score of 10 for the highest pain felt and 0 for the situation where they felt no pain.
Measured: 45 minutes for each patient.
Comparison of Pain Experienced by Patients After Central Venous Catheter Insertion Procedure with Local Anesthesia with Lidocaine and the Wide-Awake Tourniquet-Free Local Anesthesia Technique (WALANT)
To measure pain, patients were asked to describe the pain felt before and after central venous catheter insertion using a VISUAL ANALOG SCALE (VAS). They were asked to give a score of 10 for the highest pain experienced and 0 for no pain at all. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales used for the amount of pain that a patient feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. From the patient's perspective, this spectrum appears continuous; their pain does not take discrete jumps, as a categorization of none, mild, moderate and severe would suggest.
Measured: The time from the beginning of the CVC insertion process until the patient can describe the pain he/she feels is a maximum of 30 minutes. The study duration was 45 minutes per patient.
Pain felt after local anesthesia
To measure pain, patients were asked to describe the pain felt before and after central venous catheter insertion using a VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE (VAS). They were asked to give a score of 10 for the highest pain experienced and 0 for no pain at all.
Measured: The maximum time elapsed from the moment the patient was able to describe the pain felt after the local anesthesia procedure was 30 minutes.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2025
- Study start11 Jan 2023
- Primary completion1 Nov 2023
- Study completion1 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Trauma (Including Fractures)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ataturk UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ataturk University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, ümit arslan, Ataturk University
- Investigators
- SULTAN TUNA AKGÖL GÜR, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, Principal investigator, ATATÜRK UNİVERSİTYMURAT MAKSUT ÇALBAY, SPECİALİST, Principal investigator, ERZURUM CİTY HOSPİTALMUHAMMED ÇAĞRI AYKUT, MD, Principal investigator, ATATÜRK UNİVERSİTYORHAN ENES TUNÇEZ, MD, Principal investigator, AMASYA SULUOVA STATE HOSPITAL
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07299383
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/830
- Other IDs
- Ayça ÇALBAY
- Acronym
- WALANT
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 23 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Epidemiological data in the case form prepared for the study, chronic disease/chronic medication use, VAS values of the study, and data on the presence of complications can be shared.
Publications
Arik HO, Coskun T, Kose O. Management of spaghetti wrist under WALANT technique. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021 Oct;40(5):655-659. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
PubMed 34166849Abell RG, Page IH. THE REACTION OF PERIPHERAL BLOOD VESSELS TO ANGIOTONIN, RENIN, AND OTHER PRESSOR AGENTS. J Exp Med. 1942 Mar 1;75(3):305-14. doi: 10.1084/jem.75.3.305.
PubMed 19871185Yayla EM, Ozdemir L. Effect of Inhalation Aromatherapy on Procedural Pain and Anxiety After Needle Insertion Into an Implantable Central Venous Port Catheter: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Cancer Nurs. 2019 Jan/Feb;42(1):35-41. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000551.
PubMed 29199999Samantaray A, Hanumantha Rao M, Sahu CR. Additional Analgesia for Central Venous Catheter Insertion: A Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl. Crit Care Res Pract. 2016;2016:9062658. doi: 10.1155/2016/9062658. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
PubMed 27200187Dar QA, Avoricani A, Rompala A, Levy KH, Shah NV, Choueka D, White CM, Koehler SM. WALANT Hand Surgery Does Not Require Postoperative Opioid Pain Management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 1;148(1):121-130. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008053.
PubMed 34181608Moscato L, Laborde A, Kouyoumdjian P, Coulomb R, Mares O. Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthroplasty under Wide Awake Local Anesthesia with No Tourniquet (WALANT) versus Local Anesthesia with peripheral nerve blocks (LAPNV): Perioperative pain and early functional results in 30 patients. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021 Sep;40(4):453-457. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
PubMed 33775887Tahir M, Chaudhry EA, Zaffar Z, Anwar K, Mamoon MAH, Ahmad M, Jamali AR, Mehboob G. Fixation of distal radius fractures using wide-awake local anaesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) technique: A randomized control trial of a cost-effective and resource-friendly procedure. Bone Joint Res. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):429-439. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.97.BJR-2019-0315.R1. eCollection 2020 Jul.
PubMed 32905335Wellington I, Cusano A, Ferreira JV, Parrino A. WALANT Technique versus Sedation for Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release. Hand (N Y). 2023 Mar;18(2):214-221. doi: 10.1177/15589447211003180. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
PubMed 33834864Lalonde DH. Conceptual origins, current practice, and views of wide awake hand surgery. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Nov;42(9):886-895. doi: 10.1177/1753193417728427. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
PubMed 28886668
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Local Anesthesia With the Fully Awake Tourniquet-Free Local Anesthesia Technique (WALANT) in Central Venous Catheter Insertion Procedure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07299383
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WALANT / B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/830
- Keywords
- walant, cenral venous catheter, local anesthesia, lidocain, epinephrine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ataturk UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether WALANT is an alternative local anesthesia method that can increase patient comfort and reduce pain during CVC procedure, which is one of the invasive procedures to be performed especially in areas where bleeding control is difficult.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Can we offer an alternative local anesthesia method that can be used to treat patients who require CVC insertion with minimum pain and maximum comfort?
