AzTrials
AzTrials

Laryngoscopic Stress ResponsePhase 4NCT07300878

Effect of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Conventional Laryngoscopy Upon Hemodynamics

A Phase 4 study testing C MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopy and Conventional macintosh laryngoscopy in people with Laryngoscopic Stress Response and Video Laryngoscopy, run by Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In general anestheisa airway is secured by passing a tube down the widpipe. This helps the patient to breath via ventilator during anesthesia. For placing this tube laryngoscopy is done which results in increase in blood pressure and heart rate. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
C MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopy and Conventional macintosh laryngoscopy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
208 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
22 Dec 2025to 15 May 2026
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Elective surgeries under General Endotracheal Anesthesia. ASA class I and II.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Body mass index >35 kg/m2
  • No teeth
  • Maxillofacial trauma
  • Limited Cervical spine movement
  • Upper Airway Tumors
  • Preoperative assessment indicating difficult airway requiring use of video laryngoscope or fiberoptic intubation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Deparment of Anesthesia PIMS

    Islamabad, 44000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Comparison Of Hemodynamic Stress Response To Laryngoscopy With Video Laryngoscopy Versus Macintosh Laryngoscopy In Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries Under General Anesthesia

In general anestheisa airway is secured by passing a tube down the widpipe. This helps the patient to breath via ventilator during anesthesia. For placing this tube laryngoscopy is done which results in increase in blood pressure and heart rate. This study will compare the rise in blood pressure and heart rate among when using video laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscope.

Read the detailed description

In this study Patients will be randomly divided into two groups with group V patients being intubated using Videolaryngoscope while group M patients will be intubated using Macintosh laryngoscope. The amount of rise in blood pressure and heart rate as a result of laryngoscopy will be noted.

Being tested
C MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopy, Conventional macintosh laryngoscopy
Keywords
Laryngoscopic stress response, Video laryngoscopy, Conventional laryngoscopy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • C MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopyDevice

    Patient will be intubated using hyperangulated C MAC video laryngoscope

  • Conventional macintosh laryngoscopyDevice

    Patient in this group will be intubated using conventional macintosh laryngoscopy

Study groups in NCT07300878
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Video laryngoscopyExperimentalPatient in this group will be intubated using hyperangulated C MAC video laryngoscope
Receives: Device: C MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopy
Conventional LaryngoscopyActive comparatorPatient in this group will be intubated using conventional macintosh laryngoscopic blade
Receives: Device: Conventional macintosh laryngoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Heart Rate

    Measured: Upon arrival in OR (baseline) then immediately following intubation (T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Mean Blood Pressure

    Measured: This will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation

  2. Systolic Blood Pressure

    Measured: This will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation

  3. Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Measured: This will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Dec 2025
  2. Study start22 Dec 2025
  3. Primary completion15 May 2026
  4. Study completion15 May 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
208 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07300878
Sponsor's protocol ID
F.5.2/2024(ERRC)/PIMS
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
21 Dec 2025
Last updated
29 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: This is due to hospital and ethical committee policies

Publications

  • Wang L, Li H, Zhong Y, Ye S, Deng J, Pan T, Zhang Y. Comparative Analysis of Hemodynamic Responses and Oropharyngeal Complications in Tracheal Intubation: Evaluating Conventional, Video, and Rigid Video Laryngoscopes Under General Anesthesia. Med Sci Monit. 2024 Sep 5;30:e944916. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944916.

    PubMed 39233395

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing C MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopy and Conventional macintosh laryngoscopy in people with Laryngoscopic Stress Response and Video Laryngoscopy, run by Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Heart Rate (time frame: Upon arrival in OR (baseline) then immediately following intubation (T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07300878, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in