- Can the WALANT technique reduce the risk of complications during CVC insertion?
Participants were:
randomized using a single-blind allocation method based on hospital file numbers: odd numbers received WALANT and even numbers received lidocaine. The WALANT solution was prepared according to the standard protocol and injected into a 3×3 cm target area 20 minutes before catheter insertion. CVCs were placed without ultrasound guidance in jugular, subclavian, or femoral veins by anatomical localization. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before and after the procedure. In the control group, after marking the anatomical location, the vein where the procedure would be performed was identified by using a 10cc syringe, which was then passed through the skin and subcutaneous tissues using negative pressure. As the needle tip was slowly withdrawn, local anesthesia was induced with an average of 2-10ml lidocaine (1.5-2 mg/kg) applied to the designated 3x3cm area. The CVC was then placed according to routine procedures. Patient assessments were recorded using a visual analog scale before and after the procedure.
Detailed description
Patients were included in the study if they were older than 18 years, non-pregnant, had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15, were oriented and cooperative, and had a hemorrhagic shock stage of at most 1 or were not in hemorrhagic shock. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years, pregnant, had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <15, were unoriented and cooperative, were in hemorrhagic shock stage >1, had coagulopathy, increased intracranial pressure, target vessel hemorrhage, obstruction, or thrombus, skin infection in the relevant area, or had burns. Sixty-four patients were included in the study between the targeted dates. Patient epidemiological characteristics, the vessel from which CVC was administered, pre- and post-treatment VAS scores, chronic diseases, medications, and any complications were recorded in the prepared case forms.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Case group | Active comparator | Procedure: local anesthesia with walant solution, Procedure: Local anesthesia with lidocaineAfter selecting the area where the CVC would be inserted (femoral vein, subclavian vein, jugular vein), anatomical localization was determined without using any guide such as USG, and the vein where the procedure would be performed was determined by using a 10cc syringe with negative pressure and passing through the skin and subcutaneous tissues. An average of 2-10ml of WALANT solution was injected into the designated 3x3cm area while the needle tip was slowly withdrawn. After waiting 20 minutes, CVC placement was performed. Patient assessments were recorded using a visual analog scale before and at the end of the procedure. |
| Control (Lidocaine group) | Active comparator | Procedure: Local anesthesia with lidocaineFor the control group, patients requiring a CVC were selected as single-blind and underwent the procedure in the emergency resuscitation room. After selecting the catheter insertion site after marking the anatomical location, the vein to be treated was identified by using a 10cc syringe and applying negative pressure to the skin and subcutaneous tissues. While the needle was slowly withdrawn, local anesthesia was induced by applying an average of 2-10ml lidocaine (1.5-2 mg/kg) to the designated 3x3cm area. CVC insertion was then performed according to routine procedures. Patient assessments were recorded before and after the procedure using a VAS. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who are over 18 years of age, not pregnant, have a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15, are oriented and cooperative, and have a hemorrhagic shock stage of at most 1 or are not in hemorrhagic shock.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who are younger than 18 years of age, pregnant, have <15 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale, are not oriented or cooperative, are in hemorrhagic shock stage >1, have coagulopathy, increased intracranial pressure, bleeding-obstruction-thrombus in the target vessel, skin infection in the relevant area, or have burns.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| local anesthesia with walant solutionWalant solution was prepared using 5 ml lidocaine, 4 ml 0.9% isotonic, 1 ml 8.5% sodium bicarbonate, 1 ml 1/1000 epinephrine and an average of 2-10 ml of WALANT solution was injected into a 3x3 cm area | Procedure or surgery | Case group |
| Local anesthesia with lidocaineocal anesthesia was induced by applying an average of 2-10ml lidocaine (1.5-2 mg/kg) to the designated 3x3cm area. CVC insertion was then performed according to routine procedures. | Procedure or surgery | Case group, Control (Lidocaine group) |
Primary outcome
Comparison of the pain felt by patients after central venous catheter placement when local anesthesia is performed with Lidocaine and when it is performed with the Wide Awake Tourniquet-Free Local Anesthesia Technique (WALANT).
Time frame: 45 minutes for each patient.
To measure pain, participants were asked to describe the pain felt before and after central venous catheter insertion using a VISUAL ANALOG SCALE (VAS). They were asked to give a score of 10 for the highest pain felt and 0 for the situation where they felt no pain.
Comparison of Pain Experienced by Patients After Central Venous Catheter Insertion Procedure with Local Anesthesia with Lidocaine and the Wide-Awake Tourniquet-Free Local Anesthesia Technique (WALANT)
Time frame: The time from the beginning of the CVC insertion process until the patient can describe the pain he/she feels is a maximum of 30 minutes. The study duration was 45 minutes per patient.
To measure pain, patients were asked to describe the pain felt before and after central venous catheter insertion using a VISUAL ANALOG SCALE (VAS). They were asked to give a score of 10 for the highest pain experienced and 0 for no pain at all. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales used for the amount of pain that a patient feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. From the patient's perspective, this spectrum appears continuous; their pain does not take discrete jumps, as a categorization of none, mild, moderate and severe would suggest.
Pain felt after local anesthesia
Time frame: The maximum time elapsed from the moment the patient was able to describe the pain felt after the local anesthesia procedure was 30 minutes.
To measure pain, patients were asked to describe the pain felt before and after central venous catheter insertion using a VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE (VAS). They were asked to give a score of 10 for the highest pain experienced and 0 for no pain at all.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Dec 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 34166849Arik HO, Coskun T, Kose O. Management of spaghetti wrist under WALANT technique. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021 Oct;40(5):655-659. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 19871185Abell RG, Page IH. THE REACTION OF PERIPHERAL BLOOD VESSELS TO ANGIOTONIN, RENIN, AND OTHER PRESSOR AGENTS. J Exp Med. 1942 Mar 1;75(3):305-14. doi: 10.1084/jem.75.3.305.
- Results publication: PubMed 29199999Yayla EM, Ozdemir L. Effect of Inhalation Aromatherapy on Procedural Pain and Anxiety After Needle Insertion Into an Implantable Central Venous Port Catheter: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Cancer Nurs. 2019 Jan/Feb;42(1):35-41. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000551.
- Results publication: PubMed 27200187Samantaray A, Hanumantha Rao M, Sahu CR. Additional Analgesia for Central Venous Catheter Insertion: A Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl. Crit Care Res Pract. 2016;2016:9062658. doi: 10.1155/2016/9062658. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 34181608Dar QA, Avoricani A, Rompala A, Levy KH, Shah NV, Choueka D, White CM, Koehler SM. WALANT Hand Surgery Does Not Require Postoperative Opioid Pain Management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 1;148(1):121-130. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008053.
- Results publication: PubMed 33775887Moscato L, Laborde A, Kouyoumdjian P, Coulomb R, Mares O. Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthroplasty under Wide Awake Local Anesthesia with No Tourniquet (WALANT) versus Local Anesthesia with peripheral nerve blocks (LAPNV): Perioperative pain and early functional results in 30 patients. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021 Sep;40(4):453-457. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 32905335Tahir M, Chaudhry EA, Zaffar Z, Anwar K, Mamoon MAH, Ahmad M, Jamali AR, Mehboob G. Fixation of distal radius fractures using wide-awake local anaesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) technique: A randomized control trial of a cost-effective and resource-friendly procedure. Bone Joint Res. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):429-439. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.97.BJR-2019-0315.R1. eCollection 2020 Jul.
- Results publication: PubMed 33834864Wellington I, Cusano A, Ferreira JV, Parrino A. WALANT Technique versus Sedation for Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release. Hand (N Y). 2023 Mar;18(2):214-221. doi: 10.1177/15589447211003180. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 28886668Lalonde DH. Conceptual origins, current practice, and views of wide awake hand surgery. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Nov;42(9):886-895. doi: 10.1177/1753193417728427. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
- Ethical files and applications for the study were made through the university system.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Epidemiological data in the case form prepared for the study, chronic disease/chronic medication use, VAS values of the study, and data on the presence of complications can be shared.
Related trials for Trauma (Including Fractures)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Results of Medical and Nursing Record,PE, Blood Test and Radiological Examination ,Morality and Mobility of Multiple Trauma of Patient's
Trauma Centers/Statistics & Numerical Data, Trauma Blunt
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Affordable, Tailored Therapy for Financially Vulnerable People With Trauma-related Injuries
Trauma (Including Fractures), Multiple Trauma/Injuries
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Stress in Trauma Patients in Triage Categories 3-5
Trauma (Including Fractures)
RecruitingObservational study
Mortality of Trauma in the Intensive Care Unit.
Trauma (Including Fractures), Trauma ICU Patients
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Tru-Vu Wrist Positioning Aid Multi-Center Implementation Within NLHS
Trauma (Including Fractures), Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
SULTAN TUNA AKGÖL GÜR, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR principal investigator
ATATÜRK UNİVERSİTY
MURAT MAKSUT ÇALBAY, SPECİALİST principal investigator
ERZURUM CİTY HOSPİTAL
MUHAMMED ÇAĞRI AYKUT, MD principal investigator
ATATÜRK UNİVERSİTY
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing local anesthesia with walant solution and Local anesthesia with lidocaine in people with Trauma (Including Fractures) and Dialysis Catheter, run by Ataturk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of the pain felt by patients after central venous catheter placement when local anesthesia is performed with Lidocaine and when it is performed with the Wide Awake Tourniquet-Free Local Anesthesia Technique (WALANT). (time frame: 45 minutes for each patient.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07299383, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Dec 2025.